Temperatures in Northern Hemisphere Due to Fall Over Next 25 Years, According to Six Top International Scientists

Via The Daily Sceptic

Whisper it quietly – and don’t tell Al ‘Boiling Oceans’ Gore – but the Northern hemisphere may be entering a temperature cooling phase until the 2050s with a decline up to 0.3°C. By extension, the rest of the globe will also be cooled. These sensational findings, ignored by the mainstream media, were released last year and are the work of six top international scientists led by Nour-Eddine Omrani of the Norwegian Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research. Published in the Nature journal Climate and Atmospheric Science, the scientists say that the North Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, an important sea current that has been pumping warmer water into the Arctic, is weakening and that’s leading to a cooler North Atlantic area and lower temperatures, as was observed in the period 1950-1970.

Certainly, current observations back up these suggestions. As we reported recently, Arctic summer sea ice stopped declining about a decade ago and has shown recent growth. The Greenland surface ice sheet grew by almost 500 billion tonnes in the year to August 2022, and this was nearly equivalent to its estimated annual loss. Of course, climate alarmists have not quite caught up with these recent trends, with Sir David Attenborough telling his BBC Frozen Planet II audience that the summer sea ice could all be gone within 12 years.

Interestingly, the six scientists, whose work has helped debunk the ‘settled’ science myth, still attribute some global warming to human causes. The Northern hemisphere is characterised by “several multidecadal climate trends that have been attributed to anthropogenic climate change”. But producing work that predicts 30 years of global cooling puts them outside the ‘settled’ narrative that claims human-produced carbon dioxide is the main – possibly the only – determinant of global and local temperatures. At the very least, it dials down the hysteria pushing for almost immediate punitive net-Zero measures. Lead author Omrani is reported to have said that the expected warming pause “gives us time to work out technical, political and economic solutions before the next warming phase, which will take over again from 2050”.

Needless to say, such thinking was absent at last week’s Davos climate freak show, with elite delegates ramping up the fearmongering to record heights. Former U.S. Vice-President Al Gore went into full meltdown, ranting about “rain bombs” and “boiling oceans”. Current U.S. climate envoy, and private jet owner, John Kerry described the gathering as a “select” group of people trying to “save the planet”, while chief UN carnival barker Antonio Guterres claimed we were flirting with climate disaster and every week brought a new horror story. Of course, some might suggest that in the circumstances this was an all-round excellent effort to whip up more money – ahem, I mean more genuine climate concern – at a time when corals, Arctic sea ice, the Greenland ice sheet, polar bears and now global warming are having to be retired from the poster-alarm portfolio.

As we have noted on numerous occasions, rising global temperatures ran out of steam about two decades ago. Accurate satellite records show pauses from around 2000 to 2012 and a current one lasting over eight years. It could be argued that the only real warming for over 20 years was caused by a particularly powerful El Nino natural oscillation around the middle of the last decade. Surface datasets run by operations like the U.K. Met Office have added retrospective warming, while there are increasing doubts about the on-site recording of massive heat distortions caused by the growth in cities and towns across the globe.

The Omrani paper is complex but it revolves around the effect of the cyclical and natural North Atlantic Multidecadel Oscillation (AMO). Observations and records dating back to the start of the 19th century have shown enormous Arctic sea ice changes. It appears the AMO plays a major part in these changes. A key projection of the paper is “further weakening of the North Atlantic Oscillation, North Atlantic cooling and hiatus in wintertime North Atlantic Arctic sea ice and global surface temperatures just like the 1950 – 1970s”. If there is a drop comparable with this period, the global temperature could fall by up to 0.3°C.

Any science that downplays the involvement of human-caused CO2 is largely ignored in mainstream academia, politics and the media. But even some scientists who argue there is considerable anthropogenic input recognise the role played by natural atmospheric factors in a constantly changing climate. More sceptical scientists such as Emeritus Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT have an intellectual objection to blaming all or most changes in global temperatures on just one trace atmospheric gas. Lindzen is dismissive of this “one dimensional” view of the climate. He is of the climate science school of thought that argues that temperature changes are caused by dynamic heat flows in the atmosphere and the oceans, and these in turn are caused by latitudinal differences in temperature, or ‘baroclinic instability’ to give it a scientific term.

For Lindzen, it is “absurd” to assume that the controlling factor for temperature changes in our complex, three-dimensional climate is the small contribution made by CO2. It seems that the more scientists look and explore, the more they understand that the atmosphere and the climate it produces is an immensely complex environment affected by many far-reaching natural influences.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. He was a recent guest on the podcast of online climate journalist Tom Nelson, where he talked about his early journalistic influences, life as a journalist and an entrepreneur, joining a rock and roll band and his recent work on the Daily Sceptic. You can listen here.

Stop Press: Check out the Extinction Clock, a website that keeps track of all the predictions climate alarmists have made that haven’t come true. For example, this prediction in a 2009 MSNBC documentary called ‘Future Earth: What Will Earth Look Like in 2025?’ that the Hoover Damn would be a ‘dry hole’ by 2021 if nothing was done to avert the looming water shortage.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

30
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
PaulRevereDeux

A mini-ice age is yet once again approaching.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Can we do it this time without disco and bell bottoms?

Anonymous
Anonymous

So, Gates can stop chemtrailing the sun away now?

Charley Teh Unicron
Charley Teh Unicron

NASA: “..summer mesosphere 
over Earth’s poles is cooling four
to five degrees Fahrenheit and
contracting 500 to 650 feet per 
decade.”

source:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2021/nasa-satellites-see-upper-atmosphere-cooling-contracting-climate-change/

Euddolen ap Afallach
Euddolen ap Afallach

It snowed here in Tucson area yesterday, January 24, 2023.

brewer55
brewer55

Why are none of these scientists, whether they believe in man-made climate change or not, talking about the suns effect on our weather and, the fact that we are in the beginning stages of a Grand Solar Minimum? It is probably the single biggest reason that we will see colder winters and longer cold/cool springs.

Dying Sun
Dying Sun

Why are none of these scientists … talking about the suns effect on our weather….

Didn’t you know? The sun has absolutely no affect on the temperature of the planet. The only thing that affects the temperature of this planet is CO2 produced by human beings. You’re obviously not up-to-date on modern science.
In other news, the clot shots have been shown safe and effective in preventing covid in all people ages 1 to 99; because dead people don’t get covid.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

Also, don’t forget this possible explanation of warming:

The Climate Change Alternative We Ignore (to Our Peril)

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

Several years ago some folks finally discovered and admitted that the whole ‘The Atlantic Ocean Is Warming’ hysteria was due to a large chain of active underwater volcanoes in the Atlantic … 

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

Electroverse tries to explain these matters — sadly, just recently, after it moved to another country, all of its old articles (more than 1,000) were ‘lost’ — NewSpeak for ‘censored’ …

https://electroverse.co

… and here for the effects that the Arctic’s changes produce globally …

More Climate Science Backtracking: “A Warming Arctic Drove Earth Into The Little Ice Age”

Iska Waran
Iska Waran

The midwit weather dude on Minnesota Public Radio actually has a show called “Climate Cast”. He’s so invested in climate change that he’s aligned his entire career with it. Probably a wise choice, career-wise, sad to say. If the temp is above average, they bring him on. Whenever the temp is below average, they bring on the OTHER weather guy – an old school guy who just, you know… tells you the weather.

It is incomprehensibly difficult to take the temperature of the planet or even a region within a continent. Mr Climate Cast says things like “the last 8 years have been the hottest on record”. Oh really, Mr, 109 IQ? Maybe, but you have no fucking way of knowing. You just parrot what you read somewhere.

70% of the Earth’s surface is ocean. Sure, they finally deployed temperature-recording buoys. Know when? 2007 (the Argo Array). Problem is, they get moved around by ocean currents (weird, huh?) so they haven’t been able to record apples-to-apples comparisons – even over the last 15 years.

Thermometers on land have been massively affected by heat islands, as cities have grown. We’re supposed to believe their adjustments for that are not corrupted by their agenda? Riiiiight. And where were these thermometers? Sure, we’ve had them in America and Europe, but do you think there were consistently-monitored thermometers in the jungles of Borneo in 1958? Fuck no. How about Bumfuck Siberia in 1938? I think they had other things to deal with.

The most trustworthy data is probably from infrared sensors on satellites – which have only existed for ~40 years. Surprise surprise – satellite data shows insignificant planet-wide warming.

All the mainstream media headlines about the climate are basically plucked-from-ass by the sources they cite.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron

One other thing about the land-based thermometers that the NOAA folks finally admitted to more than 20 years ago was that the digital thermometers that they installed to replace the analog ones were reading 5º to 7º higher than the actual temperatures.

GIGO …

Anonymous
Anonymous

Exactly right. Thank goodness someone else understands this.

Paleocon
Paleocon

Meanwhile, they continue to engineer the climate to make it ten times worse in an attempt to stave off global warming.

Anonymous
Anonymous

That extinction clock link takes a bit to load up. Lots of countdown clocks are counting backward because the predictions failed to happen.

YourAverageJoe

How much money do people make changing the time on that thing?

Bob P
Bob P

Earth cooling? No problem since they already changed their marketing slogan to “climate change.” Just shift the rhetoric back to global cooling, as in the seventies, and proceed apace with the draconian laws meant to control us and extract more taxes from us.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Somebody understands the game.

Euddolen ap Afallach
Euddolen ap Afallach

The ongoing depopulation of the
70% (who thru their own credulity committed unintentional suicide
via medico) will provide for quite a
different future than what it would
have been with them along for
the ride.

B_MC
B_MC
Muscledawg
Muscledawg

IceAgeFarmer and SuspiciousObservers have been talking about this for several years now.

Doofus2
Doofus2

And Adapt2030

YourAverageJoe

We had a lot of climate change in Houston today.

Amb. Cornholio
Amb. Cornholio

Sylvester is still simian, however.

BL
BL

I would not be at all surprised if the northern US was eventually covered by glaciers and the Canadians finally just gave up and moved to Florida.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer

Been out snowplowing twice in the last week. The prediction for the first storm was 3″-5″ and we got 18″ and the second one was between 5″-8″ and we got about an inch and a half, followed by rain.

They cannot correctly predict weather within 24 hours when they can actually see the system coming in and measure the barometer and air temperature.

The odds of them predicting climate accurately a quarter of century or a century out is preposterous. They can guess or conjecture, but they cannot possibly foretell.

People are fun because they love to earn all these certificates to hang on their wall so they can be called experts or authorities when all they are is just another dude interested in some topic.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading