Conservative Texas Republicans Align with Zionism

Here is a rebuttal of the lies. Most of what is posted above are outright fabrications, the rest pulled out of context. Hard to believe someone could be so evil.

Let’s start here: 

Note: The word “goyim” is a derogatory and insulting word for Gentiles. Anyone who is not a jew is a Gentile. 

This is a falsehood. Goy, in Hebrew, simply means “nation” and has no negative connotation at all. Indeed, the term is often used to refer to goy Yisroel, “the nation of Israel.” Goyim is the plural form, and is a Hebrew idiom meaning “gentiles”; but it is no more derogatory than that word is in English. 

For the record; virtually all of these “quotations” are based on the work of one I. B. Pranaitis, a late 19th-century Russian antisemite whose work as translated into English in 1939 and continues to be circulated among Jew-haters, neo-Nazis, and other bigots. There is no scholarship here, just lots of deliberate distortions and intentional misquotations and mistranslations and plain old made-up lies. 

This material was thoroughly discredited more than a hundred years ago. Only antisemites refer to it today. 

Even the initial reference to the Talmud as “the Jewish “holy” book” is a dead giveaway that this material is borrowed and that the borrower knows nothing about the Talmud, which runs to more than fifty folio-sized volumes in English. 

1. Sanhedrin 59a: “Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal.”

[moved] 

3. Sanhedrin 59a: “A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death.”

These are out-of-context quotes that are not accidental misperceptions, but deliberate misrepresentations of the truth. They are from a conversation between two rabbis, one of whom does indeed put forth these fanatical arguments – which are effectively and definitively refuted and destroyed by the other. These ideas were included in the Talmud only to be rebutted and disavowed. 

2. Abodah Zara 26b: “Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed.”

Not from the Talmud, but from a commentary upon it – where it is made clear that this command applied only during one of the ancient wars of Israel against its enemies. 

4. Libbre David 37: “To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.”

5. Libbre David 37: “If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.”

These two quotations are complete fabrications. No such book as “Libbre David” exists in the Talmud or anywhere in Jewish literature, and the supposed “quotes” do not exist anywhere, either. Quotations from or allusions to “Libbre David” can only be found in antisemitic books, on antisemitic websites, or on websites exposing them. 

Proof positive, in short, that this material can only have come from a hate site. 

6. Yebhamoth 11b: “Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age.”

One of the most common and most popular false “quotations” among Jew-haters – and quite possibly the most vicious. 

The gist of the matter is that a woman who was the victim of rape as a child was to be shielded from the usual consequences of premarital intercourse, and was to be considered a virgin for purposes of marriage and bride-price. In other words, a victim of sexual abuse was not to be further injured by social ostracism or other penalty. 

The quotation marks are especially contemptible and dishonest. It’s hard to imagine a distortion more evil and vicious than this one. 

7. Schabouth Hag. 6d: “Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording.”

Another distortion. This section speaks of relief from vows which one is unable to fulfill. It does not advocate or allow swearing falsely. We shall see something similar with the Kol Nidre prayer below. 

8. Hilkkoth Akum X1: “Do not save Goyim in danger of death.” 

9. Hilkkoth Akum X1: “Show no mercy to the Goyim.”

These, yet again, are not from the Talmud, but from the twelfth-century rabbi, Maimonides. The reference is to speculation about a hypothetical future time when Jews have power over non-Jews (unimaginable in his day) – that is, the Messianic Age, and did not refer to “Goyim” at all, but to idol worshippers – specifically, those who practiced human sacrifice. 

10. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: “If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the Goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wipe him off the face of the earth.”

11. Choschen Hamm 266,1: “A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Akum (Gentile). For he who returns lost property (to Gentiles) sins against the Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of the Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honor the name of God, namely, if by so doing, Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honorable people.”

[moved]

19. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 388: “It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces.”

[moved]

20. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: “All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples.”

[moved]

23. Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 156: “When a Jew has a Gentile in his clutches, another Jew may go to the same Gentile, lend him money and in turn deceive him, so that the Gentile shall be ruined. For the property of a Gentile, according to our law, belongs to no one, and the first Jew that passes has full right to seize it.”

The book referred to in these “quotes,” Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat, is not a part of the Talmud but a sixteenth-century commentary. The quotations are, again, either wholly fabricated or gross distortions. The actual text says, “it is forbidden to steal even a small item from a Jew or non-Jew, from children or from adults.” 

Even the numbering is fabricated. Again, references like “388, 156 and “266, 1” are meaningless in the Talmud. 

12. Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Dia 17: “A Jew should and must make a false oath when the Goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.”

Another total fabrication. The two words of the supposed title mean “Responses” and are part of the titles of 1500 or so books, but there is no such book in the Talmud and the quotation does not exist anywhere in Jewish literature. 

There is elsewhere a teaching which says that a Jew may certainly swear that there is nothing against Gentiles in the Talmud, because it is a true oath. 

13. Baba Necia 114, 6: “The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts.”

Another fabrication; no such quote. Even the numbering is made up. “114, 6” makes no sense in a Talmud reference. 

14. Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D: “When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.”

Again, no such book in the Talmud. The supposed title is the name of a 10th-century Bible commentator, and the quote and the “56-D” are fabricated. 

15. Nidrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L: “Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.”

The work alluded to is not in the Talmud, but was written by an obscure 18th-century Turkish Jew who was not even a rabbi. It has no authority whatever and is little known. 

16. Aboda Sarah 37a: “A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated.”

Another deliberate falsification of a discussion similar to that described above. 

17. Gad. Shas. 2:2: “A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.”

No such source: no such quotation. 

18. Tosefta. Aboda Zara B, 5: “If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy, he is NOT responsible.”

21. Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5: “How to interpret the word ‘robbery.’ A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy.”

Tosefta, once again, is not a part of the Talmud, and once again the quotations do not exist. 

22. Seph. Jp., 92, 1: “God has given the Jews power over the possessions and blood of all nations.”

No such source; no such quotation. 

24. Nedarim 23b: “He who desires that none of his vows made during the year be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, ‘Every vow which I may make in the future shall be null’. His vows are then invalid.”

This is apparently derived from the Kol Nidre prayer, sung on the eve of Yom Kippur. The prayer asks to be released from all vows which one has made to God in the previous year, and has nothing to do with vows or contracts with other humans. It’s a common canard among antisemites. 

Even in the bible, hatred for Gentiles is displayed. In the New Testament, Gentiles are referred to as “Dogs” who do not deserve to receive the teachings of “god”.

The tendency of the Gospel writers to put blatantly bigoted and hateful words in the mouths of Jews, not to mention those which encourage antisemitism, is well known. 

This entire post was a lie and an antisemitic smear, and a very old and long-discredited one. I do not, however, think that Egyptian Cat is necessarily an antisemite; his agenda seems to be to smear all religions and insult all believers, regardless of belief.