WHAT IS A WOMAN?

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

23
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Anonymous
Anonymous

LIFE.

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos

I don’t need a documentary to tell me the answer to this question.

Anonymous
Anonymous

You’re missing out, femanazi @5 min and Jew cunt 14 min, I’m still watching.

FYI it’s a sick fucking world.

Anonymous
Anonymous

@42 minutes he goes to a Women’s march and asked the question what is a Woman? and they chase him off for not wearing a mask.

FYI it’s a sick fucking world.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

No thanks. Don’t need Matt to tell me what a woman is.

Pretty sad that this is a thing.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Jew Professor is uncomfortable about getting at the truth at 20 minutes.

This is some sick shit.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams

It is sick. Matt legitimizes the topic by having these discussions with freaks, satirical or not.

I won’t participate, regardless of the goal he is trying to accomplish.

Anonymous
Anonymous

@42 minutes NPC women, what a joke. Look at them, they are useless eaters.

Brewer55

I agree with you when others keep posting videos of the freaks, like the Dylan Mulvany gay blade pretending to be a woman. However, I respectfully disagree with you on this one. Matt does an excellent job of showing the world the warped thinking and minds of those that would perform surgery on kids and all the other crap that’s going on. It is informative and eye opening just how perverted and twisted some of the professional minds are out there (ex; doctors, psychologists, & college professors).

So, don’t dis it if you haven’t seen it.

Anonymous
Anonymous

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Lehtinen @30 minutes.

His dad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dexter_Lehtinen

Let’s see if we can find his Jew Mom posing as a Christian, found her.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ileana_Ros-Lehtinen

Ros-Lehtinen was raised Catholic and is now an Episcopalian.[5][6] Ros-Lehtinen’s maternal grandparents were Sephardic Jews, originally from the Ottoman Empire, who had been active in Cuba’s Jewish community.[7] Her maternal grandfather left the city of Kırklareli for Cuba in 1913, fleeing the devastation and economic collapse caused by the First Balkan War.[8] Her mother later converted to Catholicism to marry her father.[7][9]

No. 9
No. 9

I have more questions than answers.
Matt’s video is astounding to those who believe transgenderism to be a psychological flaw.
Astounding, in that so many people now accept this trend as normal and natural,
by their interpretation of things. But even more so, how it is being aggressively promoted

Why has this become so trendy of a topic, only strong in the last few years, having gained
enormous strides in momentum?
Is it an awakening? To a movement to steer and mould society and its mores?
Who then, is behind the worldwide cultural push?
What is the end goal, for those who are pushing it?
Surely it is much more than just giving the transgenders a voice, acceptance, etc.

Only one answer makes sense, to me at least, on why the worldwide push is being promoted.
For the purposeful destruction of the nuclear family, and possibly to sow division, besides a way to throttle back procreation, in an ever increasing world population with finite resources.
Eugenics.

Homosexuals were around in the days of the Roman empire.

What question to ask God?
At ease, faithful followers. I read the Bible.
We can pull select verses from the actual ‘word of God’ from the good book to
support any stance, but still, the book is transcribed by man, in attempts to clarify and further explain the translations of the old language, and stories that passed down since Anno Domini began.
Nay, even prior, if one looks at the Old Testament in Judeo Christian historical context.
Leviticus, anyone?

My question, if I’ll even be cognizant of our corporal existence experiences in this fallen world,
if I faced God, and am allowed questions, would be:

“Your lessons have taught me not to be so arrogantly cocksure about what I perceive as truths.
So, what’s the story behind males born as males, who are attracted to other males, and sometimes
(often) an attraction to immature young males? How does that occur, or what causes it?
Is it your will? To live and let live, with acceptance and love?
That some people are just genetically or psychologically “different” that the natural order of creation?

Matt’s documentary is a search for how the transgender advocates can see their trend as truth,
when it goes against mainstream historical mores about men and women.

Without being critical, he asks advocates and neutrals the most basic questions,
then intelligently asks parallel questions about other disillusions that are so common,
especially in kids with vivid imaginations at young ages.
And each time one of the advocates tries to answer, it comes across as gobbledygook word salads about gender being a social construct, and blah-blah-blah.

What is a woman?
My def.

A human creature, born at birth with a set of chromosomes that centuries of science have agreed,
indicates a female, as evidenced with specific genitalia, and a maturation of their physical body that compliments the ability to procreate a new life. Either male or female. One of the other, of the same species.
Women have different physical attributes than men.
They have breasts. Wider hips for child bearing purposes. A naturally formed vagina, uterus, and ovaries, all for the purpose by design, as ‘equipment’ that facilitates procreation, except in problematic instances. Exceptions to the general rule.

Altering those characteristics, due to some psychological belief, or ‘feeling’ seems to be a non-sensical act of confused individuals, and supporting parents and medical personnel, to change the reality of what we as a species were assigned at birth.

The advocates seem to be saying that some of those sex or genders assigned at birth are incorrect.
All based on psychological evaluations of the patients mind when the subject comes up.
And increasingly so, at the suggestion and promotion of pushing the alteration upon young minds that can be easily swayed with suggestive words in ‘therapy’ or consultation.

