Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
I just finished a Zoom interview here in New Zealand and the most important topic was the Baby Will story. If you haven’t heard about it, here’s the synopsis and where to find more info.
Executive summary
Will Savage-Reeves is a 4-month old boy in New Zealand who is in need of heart surgery to repair pulmonary valve stenosis. His parents Samantha (Sam) and Cole want him to have the surgery but they insist that the hospital use blood from dedicated donors that have not received the COVID-19 jabs. This blood is available but the doctors refuse to allow the parents to make this request, arguing that vaccinated blood is perfectly safe. There is also an effort by the hospital to have the guardianship of the child revoked and transferred to government authorities so that doctors can operate using vaccinated blood.
This is an important case and there are good arguments on both sides.
Introduction
Presumably, the hospital’s argument is that:
- The quality of the match is critically important. Using a large donor pool allows the best match.
- The standard procedure is to use blood from the blood bank for surgeries. If there were a safety signal from using vaccinated blood for transfusions, it would have surfaced by now.
- If they agree to use unvaccinated blood, it could be interpreted as an admission that vaccinated blood is not safe and could lead to everyone requesting unvaccinated blood which would then create severe blood shortages for a dubious benefit.
I just got off the phone with Peter McCullough to get his take. He said he’d take the vaccinated blood because of the critical nature of the matching process. With donor blood, the match quality would not be as good because there is a smaller pool to draw from and it’s not just blood type that is matched. Nobody has quantified the risk of using vaccinated blood. He said if the risk were high, it would have been noticed by now (I’m not sure I agree with that; there is a lot of willful blindness for anything associated with the vaccine).
A key piece of the puzzle: I have not heard that the doctors have made the “match quality” argument so this could be a non-issue in this case. That’s important. It makes the parents’ argument more compelling since there is no downside to using unvaccinated blood.
In support of the parents’ concerns, the embalmers have reported the unusual blood clots only occur in vaccinated people and people who have had a transfusion, so the risk is not zero.
Also, there is at least one similar case of a baby receiving vaccinated blood who died from blood clots shortly after surgery (Baby Alex). The hospital erased all records of this patient! Whoa.
My personal opinion
Based on the evidence I’ve heard so far, my take is this:
There is a risk tradeoff here: neither option is the clear better choice for the patient.
In such cases, the patient should have the right to make this risk/benefit tradeoff after being fully informed by the doctors of the risks and benefits.
This is an urgent and important issue because a life is at stake.
Background
I’m in Queenstown, New Zealand right now. I just finished a 30 minute segment on the 12 hour Truth-A-Thon telethon sponsored by Counter Spin Media which they put together to draw attention to the baby Will case.
Learn more
James Roguski has created a dedicated website, savebabywill.com with more information and what you can do. It redirects to this substack article.
Note that just typing that URL (without the http://) into your browser will not work since it will default to https: and it will just hang since the website was not set up to support SSL URLs (an oversight I’ve told James about so he knows now).
The article contains email addresses of people you can send emails to and where you can make a donation to help the parents and support the lawsuit.
Updates
I have a call into Dr. Ryan Cole to get his take. I will update this article when I hear back from him.
I’ve also suggested to the people running the telethon to invite the hospital doctors on the program. It’s important for the public to hear both sides of the story. If the doctors decline, that is their choice. The best way to resolve differences is for both sides to engage in a discussion; something that seems impossible when it comes to the safety of the vaccine.
Summary
The doctors are apparently resisting agreeing to the parents’ demands because they are concerned that it would be a tacit admission that vaccinated blood is not safe. This could lead to everyone requesting unvaccinated blood and it would make the vaccine itself look unsafe. In short, granting the request could open the floodgates. This could be a very bad thing if transfusions are safe.
On the other hand, if the doctors continue to refuse to grant the parents’ very reasonable request, an innocent child’s life could be lost.
The parents cannot transfer to another hospital because they haven’t found a hospital willing to take the political heat of doing the surgery.
This is not a game. There is a real life at stake here.
If you agree with me that the parents should have the right to choose, please take an action in this case, either write an email or send a donation or both.
Thanks.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
This story shows us where doctors’ priorities lie….
The precautionary principle should govern this situation, because of the covid lies, half-truths and deceptions.
This is further proof that they will burn it all down before they ever admit what has happened and their role in it.
‘First do no harm … ‘ was the first casualty of this fake FauciFlu event … but, in truth, those paying attention should have seen it coming since the forced AA medical school admissions and the tragedy known as the ACA (yomamacare) …
I am not up to date on blood “match” procedures, but if I remember correctly, all you do is match the blood type and then exclude any antibody-reaction, which is not common in the first place.
Unless the baby has very unusual kind of blood requirements due to antigen/antibody reactions in vitro (which could be the case because it is often precipitated by prior blood transfusions, if he has been severely sick and in need of blood all his life) it should not be difficult to find suitable blood from a more limited pool of unvaccinated donors.
More information is needed to make an informed decision and weigh the likelihood of finding blood for him versus the potential risk of vaccinated blood.
There is a severe risk from doing nothing, too.
THE SPIKE PROTEIN IS THE PROBLEM AND YOU CANNOT REMOVE IT. THAT IS WHAT IS DESTROYING THE HEARTS OF MILLIONS AROUND THE WORLD.
It comes down to this- do human beings have a say about their own bodies or are we required to submit to authorities about those decisions?
If the hospitals want to assign a higher cost for having to narrow the pool, fine, that’s a decision people can make on their own.
Telling them that they have no say about their treatment is an admission that human beings have no agency, that the collective owns you and can dictate whatever it chooses to do with you. If that is true, then it should be stated so there is no misunderstanding.
All your bodies are belong to us.
Yes, what has to change is people have to let go of this fictitious belief that ‘authorities control people’…there is no such thing as ‘authority’ in nature, it’s a mental virus.
The whole fucking thing, government, is an illusion; whole populations are quite literally LARPing.
There was something I wanted to ask you about when I saw you and now that I see you I can’t remember what it was.
Hello.
Oh!!!! I remember now.
As if I would.
However, I have the older giant, now named Genna Vee in honor of my neighbor, and I’m thinking she is an older, more gentle giant. And the Angora buck is a timid little buck now. When I place him with the lionsmane doe, he literally sits quietly in the corner until she approaches him. So, just touching base to let you know I’ve not given up my plan to have lionshead rabbits the size of small lions, but the plan did hit a hitch.
Too late.
Be careful if her name is Alice (the Goon).
Really good news! My hybrid lionsmane doe produced 3 giant kits.
My plan holds promise!
She did not get skinned alive.
Came. Came down to this. Came, & long gone.
“I’ve been to a town.” And to a hospital, too.
Had an irritant, disguised as conversation, recently.
The other person’s opening gambit was to inform me that one large supermarket chain was in process of buying up another. I said something like “great, even less competition.” The gambler, of the sort that short busses into Vegas, agreed.
A minute later I was also informed that “a referendum had just passed” allowing supermarkets to sell wine. The gambler said “I voted against it.” When I asked, rhetorically, what business it was of his what a supermarket did, or didn’t sell, the non seq response was that he just thought wine should only be sold in wine stores.
These are the people that infest towns & work in hospitals.
Educated (as they say) people. The sucker at my table (Rounders ref) went to Columbia (because it was there, came-saw-conquered yadda-yadda), got the t-shirt & the not just recently decanted PhD.
Thing about that pile is it doesn’t really matter, net-net, how high & deep it is. Piles is slang for what it is.
All tenses, but pretenses, are past.
To seesay it like Lysander Spooner just arrived from the distant past puts the ballistic arc in archaic … & finds the dirt before it ever finds a target that matters.
It’s well past argumentation, now.
But good to remember that “argumentation” has lubed every inch of this slip-sliding away, too. Cue the Paul Simonize tune.
Words are far too dangerous in the hands of most – & words are just inert symbols.
Even essential water, pure & clean, can dose to poison. But sea(what Ahab shows … & say it back, “perfectly”)water drinkers dose out fast.
So it ain’t words that are dangerous, its all those useless eater mouths attached to insatiably hungrythirsty brains that are dangerous.
Words are just emperors sheeprobes (& when spelled unpeeled that way, “probes” comes into focus … & maybe some gendermotional bias, too).
Forget Truman. An arcless Eternal Sunshine Spotless Mind Machineshot is what I want, for all those Cristofs, for Christmas. It’d be pretty good, like Kristofferson in, oh, Flashpoint, only with lots more flashing points o’ epicness.
And after, I’d replace what I’d displaced with nothing.
No cloaked R’s would be rolling off this tongue. No regicide being called revolution – which *still* sounds like flame to mothmouths insatiable.
I haven’t read past this yet, but, NO THERE ARE NOT!!
After reading the article I still concur.
“If there were a safety signal from using vaccinated blood for transfusions, it would have surfaced by now.”
Speechless. OTHER THAN…🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
There have been reports recently that the jab can be transferred to the unjabbed merely by physical contact in one form or another … so just how difficult is it to believe that it can’t be transferred via a blood transfusion?
Am I missing some fundamental truth of medicine or human biology by saying that?
FACT : The spike proteins produced by vaccinated people with the mRNA sequences are potentially dangerous even deadly to others !
Doctors duty and oath is to do no harm !
Obviously this child’s best interests are being overlooked to further the WHO/WEF/NWO “AGENDA 21” !
With the socialist agenda of the WEF supported insane prime minister of New Zealand this child’s true wellbeing is of no consequence to her !
Our daughter was born with health issues and we made informed decisions regarding her care with trusted medical advice . She graduated as a 3 sport athlete and MVP in 2 , today she is a registered nurse for a prestigious hospital rated in the top 5 in the country !
See how health care is supposed to work when government keeps their dick beaters out of it !
Time to start banking your own blood, as was common after Fauchi’s last epic when the blood supply was polluted.
The blood from anyone who took the clot shots is not safe for anyone.