California’s Homelessness Magnates

Guest Post by Ann Coulter

California's Homelessness Magnates

Well, that didn’t last long. Chesa Boudin, the “progressive” district attorney of San Francisco, was recalled in a landslide election on Tuesday. Evidently, even that city’s progressive voters finally got tired of replacing their car windshields. (On the upside, once out of office, Boudin can keep prosecuting as many criminals as he did while in office.)

Quiz for Republicans:

In a shocking upset, the most liberal city in the nation just voted to recall a pro-criminal D.A.

Q: Should you be dedicating your time to:

— Ukraine

— Tax cuts

— Abortion

— Crime

[Sen. Lindsey Graham frantically waving his hand: UKRAINE!]

Crime is primarily a state and local issue, but there are some things the federal government can do. How about auditing the “homelessness” industry for fraud, graft and corruption? (And the drug rehab industry, while you’re at it.) In the last decade, homeless “advocacy” seems to have displaced Hollywood as the most well-compensated and glamorous industry in California.

Michael Shellenberger’s 2021 book, “San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities,” details how progressives are foisting drug-addicted mental patients on an unsuspecting public. The problem is less the homeless — the drug-addicted mental patients you will always have with you — and more the well-healed liberals getting rich off the homelessness racket.

He begins by quoting all manner of homeless “advocates” — i.e., people who make money off of homelessness — such as Dr. Margot Kushel of the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), who insists that homelessness has NOTHING to do with drugs or mental illness. “We’ve always known,” Kushel said, “that most homelessness is a result, pure and simple, of poverty.”

A lot of valuable information comes from sentences that begin with “we’ve always known.”

Convinced of the truth of this preposterous maxim, San Francisco has been doling out billions of dollars to solve homelessness, by providing the homeless — or as we are now commanded to call them, “our unhoused neighbors” — with shelter, food and massive cash payments.

Also free needles! Because homelessness is just a matter of being poor, as “we’ve always known.”

On the other hand …

In 2004, nearly 5,000 homeless people were offered housing by then-Mayor Gavin Newsom. Only 131 accepted.

And because, as Einstein said, doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of excellence — isn’t that the quote? — San Francisco just keeps trying the same thing. Under a different mayor, about 15 years later, 150 vagrants were removed from a homeless encampment and offered free housing. Eight accepted.

But that makes no sense! Homeless advocates assured us our unhoused neighbors are just like you and me, except they can’t afford the rent.

Another possible cause of homelessness is hinted at in a recent Harvard University study of chronically homeless people in Boston who were given permanent housing. After following the group for 14 years, last year the researchers released their results: 86% of their subjects were beset by the “trimorbidity” of mental illness, substance abuse and medical illness. After 10 years, only 12% were still housed. Forty-five percent died before the completion of the study.

Similarly, in 2019, San Francisco’s health department found that fully half of the city’s homeless population — currently housed or not — are both mentally ill and drug addicts. About 1,600 of the city’s estimated 8,035 homeless “frequently used emergency psychiatric services.”

The pernicious — but profitable! — idea that homelessness is caused by poverty has led the city to lavish unimaginable aid on the “poor.” In straight cash welfare, SF offers $588 a month to the poor — and that doesn’t include $192 in food stamps. Compare that to Los Angeles, where the maximum cash payment to the poor is $221, or New York City, where it’s $183.

That $780 a month in cash and food stamps doesn’t include all the free stuff given to the homeless through cutout agencies, like churches and nonprofits, funded by taxpayer dollars and tax-deductible “charitable” donations.

Tom Wolf, a formerly homeless drug addict, said that, thanks to all of San Francisco’s giveaways, he was able to spend his entire general assistance payment on heroin. Which San Francisco also helps out with, giving away 6 million free needles to drug addicts every year. That’s more than New York City dispenses — with a population 10 times larger.

As a result, drug overdose is the leading cause of death among the homeless in San Francisco.

The mother of a drug-addicted, homeless young man told Shellenberger that he describes San Francisco as “Pleasure Island” in the movie “Pinocchio”:

“On one side of the street are people giving you food and clean needles. On the other side of the street are all the drug dealers. It’s like getting all the candy and treats that you think you want. You think you’re having fun. But little by little it’s taking away your humanity and turning you into something you were never meant to be, like how the kids start turning into donkeys in ‘Pinocchio,’ and then end up trapped and in cages.”

What kind of sick society would do this to people?

One possible answer: a society that rewards money-grubbing narcissists with no concern for their fellow man, masquerading as giants of compassion. There’s a ton of money to be made in the helping-the-homeless business. As the formerly homeless Wolf told Shellenberger, “[The homeless nonprofits’] whole intention is to keep more people in this cycle because they’re getting money for it.”

Say, whatever happened with UCSF’s Kushel — of the “we’ve always known” metric? In 2019, she was the lucky recipient of a $30 million grant from San Francisco billionaire Marc Benioff (Salesforce founder) to study homelessness.

Gosh, they’re virtuous.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Ghost
Ghost
June 9, 2022 2:38 pm

The streets of “any big city” USA are littered with the remnants of the hopelessly addicted dregs of society willing to live in squalor to get their daily fix.

It is tragic, sordid and fascinating.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II2dc8z3UgY

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Ghost
June 9, 2022 3:37 pm

Meanwhile the cartels are allowed unfettered access to the money here via the wide open southern border and China cranks out all the fentanyl it can to keep the pipeline filled and the ranks of the addicted expanding.
They certainly won’t have to challenge us militarily in a few years. The country is on the verge of social implosion.

Ken31
Ken31
  Anonymous
June 9, 2022 11:46 pm

Which is why they are in no hurry for military conflict. They would love to challenge us right now, if it wasn’t such terrible business. But only because the empire is completely insane.

The Duke of New York
The Duke of New York
  Ghost
June 9, 2022 4:23 pm

this is the new ‘Faces of Meth’

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid
June 9, 2022 3:39 pm

Obviously the Crazyfornians like it, they voted for, so let them fukking choke on it. And while at it have the government of the shitties raise taxes some moar to help out the people paying for the homeless.

That ought to learn them./s

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
June 9, 2022 4:22 pm

In the old days we wasted our tax money on the military-industrial complex. We paid them truckloads of money to build bombs that we dropped on other countries.

Now we’ve come up with a way to keep that money at home. We now fund the homeless-industrial complex that is destroying our cities with “compassion” as effectively as we destroyed other countries with bombs.

ran t 7
ran t 7
June 9, 2022 4:55 pm

“What kind of sick society would do this to people?”

not society. tribe. that sees them as not people.

ran t 7
ran t 7
June 9, 2022 4:56 pm

so in a free society should drugs be banned?

upvote for yes, downvote for no.

James
James
  ran t 7
June 9, 2022 6:04 pm

Rant,while I hate to see the damage done by addicts to themselves and their families feel the court/cop/prison industry and drug cartels all are the only real beneficiaries of drugs being illegal.

You feel drugs should be illegal then get rid of beer and tobbaco also,both cause death.

That said,when any one commits a crime on others due to drug dependency or any reason they need to be prosecuted and thus unfortunately the cartels to a degree still win,but,a clear message needs to be sent and those a true danger removed or hell relocated to a place barren of other people.

Those that engage in violence for profit should be shot on the street immediately.

This is why I posted a neg,not because of your ?

bigfoot
bigfoot
  James
June 9, 2022 8:51 pm

And get rid of grocery stores and fast-fooders where nearly everything sold is not only not health-giving, it is health-destroying? Ban everything that is unwise while you are at it. Good luck!

VOWG
VOWG
  James
June 10, 2022 6:28 am

hell of a difference between hard drugs and beer. That is a bs comparison.

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos
  ran t 7
June 9, 2022 6:05 pm

That is an illogical question: in a truly free society, there would be freedom of choice. Banning something takes away that choice.

ran t 7
ran t 7
  Captain_Obviuos
June 9, 2022 6:37 pm

then register a down-vote.

I suppose it’s worth it to specify a practical free society as opposed to a theoretical free society. practical free societies are not total free-for-alls but ban things held to be inimical to that freedom, however they conceive it.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
June 9, 2022 8:34 pm

The author forgot one of the most harmful industries to US Citizens and Taxpayers that needs to be audited: the taxpayer funded immigration asylum folks — the various jewish and Christian church groups that parlay our misery into their wealth … 

jo
jo
June 9, 2022 10:38 pm

Some have a hard-hearted view of the homeless. Me, too, sometimes.
Then I listen to Tom Wait’s “On The Nickel” and it changes things:
https://youtu.be/8055IqijQzo

[Note: click on ‘watch on youtube’…and it’ll play]