Criminal Investigation for Excess Deaths Due to Remdesivir

Via Mercola

criminal investigation excess deaths remdesivir

Story at-a-glance

  • The antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, is approved for use against COVID-19 despite research showing it lacks effectiveness and can cause high rates of organ failure
  • John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into remdesivir, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S.
  • Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021, to November 30, 2022, which he believes may be due to remdesivir
  • A study published in The Lancet found “no clinical benefit” from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients
  • The U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the experimental antiviral drug remdesivir, brand name Veklury, for emergency use against COVID-19 in May 2020.1 By October 2020, it had received full approval.2 It remains a primary treatment for COVID-19 in hospitals, despite research showing it lacks effectiveness3 and can cause high rates of organ failure.4

On Twitter, John Beaudoin is calling for a criminal investigation into the drug, citing data that it may have killed 100,000 people in the U.S. “They know,” he says, “or they willfully refuse to know. Either way, it’s homicide.”5

Using drugs that cause organ failure, like remdesivir, isn’t in the best interest of public health. The fact that U.S. health authorities have focused on this and similarly harmful drugs to the exclusion of all others, including older drugs with high rates of effectiveness and superior safety profiles, sends a very disturbing message.

Did Remdesivir Kill Thousands in Massachusetts?

Beaudoin has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court and believes a spike in deaths from acute renal failure (ARF) in Massachusetts is due to remdesivir, which is produced by Gilead Sciences. Using a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Beaudoin received all the death certificates in Massachusetts from 2015 to 2022.

He then graphed the FOIA data, finding 1,840 excess deaths from acute renal failure from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2022. Beaudoin also revealed an increase in deaths from acute rental failure in every age group over 15 years old, from 2015 to 2022.6 “Thousands dead in Massachusetts ARF likely due to Remdesivir. This requires CRIMINAL investigation,” he tweeted.7

acute renal failure deaths

Deaths, Kidney Injury Common With Remdesivir

Remdesivir use didn’t become widespread until 2020. From that time until October 2021, at least 7,491 adverse drug reactions were reported to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) VigiAccess, including 560 deaths, 550 serious cardiac disorders and 475 acute kidney injuries.8

For comparison, only 5,674 adverse drug reactions were reported for ivermectin from 1992 to October 13, 2021.9 Despite its strong safety profile and efficacy, ivermectin was widely vilified during the pandemic. Not to mention, remdesivir costs between $2,340 and $3,120,10 while the average treatment cost for ivermectin is $58.11 Do you think this has anything to do with remdesivir’s promotion and ivermectin’s vilification?

While WHO updated its guidance in April 2022 to recommend the use of remdesivir in “mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization,”12 a study published in The Lancet found “no clinical benefit” from the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients.13 Further, the investigators believed three deaths during the study were related to remdesivir.14

Download this Article Before it Disappears

Download PDF

Gilead’s Political Ties Questioned as Remdesivir Use Persists

Still, the question remains why remdesivir continues to be used at all. In November 2020, WHO issued a bulletin recommending against the use of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients, stating, “There is currently no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients.”15

Is it possible that Gilead’s strong political connections have influenced the government’s approvals and recommendations? It’s worth noting that Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman of Gilead from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001. Rumsfeld had previously served as secretary of defense under President Gerald Ford from 1975 to 1977, and again under President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2006.

FDA Even Approved Remdesivir for Children

In late April 2022, the FDA even approved remdesivir as the first and only COVID-19 treatment for children under 12, including babies as young as 28 days,16 an approval that boggles the mind, considering COVID-19 is rarely serious in children while remdesivir is ineffective and carries a risk of serious, and deadly, side effects.

What’s worse, the drug is also approved for outpatient use in children, which is a first. Dr. Meryl Nass expressed her concerns about the FDA’s approval of remdesivir for outpatient use in babies, stating:17

“The FDA just licensed Remdesivir for children as young as one month old. Both hospitalized children and outpatients may receive it. The drug might work in outpatients, but the vast majority of children have a very low risk of dying from COVID. If 7 deaths per 1,000 result from the drug, as … European investigators thought18 … it is possible it will harm or kill more children than it saves.

Shouldn’t the FDA have waited longer to see what early outpatient treatment did for older ages? Or studied a much larger group of children? Very little has been published on children and remdesivir …

When we look at the press release issued by Gilead,19 we learn the approval was based on an open label, single arm trial in 53 children, 3 of whom died (6% of these children died); 72% had an adverse event, and 21% had a serious adverse event.”

More Lawsuits Filed Against Remdesivir

Two women are suing Kaiser Permanente and Redlands Community Hospital in California for giving remdesivir to their husbands without consent. Both men died from kidney and organ failure after being administered remdesivir. “The day he was admitted on August 12 they started the remdesivir and on [August 17] is when they were done,” Christina Briones told CBS News. “Five doses. [On] the 17th his kidneys started to fail.”20

In California, lawsuits have been filed on behalf of at least 14 families against medical providers for prescribing remdesivir without providing necessary information about it, leading to the patients’ deaths.21 Another wrongful death suit was filed in Nevada, after a patient died of kidney failure and respiratory failure a week after being given remdesivir.22

Safety Signal Revealed for Remdesivir and Kidney Failure

Meanwhile, a study published in Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics in April 2021 detected a potential safety signal for remdesivir and acute renal failure:23

“The combination of the terms ‘acute renal failure’ and ‘remdesivir’ yielded a statistically significant disproportionality signal with 138 observed cases instead of the nine expected. ROR [reporting odds ratio] of ARF with remdesivir was 20-fold that of comparative drugs.

Based on ARF cases reported in VigiBase, and despite the caveats inherent to COVID-19 circumstances, we detected a statistically significant pharmacovigilance signal of nephrotoxicity associated with remdesivir, deserving a thorough qualitative assessment of all available data.”

In May 2021, another pharmacovigilance analysis revealed red flags against remdesivir. “Compared with the use of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, sarilumab, or tocilizumab, the use of remdesivir was associated with an increased reporting of kidney disorders,” the study found.24 It concluded:25

“Our findings, based on postmarketing real-life data from >5000 COVID-19 patients, support that kidney disorders, almost exclusively AKI [acute kidney injury], represent a serious, early, and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction of remdesivir. These results are consistent with findings from another group. Physicians should be aware of this potential risk and perform close kidney monitoring when prescribing remdesivir.”

In March 2022, yet another pharmacovigilance analysis warned of a significant association between remdesivir and acute kidney injury, especially in male patients and those over the age of 65 years. “Although causality was not confirmed,” they noted, “the association between remdesivir and AKI should not be ignored, especially in the older, male COVID-19 inpatients.”26

US Government Pays Hospitals to Use Remdesivir

Remdesivir was developed as an antiviral drug and tested during the Ebola breakout in 2014. The drug was found to have a very high death rate and was not pursued further. In the early months of 2020, however, the drug was entered into COVID trials.27 Those trials were also beyond disappointing.28,29,30

Not only was the drug ineffective against the infection but it also had significant and life-threatening side effects, including kidney failure and liver damage.31 Dr. Paul Marik, a pulmonary and critical care specialist and founding member of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), explained that during the pandemic the only drug he was allowed to prescribe was remdesivir.

When he refused to follow the remdesivir protocol, he was subjected to a “sham review,” an unofficial but well-known process in which a “troublesome” doctor is accused of wrongdoing and basically railroaded out of practice. In the end, he was fired and reported to the National Practitioner Databank and the Board of Medicine.

The financial motivations to report doctors going against the grain run deep. According to Marik, the U.S. government pays hospitals a 20% upcharge on the entire hospital bill when remdesivir is used.32 Citizens Journal also reported that the U.S. government pays hospitals a “bonus” on the entire hospital bill if they use remdesivir.33 It described this practice as a bounty placed on your life, with payouts tied to declining health instead of recovery:34

“For remdesivir, studies show that 71% to 75% of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to 10 days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death.

Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects.

… We now see government-dictated medical care at its worst in our history since the federal government mandated these ineffective and dangerous treatments for COVID-19, and then created financial incentives for hospitals and doctors to use only those ‘approved’ (and paid for) approaches. Our formerly trusted medical community of hospitals and hospital-employed medical staff have effectively become ‘bounty hunters’ for your life.”

Officials Push Expensive, Risky Treatments

In addition to remdesivir, Pfizer’s Paxlovid was granted emergency use authorization to treat mild to moderate COVID-19 in December 2021.35 The drug consists of nirmatrelvir tablets — the antiviral component — and ritonavir tablets, which are intended to slow the breakdown of nirmatrelvir.36

But like remdesivir, there are many problems with Paxlovid. In this case, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning to health care providers and public health departments about the potential for COVID-19 rebound after Paxlovid treatment.37 Further, Pfizer stopped a large trial of Paxlovid in standard-risk patients because it didn’t show significant protection against hospitalization or death in this group.38

Paxlovid costs $529 per five-day treatment39 and has cost U.S. taxpayers $5.29 billion,40 while safe and less expensive options exist. An investigation by Cornell University, posted on the University’s preprint server January 20, 2022, found ivermectin outperformed 10 other drugs against COVID-19.41

Since the FDA and CDC cannot be trusted, and even physicians’ hands are often tied by regulatory red tape, it’s imperative to take responsibility for your own health. In the case of COVID-19, seek early treatment using an effective and safe protocol — not one that puts profits over patients.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
24 Comments
The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
March 10, 2023 7:10 am

Didn’t Trump also advocate the use of Remdesivir? Why, I believe he did!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Central Scrutinizer
March 10, 2023 9:15 am

I do have to say, your memory is very good because, yes, he did say that. But let me put a little contex to your comment. The president, any president, was/is not a medical practitioner. They must rely on the people who are and that they would not lie about the life and death of precious Americans yet that’s exactly what they did. How do I know? Because Dr. Bitch and Anthony Fuckme came out and brazenly said they lied to the president. How the fuck did you expect the president, whose job is way bigger than just managing a virus, to know he was being lied to? The drug had been on the market for 6 years prior to Trump saying this. Did you really expect him to review the approval process? He was obviously lied to by the experts he relied on and who also said they lied to him. I’m just curious what you would have done if you were in the exact same position under the same circumstance.

J Far
J Far
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 9:40 am

He should have known something about Fauci’s history. The guy doesn’t read, so he doesn’t know anything.

my2cents
my2cents
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 10:00 am

You are spot on Anonymous. They keep blaming one individual, Trump, while 535 plus elected officials do nothing or support what has taken place to this day.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  my2cents
March 10, 2023 11:23 am

You go ahead and vote for the guy who you KNOW was involved right up to his eyebalz if ya want to.

See what that gets ya.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 11:09 am

Birx and fauci admitted they LIED to Trump regarding Remdesivir?

Can you provide proof of this please?

On video?

I’m not challenging you, I really want to know.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  Glock-N-Load
March 10, 2023 12:19 pm

Also, if Trump isn’t a “medical practitioner”, who TOLD him to Recommend Remdesivir in the first place?

No part of that argument stands up.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 1:30 pm

You forgot co-president Jared Kushner …

AKJOHN
AKJOHN
  The Central Scrutinizer
March 10, 2023 4:02 pm

No he did not. There is another drug with a similar name, Regeneron, that he mentioned. Remdesevir was always the drug Fauchi and Gates promoted. He is guilty of many things but not that one. He also recommended Ivermetcin and Hydroxychloriquine which everyone now knows are very good.

EuddolennelodduE
EuddolennelodduE
  The Central Scrutinizer
March 10, 2023 4:20 pm

Hi Central Heating and Air…

The “Simmer down now..” game begins:

Remdesivir.

Rem de sivir

Rem the sivir

Rem the survir

Remo the survivor

Remove the survivor.

Remdesivir=remove the survivor.

“Sim ma down nah, nah git to steppin”

Bauls
Bauls
  The Central Scrutinizer
March 10, 2023 6:14 pm

Just quick scanned, we all knew it, ain’t nobody ever going to jail just like all the other bullshit. Possibly us but no one involved with mass murder

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 10, 2023 7:15 am

I’m wondering if the good doctor is looking only at death certificates that list renal failure as the primary c.o.d., or if he weeded through the alleged “Covid deaths”. We know that doctors were directed by CDC to put Covid as the primary cause of death even when it wasn’t.

P.s. who was head of CDC when that directive was handed down?

Dan
Dan
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 9:56 am

John Beaudoin blogs as Coquin de Chien on Substack. My understanding is that he is suing because he had to leave law school for refusing the shot. He’s been poring over Massachusetts’s vital statistics to get ammo for his case and has come up with some pretty impressive data. He’s not a doctor but pretty obviously intelligent and a good researcher. From what I can tell, I doubt there’s anything he hasn’t looked at.

my2cents
my2cents
March 10, 2023 7:16 am

So-ooo, what are the attorneys, judges & legal system going to do about it, after all it is their venue. So far all I see is a bunch of talk & same-o, same-o legal bull crap. Where are the indictments? Where are the trials? Where are the incarcerations and or executions? When does this so called justice system start doing the job they are being paid to do when it comes to this high level criminal behavior? Just asking for a dying & once great country. When do the victims of this criminal activity get what they paid so dearly for, they gave their LIFE!

DFJ150
DFJ150
March 10, 2023 7:45 am

The virus didn’t get you, the jab hasn’t killed you (yet), so here’s our our “cure” that will finish the job. ANYONE involved in delivering this useless poison (remdesivir) to a patient should lose their license and be prosecuted for attempted murder, or actual murder in many cases.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  DFJ150
March 10, 2023 8:00 am

Soon, the salad and pork chop will get us, if Gates & Co succeed at their latest crimes.

Bauls
Bauls
  Anonymous
March 10, 2023 6:19 pm

Don’t worry they will have more crimes that will never get anyone in trouble, except for the people they kill

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  DFJ150
March 10, 2023 1:34 pm

Another ‘inconvenient truth’ about this whole FauciFlu — how the Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trials (following orders is no defense) have been totally forgotten — in fact, discarded …

Bauls
Bauls
  Anthony Aaron
March 10, 2023 6:20 pm

Sadly Nuremberg 2 will never happen

Euddolen ap Afallach
Euddolen ap Afallach
  Bauls
March 13, 2023 12:24 pm

Sadly Nuremberg 2 will never happen

Not having another show trial is sad because?

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
March 10, 2023 9:57 am

I believe my father inlaw was killed by the hospital protocols which included remdesivir.

The Central Scrutinizer
The Central Scrutinizer
  Glock-N-Load
March 10, 2023 12:20 pm

I’m sorry for your loss.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
March 10, 2023 1:26 pm

Let’s recap …

aids – AZT -> deaths
Ebola – Remdesivir -> deaths
C-19 – Remdesivir -> deaths
C-19 – mRNA jabs -> deaths
C-19 – ventilators -> deaths

common denominator — Anthony Fauci … and BigPharma …

Bauls
Bauls
  Anthony Aaron
March 10, 2023 6:22 pm

Still placing high bets ain’t no one ever gonna see a court much less bars, even though they should get gallows