Subsidy Junkies

Guest Post by Eric Peters

The problem with getting hooked on something – whether it’s booze, or subsidies – is that it’s hard to quit once you are.

Just ask the car industry.

It has become dependent on subsidies – in the form of “tax breaks” – to get people to “buy” electric vehicles; the “buying” in air-fingers-quotation marks to mock the fact that when someone else is paying, you’re not really buying.

Tesla built its business model on this form of grift, elaborated in several ways. The way most people don’t even know about was using federal/state regulations that required other car companies – which at the time did not build any electric vehicles – to either build electric vehicles, in order to to satisfy “zero emissions” vehicle manufacturing quotas – or buy credits from Tesla that satisfied the requirement without having to actually build (and try to sell) EVs themselves.

In this manner, Tesla got his rivals to finance his business.

Not unlike having to pay salary of the cop who “pulled you over” via the “fine” you are made to pay for some conjured “offense.”

The lesser offense was using the government to make it easier to “sell” electric cars by paying the “buyer” a large sum of money – via tax rebates – to offset their otherwise unmarketable prices. Take $7,500 off the price (or cost) of any car and it is probable you’ll sell more of them.

Conversely, do not take $7,500 off and fewer people will buy them.

Chiefly because they can’t.

You can perhaps see why the industry got hooked on subsidies. Not just Tesla. The rest emulated Tesla’s business model, which – courtesy of the subsidies – was guided by glitz as well as grift. Market forces were subverted. Massive subsidies allowed Tesla to forget about cost and by dint of that, pursue an almost-cost-no-object approach to designing its cars, which have always emphasized power/performance primarily, with very little thought given to whether people can afford to buy that.

A few can, of course.

But the whole point – ostensibly – of the EV juggernaut is to largely replace existing non-electric vehicles with electric ones, in order to stave off the supposed “climate crisis.”

But – thanks to the subsidies – most electric cars cost as much or even more than non-electric luxury cars, with the average EV price tag just shy of $50,000. Put another way, subsidies have resulted in a juggernaut of $50k-plus electric vehicles flooding a market for which there are simply not enough market. Because there are only so many people who can afford $50k-plus vehicles – electric or not.

Replacing the existing fleet of internal-combustion powered Lexus, BMWs Porsche and Mercedes-Benz vehicles – which combined represents less than 20 percent of new vehicle sales because most people cannot afford a BMW, Porsche or Mercedes – is not going to stave off “climate change.”

The good news there, of course, is that the “climate” isn’t “changing” – at least not in the  catastrophic way that serves as the artificial fuel of this artificially engendered hysteria.

The bad news – for the car industry – is that it’s hard to sell people on a Hyundai budget an electric Lexus.

Much less a $100,000 electric Hummer.

But the industry has bought into this cost-no-object business model – and the rest of us get to pay for it. Via the subsidies – which just got expanded – after the industry roused itself from its stupor and realized that, under the rubric of the recently passed “Inflation Reduction act” (which had as much to do with “inflation” as Social Security has to do with an annuity) the subsidies for many EVs would no longer apply to many EVs that cost more than $55,000.

This being dangerously close to the price of a Tesla Model 3 or Ford Mach3. Add a few options – including the optional “long range” battery” – and many EVs exceeded the subsidy threshold. The would-be buyer discovers he’ll be paying the full price – as opposed to getting a $7,500 kickback from the government – and decides not to buy.

Cue the hue and cry.

And it was heard. The subsidy qualification has been expanded by redefining which EVs qualify.

Guess which ones?

The very ones that cost too much for too many people to buy without the subsidies –  i.e., models like the Model 3 and Mach-e “Mustang” (which is a “Mustang” to the same extent that Rachel Levine is a “she”). Sales were decreasing because the price of these models increased once the subsidy was no longer available.

Right on cue – as a result of the cry – the previous (very temporary, as it turned out)  $55,000 “cap” – on subsidization of electric coupes, sedans and crossovers – has been lifted.

One can “buy” an $80,000 electric truck or SUV and still qualify for the $7,500 subsidy.

The time is probably not far distant when people who buy $800,000 homes will qualify for subsidies, too – if they use “green” building materials.

But the point – as regards EVs – is that the subsidies have turned the industry into a lumbering junkie who has become dependent on subsidies, just the same as a heroin addict is on his “fix.” Both get excitable when they think they might not be able to get their next one, too.

The great irony here is that the subsidization of EVs has badly hurt the case for EVs, if there ever was one to begin with.

If you believe that “climate change” is an existential crisis, it won’t be solved by encouraging the manufacture of $50k-plus EVs that emphasize luxury and performance (often at the cost of practicality) that most people can’t afford to indulge – rather than economy, efficiency and practicality.

The problem with the latter, of course, is that economy, efficiency and practicality aren’t as appealing as luxury and performance, especially to the affluent – who aren’t interested in making “sacrifices” to stave off the supposed “climate crisis.”

They just want to look as if they are.

And they want you to “help” them pay for it.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

12
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
YourAverageJoe

Electric stupid, ICE Smart, and that ain’t gonna change.
Live in a coastal city with an approaching hurricane and prove me wrong.

Anonymous
Anonymous

or try to run the heater when it’s 30 below.

awoke
awoke

The only good EVs are trains, street cars, and subways. Maybe buses.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Trolley buses. Those are the ones with two poles on top. Been around for over 100 years. Chicago proved they worked when the trolley buses replaced the Green Hornets and other streetcars. Funny thing is with an adapter kit, a trolley bus could run the same route as a streetcar, using the same electric infrastructure.

Why do the ones you mentioned work? No batteries limiting range.

VOWG
VOWG

Tesla would not exist without subsidies, neither would wind turbines, solar panels, passenger rail travel, city busses, all government departments, the list is long and is actually bankrupting America. I refer you to the deficit and debt of the nation which borrows to pay all subsidies and government programs and salaries.

Anon y mous
Anon y mous

I would prefer that all on your list did not exist, due to the environmental damage they cause

Anonymous
Anonymous

Amcrash is the result of continuous government subsidizing passenger trains that were losing money and bankrupting the freight railroads. The very few railroads that decided to not turn over their passenger trains to Amcrash either did so a few years later, turned over their passenger trains to some other government entity at the state level, or ended up ultra-bankrupt with the remaining track and rolling stock being sold off piecemeal to the highest bidder at fire sale prices.

flash
flash

That’s just capitalism weeding out the weak with hard work and sacrifice, bruh… muh free market is real!!! ….reeeeee

Discover Where Corporations are Getting Taxpayer Assistance Across the United States
SUBSIDY TRACKER is the first national search engine for economic development subsidies and other forms of government financial assistance to business.

https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/

comment image

comment image

Anonymous
Anonymous

To many view the welfare system for poor Americans is stereotypical examples of a black women with 5 kids from different unknown fathers in a 2 bedroom apartment ! This example although accurate covering her rent and food assistance along with healthcare assistance is a drop in the bucket compared to industries tax breaks and grants ! Like section 8 rent vouchers or WELFARE FOR LANDLORDS ! Then there is the food assistance INDEPENDENCE CARDS , 40% of Walmart’s profits are from the welfare system ! Cities make out with rent subsidies because an investor pays the property tax for the section 8 rental .
That rent paid is assurance the investor and local governments get paid and the taxpayers get BOHICA
THE BIGGEST WELFARE SCAN GOING IS THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
THE PAYOFF CIRCLE JERK From Wall Street to K-Street to Capitol Street then from the printing press and taxpayers back to Wall Street And again Americans working get BOHICA

Anonymous
Anonymous

I am a broken record on this next point but I will keep saying this until someone that writes about electric cars mentions it. 44% of the American public lives in apartments and condominiums. Nearly of of these facilities have nothing but outdoor parking. Retro fitting the millions of parking spaces with charging ports would cost hundreds of billions of dollars and most of that would go to upgrading the electric grid to accommodate the new electricity to supply the new power needed. This is 100% impossible to do in 50 years let alone 10 years! This is 100% pure fucking insanity!

Anonymous
Anonymous

Never mind that the environ-mentalists are demanding the shutdown of coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear power plants while sizing up hydroelectric power for their next item to eliminate. Where is all this additional power supposed to come from? According to the eco-terrorists, batteries, solar panels full of snow that work less than 8% of the time, and windmills that work only under perfect conditions 8% of the time.

The eco-terrorists don’t want more electric power. They want no electric power. They won’t be happy until everyone is living in the stone age. Except for themselves, of course. Elite socialists always exempt themselves.

Solution? Burn socialist eco-terrorists and elites in those coal fired power plants. Find out how well that works as green energy.

charles zilich
charles zilich

you can throw guest worker, mostly mexican, industry in there too. and the child tax credit industry

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading