Automatic Earth with another reality check on the shale gas BOOM!!!
Let’s see – tremendous levels of debt, hype times infinity, Wall Street shysters, douchebags like Aubrey McClendon, delusional drillers, record low prices, high drilling costs, and low EROEI. Sounds like a perfect combination.
Shale Gas Reality Begins to Dawn
It has long been our position at The Automatic Earth that North America is collectively dreaming with regard to unconventional natural gas. While gas is undeniably there, the Energy Returned On Energy Invested (EROEI) is dramatically lower than for conventional supplies. The critical nature of EROEI has been widely ignored, but will ultimately determine what is and is not an energy source, and shale gas is going to fail the test.
As we pointed out in Get Ready for the North American Gas Shock in July 2011, the natural gas situation is not what it seems at all:
The shale gas bubble is a perfect example of the irrationality of markets, the power of perverse short-term incentives, the driving force of momentum-chasing, the dominance of perception over reality in determining prices, and the determination for a herd to stampede over a cliff all at once.
The perception of a gas glut has driven prices so low that none of the participants are making money (at least not by producing gas) or creating value. We see a familiar story of excessive debt, and the hollowing out of productive companies dead set on pursuing a mirage.
Many industry insiders know perfectly well that the prospects for recovering substantial amounts of gas are poor, and that the industry is structured as a ponzi scheme. Still, there has been money to be made in the short term by flipping land leases and building infrastructure to handle gas.
The hype is so extreme that those who fall for it contemplate, in all seriousness, North America becoming a natural gas exporting powerhouse, and a threat to Australian LNG producers, or to Russia’s Gazprom.
This concept, constructed from a mixture of greed and desperation (at the lack of conventional gas prospects), is entirely divorced from reality. (See here for Dimitri Orlovs excellent piece on why Gazprom has nothing to worry about.)
Nevertheless, euphoric hype is extremely catching. Given that prices are driven by perception, not by reality, hype has the power to change the dynamics of an industry, exaggerating boom and bust cycles in practice. The hype has resulted in the perception of glut – that North America is drowning in natural gas. The inconvenient fact that this peception is completely wrong does not alter its power in relation to prices.
Natural gas companies gambling on shale gas have been facing prices so low – far below the cost of production – that all of them have been producing gas unprofitably. The financial risk has been increasing dramatically as the companies have been drowning in debt trying to ride out the rock bottom prices that have been the result of people believing the fantasy. Finally, casualties of the financial shenanigans involved are emerging. It is very likely that there will be many more, as companies that have tried to ride out the low prices go under.
Wolf Richter:
Natural Gas: Where Endless Money Went To Die
Alas, thanks to the Feds zero-interest-rate policy and the trillions it has handed over to its cronies since late 2008, the sweeps of creative destruction have broken down. Instead, boundless sums of money have been searching for a place to go, and they’re chasing yield when there is none, and so theyre taking risks, any kind of risks, in their vain battle to come out ahead.
The result is a stunning misallocation of capital to the tune of tens of billions of dollars to an economic activity drilling for dry natural gas that has been highly unprofitable for years. It’s where money has gone to die. What’s left is debt, and wells that will never produce enough to make their investors whole.
But the money has dried up. And drilling for natural gas is collapsing. Last week, there were only 562 rigs drilling for dry natural gas, the lowest number since September 1999…
.But even if it doubled, it would still be below the cost of production. And if it tripled, it might still be below the cost of production for most producers. That’s how mispriced the commodity has become.
More from Wolf Richter:
Dirt Cheap Natural Gas Is Tearing Up The Very Industry That’s Producing It
The economics of fracking are horrid. All wells have decline rates where production drops over time. But instead of decades for traditional wells, decline rates in horizontal fracking are measured in weeks and months: production falls off a cliff from day one and continues for a year or so until it levels out at about 10% of initial production. To be in the black over its life under these circumstances, a well in the Barnett Shale would have to sell its production for about $8 per million Btu, pricing models have shown.
…Drilling is destroying capital at an astonishing rate, and drillers are left with a mountain of debt just when decline rates are starting to wreak their havoc. To keep the decline rates from mucking up income statements, companies had to drill more and more, with new wells making up for the declining production of old wells. Alas, the scheme hit a wall, namely reality…
…The natural gas business is brutal. The peak in drilling occurred in September 2008 with 1,606 rigs. Then the financial crisis threw it into a vertigo-inducing plunge. After last years mini-peak, the plunge continued…
…Production lags behind rig count, and while rig count for gas wells has been setting new decade lows, production has been rising month after month to new record highs. But lagging doesn’t mean decoupled. And someday…. Oops, it already happened. It has started. Production has turned the corner, and not just in one field, but across the US.
Money has been thrown at the industry, but the notion is dawning that the game is up and that returns will never materialize. The ponzi scheme has reached its natural limit, and investors are waking up to the realization that they have been chasing a fantasy.
Ironically, just as the washout begins, natural gas prices may have bottomed. Conventional natural gas in North America peaked in 2001. Coal bed methane and now shale gas have been revealed to be massively overblown as an energy source. Producers are reaping the consequences of malinvestment and will be going out of business. Demand has been building with the transition from coal to natural gas for power generation. This is an ideal set up for a supply collapse and subsequent price spike.
North America is poised for a huge natural gas shock. Far from being an exporter, North America is going to experience a natural gas supply crunch. Prices will be rising at the same time as peoples purchasing power falls precipitously, thanks to deflation. The structural dependency on natural gas that has been cemented in recent years is going to guarantee maximum pain as prices reconnect with reality.
I’ve got short and intermediate term buys on UNG this week. Maybe Nat. Gas has bottomed but I’ll wait and watch a bit longer before committing funds.. Right now it only good for trading.
MA
This article falls squarely in the “So What” column. The money involved is PRIVATE VENTURE CAPITAL. If the whole venture collapses like a house of cards, as the article predicts it will over and over again ad naseum, it won’t cost YOU a fucking penny, meaning no government tax dollars thown at yet another failed “Government Picks the Winners” program, a la Solyndra.
I’m changing my mind. It’s not a “So What” article. It’s a piece of anti-capitalist bullshit.
SSS actually believes the shale gas boom has no government involvement. How naive for a secret agent.
PA alone has thrown billions of taxpayer dollars at the gas industry with tax incentives, breaks, and credits. The promise of endless jobs has led our fine public servants to allow these corporate scumbags to drill with little to no safety regulations. When this boom goes bust, there will be putrid pools of toxic slime left, thousands of jobs lost, and the taxpayer left on the hook. Fucked again by the corporate fascist state.
Time to get your magnifying glass out and get a clue SSS.
Before I lay into Admin with a two-by-four, I googled “steaming pile of shit” to go with my comments directed at Admin. I stumbled on this photo.
[img[/img]
This tattoo on a girl’s back comes with this story. Seems she was the girlfriend of a tattoo artist and was cheating on him with his best friend. He found out about it, but played it cool and got her to agree to a tattoo on her back from the movie Narnia. He then plied her with shots of tequila and wine and proceeded to put this tattoo on her back. Too funny. She’s suing him.
What’s better….
That or tire tracks?
Admin
You ignorant slut. You said, “PA alone has thrown billions of taxpayer dollars at the gas industry with tax incentives, breaks, and credits.” Bullshit. Show me one penny, just one penny, that has come out of the PA treasury and sent to the natural gas industry. EVERYONE who drills for gas and oil get the tax breaks you describe, at both the federal AND state levels. Why do governments do that? Because the revenue they expect to GAIN exceeds the tax breaks they are granting, such as gains on wages/salaries of the new jobs, gains on sales taxes, taxes on royalties paid, etc. If the whole venture collapses, then the state will STILL get some revenue because of the economic activity created before the collapse.
Your penchant for false hyperbole is breathtaking, such as “the promise of endless jobs.” Show me one instance, just one, where the gas drillers promised endless jobs. You can’t, because it never happened. No one in his right mind would ever make a promise of endless jobs, except maybe you.
You also said, “When this boom goes bust, there will be putrid pools of toxic slime left, thousands of jobs lost, and the taxpayer left on the hook. Fucked again by the corporate fascist state.” More bullshit, more blathering hyperbole. Every oil and gas well plays out sooner or later. 100%. No exceptions. And everyone knows that, except maybe you. When the well goes dry, jobs will be lost. Period. Happens all the fucking time.
As for your bullshit “putrid pools of toxic slime left” and “the taxpayer left on the hook” statements, prove it. Show the readers here where the drilling contracts read, “any pools of toxic slime left will be cleaned up on the Pennsylvania taxpayer’s dime.” Can you do that, please, Mr. Charter Member of The Wilderness Society and Super Secret Admirer of The Sierra Club? Thank you.
Colma
I think the flies going around the pile of shit add a nice touch to the tattoo.
Admin
Heads up. I just got a call from a famous Hollywood producer, who asked to remain anonymous. He wants to make a movie entitled “Epic Beatdown, The Sequel.”
Clueless SSS
SSS about to flail about in flashlike frenzy of CIA level accusations and denials in an effort to distract from the ass kicking he is receiving from Admin. SSS should stick to golf and Latin America coups.
Fracking fluid spilled into creek at gas well incident near LeRoy
ERIC HRIN
A incident involving a gas well spewing fluids occurred late Tuesday night in LeRoy Township, Bradford County Commissioner Mark Smith said today.
