NASA Warns: 99% Chance Of At Least A 5.0 Quake Hitting LA Within 30 Months

Tyler Durden's picture

If scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena are correct, a moderately-sized earthquake is expected within the next two-and-a-half years.

As CBS LA reports, JPL experts predict a possible 5.0 magnitude quake in Los Angeles, but say it very well could be stronger.

JPL geophysicist Dr. Andrea Donnellan, along with seven other scientists, has been using radar and GPS to measure Southern California’s chances for a sizable earthquake, and has made a sobering hypothesis about another big one.

 

“When the La Habra earthquake happened, it was relieving some of that stress, and it actually shook some of the upper sediments in the LA basin and moved those a little bit more,” Dr. Donellan said.

 

However, according to Dr. Donnellan, those strains remain, with enough power to produce an even larger quake in the same epicenter in La Habra.

 

“There’s enough energy stored to produce about a magnitude 6.1 to 6.3 earthquake,” Dr. Donnellan described.

The new NASA-led analysis of a moderate magnitude 5.1 earthquake that shook Greater Los Angeles in 2014 finds that the earthquake deformed Earth’s crust across a broad region encompassing the northern Los Angeles Basin and northern Orange County. As Fox LA adds rather ominously,

The shallow ground movements observed from this earthquake likely reflect strain accumulated on deeper faults, which remain locked and may be capable of producing future earthquakes.

 

“The earthquake faults in this region are part of a system of faults,” said Donnellan. “They can move together in an earthquake and produce measurable surface deformation, even during moderate magnitude earthquakes. This fault system accommodates the ongoing shortening of Earth’s crust in the northern Los Angeles region.

 

 

 

Tectonic motion across the Los Angeles region is distributed on an intricate network of horizontally and vertically moving faults that eventually release accumulated strain in the form of earthquakes, such as the destructive 1994 magnitude-6.7 Northridge earthquake.

 

Donnellan said a future earthquake to release the accumulated strain on these faults could occur on any one or several of these fault structures, which may not have been mapped at the surface. “Identifying specific fault structures most likely to be responsible for future earthquakes for this system of many active faults is often very difficult,” she said.

*  *  *

Seismologists at the US Geological Survey have questioned that probability, suggesting it may in fact be slightly lower, stating: “…the accepted random chance of a (magnitude five) or greater in this area in three years is 85 percent, independent of the analysis in this paper.”

USGS uses different methods from radar and GPS, such as fault maps and models, to develop their results.

Regardless of the discrepancy in percentage, scientists agree that the probability of at least a moderate-sized earthquake in Los Angeles over the next three years is high.

“We all need to be prepared. That’s not new for LA.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
17 Comments
Tommy
Tommy
October 21, 2015 6:31 pm

There’s a 90% chance they are 70% right.

kokoda
kokoda
October 21, 2015 6:54 pm

A 5.0 quake for CA – what’s not to like.

gm
gm
October 21, 2015 7:07 pm

lets hope no earthquakes hit California , um I cant afford the extra taxes lol . Because I know .gov will make me pay somehow even when im on the east coast .

Rise Up
Rise Up
October 21, 2015 7:25 pm

Most of the earthquake swarms in the last 6 months are in the San Francisco area. I’d bet something will happen there before L.A.

Nami
Nami
October 21, 2015 7:35 pm

I suggest people check out dutchsinse on facebook, twitter, or youtube.

“Swarm of earthquakes happening just East of San Francisco, officials NOT telling everyone about the fact that the swarm is happening on the flanks of Mount Diablo.
Here is the official word on the swarm:
http://news.yahoo.com/questions-answers-cluster-quakes-near-san-francisco-190513998.html
Nice they leave out the 24 million year old, long ancient extinct volcano at the location!
Up until a few years ago, professionals DENIED that Mount Diablo was a volcano, that was until they found volcanic lava deposits, and dome formations near the peaks.
Now it’s a hidden gem that few know about — well, that was until now.
Now you know the swarm is at a volcanic location.
Diablo California, conveniently not mentioned by the USGS, or any main stream news outlet, is an ancient volcano:
http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_18918028

Lysander
Lysander
October 21, 2015 7:41 pm

Could they be any more vague? Here’s my prediction: There’s a 100% chance that the thousands of pointless government workers at NASA will still have their cushy government job in 5 years.

NASA’s motto…….”This sure beat working for a living!”

Hey Nasa, why don’t you send another probe to Uranus.

AC
AC
October 21, 2015 8:37 pm

As we all learned in Mel Gibson’s documentary, ‘Conspiracy Theory,’ NASA is actually causing these earthquakes.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
October 21, 2015 11:56 pm

L.A. people take little 5.0 quakes in stride. They’re used to them.

The ones people fear are those higher that 6.0. The Northridge quake was 6.7 and THAT is pretty powerful.

SSS
SSS
October 22, 2015 12:51 am

“If scientists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena are correct, a moderately-sized earthquake is expected within the next two-and-a-half years.”
—-Lead sentence to the article

Let’s deconstruct that sentence.

NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Add in Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and you have a giant WTF question. As in WTF are scientists from NASA and JPL doing in the “science” of predicting earthquakes? Get it? First, there is no SCIENCE on earthquake prediction. None, and never will be.

But the biggest question is why NASA and JPL are even involved in this alchemy of earthquakes in the first place. Aeronautics, space, and jet propulsion has fucking ZERO relationship with goddamn earthquakes. Yet it is another multi-billion shithole for your taxes.

the tumbleweed
the tumbleweed
October 22, 2015 1:39 am

Ha ha ha, these are funny. Yes also there is a 100% chance that a NASA rocket will fail, come in over budget, or prove to be utterly worthless to the common man in the next 5 years.

TE
TE
October 22, 2015 7:27 am

Guess they have some time on their hands after shuttling our shuttle program and sending the billions annually to Russia. Funny how little coverage that fact gets in light of the “sanctions” over Crimea.

There isn’t an “alphabet” agency in existence that shouldn’t be dismantled and re-thought.

So it goes…

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
October 22, 2015 7:48 am

NASA has an Earth Sciences program/department or something to that effect. It’s all part of a larger program of planetary science program and JPL specializes in building the space craft that make it all possible.

Personally I think much of what they do is worthwhile but ONLY if we have the money to spend on such extravagances. We don’t. But fuck it. The faster shit collapses the faster we get to see what comes next!

Embrace the doom!

IndenturedServant
IndenturedServant
October 22, 2015 8:06 am

TE, I’m with you regarding the money paid to the Russians to buy rides to and from the ISS. The hypocrisy of it all is mind boggling.

On the plus side, Americans and Russians have been cooperating in space more and more since the Apollo-Soyuz days. It reminds me that all the world leaders, much like our congresscritters are really good friends behind closed doors and that everything else is a carefully managed shit show the mask their theft and corruption from the sheople and to keep us at odds with each other.

Gayle
Gayle
October 22, 2015 9:04 am

Ho hum. An earthquake of any magnitude is always on the table for fault-ridden California. I’m more concerned about the southern leg of the San Andreas, which is about 50 miles from my house and is at least 100 years overdue for a major shift.

Dutchman
Dutchman
October 22, 2015 9:33 am

NASA – why the fuck do we want pictures of Pluto? These people should stick their heads up their asses – see what’s up there.

I’m only for an earthquake if it completely destroys LA, and kills all the SPIC’s that live there. I don’t want them coming to my state.

Thinker
Thinker
October 22, 2015 10:33 am

SSS — exactly. And others who study the science of earthquakes commented on that:

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-usgs-99-9-percent-chance-20151022-story.html

Kill Bill
Kill Bill
October 22, 2015 3:21 pm

*sigh* another few minutes of my time wasted…

*Googling Brazilian Fart Porn*

I keed.