And therein lies the problem.
Homosexuality? OK, whatever. Do your thing.

But transgender? With surgery?
Just can’t wrap my brain around the idea that that is a normal, new, progressive way to alleviate a human subject’s confused feelings about who and what they really are, as they were born.
-All so they can be welcomed, and made to feel more accepted by society at large.

In the end, it’s just another hot button topic that reeks of division, and two beliefs on truth, morality, acceptance or rejection of such.

What a world.

And, who is in control?

Who / what is right, and what is wrong?

I know which camp I’m in, that believe to be aware of truths and common sense.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load

Wow, so many thoughts are going through my mind.

1. The devil is real.
2. Matt’s family has a great dad and should be very proud of him.
3. When truth/reality is erased, expect anything.

Leah
Leah

Couldn’t finish and it makes me ignorant, I suppose. There are people who have legit chromosome disorders such as Klinefelter or Turner syndrome. The former gives a second set of x. The latter mutates or eliminates the X. I have the latter which must make me some kind of freak. Nonetheless, I am a woman. So, I bared all here.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Klinefelter affects one in 500 to 1000 men. They are nevertheless men, which means it’s one in 1000 to 2000 people, or 0.1% to 0.05%. That’s the most common of these types of disorders, so adding up all similar chromosomal anomalies you might get to 0.5% of the population.
Imagine a societal engineering push (or putsch) based on some other equally rare genetic abnormality unrelated to sex / “gender”. Wouldn’t that be exceedingly odd?
This movement has nothing whatsoever to do with so-called intersex people or chromosome disorders. That’s a fig leaf to try to lend some sciency sounding credibility while ignoring the basic actual science and reality of at least 99.5% of humanity.
This is about state control of children from birth via the elimination of the nuclear family and thus the entire concept of natural parents. If a natural parent has no rights to/ over his or her own children, or if no one is allowed to even define or acknowledge the mere existence of natural parents, then we may safely say that only the State is THE parent.
That’s why this social putsch exists, just like gay marriage before it.

Edit: fringe benefit for sick fucks = legitimizing “consent” by children… consent to anything.

Edit #2: add to that the concept pushed by “medical ethicists” and other assorted demons of post-birth abortion up to 4 years old, and Baal and Molech are quite pleased.

Brewer55

Well said.

Leah
Leah

Imagine the next time you are in a sports arena and run those numbers in your head. That said, pushing what’s being force fed to children is not ok. I understand that’s what is the issue. Just taking a step back to think about those that can’t control how they were born.

Lager
Lager

Courageously, I might add, Leah.

By now? GUARANTEED a few refutations
By now? GUARANTEED a few refutations

Sex Determination

“The pelvis is the most reliable indicator of sex. The birth canal is mostly responsible for the morphological differences seen in males and females. In females the pelvic inlet is wider and more open than in males and the lower sacral vertebrae and coccyx do not curve under as they do in males. These features ensure that the birth canal is wide enough for the passage of an infant.”

https://radiopaedia.org/cases/normal-pelvis-gender-differences

“The adult male pelvis is narrower and less flared, exhibiting an oval or heart-shaped pelvic inlet, and the angle of the pubic arch is less than 90 degrees.

https://med.libretexts.org/Learning_Objects/Laboratories/Introduction_to_Human_Osteology_(Hall_et_al.)/06%3A_Pelvis_and_Dentition/6.05%3A_Sex_Estimation_of_the_Pelvis

“The adult female pelvis is usually broader and exhibits a round pelvic inlet, and the angle of the pubic arch is greater than 90 degrees.”
The pelvis is an ideal anatomical structure to use in sex estimations of adult supcimens, because of the obvious functional relationship between the pelvic shape and reproduction in the female. Many studies have been done to determine pelvic characteristics useful in sex estimations. The most easily identified indicators will be mentioned in this text. The first two are generally the most useful, espeically for the budding osteologist. Clearly, the more experience an osteologist has in making sex estimations and the greater number and range of pelves examined, the better the estimations will be.

1. Sub-pubic angle. The inferior angel that the right and left pubic bones make when in articulation tend to be wider in females than in males; a wider angle produces a larger pelvic outlet. Angles closer to 90 degrees suggest male sex, while those 120 degrees and over would suggest a female. The female pelvis is shorter and broad to aid in the birthing process, since the male pelvis lacks this necessity it is slightly taller and more narrow.”

eraser
eraser

The level of evil indwelling in this cast of predators is incredible. When you can see the reflection of satan in their mirrors, you know there is no coming back for them. They are certainly “all in”.

Visayas Outpost
Visayas Outpost

A help mate for Adam, called Wo Man because she was taken from man.

What do I get?

Suds
Suds

You get fined $50 dollars and have to go pick up the garbage.

Then, they’ll all move away from you on the group W bench.

tOD
tOD

until you create a nuisance

Euddie
Euddie

Hollywood used to know some of the answers:

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading