QOTD: WOULD AN ARMED GUARD IN EVERY SCHOOL IN AMERICA PREVENT THESE MASS SHOOTINGS?

MK-Ultra and the drugs that the CIA have perfected for it’s use are pretty hard to stop… No, we will have to cut the snakes head off if we truly want it to stop.

Maybe we will get to that tomorrow, tomorrow , tomorrow.

No.

Many of the schools have had a “resource officer” on campus but given the size of consolidated schools, even here in Podunk, WV., it can be 5 minutes before they reach the other side. Also, many of the PROs are either there because they got slapped on the wrist for doing something stupid (DUI, roughing up someone, etc.) or milking the end of a career. Not the fittest of the bunch.

As Brian posted, competent, well trained staff would certainly be a more imposing deterrent, greatly altering the ratio of students/defenders.

The fact of not knowing how many/location of armed staff would, at least, be on the mind of these psychopaths.

Or not.

But they would be confronted MUCH sooner when entering a school.

Point is, more guns, more safety. No one charges police stations. Except in Hollywood.

Maybe if we put “armed guards” on the street corners of Chicago or Baltimore we’ll end the shootings there, too.

I reject the premise.

If there’s no mass, there can be no mass shootings.
If there’s no school, there can be no school shootings.
Home School, or get together with 5-10 like minded parents and hire tutors.
It’s more difficult.
It’s more cumbersome.
It’s more expensive (especially sans moneys taken from others at theoretical or literal gunpoint).
It’s less “convenient” to actually raise your own children.
Get rid of Dept of Ed.
Get rid of leftist activist school boards.
Get rid of teachers’ unions.
Get rid of Property Tax.

Or, keep doing things for the convenience of having the state own and raise your recklessly spawned offspring, and keep experiencing the known and expected consequences (like having your little boy come home demanding he’s a little girl, or having your 4th grader taught – in explicit detail – the joys of anal sex, etc, etc, etc).
End it, or quit bitching.

Let’s see…
You’re asking if a government solution (an armed guard) would be a solution to a government created problem (unprotected mass indoctrination centers).
Sure, of course it would work.
That’s the design of the Hegelian Dialectic.
When it doesn’t work, and creates more problems, just add the next government solution.
Or choose Option C, and homeschool your children, and the QOTD is moot.
Marksmanship, gun and edged weapon training and safety should be included with martial arts training to not only increase self discipline and esteem, but so that self protection is not a taboo subject.
It’s not convenient, but your children are your wealth and greatest asset.

Either these events are staged or the media coverage is made to make them appear staged, for whatever reason. The interviews with the parents and witnesses are highly suspect. No real evidence of grief and no tears. What parent could give a coherent interview a day after their child was killed?? We have all seen Robbie Parker also.

In Canuckistan, there are no armed guards at schools or any such thing. There is also no due process or even evidence required that a serious crime is in progress. Apparently there is no need for any of that, since Canuckistan cops can resort to Minority Report techniques……An individual who merely is seen carrying a what looks like a lethal weapon anywhere near a residential area, that by default also has schools, is just instantly shot dead.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-man-fatally-shot-by-police-was-carrying-a-fake-rifle-near-schools-in/

Read the MSM report above and note the most basic and important questions are NOT answered:

– Was there any threats made by the individual carrying a pellet gun? – Doesn’t say
– Was there any previous firearms or violent crimes committed by this individual? – Doesn’t say
– Were there any online threats or manifesto published by by this individual? – Doesn’t say
– What were the words, if any, exchanged between the individual and the police prior to his execution? – Doesn’t say
– What was the reason the individual was walking down the street with a pellet gun? – Says “we don’t know” – I guess it was just too much effort for police to detain and ask him, so they just shoot him dead instead

Here is what the article DOES say:

