No doubt about it. Holograms are real.

CIA Pilot Presents Evidence That No Planes Hit Towers On 9/11

Fact checked
   

Ex-CIA pilot John Lear vindicated as evidence that no planes hit the twin towers on 9/11 is compiled and published online

Ex-CIA and commercial jet pilot John Lear claims that the Twin Towers were not bought to the ground by planes crashing into them on 9/11, and now detailed information has been posted online corroborating his account.

In Lear’s expert opinion the official claim that two planes crashed into the towers is actually “physically impossible.”

The grandson of Learjet founder Bill Lear, John Lear is a retired airline captain and former CIA pilot who has flown over 100 different types of plane during 40 years of active flying. He holds more FAA airman certificates than any other FAA certified pilot, and has flown secret CIA missions in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

9/11 Plane Hoax explains the theories.

THE EVIDENCE THAT NO REAL PLANES WERE USED ON 9/11

We are supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the towers, with no pieces showing. A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide and 159 feet long. The distance from: the outer perimeter of the North Tower at the alleged point of contact by AA Flight 11, to: the central 47 massive inner core beams that are cross-braced is 60 feet. The distance from: the outer surface of the South Tower at the alleged point of contact by UA Flight 175, to: the core structure of that building was 37 feet. The differential in length in relation to the North Tower with respect to plane length and a building length that is measured in terms of the distance to the core structure is about 99 feet. The differential length for the South Tower is approximately 122 feet. A 767 is 159 feet long so most of the plane has got to be outside of the tower in both cases since there is simply no room for the entire length of the plane to crumple into. Why didn’t we see 99 feet of AA Flight 11 sticking out of the North Tower or broken off, crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the ground below? Why didn’t we see 122 feet of UA Flight 175 sticking out of the South Tower or crumpled up, and/or crumbling to the WTC plaza below?

There is no plane or plane wreckage at all to be seen in the hole of either tower in any video or photos.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D55l4afJeMc?feature=oembed]

Of course, as per Lear’s theory, there are no planes to be seen in the holes of either tower or on the street below because there were no real planes.

We would expect a sharp deceleration as the plane crumpled to fit into the 60 feet of space (North Tower, Flight 11) and 35 feet of space (South Tower, Flight 175) from the perimeter to the central steel core. Instead, in the videos, both planes enter the towers entirely at uniform motion.

John Lear 9/11

A Boeing 767 is 156 feet wide. The width of the hole in the South Tower was 106 feet wide and the width of the hole in the North Tower was 125 feet wide. 50 feet of the Boeing 767 that allegedly struck the South Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. 31 feet of the Boeing 767 that is said to have hit the North Tower cannot fit into the size of the hole that is in the North Tower…a hole that was supposedly created by a Boeing 767 with a wingspan of 156 feet. Some people may say that the wings of the Boeings merely folded back as the aluminum portion of the wings came in contact with the exterior steel columns. However we can see this is not what happens in the videos. Even so the aluminum wings would not neatly fold back they would be torn off.

Twin towers torsion

Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” High school physics states that the force an airplane exerts on a building is the same as the force a building exerts on an airplane. Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.

9/11 no planes

The above diagram shows that Flight 175 was intersecting with eight (8) floors that consisted of steel trusses connected at one end to the core columns and to the external support columns at the other, where each floor was covered with 4-8” of concrete, representing an acre of concrete apiece and posing enormous horizontal resistance to any airplane’s penetration into the building.

In the impact videos, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks videos we see what we are told is a plane cartoonishly pass through the steel face of the tower like a ghost. As the alleged plane makes contact with the tower there is no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. This is impossible. It is cartoon physics. It melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds. The “plane” we are told is Flight 175 is depicted as being simultaneously both half in the South Tower and still completely intact, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

From the holes left in both towers after “impact” we are supposed to believe the wings sliced clean through the 14 inch steel beams but this is simply impossible. The fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings would not slice through all the 14 inch steel box columns of the WTC towers and leave a Wylie Coyote style hole. An airplane wing can be sliced in half by a wooden telephone pole:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zt1oTYhcgo?feature=oembed]

Aluminum plane wings will not cut through 14 inch steel regardless of speed and weight. Not only is it impossible for the wings to have cut through the steel columns but it is absolutely impossible for the fragile wing tips to have also cut through the steel columns.

