Low prices mean no new oil, and no new oil means no growth
The world economy is slowing down and the authorities are worried.
Besides the official gross domestic product statistics, we have further confirmation of this slowdown from the four big commodities associated with growth; oil CLF5, -3.81% (-40% from June 2014), coal (-52% from peak in 2010), copper (-14.4% in 2014), and iron ore (-41% year-to-date 2014).
Japan, Italy, and Greece are all in recession. China is slowing down according to its official statistics, and even more according to the whispers.
The days of rapid economic growth are behind us because the days of cheap oil are behind us.
Germany, France and the Netherlands are all at stall speed.
The U.S. is, according to the Commerce Department, doing just great at nearly 4% growth, but you wouldn’t know that from either the quality of the new jobs being created (which is low) or consumer spending (also low).
The worry, as always, has nothing to do with the central banks’ concern for you, your job, your children, wealth equality, or the future, and everything to do with the simple fact that the stability of the banking system absolutely depends on a steady stream of new loans being created.
The core of the problem is that we have a monetary system that is either expanding or collapsing. It has no steady state.
In 2008 and 2009, net credit creation was only slightly negative, but that was enough to very nearly cause the entire system of money and banking in the developed world to collapse.
Either money and credit are expanding and the banks are relatively happy or the banks are collapsing and demanding taxpayer bailouts. It’s really that stark.
Now after the most heroic run of interest rates forced to zero (ZIRP) and below (NIRP in Europe) and the grandest experiment with money printing in global history, credit growth is somewhat back on track but not enough to ease the bankers’ worries.
So they continue to pump, and jawbone, and panic at every slight downturn in wildly inflated financial asset prices because those are their only major successes in this drama.
The actual economy, the one that lives on Main Street, never really recovered, at least not compared to past recoveries. Growth, jobs and incomes all were anemic compared to prior recoveries. Capital expenditures by corporations were all but dead in the water throughout the “recovery.”
If oil prices do not recover and quickly, the U.S. shale miracle will rapidly turn into a shale bust.
And this brings us to the collapse in oil prices.
Our view here at Peak Prosperity is that the days of rapid economic growth are behind us because the days of cheap oil are behind us.
Oil fuels the engine of growth and the world has spent $2.5 trillion over the past nine years chasing more oil and yet is producing roughly the same amount of oil as it was before it spent all that money.
As Jeremy Grantham put it in his latest quarterly newsletter:
“As a sign of the immediacy of this problem, we have never spent more money developing new oil supplies than we did last year (nearly $700 billion) nor, despite U.S. fracking, found less — replacing in the last 12 months only 4½ months’ worth of current production! Clearly, the writing is on the wall.”
Unless investment in oil production really accelerates from here, new production will be swamped by existing declines.
But with oil down some 40% since June, new oil drill programs are being scrapped left and right.
New drill permits in the U.S. shale plays were down 40% in November compared to October and for good reason: most of the plays are uneconomical at current prices:
The bottom line, though, is that without growth in oil supplies robust economic growth is impossible to achieve.
What Is the 2015 Economic Outlook?
Worse, global oil projects are now on hold and those potential future supplies have been pushed out further waiting for higher oil prices.
No new oil means no new economic growth. It’s as simple as that.
This calls into question the sky-high valuations we currently see for stocks and bonds. The operative question being, what is the value of these stocks and bonds in a world without growth?
To me the answer is simple; a lot less than they currently are.
So the central banks are worried that their efforts to ignite new borrowing are not working, but I am worried that the bloated asset prices that were a product of this quest are going to run straight into the reality of diminished oil output.
In short, my worry is that we are now well past the point where the next financial correction can be avoided. It’s going to hurt.
The central banks have failed, perhaps honestly and with good intentions, but they have failed nonetheless. All because they were peering out just one of several portholes and thought they understood the world.
Chris Martenson is an economist and futurist who co-founded the PeakProsperity.com blog.
Oil Crash Comes Home To Roost: ConocoPhillips To Slash 2015 CapEx By 20%
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/08/2014 12:05 -0500
With every single hollow chatterbox repeating that crashing oil prices are “unambiguously good” it is clearly the case that the opposite is true. And sure enough, the first two indications that the crude price crash is about to lead to some serious pain in the US came yesterday from BP, which announced over the weekend that it would “slash 100s of mid-level supervisor jobs” around the globe, and moments ago ConocoPhillips added that as a result of plunging oil prices, it would slash its 2015 spending budget by a whopping 20%, cutting off some $3 billion in capital spending mostly involving “less developed project : spending which for those who remember their GDP calculation, means a proportional reduction in the US Gross National Product.
From Houston Chronicle:
BP is cutting mid-level supervisors in its oil production and refining businesses and in back-office corporate functions, the British oil giant’s chief financial officer told the Times of London as it is set later this week to lay out plans through the end of this decade.
BP has roughly 10,000 employees and contractors working in Houston, where it has its main U.S. offices.
According to the UK newspaper, BP CFO Brian Gilvary said the company is trimming employees who work in layers above operations. It’s unclear whether falling oil prices will prompt BP to accelerate its layoffs, which are part of plans detailed previously to streamline the company. Gilvary said BP has the financial flexibility to “trim into next year if that’s what we need in a new world of oil at $70 or $60” a barrel.
Gilvary said falling oil prices could force the company to pare back some projects, either pausing or scuttling them… A spokesman in Houston declined comment Sunday. BP will update investors on its plans through 2020 on Wednesday.
And from Reuters:
ConocoPhillips said it would cut its 2015 capital budget by 20 percent, or about $3 billion, compared with this year, marking the biggest spending cut by a U.S. oil and gas company in dollar terms as global oil prices hit five-year lows.
ConocoPhillips said it would “defer significant investment” on less developed projects in the Montney and Duvernay fields in Canada, the Permian Basin in Texas and the Niobrara shale field, which extends over Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska and Kansas.
“The announced budget is well below our expectations of $15 billion,” Simmons & Co analysts wrote in a note.
ConocoPhillips, which is focusing on the Eagle Ford shale in Texas and North Dakota’s Bakken shale, said it will also spend less on major projects, many of which are nearing completion.
Despite lower investment, the company expects its production from fields outside of Libya to rise by 3 percent in 2015. ConocoPhillips forecast 3 to 5 percent growth in October.
“This plan demonstrates our focus on cash-flow neutrality and a competitive dividend, while maintaining our financial strength,” Chief Executive Ryan Lance said.
So yes: “unambiguously good” for US consumers who decided to blow the tiny amount of cash they save at the pump on trinkets instead of saving the money, but quite unambiguously bad for better-paying energy jobs which are about to be slashed across the board in virtually all US shale projects, leading to a huve adverse impact for the millions of downstream jobs that also sprang up in the past 6 years thanks to the shale miracle, especially since as we reported previously, virtually all jobs created since the trough of the recession have been courtesy of the US energy sector. Jobs which are about to disappear once again.
I heard on the evening news last night that SUV sales are up.
–
Ya gotta love it !
–
SnowieGeorgie
Some who don’t think deeply about the reasons for lower oil prices automatically have a knee-jerk reaction that “lower is better”.
But some causes of lower oil prices are dangerous to our future especially higher unemployment in the US and worldwide which reduces demand for consumer and industrial oil consumption causing more job losses.
I still believe cheap oil resources are depleting fairly quickly despite fracking and suspect ROI for investors is also decreasing due to increased costs of extracting and processing other oil forms. This should help cause oil price increases but apparently unemployment and lack of demand are much higher than reported which is why oil prices keep falling.
Would it ever be made public that we are truly running out of cheap oil and the costs of keeping industrial economies going with more expensive alternatives will begin to skyrocket? Perhaps the ruling class is intentionally creating the conditions for higher unemployment to try to lessen consumption and the rate at which cheap oil is depleting?
Probably not but I wonder sometimes since cheap oil runs the world – and supplies are finite.
I read this article a couple days ago, and think Chris Martenson is spot on. The unintended consequences just blow me away. Our gal Ogla hit it on the head this AM, we are so Fucked.
If, prices keep going down, maybe GM, and other auto companies, will start selling trucks, and cars. Then hiring back factory workers The oil glut could cause, people to buy more goods from china, and we could sell all the coal we want to them and the rest of the world.
Maybe at gas at 1.50 a gallon and energy, so cheap, it would cause a manufacturing boom and more jobs, right here at home. More jobs mean more taxpayers.
All that money sitting in banks and in the market, might come out for investment, in the US economy.
But it would cause deflation, thus the bankers won’t let it happen.
So screw the economy and cheap energy, and cheap goods, and a better standard of living.
Does anyone remember what happened to oil production back in 1986 when the USA and Saudi Arabia flooded the world with oil until the price was under $10 per barrel? The object was to financially sink the soviets and it worked. Domestic production was not a big factor if I remember correctly. As I have posted we may be seeing round two.
BP is on their own in this one.
So the oil industry loses some jobs. Cheap fuel prices create other jobs elsewhere..more people will fly, tourism will go up. People will have more to spend on things besides high fuel costs.Those BP managers can go to Saudi for all I care.