Gary Wilcox, the county’s director of public safety, said there was no fire or explosion at the Chesapeake well site. He said, “They lost control of the well, there was a malfunction in something. They did lose pressure in the well, which caused material to come back up. They were fracing, so whatever material they were using when they were fracing is what came back up.” He didn’t know what type of materials they were.
The material went into the containment area, and into a field and into a tributary of Towanda Creek and into Towanda Creek, he said. “I’m not sure of the amount of gallons that went into the creek,” he said.
He said there is no adverse effects to the streams or waterways, however, and DEP is monitoring and taking samples. NO one from DEP was immediately available to confirm Wilcox’s comment about the effect on the waterways.
Brian Grove, director of corporate development, for Chesapeake, said early this afternoon the incident occurred because of an equipment failure. He issued the following statement:
“At approximately 11:45 p.m. on April 19, an equipment failure occurred during well-completion activities, allowing the release of completion fluids from a well at a location in Leroy Township, Bradford County, Pa. He called it a blowback.
Crews are on location working to control the leak and contain the fluid flow. All relevant emergency agencies have been notified and are either on location or en route. Well-control specialists Boots and Coots have been mobilized and are prepared to respond if necessary. All non-essential vehicles have been removed from the location. An undetermined amount of water has flowed off the location. Crews are working to minimize any impacts to the nearby Towanda Creek.
As a precautionary measure, seven families who live near the location have been temporarily relocated until all agencies involved are confident the situation has been contained. There have been no injuries or natural gas emissions to the atmosphere.”
If SSS can take a few minutes away from his Lawrence Welk reruns, he can click this link and learn something about the toxic pools of fracking fluid. No reason to worry. These corporations don’t really care more about short-term profits than the lives of people.
http://www.marcellus-shale.us/impoundments.htm
I wonder what he tattooed on his best friends back.
Actual photo of a copper mine in Admin’s backyard. No wonder he’s pissed.
[img]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS3WOT9xmW_gbttD3AUiRQY3tTQSxbHnOTIMa1DMPhd4uOdSp6ywA[/img]
I was wondering when the opening salvos would escalate.
After pausing from some fine literature, Administrator flanks with the groundwater question.
Undoubtedly, SSS will impeach the accusers…
After nap-time, of course….
[img?w=610[/img]
Someone bring the beer and hot wings this is going to be interesting!
KB
More like this.
SSS on the golf course distracted by the epic beatdown applied to his specious ass by Admin.
[img[/img]
Fluid?
Admin spews hysterical, flash-length articles to logjam the thread and changes the subject to water. Four homes with contaminated water ………. not 4 million or 4 thousand or 4 hundred or even 40, just 4 …….. and the fucking EPA steps in and Admin goes into orbit.
You know what that article tells me, Admin. That you are the classic worshipper of a fart in a hurricane. Otherwise, that article doesn’t mean jackshit. Same goes for the next article about some chemical which may have gotten into a creek. Another fart in a hurricane. Oh, the goddamn horror. Did the EPA call for an emergency evacuation of Pittsburgh, Admin? Well, did it?
Now, then, I await your brutal refutation of my initial remarks above about your misleading statements on PA “throwing billions of taxpayer dollars” at the natural gas industry, which you claim will leave pools of taxic waste behind after the wells play out. Try and focus this time.
SSS
I can find 50 articles about “small” meaningless farts in a hurricane within 30 minutes. Are you such a dullard that you actually expect these companies to commit one grand fuckup? No. They will commit thousands of fuckups due to short cutting safety procedures in order to make their profit goal set by suits at headquarters. Good to see you’ve retained that government drone mentality during your taxpayer financed retirement. Thanks for confirming my beliefs about government drones.
Think of all the benefits to the people living near these fracking operations. They don’t have to boil their water for a cup of tea.
Silly Wabbit
Aubrey McClendon, brilliant CEO of Chesapeake Energy, says fracking fluid is safe enough to drink. Have a big glass SSS.
[img[/img]
This guy drank some fraking water. Dangerous stuff
[img[/img]
Can we all play along?
[img[/img]
[img[/img]
The jobs promises have been mostly through the MSM, not official statements by the industry itself.
At least, thats my take on it.
As for the danger of fracking fluids, its true that the amount of damage we are aware of isn’t exactly massive, however I KNOW what those chemicals are, and I KNOW the precautions we have to take when handling them in the research lab.
Its a laundry list of things that can kill you slow, fast or horribly. Not only that, but a large number of them are very stable and can reside in the fat of an animal or the soil/water of an area for a long damned time.
They use those chemicals because they are cheaper than the alternatives, and they usually do so while following relatively stringent guidelines laid down by the EPA. The research we have shows that this is “good enough” however it is fairly unsustainable as there are better uses for those chemicals than fracking with them. With the world’s oil supplies drying up its the responsibility of the world’s chemists to find cheap, green alternatives to current crude oil fractioned chemicals, but since those new chemicals haven’t been discovered/created yet we need to pull our heads out of our asses and stop wasting stuff.
@SSS –
My understanding of the tax breaks thing is as you described, however I see the Admin’s point as they are breaking their promise to the state/country to not only produce energy, but also tax revenue. As it is right now they get tax breaks to lose money. Leave the taxes as-is, and it will drive out the noncompetitors which would hopefully start letting prices rise.
Every time the government steps in to “fix” markets they mess everything up. I expect them to provide regulations and guidelines for everyone to play together, but when they start dictating who wins and who loses the whole thing goes to hell in a handbasket.
You going to let these curs play the violin for some isolated instances, SSS?
^^^^^^^
Colma @ 4:44
Admin: “Cordially Admin sitting on the deck drinking a spiked Arnold Palmer and reading Starship Troopers.”
Is that the story about bug planets?
This thread is giving me gas.
Admin
Pot calls kettle black. If there’s a government drone mentality in this discussion, it belongs to you, not me. You’re the one posting articles relying on government agencies such as the EPA to bolster your argument, not me.
And as for that link you posted relating to the Marcellus Shale activity, you know what I saw, instead of your Chicken Little pictures of pools of toxic waste? I saw private sector economic activity. Lots of it. People sitting on heavy earth moving equipment and building impoundment ponds and drawing a solid paycheck for their labor and paying taxes THAT WEREN’T THERE BEFORE THE DISCOVERY OF NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS IN THE AREA. And I saw farms around those impoundment ponds that are paying fat taxes on their royalty checks THAT WEREN’T THERE BEFORE THE DISCOVERY OF NATURAL GAS DEPOSITS ON THEIR FARMS. That’s what I saw.
So you go right ahead with your specious, hollow, misleading arguments. All mining activity carries a degree of risk to the miners (and investors) and some damage to the environment. Everyone knows that. You seem to be negatively smitten with this particular activity which will greatly benefit one of the poorest areas of PA. Strange.
SSS with the bullshit excuse that all mining activity carries “SOME DEGREE” of risk and “SOME” damage to the environment. What a load of shit. Mines are located in the middle of nowhere far away from people’s homes. This fracking is occuring in the fucking backyards of people while they still live there. Only a complete ignoramus would make the ridiculous argument that you are putting forth. If these companies want to frack and cause “SOME DEGREE” of environmental damage (ie flaming tap water, toxic spills into rivers, toxic ponds of chemicals, earthquakes, contaminated drinking water) then they should BUY the land and allow the residents to leave. That sounds like a capitalistic solution. Doesn’t it big guy? But that would dramatically cut into profits. We can’t let that happen. They’ve perfomed a cost benefit analysis and a certain level of cancer deaths among the poor schlubs is worth it.
Your complete trust in these scumbag corporations is touching. Sorry big guy, you sliced this one into the woods.
Seeming to be surrounded, relentless artillery punding away, SSS shows up behind the lines with a shell of his own…
Thinking that perhaps DaveL would assist his fellow Tweener, we are instead privy to a comment on leisurely reading material…
@SSS –
I fear that the short term monetary gains the populace reaps from said drilling will in no way offset the longterm damage done to the environment.
My former boss and mentor worked in a contract lab in Colorado where he provided third party analysis for impoundment ponds as well as other sources. I’m getting my information from him, as well as from my own personal research and experience.
The dangers are real, the benefits aren’t worth it. If people were free thinking and capable of looking at the long term they would laugh in the face of these “quick bucks”. The companies are just playing off of the FSA mindset that our corporations and country have tried so hard to instill in all of us.
It must be naptime again.
For Admin AND SSS.
[img[/img]
Strip mine (coal) in West Virginia. Worth it or not, TPC? Yes or no. It’s already displaced some people who lived nearby, will produce 5-8 BILLION gallons of toxic coal sludge, sits on top of some abandoned coal shafts and upstream from the town of Whitesville, where many of the miners undoubtedly live. I ask you again. Worth it? Yes or no.
Colma
After the thrashing I gave him, Admin drank himself into a stupor and passed out. Now, if you’ll excuse, I’m about to put a severe whoopin’ on that impertinent interluder, The Pessimistic Chemist.
My current opinion: probably not. That being said MY post was referring to natural gas production and fracking in particular, NOT coal.
I see your attempt to change the topic to coal and counter with “Boomers did it.”