Twin towers hoax

9/11 truth

9/11 John lear

The wings would break off immediately upon contact and the plane would explode. It would not enter the tower and then explode. The plane would simply be obliterated to pieces by the 14 inch steel box columns and the steel and concrete floor trusses before it got anywhere near the inside of the tower.

9/11 plane

Newton’s First Law of Motion: “A body remains at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.” The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the steel/concrete face of the tower as it did through the air? This is impossible. The “plane” also violates Newton’s First Law.

9/11 CNN

9/11 hoax

WTC 9/11 plane

The hole that wasn't there 9/11

9/11 impossible

THERE ARE NO VERIFIED AIRPLANE PARTS

Apart from one or two props placed there like a bit of tire and a bit of engine…parts that didn’t even match a Boeing 767 and like the laughable bit of engine on the Pentagon lawn there were no real plane parts or debris to be seen and no black boxes were ever found at ground zero. In reality, if a plane had hit the tower it would have crushed up like a car hitting a wall and its wings would have broken off and the majority of the plane would have fallen to the street below. The street below would have been littered with plane debris and the charred remains of the passengers yet it wasn’t because there was no plane.

NO OFFICIAL CRASH REPORTS

FAA Regulation 121 requires a comprehensive investigation of all crashes of scheduled commercial flights yet there are no official crash reports on the 4 incidents because there were no planes.

“THE AIRCRAFT WOULD LITERALLY FALL OUT OF THE SKY”

Experienced commercial and military pilots have stated that the speed and manoeuvres of the planes that hit the World Trade Center are impossible to have happened. They state they could not replicate the alleged flights themselves. Two experienced pilots using flight simulators on the morning of 9/11 could not hit towers at 500 mph in six attempts. In reality a 767 fly can not fly that fast at sea level. Pilots For 9/11 Truth state that the speed and sharp manoeuvres would have resulted in the plane breaking up from the stress on the aircraft frame due to the the speed and air pressure. It would be extremely difficult for the pilot to actually hit the tower even if the wings didn’t break off due to the stress.

9/11 debunked

Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Capt. Russ Wittenberg is a unique individual in that he had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft Flight 93 and Flight 175.

This is what he has to say:

Video interview 9/11 Ripple Effect 8/07:

“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.

I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s.

And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”

Article 7/17/05:

“The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple.” … Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77 could have “descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn.”…

“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower.

I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it’s design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding — pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”

“For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not one chance in a thousand,” said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727’s to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737’s through 767’s it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.

“The airplane could not have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into what they call a high speed stall.

The airplane won’t go that fast if you start pulling those high G maneuvers at those bank angles. … To expect this alleged airplane to run these maneuvers with a total amateur at the controls is simply ludicrous…

It’s roughly a 100 ton airplane. And an airplane that weighs 100 tons all assembled is still going to have 100 tons of disassembled trash and parts after it hits a building.

There was no wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon. … The vehicle that hit the Pentagon was not Flight 77. We think, as you may have heard before, it was a cruise missile.”

“PLANES” HAVE A CGI APPEARANCE

In all of the footage the alleged planes hitting the twin towers clearly do not look real. The planes have a computer generated appearance. In the different footage we see the planes changing shape and color, missing wings, are featureless and blurred. Pilot John Lear made the observation that the plane has no strobe lights. The plane also casts no shadow.

9/11 vanishing wing

9/11 plane no shadow

NO RECORD OF FLIGHTS TAKING OFF

According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.

Although flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11, even when every other plane that took of that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS. The flight that was labelled flight 11 by air traffic control was 10 miles from Manhattan at 8:46am. If flights AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then there are only two planes, not four, to be accounted for. Investigators who have checked the tail numbers for the planes which departed as UA 93 and UA 175 on 9/11 (namely N591UA and N612UA respectively) believe that these planes are still in service. If so, and if AA 11 and AA 77 never existed, then the number of Boeing 757s and 767s destroyed on 9/11 was not four, as the US government maintains, but rather zero.

Both UA 175, plane number N612UA and UA 93, plane number N591UA, were “still registered and valid more than 4 years after [their] alleged destruction.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth, have confirmed that United 175 received a message at least twenty minutes after it allegedly crashed into the World Trade Center. This proves that the flight never smashed into the Center but instead flew for some time that day, a point advanced in the book ‘Planes Without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11’.

NO PLANES ANYWHERE

Most people in the 9/11 Truth community accept that no planes were used at the Pentagon and Shanksville; the evidence shows no real planes were used for the towers either.

9/11 pentagon no plane

9/11 smoking gun

In conclusion we can be 100% certain the planes were not real. Apart from defying the laws of physics with impossible crash dynamics the planes do not even look real. The question is: are the planes digital composites (CGI) inserted into real video or is it a 3D projected image using advanced technology not known to the public? Richard D Hall’s 3D radar data analysis has confirmed that the trajectory of the “planes” in all the videos match up with the radar data. If video fakery was used i.e the planes were digital composites, the question can be asked why would they go to the trouble of making sure all the “plane” videos match up with the radar data but do such a poor job of rendering the planes which look like poor quality CGI, Why does the wing momentarily disappear in six different videos? This is a still from the Hezarkhani video showing a digital composite plane on the top and the original “plane” from the Hezarkhani video underneath: http://imageshack.com/a/img198/7545/n16q.jpg The digital composite plane looks more realistic. Here is a video showing how easy it is to create a digital composite plane and insert it into real video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rml2TL5N8ds Here is another example of a digital composite plane inserted into the Evan Fairbanks video: http://imageshack.com/a/img834/7263/qsm.gif Why would they create such poor quality CGI planes that look different in different videos? If the planes were a digital composite it should look the same in every video. Based on Richard D Hall’s radar data analysis (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5DgFcpsxes), the witness testimony and the fact the left wing disappears in 4 videos and the right wing in 2 videos the evidence points to the plane being a 3D projection. Richard D Hall believes there may have been a solid object, probably a small missile at the centre of the “illusion”, with an image of a Boeing 767 being projected around it.

ADVANCED HOLOGRAM TECHNOLOGY?

The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.”

This technology was reported in the media before 9/11 pertaining to military psychological operations (PSYOPS).

Washington Post

“When Seeing and Hearing Isn’t Believing”

By William M. Arkin

February 1, 1999

A few notable quotes (emphasis added):

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

…washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space … for special operations deception missions.”

Author: Glock-N-Load

Simply a concerned, freedom loving American.

58
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
GNL
GNL

Look at the photo of the plane halfway in the building yet no damage or fire.

Jdog
Jdog

At the point where the planes made contact with the buildings, and more so when they reached the steel columns, the front of the plane would have sharply de-accelerated while the rear section of the plane would not, causing the fuselage to buckle and the tail section to break off long before it reached the building. Study some slow motion footage of automotive test crashes, and you will see how that works.
Airplanes are not build to withstand impacts of any kind, they are thin aluminum tubes. They do not penetrate steel and concrete. In real life the fuel would have exploded and the broken pieces of the plane would have bounced off the building, leaving debris for blocks around.
Look at images of the crash of Flight 182 in San Diego. Despite hitting the ground at 300+ mph nearly straight on, there are large pieces of the plane everywhere. That is what a real crash site looks like.

BL
BL

They got their war, that’s what it was all about. Common sense should have told people that you don’t fly huge commercial aircraft into steel and concrete like it was Jello and watch the planes disappear as if by magic……AS IF BY MAGICK….AS- IF- BY – MAGICK.

ottomatik
ottomatik

Wars not War.

ken31
ken31

It probably never is anything but nasty business. I got numb to the horrors I had nothing to do with.

Gundel
Gundel

And control on us, too. Screening, spying on us in the name of mighty terrorism.

Jdog
Jdog

The wars were only part of equation, the major goal was the implementation of the Patriot Act, and the massive intelligence machine they built in the aftermath. After the Patriot Act, the US became a dictatorship and any delusions we had about being a free country and the Citizens having self determination became a shameful illusion.

CCRider
CCRider

Very interesting. But it has little meaning to me. It’s like wondering who were the snipers who shot at JFK? That’s not the important part. The fact that whoever ordered the hit got away with it tells us all we need to know: We have owners and all that “We The People” talk is a bunch of bullshit. Same principle here. We already knew building 7 was a controlled demolition. The wing tip part is very telling especially from such a credible source.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I’ve posted this for years, hoping someone would respond. Few have. https://newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-911/

Our owners continue their ownership by the manufactured consent of we governed. How do a thousand rule a billion? With the consent of the governed. We are complicit in our subjection.

RESIST.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2023%3A2&version=NIV

Overthrowing the State

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/1248291-once-one-concedes-that-a-single-world-government-is-not

The Fake Alien Invasion of 2024

WTC-6?
https://yandex.com/search/?text=wtc+6&lr=223

brewer55
brewer55

I’m pretty much with you, CC. I know that things definitely didn’t add up, how much, I just don’t know. Since building #7 went down with supposedly just some fire on the roof well, then anything is possible with what the gubmit did or allowed to happen. One this is for sure, ‘W’ (the pretend Christian POS) gave us the ‘Un-Patriot Act’ and other laws and agencies that have taken away many of our civil liberties.

CCRider
CCRider

I was raised in Connecticut and knew the Bushs well. Patrician Prescott Bush was a power-mad tyrant whose only devotion wasn’t to God, but to political power. Same with W only dumber.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

Bush may have signed the ‘Patriot’ Act … but it was Sleepy Joe Bidet who actually drafted it and tried to get it enacted in 1998 …

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

They’re all on the same team. Who was it that shut the country down? Get my point?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Billions are on the same team as their oppressors. How do a few thousand rule a few billion?

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

Oh, I love pop quizzes. Fear & safety??

mark
mark

An oldie but goodie…the one surviving vid of the missile hitting the Pentagon…in the exact office area that was about to expose the theft of trillions.

9/11 FACT: The Pentagon Was Hit By A Cruise Missile From The US Military Arsenal

BL
BL

Mark- You have to love the pristine lawn left after the missile went into the Pentagon. I upped you for this link and I am sad that people still hold onto the 9/11 fable as fact. Like CCR said above, they got away with it….sorta like the Covid plandemic. Nobody is in jail so I guess the coast is clear.

mark
mark

BL,

Shoot…there was evidence of men spreading a few plane parts around the lawn right after.

I have been successful in changing some minds close to me with this link and many, many, many others.

Others get uncomfortable, look away, and change the subject.

But that happens with a lot of subjects.

I know people who won’t even LOOK UP when they are being sprayed liked bugs.

I suspect many of the people who realized the truth about 911 also are Pure Bloods…once your eyes are really opened…it is impossible to start mooing again…and get back in line.

Then there is this:

comment image

Mike
Mike

It was either a day or two before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld was giving testimony before a Senate panel and admitted that the Pentagon could not account for a trillion dollars. We all know what happened next.

James
James

I really thought I was done with paranoid thinking,sigh……,I was wrong.

comment image

Anonymous
Anonymous

Thinking rationally is not paranoia.

YourAverageJoe
YourAverageJoe

They will bite your loving hand…

ken31
ken31

I love that pic. The forward whickers give away that the cat is enjoying it, despite the camera angle.

Ghost
Ghost

comment image

Real US Army Manual, no kidding.

https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/fm3-05-301.pdf

Chapter 10, 11 and 12 look interesting!
comment image

ottomatik
ottomatik

I remember the shit fests we used to have…
Now, just add it to the gargantuan piles of lies and false flags littering the history of this crumbling Republic.
This was a great piece, thank you for posting.

Anonymous
Anonymous

The republic was coopted by May 1787:

Conspiracy in Philadelphia by Gary North

On May 25th, 1787, a group of 55 men gathered for a closed meeting in Philadelphia. Officially, it was being convened to discuss alterations to the then constitution of the United States of America: the Articles of Confederation. Some state legislatures had authorized their representatives to attend the meeting only on this basis, explicitly prohibiting them from considering a new constitution. To make certain that the general public did not find out about the nature of this conspiracy, the convention members swore an oath not to discuss any proceedings with the public…for the rest of their lives. The only first-hand accounts of the proceedings were published several years later after the death of the last survivor, James Madison, in 1836. The press was forbidden to attend. The meetings were held on the second floor of the building, so that would-be eavesdroppers could not hear anything. The new constitution would become the law of the land whenever nine state conventions ratified it. This was in explicit violation of the Articles, which required a unanimous vote for amendments. Thus did a group of men launch a coup-d’etat. This coup established a new national covenant in 1788, a covenant stripped of the Articles’ invocation of God, “The Great Governor of the World,” with only the old country’s name transferred for public relations’ sake: the United States of America.

Conspiracy in Philadelphia

http://www.garynorth.com/philadelphia.pdf

Banksta mafia and secret societies in da house, by 1787, y’all . . .

