Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/21/2015 13:15 -0500
Last month, US Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard went on CNN and laid bare Washington’s Syria strategy.
In a remarkably candid interview with Wolf Blitzer, Gabbard calls Washington’s effort to oust Assad “counterproductive” and “illegal” before taking it a step further and accusing the CIA of arming the very same terrorists who The White House insists are “sworn enemies.”
In short, Gabbard all but tells the American public that the government is lying to them and may end up inadvertently starting “World War III.”
For those who missed it, here’s the clip:
That was before Paris.
Well, in the wake of the attacks, Gabbard has apparently had just about enough of Washington vacilating in the fight against terror just so the US can ensure that ISIS continues to destabilize Assad and now, with bi-partisan support, the brazen Hawaii Democrat has introduced legislation to end the “illegal war” to overthrow Assad.
Gabbard, who fought in Iraq – twice – has partnered with Republican Adam Scott on the bill. Here’s AP:
In an unusual alliance, a House Democrat and Republican have teamed up to urge the Obama administration to stop trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad and focus all its efforts on destroying Islamic State militants.
Reps. Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat, and Austin Scott, a Republican, introduced legislation on Friday to end what they called an “illegal war” to overthrow Assad, the leader of Syria accused of killing tens of thousands of Syrian citizens in a more than four-year-old civil war entangled in a battle against IS extremists, also known as ISIS.
“The U.S. is waging two wars in Syria,” Gabbard said. “The first is the war against ISIS and other Islamic extremists, which Congress authorized after the terrorist attack on 9/11. The second war is the illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad.”
Scott said, “Working to remove Assad at this stage is counter-productive to what I believe our primary mission should be.”
Since 2013, the CIA has trained an estimated 10,000 fighters, although the number still fighting with so-called moderate forces is unclear. CIA-backed rebels in Syria, who had begun to put serious pressure on Assad’s forces, are now under Russian bombardment with little prospect of rescue by their American patrons, U.S. officials say.
For years, the CIA effort had foundered — so much so that over the summer, some in Congress proposed cutting its budget. Some CIA-supported rebels had been captured; others had defected to extremist groups.
Gabbard complained that Congress has never authorized the CIA effort, though covert programs do not require congressional approval, and the program has been briefed to the intelligence committees as required by law, according to congressional aides who are not authorized to be quoted discussing the matter.
Gabbard contends the effort to overthrow Assad is counter-productive because it is helping IS topple the Syrian leader and take control of all of Syria. If IS were able to seize the Syrian military’s weaponry, infrastructure and hardware, the group would become even more dangerous than it is now and exacerbate the refugee crisis.
And make no mistake, Tulsi’s understanding of Washington’s absurd Mid-East policy goes far beyond Syria. That is, Gabbard fully grasps the big picture as well. Here’s what she has to say about the idea that the US should everywhere and always attempt to overthrow regimes when human rights groups claim there’s evidence of oppression:
“People said the very same thing about Saddam (Hussein), the very same thing about (Moammar) Gadhafi, the results of those two failed efforts of regime change and the following nation-building have been absolute, not only have they been failures, but they’ve actually worked to strengthen our enemy.”
Somebody get Langley on the phone, this woman must be stopped.
Here’s Gabbard speaking to CNN this week about Assad:
So there’s hope for the US public after all.
Perhaps if the clueless masses won’t listen to “lunatic” fringe blogs or Sergei Lavrov, they’ll listen to a US Congresswoman who served two tours of duty in Iraq and who is now telling Americans that The White House, The Pentagon, and most especially the CIA are together engaged in an “illegal” effort to overthrow the government of a sovereign country and in the process are arming the very same extremists that are attacking civilians in places like Paris.
Good luck Tulsi, and thanks for proving that there’s at least one person inside that Beltway that isn’t either dishonest or naive.
* * *
From Gabbard
“Here are 10 reasons the U.S. must end its war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad:
- Because if we succeed in overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad, it will open the door for ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other Islamic extremists to take over all of Syria. There will be genocide and suffering on a scale beyond our imagination. These Islamic extremists will take over all the weaponry, infrastructure, and military hardware of the Syrian army and be more dangerous than ever before.
- We should not be allying ourselves with these Islamic extremists by helping them achieve their goal because it is against the security interests of the United States and all of civilization.
- Because the money and weapons the CIA is providing to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad are going directly or indirectly into the hands of the Islamic extremist groups, including al-Qaeda affiliates, al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham, and others who are the actual enemies of the United States. These groups make up close to 90 percent of the so-called opposition forces, and are the most dominant fighters on the ground.
- Because our efforts to overthrow Assad has increased and will continue to increase the strength of ISIS and other Islamic extremists, thus making them a bigger regional and global threat.
- Because this war has exacerbated the chaos and carnage in Syria and, along with the terror inflicted by ISIS and other Islamic extremist groups fighting to take over Syria, continues to increase the number of Syrians forced to flee their country.
- Because we should learn from our past mistakes in Iraq and Libya that U.S. wars to overthrow secular dictators (Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi) cause even more chaos and human suffering and open the door for Islamic extremists to take over in those countries.
- Because the U.S. has no credible government or government leader ready to bring order, security, and freedom to the people of Syria.
- Because even the ‘best case’ scenario—that the U.S. successfully overthrows the Syrian government of Assad—would obligate the United States to spend trillions of dollars and the lives of American service members in the futile effort to create a new Syria. This is what we have been trying to do in Iraq for twelve years, and we still have not succeeded. The situation in Syria will be much more difficult than in Iraq.
- Because our war against the Syrian government of Assad is interfering with our being one-pointedly focused on the war to defeat ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and the other Islamic extremists who are our actual enemy.
- Because our war to overthrow the Assad government puts us in direct conflict with Russia and increases the likelihood of war between the United States and Russia and the possibility of another world war.”
* * *
Oh, and if you needed another reason to like Tulsi, here’s a bonus 40 second clip for your amusement…
She’s 100% correct. Also pretty hot.
she does fit the mold of a democrat, both attractive and makes very good sense
stucky called this one. I never heard of her before stuck’s post. Truth telling. It’s on the horizon. The dimocrat party has it’s cupboards stripped bare. There are no leaders in the pipeline. This chick may be smart enough to realize that. Go, bitch. America needs more of your type.
A Dem going against the DICKtator – a mighty hurrah; and she is 100% correct. We need 100 more like her.
Too bad most of Dem’s and Rep’s are too corrupt – hard not to be since our Dear Leader and our INjustice Dept. are Marxists.nothing she does will get traction. Most of our CONgress is feeding at the trough.
Never trust a Dem or a Repuke for that matter. These people will say anything to gain your trust just before they stab you in the back. PLEASE just say no to all beltway political whores.
I think the .gov is awesome on how they use the incrementalist approach . They put something out there so extreme , then pull it back a little bit when everyone bitches about it . Then they wait and do it again until they get what they want .
So this Rep. is the counter to Hildebeast . Altho .gov will still get what they want , no matter who is in office. The state expands to meet the every growing demands of the state .
She might be innocent and well meaning now, but give it a little time and she will follow the company line. Just another way for the state to say they have legitimacy . Because we voted.
Trump seems like another pull back from the extremism of the current regime of O’Niglet.
Even if he has good intentions. He cant fight the real monied interests. But he sounds good !!
Just like O’vomit. I ponder what legislation is already written to move the AGENDA forward if Trump gets Selected ? What tragedies await the world that further the POCB’s Plan?
Same as it ever was , Same as it ever was.
Ending Blowback Terrorism
Authored by Jeffrey Sachs, originally posted at Project Syndicate,
Terrorist attacks on civilians, whether the downing over Sinai of a Russian aircraft killing 224 civilian passengers, the horrific Paris massacre claiming 129 innocent lives, or the tragic bombing in Ankara that killed 102 peace activists, are crimes against humanity. Their perpetrators – in this case, the Islamic State (ISIS) – must be stopped. Success will require a clear understanding of the roots of this ruthless network of jihadists.
Painful as it is to admit, the West, especially the United States, bears significant responsibility for creating the conditions in which ISIS has flourished. Only a change in US and European foreign policy vis-à-vis the Middle East can reduce the risk of further terrorism.
The recent attacks should be understood as “blowback terrorism”: a dreadful unintended result of repeated US and European covert and overt military actions throughout the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and Central Asia that aimed to overthrow governments and install regimes compliant with Western interests. These operations have not only destabilized the targeted regions, causing great suffering; they have also put populations in the US, the European Union, Russia, and the Middle East at significant risk of terror.
The public has never really been told the true history of Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda, or the rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Starting in 1979, the CIA mobilized, recruited, trained, and armed Sunni young men to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. The CIA recruited widely from Muslim populations (including in Europe) to form the Mujahideen, a multinational Sunni fighting force mobilized to oust the Soviet infidel from Afghanistan.
Bin Laden, from a wealthy Saudi family, was brought in to help lead and co-finance the operation. This was typical of CIA operations: relying on improvised funding through a wealthy Saudi family and proceeds from local smuggling and the narcotics trade.
