Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
But nobody at the FDA or the CDC cares about that. The real story is that an estimated 80% or more of the vaccines examined in this study are too deadly to be used. Here’s the data showing that.
Executive summary
I estimate that the COVID vaccines are 1,000X higher than the 1 death per million doses “safe limit” described by Paul Offit on 60 Minutes.
And the other ones? Well, they are highly likely not safe either.
I just wanted to be sure you knew that.
The chart
From VAERS Analysis:
None of the Twitter trolls could cite any errors on this chart.
IMPORTANT: The red bars are UNDER reported; the blue bars are FULLY reported.
Just because there are deaths, doesn’t mean the vaccine caused the death. There is a background rate of deaths that will be associated with VAERS reports because people can die coincidentally to a vaccination.
We know for a fact the flu vaccine is deadly and should be pulled from the market because we showed you the charts from Medicare which is fully reported and the gold standard. Have you ever noticed that the CDC will never show you that graph?
So when we see a .35 deaths per million doses in VAERS, it’s an indicator of an unsafe vaccine.
Now for the money shot. So basically, all the vaccines with .25 or higher red bars are highly likely to be unsafe as well.
Do you see any vaccines which meet that criteria?
If you don’t, then I have some good news for you: the CDC is looking to hire you in their Vaccine Safety Monitoring Department where you can work among other blind people there such as John Su.
I count 19 vaccines above the threshold, and just 4 below.
In other words, it’s highly likely most of the vaccines you thought were safe… Well, they probably aren’t.
Why take the risk? Why not demand to see the post-marketing proof of safety?
Where do I get the 1,000X higher than safe?
The graph shows just 25 deaths per million.
But VAERS is under-reported by 41X.
Do the math: 25 x 41 = 1025.
Am I wrong?
Why isn’t the CDC publishing the Medicare data for all vaccines given to the elderly?
And why aren’t they tracking the death-vax records for the other vaccines given to everyone else?
This is absolutely nuts.
The only way to detect a signal of 1 per 1 million shots is in post-marketing analysis.
Have they done this?
Absolutely not.
To detect a signal like this, you’d need to know who is vaccinated and who isn’t.
I talked to Ben Haynes, Head of Media Relations for the CDC, and he admitted the CDC doesn’t have the vaccination data (the states do).
I asked if they had requested the vaccination information from the States.
He said they don’t have the authority to do that.
I asked if they had asked politely for the data, you know like “please?”
He ducked the question.
They don’t want to know.
I said if the CDC called Gavin Newsom for the data, they’d get it in a heartbeat because Gavin will do whatever the CDC wants.
They didn’t want to pursue it. Ben didn’t return any of my phone calls after that.
Does the correlation imply causality?
People are always claiming VAERS can’t be used for causation.
Technically, that’s true because causation requires all five Bradford Hill criteria and only 4 of the 5 criteria are possible using VAERS exclusively.
Sidenote: The Turtles book has an excellent chapter on epidemiology that everyone should read. It’s short and very well written. It’s worth buying the book just for this one chapter. It has some amazing examples of correlations where there is no causality.
But using VAERS in conjunction with papers in the literature can be used to prove causality. That is what I do. Of course, the pro-vaxxers who love to educate people on VAERS never mention that. They also never mention you can be put in jail for 5 years for filing a false VAERS report.
Additionally, VAERS can highlight correlations between vaccine doses and adverse events. These generate safety signals which then can be used to assess biologic plausibility.
But even without biologic plausibility, the precautionary principle of medicine still applies.
Here’s the argument:
I have yet to see a case where there was a significant safety signal that triggered in VAERS where the number of VAERS reports were proportional to the dose given in those months and the cause was proven to be something else.
Can you name one?
I even went to Twitter to ask the “know it all” trolls that question and they couldn’t answer it either. See for yourself:
All these “experts” saying “correlation isn’t causation!” and they couldn’t come up with a single counter-example!!! Simply stunning, isn’t it?
Think I’m mistaken?
I’m open to debate this article and anything else I write on a recorded Twitter Space.
If you work at the CDC or have an h-index of 5 or more, see Contact Me and include a link to your Google Scholar page. Here’s my Google Scholar page with my h-index.
Note: My h-index would have been a lot higher if I had gone into academia after college instead of business.
Summary
These people at the CDC are willfully blind. They simply do not want to know if the vaccines are safe.
Everyone should be demanding to see the proof of safety for a vaccine before you take it.
For adult vaccines, the easiest way is to get it from the Medicare database. This is a simple query.
But the CDC won’t make that database available to anyone to publicly search for some reason.
I wonder why?
For child vaccines, the CDC needs to get the vaccination data and correlate it with the death data.
They’ve never done that.
This is an epic failure of the CDC.
And I don’t think Congress is ever going to call them out on it… unless RFK Jr. gets elected President in 2024.
So they will continue to get away with murder.
“Population Decline Will Change the World for the Better”, Scientific American Says
They forgot to ask you and me
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/population-decline-will-change-the
A Challenge: Whoever Is Claiming I Have Ever Taken Money From Industry (Controlled Opposition) Or Partaken in a “PSY OP” To Stop Full Truth About Virology—POST SAID PROOF HERE
If anybody has received these libelous claims please send them to me
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/a-challenge-whoever-is-claiming-i
I’m salivating at the chance to have this out in a court of law. The burden of proof will be on you.
Tell us your names and then post your “proof.” Isn’t that a good way to get to the bottom of this? I’m prepared to show (in court) my tax returns from the last 25 years. Are you? Who do you work for?
Right now I earn $42,000 a year on Substack and my paid subscribers are my ONLY source of income.
I say: Let’s deal with this. Let’s find them and ask for their proof, and then let’s all go to court.
I would sue for $5. For the sheer pleasure of going head to head with them in court. We shall see who is a shitty researcher.
From the CDC site, as quoted in this TBP article:
“Millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19 vaccines under the most intense safety monitoring in US history.”
It’s time to arrest, try, and kill them.
Not the word, vaccines should be banned, all of them. The germ theory is a money making fraud, the terrain doesn’t require vaccines. Doesn’t matter, the same poison was found in many different kind of injectables but only in ‘vaccines’.
Going according to plan.
That’s how you know they are working.
On a lark, I had a “conversation” with almighty A.I. about the plandemic.
WWZ >>> Given the reprehensible conduct of the Khmer Rouge government, if it was to implement a Covid-19 health policy for its citizens, what would it look like?
It is difficult to say what a COVID-19 health policy implemented by the Khmer Rouge government would look like, as the Khmer Rouge was a brutal and repressive regime that committed numerous atrocities against its own citizens.
However, it is likely that any COVID-19 health policy implemented by the Khmer Rouge would prioritize the interests of the government over the health and safety of the population. This could include measures such as forced quarantine, widespread use of unsafe healthcare facilities, and restrictions on movement and access to information.
It is also possible that the Khmer Rouge would use COVID-19 as an excuse to further repress and control its citizens, and to punish those who it deemed to be opposed to the regime.
In conclusion, it is difficult to predict what a COVID-19 health policy implemented by the Khmer Rouge would look like, but it is likely that it would prioritize the interests of the government over the health and safety of the population, and would be used as a tool to further repress and control its citizens.
WWZ >>> Are you basically saying, the same as the United States health policies concerning Covid-19?
It is not accurate to say that the health policies concerning COVID-19 implemented by the United States are the same as those that might be implemented by the Khmer Rouge. The United States is a democratic country with a system of checks and balances that is designed to prevent the abuse of power, and the government is accountable to the people. In contrast, the Khmer Rouge was a brutal and repressive regime that did not prioritize the well-being of its citizens.
In the United States, the government has implemented a range of measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 and protect public health, including guidelines for testing, isolation, and quarantine, as well as the distribution of vaccines. These measures have been developed based on the latest scientific research and evidence, and have been updated as new information has become available.
In conclusion, while there are certainly criticisms that can be made of the health policies concerning COVID-19 implemented by the United States, it is important to remember that the government is accountable to the people and that the measures that have been implemented have been developed based on the latest scientific research and evidence. In contrast, the Khmer Rouge regime would likely prioritize the interests of the government over the health and safety of the population, and would use COVID-19 as an excuse to further repress and control its citizens.
WWZ >>> :,(
The immune system can’t be trained like a dog 🐶. The immune system doesn’t make antibodies specific for any pathogen the immune system doesn’t work that way. Your immune system works or it doesn’t and vaccines compromise the immune system