Report Warns Risk of Nuclear War At Its Highest Since US Nuked Japan

Guest Post by Dave DeCamp

President Biden has recognized the risk of nuclear war but continues to escalate against Moscow

A Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks warned in its annual report this year that the risk of nuclear weapons use is higher today than at any point since the US dropped nuclear weapons on Japan in 1945, AFP reported on Tuesday.

Kennette Benedict, an advisor to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists who led the report for the Global Challenges Foundation, said the risk of nuclear war was greater than during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

The report warned that an all-out nuclear exchange would send enough dust in the air to block sunlight resulting in “a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger.”

President Biden acknowledged the risk back in October when he said the chances of nuclear “armageddon” are higher today than at any point since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Despite his recognition of the danger of his policy of supporting Ukraine against Russia, Biden continues to escalate US involvement in the war, and there is no end in sight to the fighting.

Ukraine’s war effort is entirely reliant on Western support, and the US is not just sending weapons but also providing training, intelligence, and other kinds of targeting support. According to recent media reports, the Pentagon now tacitly backs Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory, and the CIA is directing sabotage operations inside Russia.

Russian officials have made clear that they believe they are not just fighting Ukrainian forces in the war but also the US and NATO. This means Russia has the pretext to launch strikes on the US and NATO, although there’s no sign that such a decision has been made.

If Russia eventually chooses to retaliate by using conventional weapons against NATO, the conflict could quickly spiral into nuclear war. If Moscow decides to use a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine, most experts believe it would lead to a nuclear exchange between the US and Russia.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

21
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

That’s a nonsensical claim. There was zero possibility of a nuclear war at the time of Hiroshima since no one else possessed nuclear weapons.

Who writes these things?

Boogie
Boogie

WWII went nuclear, what difference does it make if only one side had them or used them. The Atom was used as a weapon of war to kill people in mass without discretion. To the people of Japan it was a nuclear war.

anon a moos
anon a moos

carpet bombing became passe’

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

Try telling that to the folks that lived in North Vietnam … all of those B-52 pilots weren’t delivering the airmail …

MrLiberty
MrLiberty

My first thought when I read the title. If anything, the detonation by the Soviet Union of their first nuke would be a date to use as a reference point.

cricketTheFirst
cricketTheFirst

The USA was the ONLY one that dropped 2 bombs & nuked an already surrendered country. Vaporized, killed & maimed millions.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer

You are factually incorrect. They had not surrendered. In fact, many pockets of resistance remained even after Hirohito signed the official documents…in large part due to lack of lines of communication.

watch some Gilligan’s Island, FFS.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty

Technically they had not had their surrender accepted. Of course they had tried to surrender, wanted a conditional surrender that included keeping the emperor, even if only as a figurehead. But Truman and others rejected that, only to accept it in the end, after hundreds of thousands of Japanese citizens were incinerated in Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki…..and tens of thousands of additional US soldiers had also died in fighting that was unnecessary. But of course the money had been spent on the bombs, so they had to use them and show the Soviets the level of brutality they were willing to inflict. US soldier deaths were just another consequence of politics as always.

Jdog
Jdog

The dropping of the bombs had nothing to do with Japan. Japan had already made that decision and were eager to make peace with the US before the USSR were able to transport troops to the theater.
Japan was concerned any lands conquered by the USSR would be lost forever. The dropping of the bombs was to show the USSR that the US could and would use nuclear weapons in the event that the US and USSR went to war. After the USSR defeated Germany, the US feared the power of the USSR.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer

So…we’re past that whole “there’s no such thing as nuclear missiles” thing now? Does the Phrasing Committee know about this?

Boogie
Boogie

comment image

CCRider
CCRider

War could come as a result of a mishap, an accidental launch. It wouldn’t be the first time humanity stumbled into slaughter. But perhaps the last.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty

When the media and the official government spokesscum are done, it will APPEAR as though we “stumbled” into the slaughter, but it is all part of a careful plan.

Walt
Walt

Nukes. FFS.

anon a moos
anon a moos

Gotta keep that fear needle peg’d to ten. if only trump was here to save murkia

Richard Bagg
Richard Bagg

As long as President Putin limits his targeting to :Washington D.C. New York City (U.N); Brussels (NATO) and London (The little hats), the world will be much better off.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty

Sounds like Zelensky’s visit to Davos would make a great time to explore the options.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

That’s the small-hat’s capitol, the City of London … not to be confused with the mass of humanity that lives in London …

Toujours Pret
Toujours Pret

Time to change the diapers.

Stucky

All this NON STOP talk about nukes nooks nooks blah blah NUKES!! NUKES! is freaking me the fuck out.

I’m beginning to actual hate even the word. I hereby refuse to ever use that word again. I’m going with Instant Sunshine.

Here’s my suggestion. The day AFTER the USA!USA!USA! unleashes the first Instant Sunshine maker ……. go out and start killing politicians. . Local, city, county, state, or federal …. shoot the motherfuckers on sight. WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO LOSE AT THAT POINT??? Nothing. And maybe Putin will see that we’re trying to help him out and he will spare raining a thousand Instant Sunshines on our asses. A world without politicians … almost worth it.

anon a moos
anon a moos

almost worth it.

DEFINITELY would be worth it. FIFY

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading