Story at-a-glance
- Without strong evidence to support their decisions, the FDA has begun a campaign to use an emergency use authorization (EUA) that will subject the most vulnerable to unnecessary risks from a genetic experiment
- The FDA has also proposed a “Future Framework” to approve all future COVID formulations without clinical trials if they are “biologically similar”; there is still time to take action against the proposal
- The FDA amended the Pfizer EUA to allow a booster shot in children ages 5 to 11 based on a study of 400 children. The EUA they propose for children 6 months to under 5 years is based on 10 children, a number which even outspoken vaccine advocate Dr. Paul Offit finds difficult to comment on
- Approval of the shot in children is critical to protecting the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests. Once fully licensed, the company is liable for injuries so the shot must be added to the children’s vaccine schedule to allow the government to mandate the shot
- Surveys show many pediatricians are willing to refuse treatment if a family refuses vaccination and state legislatures are changing the rules, so parents are not informed. Over 17,000 doctors and scientists believe healthy children should not be force vaccinated and offer this evidence to parents
This short video is a poignant illustration of the children who have been injured or killed by the mRNA jab. Some have died, while others are living in chronic pain, with seizures, tics and an inability to walk or eat independently.
According to data from the CDC1 there were 1,086 deaths in children aged birth to 17 years from 2020 to June 2, 2022, involving COVID-19. This was 1.33% of deaths from all causes in the same age group. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics,2 the cumulative hospitalization rate in children by February 3, 2022, was 0.7% and the cumulative death rate was 0.01%.
Although any death is tragic, it’s apparent from these numbers that COVID-19 has not affected the pediatric population to any great extent. Studies3 have also shown that most healthy children either have mild symptoms or no symptoms. Symptoms in healthy children are like those of a cold or flu-like illness.
Taking this one step further, a study4 published in July 2021 by the Department of Pediatrics at Duke University School of Medicine found children who had mild or asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 also developed a robust antibody response.
The jab is not innocuous. According to an analysis by Steve Kirsch, an engineering graduate from MIT who is himself doubled vaxxed with the Moderna shot,5 as of December 12, 2021, the jab had killed nearly twice as many children as the illness.6
The FDA Has Declared War on Children
In this three-minute video Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense, makes an impassioned plea to the public and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to stop the war against our children.7 Without strong evidence to support the attack, the FDA has begun a campaign to use emergency use authorizations (EUAs) that will subject the most vulnerable in our population to unnecessary risks from a genetic experiment.
The FDA scheduled four meetings of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to discuss — and potentially approve — EUAs that would cover the population from cradle to grave in COVID shots. The itinerary began June 7, 2022, and is scheduled to end June 28, 2022.
The planned discussions include adding the Novavax COVID shot for adults and amending Moderna’s EUA for the primary series in children and adolescents aged 6 through 17 and children 6 months to 5 years. The meetings also include an amendment to Pfizer’s primary series to include children 4 months to 4 years.
Toby Rogers Ph.D.,8 has a master of public policy degree. He’s called the June meetings a “blitzkrieg” designed to “create psychological shock and demoralizing chaos.”9
Children’s Health Defense10 mobilized a grassroots effort to inform the FDA and CDC officials, elected representatives and VRBPAC members that the public wants them to reject proposals from Pfizer and Moderna, and requests that government agencies follow science to protect public health. It is possible to make a difference when consumers are armed with real data and take action. The main points Children’s Health Defense makes for consumers include:11
• There is no COVID emergency for children — Children younger than 18 without comorbidities have a 99.995% recovery rate and the CDC data show over 74% of all children birth to 17 years have robust natural immunity.
• mRNA shots offer little protection — In 2020, regulators set a minimum standard effectiveness for EUA approval — vaccines must meet a threshold of 50% effectiveness. However, preliminary data show the jab was only 44% effective in the youngest children and 37% effective in children up to 5 years.
In addition to failing the minimum standard, the effectiveness of the vaccine against the Omicron variant dropped to 12% after seven weeks in children 5 to 11 years.
• Jab injuries in children are catastrophic — The Defender points out that as of May 20, 2022, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) recorded over 48,500 reports of adverse events in children. In 14 days, as of June 3, 2022,12 this number jumped dramatically to a total of 49,283 adverse events.
This included 114 deaths, 457 children who are permanently disabled and 8,811 who have not recovered from their vaccine injury. Vaccine injuries have included encephalitis, Bell’s palsy, new onset diabetes, aneurysms or cerebral hemorrhage and Guillain Barre or transverse myelitis resulting in paralysis.
‘Future Framework’ Doubles Down on a Failed Strategy
The final meeting is scheduled for June 28, 2022. Its focus will be a proposed “Future Framework” for COVID-19 jabs.13 According to The Defender, by June 1, 2022, over 500 million doses of the jab had been distributed and injected during a 17-month period. Unfortunately, there has been no discernible impact and far more people have died since the shots were introduced.
According to CDC data,14 at the end of 2020 there were 385,666 people whose deaths were recorded involving COVID-19. The jab was introduced in December 2020. By the end of 2021, the jab had been distributed for 12 months. People had also begun successfully treating COVID at home with a variety of protocols, including those from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko15 or the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.16
Despite knowing more about the virus after 12 months and successful at-home treatment protocols, 77,103 more people died in 2021 than in 2020 for a total of 462,769 deaths in 2021.17
The proposed Future Framework is a way for pharmaceutical companies to use information captured by regulatory agencies to get reformulated shots approved without undertaking new clinical trials. The Defender calls this “doubling down on a failed strategy.”18
In a slide presentation19 produced for the April 2022 VRBPAC meeting, the selection process for the influenza vaccine strain was reviewed and called successful. However, as The Defender reported,20
“Lisa Grohskopf from the CDC’s Influenza Division reports that last year the flu shot was somewhere between 8% and 14% effective (based on data from seven sites that participate in the U.S. Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network).”
These abysmal effectiveness percentages are what the FDA and CDC call success. The presentation goes on to identify several challenges to adapting the influenza model to new COVID-19 vaccines.21 The answer to these problems appears to be the Future Framework.
Proposed changes would allow the regulatory process to approve future COVID-19 shots without clinical trials, regardless of how drastically the formulation changes. If the changes are implemented, they will only need to meet the standard of being “biologically similar.”22
The meeting is scheduled for June 28, 2022, so there is still time to tell the FDA to get their #HandsOffOurChildren by using the Children’s Health Defense action page, where you can quickly and easily send emails to the FDA, VRBPAC committee, CDC officials and elected representative.
FDA Reviewed Pfizer’s Test Results Based on 10 Children
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended its EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot to allow a booster dose for children ages 5 to 11.23 The FDA’s “evaluation of safety” for the booster dose in young children was based on a study of only about 400 children, and although that number is exceedingly low, it’s far greater than the 10 children in the test for children 6 months to 5 years.24
In a press release, Pfizer announced the EUA they were seeking from the FDA for children 6 months to under 5 years is “based on 10 symptomatic COVID-19 cases identified from seven days after the third dose and accrued as of April 29, 2022.”25
The study included 1,678 children who received three doses of the formulation. However, the 80.3% efficacy that Pfizer announced is based on just 10 cases. The number is so low that even outspoken vaccine advocate Dr. Paul Offit expressed dismay, saying:26
“I mean, 10 children — you’re talking about 10 children. It’s a small number, so it’s really hard to comment o[n] this as something more general since you don’t know because the numbers are so small.”
The trial reportedly evaluated “the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.”27 This claim of 80.3% effectiveness in children came on the heels of data released by the New York state Department of Health study28 that showed efficacy in children ages 5 to 11 years fell to 12% in two months after vaccination.
These data are consistent with a report29 from Britain that showed effectiveness against symptomatic infection dropped 22.6% after two months in adolescents aged 16 to 17 years. In the press release, Pfizer wrote the shot was “well-tolerated among 1,678 children under 5 years of age with a safety profile similar to placebo.”30
However, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics,31 as of June 8, 2022, 36% of 5- to 11-year-olds had received at least one dose and 29% had received two doses and, according to VAERS, there were 11,773 total reports of adverse events in children 5 to 11 years through June 3, 2022.
If you extrapolate the adverse event numbers using 36% of the pediatric population that received at least one dose, there would be 32,702 adverse events reported in children aged 5 to 11 if 100% were given the shot.
It seems highly unlikely, based on the number of adverse events in children reported to VAERS after at least one injection, that shots in children aged 6 months to under 5 years would have resulted in only “mild or moderate”32 events, or that the shot could have “a safety profile similar to placebo.”
Children’s Vaccine Approval Crucial to Protect Big Pharma
It is crucial to understand what is driving the push behind getting children vaccinated when there appears to be no scientific reason to do it. In this interview with Alix Mayer, we discuss the nefarious reasons why children are being aggressively targeted. Even though VAERS33 has shown many vaccines have a questionable safety profile, data collected from 2021 and 2022 demonstrate the COVID jab presents a more serious risk than all the previous vaccines combined.
Lack of transparency has been a chronic issue within the industry, but the current challenges with the COVID shots have highlighted the issue. The jabs were released under EUA to give the pharmaceutical companies legal immunity against liability for vaccine injury.34
As Mayer points out in the interview, what you may not realize is that although the FDA appeared to approve and license BioNTech’s Comirnaty,35 the shot is still administered under the EUA.
One significant reason is that once the product is fully licensed, the company is liable for injuries.36 For a vaccine and the manufacturer to have immunity that is not administered under an EUA, it must be placed on the childhood vaccination schedule.37,38 This allows state governments to mandate the shot (the federal government only makes recommendations; states issue the mandates). Mayer notes:39
“This is the holy grail if you’re a vaccine manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put it on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule.”
Will Pediatricians Refuse Care if Parents Refuse the Jab?
Parental concerns over vaccinations are not a new issue. A study40 published in 2005 found “many” pediatricians said they would discontinue care if a family refused vaccination. Another study41,42 published in 2020 surveyed U.S. pediatricians and found 51% said they would dismiss a family if they refused vaccinations.
Medical trade associations and several states have also stepped in to pull parental rights out from under families who want to exercise informed consent on behalf of their children.
In 2020,43,44 the District of Columbia passed a allowing minors as young as 11 to consent to a federally-recommendation vaccination without their parents’ consent or knowledge. Since then,45 Alabama, Oregon, South Carolina, North Carolina and Rhode Island have passed legislation specifically for the COVID shots. The laws allow doctors to persuade children from 14 to 16 years to take the jab without telling their parents.
In May 2022, California, which already has a law permitting minors as young as 12 to get an HPV or hepatitis B vaccination without their parents’ knowledge consent, filed a bill adding the COVID shot to it.46
17,000 Doctors and Scientists Warn Parents
In his interview with podcaster Joe Rogan,47 Dr. Robert Malone gives a historical perspective on the credentials that make him uniquely qualified to understand and speak about the mRNA technology used in the current COVID-19 genetic jabs.
Rogan’s podcast is hosted exclusively on Spotify48 but you can see this particular one and read the transcript on the website of Texas Congressman Troy Nehls’, R-Texas, without downloading the Spotify app.49
Malone is the primary inventor of the mRNA gene transfer technology that underpins the jab. The very nature of the technology used to create the jab transfers genetic material from the shot into your cells, creating genetic therapy.
The information Malone shared during the three-hour interview was so damaging to the COVID narrative that Google manipulated the search results50 and just days before the interview Twitter banned Malone.51
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Please, give us a flippIn break. Those CDC number are not even close to being accurate, yet here you are quoting numbers that are so low as to be a joke. Stop reporting junk everyone knows is total BS. The deaths from that jab for the experimental mRNA fake vaccine is now close to one hundred thousand, in America alone. In fact is it being reported that the fake jab has actually kill more people than did SARS-COV-2, when you account for those who died “FROM” COVID as opposed to those deaths who died “WITH” COVID. That is a major distinction that morons tend to mix up, because the hospitals and doctors refuse to tell the truth because it cuts down on their profit margins.
I no long trust hospitals or the doctors they use to keep what problems arise, QUIET, because hospitals run on profit not altruism. Hospital administrators and doctors have all been either paid off or threatened with their licenses if they don’t comply. This tyranny must stop if doctors want to regain their respectability.
Here is something everyone need to hear because it paints the real picture: “Trying to keep safe by wearing a face mask is essentially the same as trying to stop a mosquito with a chain link fence.” Do you now understand just how idiotic it is to force everyone to wear a mask, when those demanding it are not even doctors, Even Fauci is no longer a doctor, HE IS A SICK POLITICIAN !!@!
I live in a country of retarded people.