“An autopsy is scheduled for the weekend.” – Right, because they have no idea how someone shot by the police died.
“Police and school officials caution that they have little information about the Toronto man or his motives” – i.e. likely not known to police and likely no criminal history, but we can’t take any chances!!!!
“This event did not happen on school property,” – slaughtering citizens is now called an “event”
“The Special Investigations Unit will eventually release a public report about these events.” – long after its been forgotten, and it will be done very quietly
“NDP Leader Andrea Horwath issued a statement thanking Toronto Police and saying that “guns have no place on our streets.”” – What a Scumbag – thanks police for shooting someone dead, without due process, with firearms that she says in the same sentence “have no place on our streets”
“Liberal Leader Steven Del Duca also thanked police. “As a parent of two young daughters, this is any parent’s worst nightmare,” he said.” – another Scumbag pol thanking police for shooting someone dead without due process because “this” is any parents worst nightmare. What “this” is this idiot referring to? Do you think he’s taking about the nightmare for the parents of the 27 year old? Or the “nightmare” about the manufactured panic and trauma, since no kids were harmed or were even in danger? (rhetorical questions).

Look – don’t mean to rant here – but I’m pissed as I write this. Seems I live in a totalitarian police state without due process where cops can kill with impunity anyone who merely APPEARS like they are intent on doing harm. And I seriously doubt this individual was either intent or capable on doing much, if any harm. In many ways I hope I’m wrong….but a pellet gun? Seriously? Not a lethal weapon. I’ve been shot by a pellet gun many times back in the day – welts and bruises, nothing more. Sure, they can be harmful. Yes, walking down the street with one in this day and age is likely to send some kind of message (yet in our teenage years we walked down our residential street into the forest with our pellet guns and – nothing was thought or said about it).

But the way I see it – we, you, I – the minions and serfs – will never hear anything resembling the truth about this “event” from the police or MSM. Doesn’t fit the narrative. And the narrative must remain manufactured, reinforced, and amplified – even if citizens have to be shot dead in the street because of it.

I’m sorry Stucky – this was not meant to hijack this thread, so I will now just answer your question:

Q: WOULD AN ARMED GUARD IN EVERY SCHOOL IN AMERICA PREVENT THESE MASS SHOOTINGS?
A: Prevent, No. Dissuade, possibly. Reduce casualties, probably. But an armed guard in every school in Canuckistan would never happen and would be completely unnecessary since drug gangs and cops commit almost all of the fatal shootings – right out in the streets.

Here’s a real novel solution:

Get rid of state schools and you get rid of school shootings.

A single target becomes just that. I have no issue regarding one or more armed folks there for protection, but it should be between the parents and the school administration from which they have PRIVATELY contracted educational services. The root problem of course is the presence of government monopoly day prisons in our society, incarcerating children for 12 years in a prison-like environment that pretends to educate them. We should begin by abolishing ALL government involvement in education including theft to pay for it, and allow ONLY a fully competitive marketplace of businesses and individuals to provide educational services. Those that provide the best security, education, etc. will remain in business, and those that do not, will not.

And when was the last time you heard of anyone shooting up a homeschool?

Pretty sure a non-corrupt government actually for the people would help.
Or even (lol) an FBI that didn’t FF the fuck out of mentally ill, easily mkultra’d fucktards and send them off to cause pain and destruction to finally convince enough of america to give up it’s guns.
I gave the latest a 9/10 on the emotional score, but the details are starting to destroy the narrative on this one as well…
It’s all so tiring.

No, but if a stupid janitor had not propped the door open then this would have been isolated.
All doors to schools are to be locked from the outside during the school hours. PERIOD!

… only if the attacker was after the LEO’s donuts and coffee …

well, no, seeing how the main cause of these ‘mass shootings’ seems to be leftist politicians trying to disarm the citizens.
the generally miserable condition these days of the youth and the ‘education’ system, the schools that look and function more like prisons than schools, the huge fraction of the population, even children, who have been put on some mind-altering ‘medication’ or another to keep the pharma industry ticking off profits, the fact that the majority of today’s youth has been twisted this way and that by growing up in an electronic disneyland instead of out in the fresh air with other humans, these things make for very fertile ground whenever some politician wants to stri up more ‘gun violence’ to try to justify disarming the citizens.. again and again til they get what they want.
funny how there arent any ‘mass shootings’ in the circles of homeschooled kids brought up in loving (but not indulgent, the two are poles apart!) traditional families , free of chemical and electronic narcotics, who are close to the top of the list of whom the power freaks want to disarm, coincidentally…

It would stop almost all that weren’t planned and executed by agents of the Federal government.