Advance warning: My next move is to claim Zionist Conspiracy!
“I fear that the short term monetary gains the populace reaps from said drilling will in no way offset the longterm damage done to the environment.”
—-The Pessimistic Chemist
What a crock of shit. Let’s turn to another valuable product from the Earth: timber. Did the companies which clear-cut old growth forests to build everything from houses to ships do any damage to the environment? You bet they did. They didn’t replant trees, and some pretty severe soil erosion set in which rendered the area rather useless for decades. Was it done for short term (whatever that means) monetary gain? Fucking A Tweety it was.
Now we know better and do things smarter to the point that there is more forested area in the U.S. today than there was 200 years ago. Maybe the fracking process could be done more safely. I don’t know. But I do know that our increasing demand for natural gas, particularly in the exploding number of natural gas power plants being built, needs to be met. What better way to do it than right here in this country, where the jobs created stay right here. And it’s being done by the private sector, not some phony government bureaucracy in Harrisburg or DC.
Very well. I shall take a nap of my own in hopes that I can move at work tomorrow…
A summertime bug hit me like a Brinks truck Friday night….
Perhaps the fever will produce dreams of a government of realistic and a Scientific Theory of Morals, franchise to any and all who dare put themselves in harms way first, where business and life are left alone so much as it does not interfere with society’s survival, and criminals like sandusky, corrupt officials and unruly miscreants are given proper corporal punishment…. All following the collapse of a well-meaning but foolhardy freebee society demolished by war with the Chinese Hegemony.
Or it’s just bug planets.
I expect to return to a classic TBP brawl wherein TPC survives a tangle with a Big Dog, his senses honed and his argument sharpened.
Colmes:
I’ll send you some medicine through the server. Don’t cost much.
Watching this argument is like watching two 85 y.o. men trying to piss through prostates the size of a grapefruit. Takes forever, and not much comes out. Entertaining all the same.
Needs more insults
[img[/img]
SSS waiting for the next assault by Admin.
What a crock of shit. Let’s turn to another valuable product from the Earth: timber. Did the companies which clear-cut old growth forests to build everything from houses to ships do any damage to the environment? You bet they did. They didn’t replant trees, and some pretty severe soil erosion set in which rendered the area rather useless for decades. Was it done for short term (whatever that means) monetary gain? Fucking A Tweety it was.
===================================
Timber grows back. Soil piles up in other areas. Coal dumps lots of toxic compounds into the ecosystem that were previously sequestered in borderline harmless black rocks under ground.
Different levels of harm to the environment. The fact that you lump things together like this means we can’t really discuss one at length. I discuss gas, you bring up coal. I (briefly) address coal, and you switch to timber. You don’t seem to have a lot of confidence in your position.
Each industry is very, very different. I’m sorry you can’t distinguish between them all. Here, I’ll help:
Here is a piece of coal!
[img[/img]
Here is a tree!
[img[/img]
And, some natural gas!
[img?w=300[/img]
Colma – I expect to return to a classic TBP brawl wherein TPC survives a tangle with a Big Dog, his senses honed and his argument sharpened.
A big dog? His bark is loud, but his bite is missing teeth.
SSS actually believes the fracking industry is just public companies doing their part in capitalism. No government involvement in this boom. How touching to see the brilliance of an SSS analysis in all its glory:
Fracking: Corruption a Part of Pennsylvania’s Heritage
A study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), published in 2004 concluded that fracking was of little or no risk to human health. However, Wes Wilson, a 30-year EPA environmental engineer, in a letter to members of Congress and the EPA inspector general, called that study “scientifically unsound,” and questioned the bias of the panel, noting that five of the seven members had significant ties to the industry. “EPA’s failure to regulate [fracking] appears to be improper under the Safe Water Drinking Act and may result in danger to public health and safety.”
The following year, the Energy Policy Act of 2005—on a 249–183 vote in the House and an 85–12 vote in the Senate—exempted the oil and natural gas industry from the Safe Water Drinking Act. That exemption applied to the “construction of new well pads and the accompanying new roads and pipelines.” The National Defense Resource Council noted that the EPA interpreted the exemption “as allowing unlimited discharges of sediment into the nation’s streams, even where those discharges contribute to a violation of state water quality standards.” The exemption became known derisively as the Halliburton Loophole, named for one of the nation’s major energy companies, of which Cheney, whose promotion of Big Business and opposition to environmental policies is well-documented, had once been the CEO.
Bills introduced in the U.S. House (H.R. 2766) and U.S. Senate (S. 1215) in June 2009 to give federal regulatory oversight under the Safe Water Drinking Act to hydraulic fracturing languished. New bills (H.R. 1084 and S. 587), introduced in March 2011 in the 112th Congress, are also expected to die without a vote.
The natural gas industry has a long history of effective lobbying at the state and national level. America’s Natural Gas Alliance has four former Congressmen as lobbyists, according to research by the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). Through various political action committees (PACs), the industry has contributedabout $238.7 million in campaign contributions, about three-fourths of it to Republican candidates, since 1990, according to the CRP. For the 2008 election, the gas and oil industry contributed $27.4 million, including contributions from individuals, PACs, and soft money, according to CRP data. Total contributions for the current election cycle, as of mid-March, are $20.6 million, with almost 90 percent of it going to Republicans.
At the federal level, the top recipients of oil and gas contributions during the current election cycle, according to the CRP, are former presidential hopeful Gov. Rick Perry of Texas ($833,674), Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst of Texas ($650,850), presidential hopeful Mitt Romney ($597,950), Senate Majority LeaderMitch McConnell ($264,700), and Sen. John Barasso of Wyoming ($225,400), a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Every one of the top 20 recipients is a Republican.
Mixed into Pennsylvania’s energy production is not only a symbiotic relationship of business and government, but a history of corruption and influence-peddling. Between 1859, when an economical method to drill for oil was developed near Titusville, Pa., and 1933, the beginning of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” Pennsylvania, under almost continual Republican administration, was among the nation’s most corrupt states. The robber barons of the timber, oil, coal, steel, and transportation industries essentially bought their right to be unregulated. In addition to widespread bribery, the energy industries, especially coal, assured the election of preferred candidates by giving pre-marked ballots to workers, many of whom didn’t read English.
In a letter to the editor of The New York Times in March 2011, John Wilmer, a former attorney for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), explained that “Pennsylvania’s shameful legacy of corruption and mismanagement caused 2,500 miles of streams to be totally dead from acid mine drainage; left many miles of scarred landscape; enriched the coal barons; and impoverished the local citizens.” His words serve as a warning about what is happening in the natural gas fields.
Pennsylvania’s new law that regulates and gives favorable treatment to the natural gas industry was initiated and passed by the Republican-controlled General Assembly and signed by Republican Gov. Tom Corbett. The House voted 101–90 for passage; the Senate voted, 31–19. Both votes were mostly along party lines.
In addition to forbidding physicians and health care professionals from disclosing what the industry believes are “trade secrets” in what it uses in fracking that may cause air and water pollution, there are other industry-favorable provisions. The new law guts local governments’ rights of zoning and long-term planning, doesn’t allow for local health and environmental regulation, forbids municipalities to appeal state decisions about well permits, and provides subsidies to the natural gas industry and payments for out-of-state workers to get housing but provides for no incentives or tax credits to companies to hire Pennsylvania workers. It also requires companies to provide fresh water, which can be bottled water, to areas in which they contaminate the water supply, but doesn’t require the companies to clean up the pollution or even to track transportation and deposit of contaminated wastewater. The law allows companies to place wells 300 feet from houses, streams and wetlands. The law also allows compressor stations to be placed 750 feet from houses, and gives natural gas companies authority to operate these stations continuously at up to 60 decibels, the equivalent of continuous conversation in restaurants. The noise level and constant artificial lighting has adverse effects upon wildlife. As a result of all the concessions, the natural gas industry is given special considerations not given any other business or industry in Pennsylvania.
Each well is expected to generate about $16 million during its lifetime, which can be as few as ten years, according to the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center (PBPC). The effective tax and impact fee is about 2 percent. Corbett had originally wanted no tax or impact fees placed upon natural gas drilling; as public discontent increased, he suggested a 1 percent tax, which was in the original House bill. In contrast, other states that allow natural gas fracking have tax rates as high as 7.5 percent of market value (Texas) and 25–50 percent of net income (Alaska). The Pennsylvania rate can vary, based upon the price of natural gas and inflation, but will still be among the five lowest of the 32 states that allow natural gas drilling. Over the lifetime of a well, Pennsylvania will collect about $190,000–$350,000, while West Virginia will collect about $993,700, Texas will collect about $878,500, and Arkansas will collect about $555,700, according to PBPC data and analyses.
State Sen. Daylin Leach, a Democrat from suburban Philadelphia, says he opposed the bill because, “At a time when we are closing our schools and eliminating vital human services, to leave billions on the table as a gift to industry that is already going to be making billions is obscene.” State Rep. Mark Cohen, a Democrat from Philadelphia, like most of the Democrats in the General Assembly, agrees. The legislation, he says, “produces far too little revenue for local communities, gives the local communities local taxing power which most of them do not want, because it pits one community against the other, and gives no revenue at all to other areas of the state.”
The new law is generally believed to be “payback” by Corbett and the Republican legislators for campaign contributions. The industry contributed about $7.2 million to Pennsylvania candidates and their PACs between 2000 and the end of 2010, including $860,825 to the Republican party and $129,100 to the Democratic party, according to data compiled by Common Cause. In addition, the natural gas industry contributed about $1.6 million to Corbett’s political campaigns during the past 10 years, about $1.1 million of that for his campaign for governor, according to Common Cause. Rep. Brian L. Ellis (R-Butler County), sponsor of the House bill, received $23,300. Sen. Joseph B. Scarnati (R- Warren, Pa.), the senate president pro-tempore who sponsored the companion Senate bill (SB 1100), received $293,334. Of the 20 Pennsylvania legislators who received the most money from the industry since 2001, 16 are Republicans, according to Common Cause.
Rep. H. William DeWeese (D-Waynesburg, Pa.), received $58,750, the most of the four Democrats. DeWeese, first elected in 1976, had been Speaker of the House and Democratic leader.
It’s possible that the significant campaign contributions didn’t influence Pennsylvania’s politicians to rush to embrace the natural gas industry and its controversial use of hydraulic fracking. It’s possible that these politicians had always believed in fracking, and the natural gas industry was merely contributing to the campaigns of those who believed as they do. However, with the heavy amount of money spent by the natural gas lobby and, apparently, willingly accepted by certain politicians, there is no way to know how they might have voted had no money or lobbying occurred.
Tom Corbett’s first major political appointment after his election in November 2010 was to name C. Alan Walker, an energy company executive, to head the Department of Community and Economic Development. ThePennsylvania Progressive identified Walker as “an ardent anti-environmentalist and someone who hates regulation of his industry.” A ProPublica investigationrevealed that Walker had given $184,000 to Corbett’s political campaign.
Shortly after taking office, Corbett repealed environmental assessments of gas wells in state parks. The result could be as many as 2,200 well pads on almost 90 percent of all public lands, according to Nature Conservancy of Pennsylvania.
Corbett’s public announcements in March 2011, two months after his inauguration, established the direction for gas drilling in Pennsylvania.
In his first budget address, Corbett boldly declared he wanted to “make Pennsylvania the hub of this [drilling] boom. Just as the oil companies decided to headquarter in one of a dozen states with oil, let’s make Pennsylvania the Texas of the natural gas boom. I’m determined that Pennsylvania not lose this moment.” Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley would later boast, “The Marcellus [Shale] is revitalizing our main streets in downtowns.”
Within the budget bill, Corbett authorized Walker to “expedite any permit or action pending in any agency where the creation of jobs may be impacted.” This unprecedented reach apparently applied to all energy industries. That same month, Corbett created an Advisory Commission, loaded with persons from business and industry. Not one member was from the health professions; of the seven state agencies represented, not one member was from the Department of Health.
Between 2007 and the end of 2010, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) issued 1,435 violations to natural gas companies; 952 of those violations related to potential harm to the environment. In March,Michael Krancer, the new DEP secretary, also a political appointee, took personal control over his department’s issuance of any violations. By Krancer’s decree, every inspector could no longer cite any well owner in the Marcellus Shale development without first getting the approval of Krancer and his executive deputy secretary.
“It’s an extraordinary directive [that] represents a break from how business has been done” and politicizes the process, John Hanger told ProPublica. Hanger, DEP secretary under the Ed Rendell administration, said the new rules “will cause the public to lose confidence entirely in the inspection process.” He told theScranton Times-Tribune the new policy was the equivalent of every trooper having to get permission from the state police commissioner before issuing a traffic citation. Because the new policy is so unusual and broad “it’s impossible for something like this to be issued without the direction and knowledge of the governor’s office,” said Hanger. Corbett denied he was responsible for the decision. Five weeks after the Krancer decision was leaked to the media, and following a strong negative response from the public, environmental groups, and the state’s media, the DEP rescinded the policy—which Krancer claimed was only a three-month “pilot program.”
“When state agencies say they will ‘regulate’ or ‘monitor’ hydraulic fracturing to reduce known threats, we should not accept this as a guarantee of any kind,” says Eileen Fay, an animal rights/environmental writer. Fay argues that because of legislative corruption, it is a responsibility of citizens to protect their own health and environment by “putting pressure on our legislators.”
In February 2012, Corbett proudly signed Act 13, a merger of the House and Senate bills.
HB 1950 had initially included a provision to provide up to $2 million a year in funding to the Department of Health for “collecting and disseminatinginformation, preparing and conducting health care provider outreach and education and investigating health related complaints and other uses associated with unconventional natural gas production activity.” That provision, strongly supported by numerous public health and environmental groups, was deleted in the final bill.
The Pennsylvania Constitution (Article I, section 27) declares: “The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come. As trustee of these resources, the Commonwealth shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all the people.”
TPC
Watchout for the TBP big dogs. They are really dangerous. They might gum you to death.
[img[/img]
Unfortunately I cant stay to play, real life calls.
Have fun all!
-TPC
“Mines are located in the middle of nowhere far away from people’s homes.”
—-Admin
Just when I thought Admin couldn’t say anything more stupid, he proves me wrong. For over a century, when a valuable deposit of a mineral is found, regardless of where it is, people MOVE to where that mineral is and build a town. Ever heard of Bisbee, Arizona, Admin? San Manuel? Ajo? Just three of many towns that sit right next to a copper mine (open pit, by the way) in this state. How about Wallace, Idaho or Leadville, Colorado. Right next to silver, lead, and molybdenum mines. None of these towns were there BEFORE those minerals were found.
As to your comment about the mining companies buying the land, why should they? Much cheaper to buy the mineral rights from the landowner and pay a royalty, isn’t it? You do know something about keeping costs down, don’t you, Mr. Ikea?
Just to infuriate you even more about costs, read the federal government’s Mining Act of 1872, which is still in force. It gives mining companies the right to extract minerals from “The People’s” property, ie. federally owned lands. Nowadays, mining companies have to jump through a myriad of hoops created by the EPA, but once they get the green light, those minerals belong to the evil mining companies. Billions and billions have gone into private, evil coffers that way. I bet you are just tickled pink, aren’t you?
This is not going well for you, Admin. In one sense, it’s downright sad. Yet in another, I’m flush with the feeling of overwhelming victory.
Damn – the Admin has morphed into Flash. A cut-and-paste addiction is a terrible thing to watch develop. Admin, we will arrange an intervention. I only hope it isn’t too late.
Senile old CIA agent still babbling on about copper mines when we are talking about fracking. Focus old man. Are you having flashbacks to the good old days when you were winning the War of Drugs? Bwaaaahhhhaaaa!!!!
You respond to my comment about fracking occurring in the back yards of people with idiocy about towns near copper mines. What a pitiful display of debating skills. Are you sure you weren’t a KGB agent? You certainly aren’t reflecting proudly on the CIA with this display of dimwittedness.
Let me focus your mind. We are discussing fracking, not mining. It’s good to see you are so cost conscious. I presume you thought Ford’s cost benefit analysis on Pinto deaths was brilliant corporate management. Great cost containment.
Jessuz – this is like kicking a retarded shit eating monkey.
It’s so sad to see someone’s mind deteriorate before my very eyes.
TPC posts a picture the size of a highway billboard and then exits stage left. Good riddance.
Admin posts an article the length of which would give flash an orgasm. Sheesh. No wonder you try to stick to what someone else has written. Everything that reflects your personal knowledge and opinions on the subject of mining comes across as silly, just plain silly. But I’ll read the fucking “War and Peace” treatise anyway.
SSS
Based on your comprehension skills, you should have a 3rd grader read the article to you and explain it with crayons.
SSS & LLPOH – Big Dogs of TBP
[img[/img]
Admin – don’t make me get involved. You wouldn’t like it. It is already an uneven fight what with SSS spanking you like a poor step-child. And here I was voicing concern about your recently acquired cut-and-past addiction, and you gotta start posting cartoons. I may have to revise my diagnosis from cut-and-paste addiction to early onset dementia.
Admin quivering with fear with the possibility of llpoh entering the fray.
SSS after giving the Admin a spanking.
Next TBP big dog.
no, this bust should be a doozy…
[img[/img]
TPC
It’s my understanding the fracking fluids are proprietary information. What chemicals do they use in this process
Fracking Fluid – A mixture of water, sand and proprietary chemicals are injected into the ground during oil and gas drilling operations. The exact ingredients that are employed by companies involved have not been officially disclosed and due to exemptions enjoyed by drilling companies (e.g. the “Halliburton Loophole”), the ingredients remain proprietary and are not subject to regulation by agencies such as the EPA. Independent testing has been done on fracking fluids, however. The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, a non-profit organization headed by Dr. Theo Colborne, has identified 649 chemicals recovered from drilling operations, including Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Neurotoxicants, and other dangerous chemicals which are heavily regulated when used in most other capacities.
Admin considering his options:
[img[/img]
Oh no -SSS AND LLPOH!
[img[/img]
Actual picture of LLPOH’s hand. Now you know why he is so sensitive about thumb rings.
[img[/img]
The last time llpoh dared to confront Admin. It wasn’t pretty.
[img[/img]
Admin now able to cure diaper rash and prevent jock itch:
[img[/img]
Admin after our last encounter:
[img]http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/resources/images/830024/?type=display[/img]