Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
Conclusion: “The Ontario data show that vaccination currently makes little difference in terms of hospitalization and death rates for those below age 60.”
A new report prepared by a group of highly qualified experts analyzed the government data in Ontario and concluded that the vaccines don’t reduce hospitalization and death in those under 60.
In other words, we’ve been lied to. Are you surprised?
Also, don’t assume the report endorses vaccination for those over 60. It doesn’t.
Here’s the full report (26-page PDF file).
It concludes:
Given the statistical evidence provided in this report, the public health policy tools such as mass vaccination campaigns, mandates, passports and travel restrictions need to be reevaluated for relevance in this phase of SARS-CoV-2. The abundance of evidence documented by Public Health Ontario (PHO), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and top-tier scientific journals demonstrates that the vaccines do not prevent infection or hospitalization. The Ontario data show that vaccination currently makes little difference in terms of hospitalization and death rates for those below age 60. Additionally, since there are known risks of adverse events and unknown long term effects, these must be considered in developing vaccine policies.
The empirical evidence investigated in this report from PHO and PHAC does not support continuing mass vaccination programs, mandates, passports and travel bans for all age groups. Rather, it may be prudent to utilize a more targeted and cost-effective approach focused on vaccinating the high-risk group, while factoring in an individual’s potential risk of vaccine-related adverse events.
That’s what you get when the people writing the report remain anonymous and are free to speak the truth without fear of retribution. Interesting, isn’t it?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
“…no benefit for those under 60.” Are you kidding me? It has no benefit for anyone and is deadlier than the virus.
Same truth that existed but was ignored since 2020.
This report accords well with the Ontario data I’ve seen (I’ve been keeping track because I live in Ontario), so I trust the data and the conclusions. The only question I have is who is this “independent researcher?” I ask because I could designate myself an independent researcher and draft a report like this and send it to my member of parliament. It says, “This report is prepared for the Liberal Party of Canada.” This doesn’t necessarily mean that the Liberal Party asked for it. It’s possible, I suppose, but it would surprise me; they haven’t been interested in real science up to this point. If some Joe like me wrote up this report and merely sent it to an MP it becomes a big “so what?” On the other hand, if it was contracted by the Liberals, then it becomes important because they would be under some obligation to pay attention to it, though they would still likely ignore the conclusions because Trudeau has chosen his tyrannical path, facts be damned.
Same here in British Communista. The data the govt was posting on their cdc site was altered and some was finally pulled down because anyone with several functioning brain cells was starting to figure out it is all a scam. And, facts be damned thats why OUR tyrannical asswipes are still continuing the mask mandates for all ‘medical’ facilities.
“Also, don’t assume the report endorses vaccination for those over 60. It doesn’t.”
Then why use age as a defining line in the report?
Denmark 50 years old – Canada 60 years old. Who’s next?
I think it is a little harsh to say the vaccines have no benifit…. they have killed off a buttload of liberal asshats who were stupid enough to take them, so they did have some benefit. Just not enough….
I believe the shots worked perfectly
They were extremely effective in getting people to call them vaccines, you have to give them that.