America, 1776 to 1787, RIP

Been posting this everywhere for years, to no avail:

CIA Pilot Presents Evidence That No Planes Hit Towers On 9/11

It’s just giant CGI. Project Blue Beam. God will come back as a hologram when TPTB need it. Or aliens. And modern cargo culters will buy it. They always do. Masks, shots, TSA, fake currency, trannies . . . even a “rational” no-nonsense man like Penn Jillette will buy it:

https://www.takimag.com/article/and-a-child-shall-mislead-them/

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load

One of the anonymouses posted it in a comment on another article. I just made an article so it would get more eyes.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Thanks for being one of the few who noticed. I was that anon. Now please check out the Gary North CONstitutional “Conspiracy in Philadelphia” article. Our lunch was ate a looong time ago.

i forget
i forget

Pan(-fried long before the )opticon before the tech caught up.

The tech is projection.

Which of Newton’s Laws applies? Does he have one about fig-like stuff wrapped in bromated flour-like stuff?

Cookie jar raiding: world’s oldest profession.

Maybe the local ciaffiliate can weigh, inveigh, in.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

He’s too busy mourning the Queen…and all that she stood for.

i forget
i forget

S/teamplay (not to be confused with S/teampunk) is a bunch of individual droplets that just happen to be in the same vicinity.

But some droppedlets, lots of those, really ~ needwant to organize that swirl into command chains & hierarchies.

Susurrations past. & look who caught it for the point. Or a point. Maybe those gatekeeping teachers were just upset that you refused to play for their team. ☺

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

😎

ottomatik
ottomatik

The rumors are strong that the Monarchy runs all of the 5 Eyes…

mark
mark

In my opinion…It runs the Committee of 300 who the 5 Eyes are subservient to.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load

I’ll submit it to Jim.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Amazing the amount of normies who buy the official story!! And the sickening tributes every year

Anonymous
Anonymous

Military technology known as “volumetric displays” would not only explain the 9/11 images, but the UFO reports in where there was no sound and no radar tracking.
The ability to create artificial visual images in 3d would have extremely valuable military uses.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load

Can you share information on volumetric displays? If so, just keep replying to my comments when you see them. Add links if you have them please.

Jdog
Jdog

Just do an internet search. There is quite a bit of information about private industry, but not much about military, other than the patents taken out decades ago. The technology allows for 3D images to be projected and to be seen from any angle.

Ghost
Ghost

Talk to me… where from is this one?

comment image.webp

YourAverageJoe
YourAverageJoe

T’was Blind, but now I See.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

Great to hear, Joe! Now stay off that Trump train.

ken31
ken31

If I had known it would be so hard to get them back off again, I would have never tried to get them on.

Maybe I should have posted a sign: If you are this Boomer high, you can’t get on this train.

Anonymous
Anonymous
bidenTouchesKids
bidenTouchesKids

Where’d all the missing passengers go? Big mass grave somewhere yet to be found?

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

As these articles show — there was no passenger list for any of these flights — nor any records of the flights taxiing, taking off — nothing at all …

bidenTouchesKids
bidenTouchesKids

But the people who were supposed to be on the planes had to go somewhere?

ken31
ken31

I read this earlier from the link it was taken from. It seems pretty convincing. It doesn’t change anything when you already know it was an inside job, but it a satisfying explanation. I watched the second one hit “live”. My gut reaction was it wasn’t real. No denial of reality, but that it didn’t look real. I won’t say more.

Jdog
Jdog

We have long lived in a world where you could only believe half of what you saw, and nothing of what you heard. Today we live in a world where you cannot believe anything, except that the people who run our world are evil beyond comprehension.

tony
tony

this story is old hat but it’s just like grandpa’s ghost stories which just get better with each telling. the jews and their whores perpetrated the hoax and destruction with controlled demolition. the dancing israelis story is another one which deserves retelling. the bush crime syndicate with the rotschild satan worshipping jews produced the spectacle.

Jack G.
Jack G.

I was there and I saw it, so unless they can project huge holograms, I think we are delving into wacko world. We have so much concrete evidence on our side about the state of the world. Shit like this makes us look tin-foil hatty. The whole event was probably staged and coordinated with our intelligence communities to foment war to further the New World Order, but planes did actually hit the building.

Ottomatik
Ottomatik

I think so too. My best guess is remote controlled. Like the pilot in article says about the camel jockeys, No Fuckin Way.

i forget
i forget

if you care about how you look, particularly to people who mean to do you harm, you don’t know where you are or understand reality – including how being concerned in that way is a developed weapon that is being used against you.

Anonymous
Anonymous

U r absolutely right Sir , articles like these r totally ridiculous to turn conspiracy facts to theories advocated by paranoids

Shaywood
Shaywood

If there were no planes – where are the passengers that loaded onto the planes and are missing?

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading