TOO BIG, POWERFUL

What’s it say when 2/3 of the population thinks the government is too big and powerful? That means that even people getting money from the government are dissatisfied (since 50% of the population is getting money from the government). And the government just keeps getting bigger, spending more, and going further into cataclysmic debt. Our government will steal more than $3 trillion in taxes this year, while producing nothing buy misery, and taking away our freedom.

It costs a fortune to pay 30 million union government drones who make 65% more than the same employee in the private sector and retire at 50. We desperately need smaller government, and at least half the government pisses away every year for investment, which creates jobs. Won’t happen, and before long, like all socialist/communist welfare states, the government takes over EVERYTHING. Don’t think it won’t happen? Guess again.

null
null

Gallup: Two-Thirds Say Fed. Gov’t ‘Too Big, Powerful’

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that the federal government is too big and powerful and are dissatisfied with how the government is working.

Gallup released its “Mood of the Nation” poll yesterday, conducted between January 5-8, finding that 66% of Americans are “unhappy with the size and power of the federal government.” This number has been the roughly the same for the last three years after jumping 10 percentage points between 2008 and 2011. In addition, 65% of Americans “are dissatisfied with the nation’s system of government and how well it works, the highest percentage in Gallup’s trend since 2001.”

Read rest of article.

null

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
bb
bb
January 23, 2014 2:04 pm

AWD ,Admin ,both of you keep saying half the population is getting government welfare
Money of some kind .You say 92 million adults of working age are not in workforce.Areyou iincluding people on SS and people on Disability in these numbers.Simple ?Are you including college students?What people are you talking about?

treemagnet
treemagnet
January 23, 2014 2:53 pm

When obama and his family first moved into government housing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, who knew he’d ever leave.

bb
bb
January 23, 2014 3:16 pm

No answer ,I will look it up myself and and you have been.including college students ,people on SS and
Disability and Vets in these numbers I am going to take both of you to the woodshed .It want be pretty.

Erasmus Le Dolt
Erasmus Le Dolt
January 23, 2014 3:22 pm

President Truman and Bes set a standard beyond the comprehension of the current White House occupants. They paid for their own food. He only took a vacation on Doctors orders to Key West and established the ‘Little White House’ there. After he left office, He and Bes drove themselves home and stayed at motels along the way at their cost.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
January 23, 2014 3:53 pm

Social Security recipients, SSDI recipients, recipients of Section 8, TANF, Pell grants – hell, any government employee or pensioner – they’re all welfare recipients, if you ask me. Vets are in a different category. Some earned their current benefits, and some get disability benefits that are questionable. Social Security is welfare. Unless someone can tell me the exact vested present-value balance of their “account” at Social Security (which no one can), it’s welfare.

Billy
Billy
January 23, 2014 4:25 pm

Fucking Barry and Chewie’s theme song…

Spinolator
Spinolator
January 23, 2014 5:41 pm

I don’t think Ron Paul ever had a chance of changing anything. He would have had an accident…

Rise Up
Rise Up
January 23, 2014 8:50 pm

@Iska Waran, who said: “Social Security is welfare.” Yes, it’s welfare to the Gov! Do you get a paycheck, Iska? How much SS tax did they take from your pay? Are you ever going to get it paid
back to you in the form of social security benefits?

Thinker
Thinker
January 24, 2014 8:06 am

Record Low Say Own Representative Deserves Re-Election

Less than a fifth of registered voters say most in Congress deserve re-election

by Andrew Dugan and Brad Hoffman

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The enduring unpopularity of Congress appears to have seeped into the nation’s 435 congressional districts, as a record-low percentage of registered voters, 46%, now say the U.S. representative in their own congressional district deserves re-election. Equally historic, the share of voters saying most members of Congress deserve re-election has fallen to 17%, a new nadir.

[imgcomment image[/img]

These findings are from Gallup’s annual Mood of the Nation poll, conducted Jan. 5-8, 2014. The percentage of voters saying most members of Congress deserve re-election has been below its historical average of 39% since early 2008. The figure has plummeted since mid-2011, with a brief improvement — to 36% — in November 2012, attributable to a surge in Democratic support at the time of the national election.

The legendary Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill famously coined the phrase “all politics is local,” a dictum that guided his Democratic majorities against Republican electoral waves in the 1980s. More generally, the saying describes the local versus national phenomenon that also occurs when the public is asked about such things as healthcare, education, and crime. But now that adage rings less true as voters see their own U.S. representative in the same way that they see most other members of Congress — as not deserving re-election.

Can 2014 Be a “Wave” Election?

The 17% of voters who now say most of Congress deserves re-election is well below the roughly 40% threshold that has historically been associated with major electoral turnover. With this in mind, Congress could be in for a major shake-up. Judging by net seats lost in an election as a percentage of the overall number of seats, 2010, 1994, and 2006 register as the top three recent elections. All of these years had election-year averages of 41% or fewer voters saying most of Congress deserved re-election, with the Republican-wave election of 2010 registering the lowest, 30% — still 13 percentage points higher than the current reading.

[imgcomment image[/img]

The political direction of any potential electoral wave is difficult to determine, however, as self-identified registered voters of both parties largely agree that most members of Congress do not deserve re-election. Eighteen percent of Republicans, the majority party in the House, say most members deserve re-election, identical to the percentage of Democrats saying so.

Thus, voters’ wrath appears not to be directed toward one party in particular, as much as toward any incumbent member of Congress.

Implications

Consistent with abysmally low congressional approval ratings and widespread dissatisfaction with the nation’s system of government, the proportion of registered voters saying Congress deserves re-election has hit an all-time low of 17%. While Congress as an institution is no stranger to voter disenchantment, American voters are usually more charitable in their assessments of their own representatives in the national legislature. But even this has fallen to a new trough.

Typically, results like these have presaged significant turnover in Congress, such as in 1994, 2006, and 2010. So Congress could be headed for a major shake-up in its membership this fall.

However, unlike those three years, when one party controlled both houses of Congress, the beneficiary of the anti-incumbent sentiment is not clear in the current situation, in which one party controls the House and the other, the Senate. Partisans on both sides of the aisle are displeased with Congress. But with so few voters saying they are willing to re-elect their own representative, it suggests that many officeholders will be vulnerable, if not in the general election, then perhaps in the host of competitive primaries soon to take place.

Thinker
Thinker
January 24, 2014 2:28 pm

Scary as all hell… thank God I live just outside the range of these things. For now.

Blimplike surveillance craft set to deploy over Maryland

The aerostats — that is the term for lighter-than-air craft that are tethered to the ground — are to be set aloft on Army-owned land about 45 miles northeast of Washington, near Aberdeen Proving Ground, for a three-year test slated to start in October. From a vantage of 10,000 feet, they will cast a vast radar net from Raleigh, N.C., to Boston and out to Lake Erie, with the goal of detecting cruise missiles or enemy aircraft so they could be intercepted before reaching the capital.

GRAPHIC: How the aerostats work

Aerostats deployed by the military at U.S. bases in Iraq and Afghanistan typically carried powerful surveillance cameras as well, to track the movements of suspected insurgents and even U.S. soldiers. When Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales murdered 16 civilians in Kandahar in March 2012, an aerostat above his base captured video of him returning from the slaughter in the early-morning darkness with a rifle in his hand and a shawl over his shoulders.

More HERE.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 24, 2014 2:50 pm

marslinger must be a personality problem because the Administrator fixed it for me and i assume just about everyone else.