By promoting the core vision of a jihad to defend the lands of Islam (Dar al-Islam) from outsiders, the CIA produced a hardened fighting force of thousands of young men displaced from their homes and stoked for battle. It is this initial fighting force – and the ideology that motivated it – that today still forms the basis of the Sunni jihadist insurgencies, including ISIS. While the jihadists’ original target was the Soviet Union, today the “infidel” includes the US, Europe (notably France and the United Kingdom), and Russia.
At the end of the 1980s, with the Soviet retreat from Afghanistan, some elements of the Mujahideen morphed into Al Qaeda, Arabic for “the base,” which referred to the military facilities and training grounds in Afghanistan built for the Mujahideen by bin Laden and the CIA. After the Soviet withdrawal, the term Al Qaeda shifted meaning from the specific military base to the organizational base of jihadist activities.
Blowback against the US began in 1990 with the first Gulf War, when the US created and expanded its military bases in the Dar al-Islam, most notably in Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam’s founding and holiest sites. This expanded US military presence was anathema to the core jihadist ideology that the CIA had done so much to foster.
America’s unprovoked war on Iraq in 2003 unleashed the demons. Not only was the war itself launched on the basis of CIA lies; it also aimed to create a Shia-led regime subservient to the US and anathema to the Sunni jihadists and the many more Sunni Iraqis who were ready to take up arms. More recently, the US, France, and the UK toppled Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya, and the US worked with the Egyptian generals who ousted the elected Muslim Brotherhood government. In Syria, following President Bashar al-Assad’s violent suppression of peaceful public protests in 2011, the US, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and other regional allies helped to foment a military insurgency that has pushed the country into a downward spiral of chaos and violence.
Such operations have failed – repeatedly and frequently disastrously – to produce legitimate governments or even rudimentary stability. On the contrary, by upending established, albeit authoritarian, governments in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and destabilizing Sudan and other parts of Africa deemed hostile to the West, they have done much to fuel chaos, bloodshed, and civil war. It is this turmoil that has enabled ISIS to capture and defend territory in Syria, Iraq, and parts of North Africa.
Three steps are needed to defeat ISIS and other violent jihadists.
First, US President Barack Obama should pull the plug on CIA covert operations. The use of the CIA as a secret army of destabilization has a long, tragic history of failure, all hidden from public view under the agency’s cloak of secrecy. Ending CIA-caused mayhem would go far to staunch the instability, violence, and anti-Western hatred that fuels today’s terrorism.
Second, the US, Russia, and the other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council should immediately stop their infighting and establish a framework for Syrian peace. They have a shared and urgent stake in confronting ISIS; all are victims of the terror. Moreover, military action against ISIS can succeed only with the legitimacy and backing of the UN Security Council.
The UN framework should include an immediate end to the insurgency against Assad that the US, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey have pursued; a Syrian cease-fire; a UN-mandated military force to confront ISIS; and a political transition in Syria dictated not by the US, but by a UN consensus to support a non-violent political reconstruction.
Finally, the long-term solution to regional instability lies in sustainable development. The entire Middle East is beset not only by wars but also by deepening development failures: intensifying fresh water stress, desertification, high youth unemployment, poor educational systems, and other serious blockages.
More wars – especially CIA-backed, Western-led wars – will solve nothing. By contrast, a surge of investment in education, health, renewable energy, agriculture, and infrastructure, financed both from within the region and globally, is the real key to building a more stable future for the Middle East and the world.
Sadly Americans knows its all about looting another countries resources,and collapsing/overthrowing the US,EU and Germany with military age Islam refugees .
Since she’s against deposing Assad, she ought to prefer Trump to Hillary.
Obama Caught Smuggling in Refugees on UPS Planes? (Video)
http://right.is/politics/2015/11/false-flag-alert-obama-caught-smuggling-in-refugees-on-ups-planes-video-46217.html
“Without knowing precisely what is going on, there is no doubt something nefarious is afoot. There is no reason for 30 buses of people to be flying on a UPS flight designated for parcels, under the cover of night, filled with people, who are met on arrival with buses already waiting, and whisked away in secret.
“In the video, the person recording is in hot pursuit of up to 30 buses that he claims are filled with people he just watched land in Harrisburg International Airport on a UPS plane.
“Upon the plane’s arrival, which was alleged to be a “parcel flight,” there were 30 buses already lined up, and ready to receive, what turned out not to be parcels, but dozens and dozens of people.
“According to whoever took the video, he watched as the planes occupants were quickly escorted onto the buses that were already waiting, and then he began filming as the buses departed with all the “mystery flyers.”
“Never trust a Dem or a Repuke for that matter. These people will say anything to gain your trust just before they stab you in the back.” ————– bea lever
99% of the time I would agree with you, Bea.
But, not this time. Perhaps you would like her if she had “L” (Libertarian) next to her name? I get ZERO sense that she’s in it for any other reason than serving the American people.
She has more smarts, and integrity, than all the current POTUS-wannabes put together. I could see myself voting for her if she ran.
Nevertheless, you find some poop & mud about her …. I’m willing to take that into consideration.
@sword wielding stucky in someone’s head lol do you seriously think this is not theatre of some kind sir?
Integrity ? She has violated her OATH to protect and defend the constitution . I have family members in the stan that showed me them protecting the goddamn opium crop .
Really?
Lets all assume that whatever we read is confirmation bullshit . If I think a Honda car is the best then everything I research will support that .
If I think a Honda is crap then everything I read will support that opinion also .
So what is the real shit ? I mean no disrespect , but what politician in your lifetime actually did what they said they would do ?
Obummer did as the fundamently change the country . Who else ?
Who the fuck can u vote for that will support your views sir? Lets vote her in as president and compare notes shortly . She will not repeal the unconstitional laws . It cannot happen !!!
“She has violated her OATH to protect and defend the constitution.” —— gm
Show me proof.
.
.
“I have family members in the stan that showed me them protecting the goddamn opium crop” —gm
Does that mean SHE did? Show me proof.
.
.
” … but what politician in your lifetime actually did what they said they would do ?” —gm
Ron Paul. Fatfuk Christie promised to lower NJ property taxes, and did.
.
.
“Who the fuck can u vote for that will support your views sir? ” —— gm
James Quinn, Admin.
Drink some booze, gm. You sound stressed out!
Stuckt…….I’m beginning to like your comments; case in point, comment at 7:43
I hope she keeps her powder dry.
Wow, she sounds very Ron Paul-ish. Which probably means she will be completely ignored, and labeled a kook…
Gabby is a dothead??
TO THE GALLOWS!! OFF WITH HER HEAD!!
/sarc
There once was a lady named gabbard
Who carried a well concealed scabbard
Within was a shiv
So that she might still live
If the cia bosses got lathered
“Forgot to add that she took her oath on the Bhagavad Gita when she was sworn-in.” —-T4C
And your point is?
You “dig” it, eh?
Fucken’ hippie. heh.
Seriously, though …. why? (I know next to nothing about the Bhagavad Gita.)
T4C
Excellent research on Tulsi Gabbard. IMHO, this is the way TBP is supposed to work. Step one. Admin posts thought-provoking and controversial articles. Step two. Someone, anyone is supposed to ask …… Who is this person making these statements in this article? What do we know about them?
And you answered these questions to the TBP readership to help us all be better informed. Good on you. FWIW, I agree with Democrat Ms. Gabbard and her colleague in the House, Republican Austin Scott. A faint hope that bipartisanship is still alive.
Thanks, T4C.
Wouldn’t ya know that because it’s TBP some jackass has to make an issue of her religion, regardless of her very correct point of view and courage.
“Step two. Someone, anyone is supposed to ask ……” ——— SSS
Hey, do you have NEW pictures of Selma’s bouncing titties … something you haven’t posted before … maybe showing a fraction of the nip?
Just askin’
Westcoaster
YOU are the jackass. NO ONE is making a fucking issue of her religion. What the fuck is wrong with you?? It’s a serious question. DO you have dementia?
T4C
Yup. That works for me.
+100
No apologies from me
[img[/img]
Stucky- I’m sure nobody will ever read this comment with those giant implanted tits flashing above, but there are things that bother me about Tulsi Gabbard.
First I would Like to clear up the “Dot Head” label, she is the offspring of a half white/half Samoan man and a white woman. In my opinion she is three quarters white and the Hindu connection is from her mother who is a practicing Hindu.
Her parents named two of the kids Aryan and Jai…….interesting. Her father is Catholic yet Tulsi is prochoice. Ms. Gabbard has flip-flopped from being against same sex marriage to being more accepting of the LBGT lifestyle and now says the government should not be involved.
The thing that I don’t trust with this woman is that I believe her service background will be used to push the idea of females taking equal part in the military in the coming war. I am not in favor of US women in combat and being eligible for draft same as males. Just a gut feeling I have as to why she is being pushed to the forefront. Her tough words against the banksters is being tolerated to give her acceptance with the sheep.
