Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
Once you open your eyes to the possibility that the systems you trust aren’t as trustable as you were led to believe, you start to see things that you could never before consider possible.
A US Senator suggested I view “SELECTION CODE: The Movie.” It’s excellent. I recommend everyone reading this take an hour to watch it, especially the last 15 minutes. Please promote it on social media after you view the film.
It seems to have escaped notice by all the mainstream media. Are you surprised?
The movie reminded me of the current battle to expose the truth about vaccine fraud. Election fraud is arguably the more important issue, and I hope once the corruption is exposed on the vaccine, it will open people’s minds to the possibility that they’ve been fooled about election security as well. This movie tells a very compelling story.
The hero of this movie is Tina Peters, County Clerk and Recorder in Mesa County, Colorado and an outspoken advocate for free and fair elections.
Here is Tina’s Wikipedia profile. Keep in mind, Wikipedia is heavily biased to make her look bad. Very bad.
Tina is the heroine of the movie and she has a piece of ironclad evidence: disk image dumps of the election machines before and after the manufacturer tampered with it. Anyone who has looked at this evidence is impressed.
What happens is that “they” spin it around and make it look to the public (and law enforcement) like she’s the evildoer. This distracts attention from the disk image evidence.
How can you tell who is telling you the truth?
It’s easy. In almost all cases, it’s the people who are not camera shy.
Consider the following:
- The Colorado Secretary of State refused to go on camera to answer any questions for the filmmakers
- Tina Peters fully cooperated with the filmmakers
- Tina Peters doesn’t have a horse in this race: she has never been involved in politics before her election.
- The filmmakers do not have a horse in this race (they are focused on other issues) and are known for exposing truth
- The evidence speaks for itself. Experts who have looked at the before/after hard disk images call it a “smoking gun.”
- Tina lacks the technical skills to have pulled this off. Those who accuse her of modifying the records have yet to show who did the work.
- Nobody seems to be able to explain how the corruption of the records happened if the manufacturer was honest.
- The State doesn’t seem to want to pursue finding the individual responsible for modifying the election records.
It’s a tough one, isn’t it?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Wikipedia is shit. I trust them about as much as I trust the media, democrats, the gov…
“Voting machines.” Sure. As if a machine is necessary to count. Still, corruption was always a feature, not a bug, long before machines.
Rigging elections has always been an American “tradition”.
machines make it much easier to change the results
Snatching Lindell’s phone at Hardees was all about getting Tina Peters.
If you watch the movie the FBI will raid you.
since the j6 “riot/insurrection” was about a rigged election i will put this here–
a capitol police intelligence analyst had been giving reports to his superiors 4 weeks that right wing patriots were going to take over the capitol on j6 but he was ignored,along w/trump’s offer of 10k natl guard troops–
from today’s patriotpost.com
A Capitol Police J6 Whistleblower Sounds Off
Pelosi’s one-sided history of the January 6 riot is being vigorously fact-checked by a group of Capitol Police intelligence whistleblowers.
Douglas Andrews
Gotta love those whistleblowers — unless, of course, you’re a Trump-hating House Democrat trying to foist upon the American people a one-sided history of the January 6 Capitol riot. In that case, you’re inclined to hate whistleblowers and to keep them as far away from your rigged J6 “investigation” as possible.
“We analysts have been reporting for weeks that Patriot groups are commenting on social media their intentions to storm the U.S. Capitol with overwhelming numbers.” So said Eric Hoar, a senior Capitol Police intelligence official, in a scathing memo to his Capitol Police superiors just three days after the January 6 riot.
Whoa. You mean to tell us that Capitol Police leadership was warned well in advance by one of its top intelligence officials that a riot was coming to the Capitol on January 6? You mean to say Donald Trump didn’t incite an insurrection at the spur of the moment? Yep, that’s precisely what John Solomon, editor in chief of Just the News, is reporting.
Imagine that. And did the Capitol Police share this information with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who’s responsible for Capitol security? Because we do know that the Capitol Police were woefully short-staffed at the time of the riot. And we do know that President Trump had previously approved the deployment of 10,000 National Guardsmen to protect the Capitol on that awful day.
Too bad Pelosi and DC Mayor Muriel Bowser both declined Trump’s offer for that overwhelming National Guard presence. Because such a show of force might’ve ended the riot before it began. And too bad Pelosi’s dog and pony show trial made no mention of Eric Hoar’s advanced warnings — although Pelosi and Liz Cheney and their fellow Democrats went to great lengths to tell us minute by minute what Trump was and wasn’t doing that day.
“I have been purposely quiet for several days in order to calm myself,” Hoar’s memo continues, “but know that I am filled with anger and frustration. Watching videos of Officers and friends that I served next to when I was in uniform being bullied. Watching posts that I’ve held being overrun, still makes me nauseous.”
As Solomon reports, there’s plenty more where this came from:
Hoar’s assessment is directly backed up by hundreds of pages of internal Capitol Police documents obtained by Just the News showing Hoar and other colleagues in the intelligence division receiving detailed warnings from the FBI, Homeland Security Department, the U.S. Marshals Service and D.C. Metropolitan Police that right-wing extremists were plotting to storm the Capitol and attack lawmakers.
At the time of the riot, Hoar worked for the Capitol Police’s Intelligence and Inter-Agency Coordination Division. And before that, before a serious auto accident put him in a wheelchair, Hoar worked as a Capitol Cop. (Interestingly, though, when one searches the three-word string “Eric Hoar whistleblower” on Google’s news aggregator, not a single result is delivered. But search that exact same three-word string on, say, DuckDuckGo, and you get plenty of results. If we didn’t know better, we’d swear Google tweaks its news-gathering algorithm to memory-hole the news it deems inconvenient.)
And Eric Hoar’s advance warnings are certainly inconvenient to the prevailing Leftmedia narrative about the January 6 riot. All that might change, though, on January 3, 2023, when the 118th Congress is sworn in and a bunch of curious Republican committee chairmen begin snatching away the gavels from their incurious Democrat colleagues.
Indeed, as Solomon reports: “Some of the intelligence was repeatedly sent in an effort to get leaders’ attention over the Christmas holidays. ‘I apologize if this is a double tap with the email,’ one of Hoar’s colleagues, Matthew Hurtig, wrote in an email dated Dec. 31, 2020, where he re-forwarded information from the FBI about right-wing extremist threats on social media to ‘storm’ the U.S. Capitol and ‘hang’ politicians.”
And yet, Solomon added, “the department’s Jan. 5, 2021 final Civil Disturbance Units plan for crowd and riot control contained this inexplicable language about threat assessment: ‘At this time there are no specific known threats related to the Joint Session of Congress — Electoral College Vote Certification.’”
“No specific known threats,” eh?
Either no one was paying attention to Eric Hoar and his Capitol Police intel colleagues, or no one wanted to pay attention to them.
patriotpost.us
those online voting machines have always been hackable–
i believe that it was in the 2014-2016 era ,maybe b4 that, there was a video going around of a bunch of county elections supervisors who were up in tallahassee at the state sec. of state’s office attending a training session–
they were being shown how votes could be changed in real time,and most were dumbfounded–