More frightening news about fertility and the mRNA shots, this time from Singapore

Guest Post by Alex Berenson

Births are plunging EXACTLY on schedule, nine months after mass Covid vaccinations

Singapore knows how to make its people behave.

The Asian city-state is famously uptight. It punishes criminals with caning and has prohibited chewing gum since 1992. (Do not under any circumstances deal drugs in Singapore; a 41-year-old man was sentenced to death after being caught with two pounds of cannabis in 2018.)

So when Singapore told its nearly 6 million residents to be vaccinated against Covid, it had very high compliance.

What is particularly interesting – though unsurprising – is how well Singapore stratified vaccine administration by age. As the chart below shows, in a few weeks in June and July 2021, nearly every Singaporean adult between 20-39 – childbearing age, essentially – received their first Covid vaccine jab.

SOURCE

The incredibly rapid uptake of vaccines among young Singaporean adults offers a natural experiment in the effect of mRNA shots on fertility. (Roughly 98 percent of all the jabs Singapore gave were mRNA from Pfizer or Moderna. Chinese vaccines used traditional inactivated virus technology made up the rest.)

You will not be surprised at this point to learn that Singapore publishes comprehensive figures on births and deaths every quarter.

Like other East Asian countries, Singapore is suffering severe baby bust. The average woman in Singapore has fewer than 1.2 children, barely half the birth rate needed to avert a long-term decline in population.

As low as the birth rate was, though, it had remained stable for a decade. Even Covid did not meaningfully change the number of births – 39,259 in 2019, 38,590 in 2020, and 38,672 in 2021.

In the first two months of 2022, Singapore received welcome news. Births actually rose about 7.5 percent.

Then came March. Again, Singapore began mass mRNA vaccinations of women (and men) of childbearing age in June 2021; March 2022 is exactly nine months later.

In March, the increase in births abruptly reversed. Between March and June 2022 – the most recent month for which figures are available – Singapore has recorded about 1,000 fewer live births compared to 2021, a decline of 8.5 percent. The drop has been consistent each month.

(Births in Singapore. See how the blue line started falling below the others in March? That’s births in 2022. That’s not good. Also, I know it’s a photo of a laptop screen. Bear with me.)

SOURCE

A 16 percent shift in birth rates practically overnight is, to say the least, highly unusual.

And Covid itself, or “long Covid,” whatever long Covid may be, cannot be blamed. Singapore had essentially no Covid until the fall of 2021 (well after mass vaccinations were complete, but that’s another story).

By itself, a four-month decline in birth rates in a single small country might not be cause for serious concern, despite the striking timing.

But Singapore is far from alone.

For example, Sweden has reported a similar decline this year, with a similarly close connection to vaccinations last year. It is hard to imagine two countries more different ethnically and geographically than Sweden and Singapore. They even had diametrically opposed Covid lockdown policies. Yet both are seeing the same drop in fertility.

Not panicking is important here.

The decline in births that countries like Singapore are seeing is large by historical standards. But it has lasted only a few months, and it comes against the backdrop of a long-term decline in fertility rates. Further, not every country has seen them.

In addition, the mRNA shots are known to cause disruption in menstrual cycles and declines in sperm counts that can last for several months. It is possible that those changes alone account for the entire drop, and that if and when they reverse birth rates will return to baseline. It is possible birth rates are already returning to baseline, since births by their nature are a lagging indicator of fertility.

But enough countries have now seen these changes that we would – at a minimum – be well advised to ask scientists who specialize in fertility what they are seeing. And this is yet another reason – as if any were needed – that healthy adults of childbearing age should avoid novel biotechnologies like mRNA vaccines unless they have no alternative.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Anonymous

Yeah, but..
Other reports have been that 80% to 90% of pregnancies among jabbed were miscarried.
So the effect should have been seen all along, and not just at nine months.

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka

If the end point is a live birth at or around 9 months, you would not see any change until then. If, instead, you had looked at number of viable and ongoing pregnancies, then you would see a shift in numbers earlier.

Anonymous
Anonymous

If it causes miscarriages, the normal gestation period of 9 months has no bearing whatsoever, as the babies don’t make it that long.
9 months only matters if it affects fertility in the sense of conception. This decline may be evidence of an effect on conceptions, but, what about the miscarriage effects?

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka

I think you might be right and me wrong.

Let’s say it is January. You are devising a study where you look at birth rates after vaccination. In January, every pregnant woman regardless of gestational age of the pregnancy gets vaccinated.

Expected delivery date of all of these pregnancies was some time between February and October. If vaccination at any time in the pregnancy, including those in the third trimester (which normally are more stable pregnancies with better outcomes) leads to an increased rate of miscarriages, then you would find decreased live normal births starting in February or March of the same year. If vaccination only leads to increased miscarriages if they were early pregnancies, then you would see decreased live normal births later, for example in August or later.

Walt
Walt

Anonymous
Anonymous

2 Esdras 6:21
Infants a year old shall speak with their voices, and women with child shall give birth to premature children at three or four months, and these shall live and dance.

Daddy Joe
Daddy Joe

The world elite are all evil grins as these type of stats just keep on rolling in. Mission is being accomplished

Anonymous
Anonymous

I’m headed to Singapore to do some impregnating. Then it’s off to Sweden.

Aunt Acid
Aunt Acid

Baal and Moloch are concerned about those falling numbers of potential sacrificees.

Anonymous
Anonymous

nah, they just got their sacrifices up front.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading