Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
I had a nice chat with Jessica Rose today on her Substack article about how the vaccine is causing your blood to perform unnatural acts.
Recently, Jessica Rose published a very long, but very important Substack article, “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to hemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?”
The short answer is yes, it appears so, according to everything we know.
Here’s a key paragraph from that article:
So the bottom line of all of this information is this: the virus infects the RBCs using spike protein via the CD147 receptor on red blood cells which causes hemolysis (rupture of the red blood cell). This causes the release of massive amounts of hemoglobin. Then the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, triggers mis-folding of the hemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots. The blood clots would be enhanced due to antibodies (Ag:Ab complexes).
These “rubbery” blood clots that are being pulled out of cadavers on a regular basis.
Watch this short video of John O’Looney explaining how these clots cause people to die.
What is remarkable is the medical examiner is completely missing this in their determination of the cause of death (which they leave unexplained). The embalmers find these clots. Most of them say nothing because they don’t want to lose business.
The “clots” featured in these videos are not blood at all; they are primarily amyloid proteins (thanks to analysis done by Mike Adams of clots supplied by Richard Hirschman).
The virus itself can cause this to happen, but to a much much smaller extent than the vaccine (think miniscule). The vaccine has an advantage over the virus because, unlike the virus, it deposits the spike protein all over your body very quickly after injection thanks to the polyethylene glycol which coats the lipid nanoparticles.
So if you are wondering why you just lost someone to a stroke or heart attack after their latest jab, now you know. If they died shortly after the vaccine, it was probably the vaccine that created a clot that blocked blood flow to the brain or heart.
Why isn’t the NIH funding a study looking at blood parameters before/after vaccination?
It’s very telling that there isn’t a single published study anywhere in the world that looks at d-dimer, troponin, and Heinz bodies both before and after vaccination.
There’s a reason for that:
They don’t want to know. It would immediately end the vaccine program worldwide.
However, if anyone reading this is interested in doing such a study, I’ll happily fund it in a heartbeat. Use the Contact me form and be sure to check the study with the d-dimer radio button.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1578133654
The porphyria evidence is very compelling, IMO. Now – let me put this into some important context for framing Jessica’s work to make scientists give it the due diligence of reading her article fully.
I was initially hesitant to accept it, because in some of the early “online theorizing” about COVID-19 hypoxia, there were many amateur hypotheses thrown out by non-specialists (GOOD THING – bear with me) about hemoglobin, malaria, HCQ, parasites, etc.
Much of this was slapped down hard by Twitter censorship. At the time I was willing to see SOME of this stuff slapped down, because SOME of it was clearly scientifically wrong. It just looked nutty, and was undermining the scientists trying to work around the lying system. (You know where that goes – mum’s the word for the moment.)
Now, looking back at the censored information, some of it was likely to have been “discussion-grooming disinformation”, very much intended to be WRONG and then slapped down. Sure, some was certainly native folly, but the rest was “too easily wrong” to have been accidental. It was softballs to the censors.
That’s a very smart trick, and now seems to help confirm that Jessica is onto something.
So keep this in mind – this is where my initial skepticism of Jessica’s thinking came from.
NEXT was the emergence of fibrin-based, non-erythrocyte explanation of the clotting. Such as:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.12.464152v1.full
My initial gut response was to say “Wait – what about fibrin? We already have a good explanation.”
The solution here is obvious -as I love to say – “AND” logic. The spike protein is a multi-mechanism pathogen, particularly nasty IN CIRCULATION – and that means multiple targets in the complexity of blood.
Framing Jessica’s proposal as explanatory but not exclusively so, is going to get it accepted. And it’s basic logic. An odd protein in the blood – just like snake or spider venom – is going to have all kinds of effects, mostly showing up as circulatory, cardiovascular, and thrombotic issues, but also affecting things perfused, such as the nervous system – all nicely designed through the constructive dynamics of nature, that better wrenches into a prey system will naturally evolve in a predator or parasite. Now assisted by scientists, sadly.
We should expect multiple hematological problems – red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets, and plasma components. ALL will be affected, and ALL will contribute to symptoms and pathology.
Jessica is pushing into what is happening in ONE of those regimes, which we have been neglecting. It is most strongly defended as such. We need to avoid the “either/or” which is being used against real science here.
Thanks for getting this information out there where it needs to be.