Separation Ruminations

Via Eric Peters Autos

We all know it can’t go on. Like a bad marriage, the “union” is a barren, emotionally alienated thing held together by nothing more than the inertia of tradition and the threat of force directed at the side that suggests the best thing to do would be for each side to go its separate way.

Peacefully, ideally.

Our side would certainly consider that ideal, for we want nothing more from the other side than to be let alone. We are not interested in the other side’s money. We merely wish to hold onto our own. To raise our families and live as we see fit – respecting everyone’s equal right to do the same. We like our history – but do not begrudge anyone else’s theirs. Only requesting that they do not attempt to replace ours with theirs.

We want to decide for ourselves with whom we do business; whether to open our doors – and for anyone who wishes to walk through them to be free to do so.

There are so many things but it really comes down to just one thing. We want to live – and are willing to let live. The other side regards that as a “threat to our democracy.” It means a threat to its hegemony. It must be one-size-fits-all, the size determined by the other side.

Irreconcilable differences. No common ground – for a wolf and his supper cannot have common ground. There are two alternatives for the “supper,” if he doesn’t wish to become that. The first is to get away from the wolf.

 

 

 

 

 

The second is to be supper.

Which is it going to be?

That separation is necessary is obvious – except to those on the other side, who know they need our side just as a wolf needs his supper. For that reason, they will never agree to peacefully let us depart, just as the wolf will not wish the rabbit a good evening and watch him hop off into the woods.

It is obvious to the wolf – on the other side – that our side cannot be allowed to depart, no matter how much they despise our side. This is interesting, when you think about it a little but. In a bad marriage, if each spouse is basically sane and well-meant, it’s understood that the best thing for both is for each to go their separate ways with as little damage to either side as can be managed. An equitable divvying up of assets. A handshake or a hug when the papers are signed. After all, they loved each other, once – and (one hopes) do not hate each other, now.

 

 

 

But what if one of the two is abusive? Cannot accept that the marriage has failed, works to prevent the other from leaving and – when he or she does finally leave – does everything possible to hurt them?

That is what we’re dealing with now, writ large. The other side does not intend to ever let us go, notwithstanding it loathes us viscerally – which, you’d think, would be motive enough to agree to a separation. What sane person wants to live with someone they cannot stand? Whom they know only remains on account of duress?

The question begs its answer.

An insane person.

An insane political philosophy.

Or, something worse. Something evil. A political philosophy founded on bullying. On making other people do things they do not want to do – and denying them the right to do the things they want to do. A philosophy of taking by force things that rightly belong to others. A mentality of meddling, in everything.

They hate us, but do not want to let us go in peace – for they feed off of us. Financially as well as psychologically. They require that we stay, even though they cannot stand the thought of us – because they need us.

 

 

 

But we do not need them.

And they know this.

It eats away at whatever remains of their humanity, etiolating into ever-increasing viciousness directed our way (viz, the red backlit rhetoric of Dark Brandon the other night).

Separation is the only solution. But how?

It is one thing to acknowledge the necessity of the thing – assuming our side wishes to avoid becoming a wolf’s “supper.” But the logistics of the thing are as complicated as the divorce is necessary.

In 1861, the sides were clearly arranged by geography. In our time, the other side is often right next door. Write large, how does our side separate from the other side? This is perhaps the most important question of our time, succeeded in importance by only one other thing.

That being the doing of it – and the sooner it is done, the better it will be.

For our side, at least.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

19
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Scott halloween
Scott halloween

The biggest mistake Trump made was NOT buying Greenland when he had the chance, now we have no place to dump the commies.
Screw giving them a portion of the us.
Buy Greenland and deport them to their new socalists paradice.

MrLiberty

The Grand Canyon will hold millions. And Greenland is too white. I’m sure there are plenty of African countries that would work too so as to further increase the diversity these folks so desperately need.

Old Dog
Old Dog

Why buy Greenland, just dump them there anyways.

Machinist
Machinist

I hear that Martha’s Vineyard has newfound capacity.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

Would love a divorce, but not gonna happen.

Most likely scenario is for Texas to secede. And that won’t even happen. Who’s running the show? All globalists, everywhere, in all the important seats. So don’t even get your hopes up that someday you’ll have your very own land. Not. Gonna. Happen.

Sen. Cornynholio
Sen. Cornynholio

I, The Great Cornynholio favor TEXIT, however, my native country is governed by GUPPIES* !!!
*GUP is the Globalists United Party

ottomatik
ottomatik

Don’t be so sure, a divided and broken US might be exactly what the Globalist want.

bidenTouchesKids
bidenTouchesKids

Separation will never happen.
Republican “leaders” are spineless cowards who get their marching orders from the Democrats. If the citizens decided to break off on their own, Biden would unleash his dogs complete with kill warrants to make it all legal and nice.

Machinist
Machinist

That lesson was well learned 1861-65, and beyond.

MrLiberty

The underlying premise that there are two Americas is false beyond belief. Most of us here would absolutely love to live in a nation in which freedom, private property rights, voluntarism, and other positive aspects of a healthy society that respects its citizens and their rights exist. But MOST of the GOP, if asked, would likely want absolutely nothing to do with true freedom. If even the elected Republicans wanted that, they wouldn’t vote nearly every time against all of that and we would have a real opposition party.. People scoff at my suggestion regarding 5000 independent nation states, but if we are trying to move towards people being able to peacefully find what suits them best, it’s going to take more than one nation run by the current Democrat scum and one run by the current GOP leadership RINO pieces of shit, or even the top level below the RINOs. 50 would be a great start, but way more would be way better.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

“The underlying premise that there are two Americas is false beyond belief. Most of us here would absolutely love to live in a nation in which freedom, private property rights, voluntarism, and other positive aspects of a healthy society that respects its citizens and their rights.”

Um, Mr. Lib, when is the last time you visited a blue state. These people absolutely do not think as you suggest.

MrLiberty

Most of us HERE…not most of us in America……HERE. I am acknowledging a kinship of ideas and values among us on TPB that is not shared among most in the GOP. Was that seriously not clear?

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

Oh, ok, I thought you meant the nation, not just TBP. Too bad we’re such a tiny group that doesn’t matter much anymore.

MrLiberty

But I think there are lots more who think like us….just saying that it isn’t the entire “red” half.

Ken31`
Ken31`

They go to considerable effort to make us think we are fewer than we are.

piearesquared
piearesquared

Eric is right that the country would be far better off if it separated into at least two (preferably about a half a dozen or more) separate countries that were joined by an agreement similar to the Articles of Confederation, instead of the Constitution. It wouldn’t be hard to do if a majority of the public was smart enough to realize that almost everyone would be better off except the corrupt politicians, the Deep State, and the lazy welfare recipients (who need the productive class to support them). The key is to separate along ideological boundaries instead of the current state boundaries which are almost meaningless ideologically. But that idea is too far outside of the box for most people, on both the Left and the Right, to even comprehend, let alone figure out how it could be accomplished. And, as Eric notes, the parasite class, which is mostly on the Left, would not like the idea if they thought about it, and would vigorously resist any efforts to separate.

But I think the Great Reset will, ironically, largely solve this problem (and many others). If the NWO reduces the world population even half as much as they would like to, which they are starting (even if it is slow) with the kill shots, that will get rid of a lot of the stupid people. Of course, a lot of smart people are going to die also during the Great Reset, but a far greater percentage of the stupid people will die, which will increase the average intelligence of the survivors, compared to the average intelligence of the world population now. When the survivors rebuild after the collapse, assuming the NWO is not able to completely subjugate the survivors, which I don’t think they will be, many of the existing problems, including the irreconcilable differences between the Left and the Right, will be largely solved.

overthecliff
overthecliff

pie, don’t count on people being smart ” enough”.

Das Arschloch
Das Arschloch

The separation of a parasite from its host is never voluntary or peaceful.

ottomatik
ottomatik

What is abundantly clear, is there has been a multi-decade effort to divide us from within.
This article is not some alt news hit piece, its Glabalist trash masquerading as a right wing thought piece.
You wanna see some real misery?
Lets go at each others throats and tear this bitch down.
You think Global heavy weights won’t get involved in a divorce?
They are fomenting it, dreaming of the opportunity.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading