NATO Article 5 – Collective Defense

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

I have spent my entire career attempting to prove my own computer system wrong. It brought me no pleasure to reveal that the world was heading into a world war. The War Cycle has never been wrong.

Poland’s attack appears similar to the Lusitania sinking that began World War II. They have lied to start every war using excuses from weapons of mass destruction to the fact that Germans sank the Lusitania because the US was secretly using passenger ships to move weapons to Britain. The collaboration of NATO means that all countries must now act.

Article 5:

  • Collective defence means that an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies.
  • The principle of collective defence is enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.
  • NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
  • NATO has taken collective defence measures on several occasions, including in response to the situation in Syria and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
  • NATO has standing forces on active duty that contribute to the Alliance’s collective defence efforts on a permanent basis.

Bombing Poland is akin to bombing all NATO countries, and each country must collectively respond. NATO was never a means to curb warfare. They have been lining up troops around Eastern Europe in preparation for this moment. Governments would not have sent troops overseas to train Ukrainian soldiers if they did not expect to participate in a war themselves. Hold tight, as this is tragically the beginning.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

16
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Anonymous

The Lusitania was durung WWI and it didn’t start the war, the assassination of the Archduke did. Use your computer to look up basic historical facts before publishing…

Cc
Cc

The Lusitainia got the US into the war. It did not start the war.
It more than likely was transporting munitions.

ken31
ken31

It was 100% proven it was and then historical docs also confirmed when it wasn’t a secret anymore.

pyrrhuis
pyrrhuis

It was proven to be carrying 7 million rounds of ammo and other goodies, and the Wilson administration knew….The US didn’t enter the war until 2 years later…

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

Germany took out ads in the New York Times warning people that it was a legitimate target because of the arms being transported. The US was manufacturing the Lewis Gun, The British Enfield P-14 (modified to 30-’06 as the US M1917 rifle), The Russian M1891- Moisin Nagant rifle among other things.

Anonymous
Anonymous

WTF is this? Did he have a point?

Just for sh*ts & giggles
Just for sh*ts & giggles

It would appear he didn’t. However, he did put on display his lack of knowledge.

B_MC
B_MC

Bombing Poland is akin to bombing all NATO countries, and each country must collectively respond.

Article was posted Nov 16, 2022

Since it was determined the Ukies did it, NATO should attack Ukraine.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

.

Anton Chigurh
Anton Chigurh

an attack on one is an attack on all. so NATO should invade Ukraine and bring Zelensky to justice

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson

The big shots would all have to find a new money launderer and get their kids new phony board of director jobs. Imagine the inconvenience!

gadsden flag
gadsden flag

kiev weather update
11.29.22 34 farenh am snow showers
10 day outlook 12.06.22 24 farenh pm snow showers

World War Zeke
World War Zeke

Good chance of airborne munitions?

Anonymous
Anonymous

why the down votes? winter’s coming. hopefully russia will end this satanic chapter.

sadly the insouciant usa citizens may find themselves in the same winter as the insouciant ukrainians.

how does a citizen fight a satanic government?

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

We’ve been getting invaded across our southern border for years, and I’ve never heard of any Estonians or Polacks showing up at the Rio Grande to help defend us. Fuck NATO. Shut it down.

Oldtoad of Green Acres
Oldtoad of Green Acres

To mato, tomato, the west is running on empty and must start a war.
Get ready as best you can.
Likely a quickie, warshington is a hollow egg and the shell is getting thinner.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading