ARE YOU F**KING KIDDING ME?

Not any of the many gay imposters we are being told are Nazis. The word and the movement have been so badly distorted since the 40’s that mere mention of the word sends kids and Karens scurrying for cover. Meanwhile the verifiably evil and demonic communists and capitalists and other faggots and dykes waltz through and into our homes and schools with ease, even welcomed.

1) What exactly is a ‘Nazi’? and 2) Why are they ‘bad’? Let’s start with these elementary issues, because even here there is much to be revealed.

Most people, I hope, know that ‘Nazi’ is a slang shorthand for the National Socialists of Hitler’s Germany (Nationalsozialisten in German, hence the ‘z’). It was coined by his opponents, along the lines of an earlier term, ‘Sozi,’ that was applied to the Social Democrats (Sozialdemokraten). Hitler himself apparently never used the term ‘Nazi,’ and others, such as Goebbels, did so only rarely. They preferred the full German word, or would use the acronym NSDAP (for Nationalsozialistiche Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, or National Socialist German Workers’ Party).

But beyond this simple terminology, we have the striking fact that no one today—virtually no one—knows what a ‘Nazi’ is. Are they Jew-haters? No, that’s an anti-Semite. A Hitler-lover? Perhaps, but that’s not a definition, and certainly not a requirement. A violent right-winger? Hardly. A racist? More likely a ‘racialist,’ but again, that’s no definition.

Let’s start with the actual phrase, ‘national socialism.’ The first term refers simply to nationalism—that is, a tendency to favor one’s own nation or nationality, as opposed to outsiders, foreigners, or those of other ethnicities or races. It typically involves national independence, self-reliance, self-determination, and a robust sense of patriotism. A nationalist is usually concerned to have a military capable of self-defense, an economy and a currency that operates independently of other nations, and places an emphasis on traditional culture and social norms. A ‘nation,’ in turn, is literally a breed, stock, or ‘race’ of people. The word derives from the Latin nasci or natus, ‘to be born.’ A nation, then, is a group of people who are genetically related, of common ancestry, and who comprise a unified ethnicity.

The opposite of nationalism would be, of course, ‘internationalism’—that is, globalism. Internationalists, such as those who predominate in the US today, promote global trade, global treaties and business pacts, currency unification, and active involvement in foreign affairs. In the old days, they pushed for colonialism. Today they promote international business practices (such as low-cost labor in poor, third-world countries), and they like to project military power around the world. Being unconcerned with ethnic unity or homogeneity, they advocate for mass immigration, interracial marriage, and multiculturalism—none of which are historically or biologically natural, and which are proven to be detrimental to the national majority.

What’s built into the name. You’ve been reading too many school book. Nazi stands for National socialist party. It was used as a slur to give it a bad look and is still done today by the misinformed who tell the uninformed who become the illinformed.

Yes on that one about the Ashkenazi in central Europe. Kin to the infamous New York Jew. However, they did contribute some Yiddish to the scam known as the spoken Hebrew language circa 00 AD. sorta kinda.

We can disagree and Hitler is really not my dog in this fight but he gets bad ink to this day for nefarious reasons.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths/five-myths-about-nazis/2017/10/20/f4463dea-b2b5-11e7-9e58-e6288544af98_story.html

But for all the attention focused on this new wave of Nazi imitators, the original Nazi party, which unleashed chaos on the world in the early decades of the twentieth century, is still shrouded in myths. Here are five of the most persistent.

MYTH NO. 1
Adolf Hitler was bankrolled by big corporate donors.
In his biography of Henry Kissinger, historian Niall Ferguson notes that “old man Thyssen” — that is, German steel magnate Fritz Thyssen — “bankrolled Hitler.” Businessmen such as Thyssen using their financial assets to assist the Nazis was “the mechanism by which Hitler was funded to come to power,” according to John Loftus, a former U.S. attorney who prosecuted Nazi war criminals.

But the Nazis were neither “financed” nor “bankrolled” by big corporate donors. During its rise to power, the Nazi Party did receive some money from corporate sources — including Thyssen and, briefly, industrialist Ernst von Borsig — but business leaders mostly remained at arm’s length. After all, Nazi economic policy was slippery: pro-business ideas swathed in socialist language. The party’s program, the Twenty-Five Points, called for the nationalization of corporations and trusts, revenue sharing, and the end of “interest slavery.” Capitalism, the Nazis charged, “enslaves human beings under the slogan of progress, technology, rationalization, standardization, etc.”

The party largely depended on grass-roots sources of funding (membership dues, subscriptions to the party press, admission to events and so forth). The Nazi propaganda machine — the dances, the “German evenings,” the concerts, the speeches — was also a moneymaking operation, as is made clear in entries in Joseph Goebbels’s diary.

Once in power, however, the Nazis did receive funding from corporate sources, as business leaders were given fat contracts for armaments production and construction projects. The regime also seized Jews’ assets, from valuable art to private savings and investments. And it took control of Jewish-owned companies in what the Nazis called the “Aryanization” of the economy.

P.S. Henry Ford also helped build up post Weimar Germany for a tidy gain.

U.S.S.R., Uk and the US needed this war to complete the eradication of competition with the RockeChilds.
Fascism was growing by leaps and bounds with their first cousins in the Phalangist movements in Spain and S. America. Japan was every bit as Fascist as Italy. Nowadays most people over 30 know we cut off Japan’s oil but what’s never mentioned is Britain could have sold them twice the amount that we were.