Elder son: I never realized how many reee-tards there are everywhere, esp. since so many lined up like livestock to take these shots near me. Lines were very long in cars blocking intersections behind local hosp. I no longer talk to dimwits who took shots, am socially isolated most the time anyway. Spend time reading and keeping house, etc. I prefer interacting w/dogs and cats. 90% adults lack left brainfunctioning, cannot process critical thinking skills to solve basic problems. Few would Q: why take an experiemental injection? No wonder this country is headed for a train wreck.
Growing Revolt Among Medical Practitioners Against Vaccinating Toddlers for Covid
IM Doc has been particularly unhappy about the push to deploy the Covid mRNA vaccines in children under five years of age. Based on his many years working on an Institutional Review Board, he believe the bar for safety testing for children, particularly very young ones, is high, and it has not been met for these vaccines.
It turns out he is far from alone. It appears many medical practitioners are seeing vaccinating kids this young as a bridge too far and some are flat out refusing to administer them…
Today in our county, which recall is over 80% vaccinated and hence has been very receptive of Covid vaccines for adults, I was called to an urgent meeting because it may be that hospital staff would need to be pulled to the Health Dept. Why? – Because the inoculation of the less than 5 is beginning – and all 3 of the Health Department nurses resigned in protest. They are simply not going to give these kids these inoculations. When a nurse on my staff was approached with filling in the deficit – her response (in my presence and that of the supervisor) – “Not only no – but FUCK no.” …
Physicians are hearing that the pharmacists in the entire Publix chain of grocery stores in the SE USA were in such an uproar about it, that Publix will not be offering these vaccines to under 5 kids. The Tampa Bay Times confirmed that Publix won’t give the Covid jab to kids below 5. Good on them…
I can readily tell from my interactions with other large academic Zoom conferences and also multiple consults with tertiary docs the past few weeks that the worm is turning. The injuries these things are causing are just no longer going to be hidden. AND WE ARE DOING THIS TO TODDLERS…
And he is CORRECT – this is likely the most immoral thing I have ever seen in my entire career. I will promise you right now – this is going to be a disaster of epic proportions.
We are the ONLY country approving and applying genocide shots for infants.
I thought China and some countries in the E.U. were giving shots to toddlers too. Hurray for Publix!
Just don’t offer your child up for sacrifice. Problem solved.
If you want a goto source for all things Covid, hard to beat Mercola and
RFK Jrs Children’s Health Defense. Mercola is cautious on quoting conservative numbers because he is first to go when censorship becomes total.
https://www.mercola.com/
There is so much fraud in the credentialing of these vaccines that these companies will be monkey hammered by the courts!
…huh?… say what? ……the courts are owned and controlled too?
Never mind….
I saw the beginning of the ritual this week on the local news, the day that the kill shots began to be administered to this age group. Misplaced excitement was on full display. The mothers were so relieved. One mom, giving a sigh of relief, explained how she has been keeping her toddler isolated for 2+ years, and keeping a mask strapped across it’s face. CHILD ABUSE! Think about it, this has been this child’s entire life experience.
She was so relieved, but will the fear disappear for her? Will she allow that poor child to go mask free now? Or allow socialization now that it’s become a habit to not socialize? The viewers witnessed a couple of toddlers being shot, and how they loudly cry out from the pain. Don’t worry parents, this is all for the greater good, reassures the reporter. The viewers were then told that children 6 mo. to 5 years will *need 3 shots.* And I am left to imagine all the pain and sorrow that undoubtedly will be coming down the pike for these dear children.
US only country jabbing < 3 year old,
Only 6 countries < 5?
Moderna banned < 30 in Germany, Sweden, Japan and .. ?
More likely to drown.
Better yet, you can just IGNORE them.
We are watching the US Government sanction and promote the slow euthanasia of not only our children and infants, but of everyone except illegal aliens. Why they are doing this is quite obvious and as always people refuse to acknowledge it. We are under foreign control by a 4th Reich. You cannot engage most people on this issue because they have been brainwashed and/or are simply bent on suicide. Our political leadership, the yellowstream media, and leftist elites are responsible for this holocaust which will dwarf the combined mass murders perpetrated by Hitler, Mao, and all communist/Marxist dictators in history.
If they ever wake up, should we even care at that point? The evidence that these clot shots are lethal is blindingly overwhelming. May all those politicians, the corrupt media, and leftist elites burn in Hell. Oh, and this is for you Stew Peters, this comment is not a blasphemy you POS F*CKHEAD steaming pile of shyte!
I said something bad about Stew Peters, will my comment be removed???