@ Bea Lever..Sorry, were you saying something? 🙂
You made good points. I fear you are as jaded and cynical as I am. The only reason I can think of to put young, child bearing age women in combat is to continue the agenda of disappearing the White race.
Other then that, it makes no sense, especially in light of all the libtard concerns over ‘rape culture’ and ‘safe spaces’.
Or maybe they are just plain stupid and cannot fathom future consequences of their acts.
“In my opinion she is three quarters white and the Hindu connection is from her mother who is a practicing Hindu.” ——— Bea
Her Hindu heritage doesn’t matter to me.
.
.
“Ms. Gabbard has flip-flopped from being against same sex marriage to being more accepting of the LBGT lifestyle and now says the government should not be involved. ” —— Bea
She is absolutely correct. The government has absolutely no business being involved with weenies and vaginnies.
.
.
“The thing that I don’t trust with this woman is that I believe her service background will be used to push the idea of females taking equal part in the military in the coming war.” —– Bea
You may fear it …. but, it’s pure speculation on your part. I would actually disagree. You may recall I mentioned on a few occasions that I worked for an Indian software company. I knew and interacted with quite a few Hindus, and not just on a business level. If anything, they tend to be strongly pacifist.
Stucky
Just once it would be nice if you opened your eyes before entering the tunnel. I don’t give a flying shit if that gal is a Hindu or a athiest BFD, she is being packaged as a non-white non-Christian. She is prochoice which is interesting as a Hindu would not kill a cow if they were starving to death.
Most important, I would like for you to understand that in the past three years the push by US military has been very strong to integrate females into combat right alongside males. They would like to have this a done deal by January 2016 which upsets me greatly as I have a 15 year old granddaughter.
There are hordes of articles out there about this subject and YES I believe she is being spotlighted to further this agenda. And YES Lysander depopulation is the bottom line of most everything TPTTB does in this day and time. Please read this article:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/01/31/military-progress-on-women-in-combat-criticized
Let me try that link again:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/01/31/militarys-progress-on-women-in-combat-criticized
“I don’t give a flying shit if that gal is a Hindu or a athiest BFD …” —— Bea
Yet, you brought it up.
.
.
“She is prochoice which is interesting as a Hindu would not kill a cow if they were starving to death.” —–Bea
It is always interesting how beliefs are formed when cultures/religions intermingle. She isn’t 100% Hindu, or 100% Catholic, etc. Add to that her culture … she’s an Americanized Hindu, which is likely very different — at least in some aspects — than an Indian Hindu. My mom will never forget what her brother told her after he visited here the first time, just 12 years after we left Austria. He said to her, “You don’t act very Austrian.”.
.
.
“Most important, I would like for you to understand that in the past three years the push by US military has been very strong to integrate females into combat right alongside males. ….. and YES I believe she is being spotlighted to further this agenda.” ———- Bea
Again, it’s something you “believe” … but, can’t prove.
Not to mention that considering all the HUGE issues facing this country, womenz-in-combat is a minor one, imho. Not a showstopper for me, even if you are correct. Israeli women fight in combat … seems to work for them.
Get this woman running for president. I wouldn’t consider voting for any of the current pretenders, but she gives every appearance of being different.
All current pretenders get an F … I’ll give Rand a D-.
Stucky- I did not bring up the Hindu thing in this thread and You called her a Dot Head which she is not.
Women in combat on the front line in WWIII may be minor to you but very serious to me and others. She is being molded into a rockstar to validate putting females in the heat of battle. We shall see as time goes on Stucky, we shall see.
The angst that I feel when I think of my granddaughter put into that situation is overwhelming. Bad enough I have grandsons who will be facing another trumped up war for the banksters and even worse that you have such a flippant attitude.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/18/politics/women-combat/
http://www.army.mil/article/105814/
“I did not bring up the Hindu thing in this thread and You called her a Dot Head which she is not.” —-Bea
Perhaps you missed the “/sarc”?.
.
.
“She is being molded into a rockstar to validate putting females in the heat of battle.” — Bea
Yet again, you are projecting your fears on her. Rockstar?? Surely you jest. Most of us have never heard of her until a few weeks ago. Again, where is your evidence?? How about just one or two quotes where she wants to put “females in the heat of battle”. (Don’t ask me to do it. YOU make the claim … YOU back it up.)
.
.
“and even worse that you have such a flippant attitude” ——– Bea
There’s nothing at all flippant about my attitude. Why do you lie? I already said I don’t want to see women in combat. I also said it’s not a showstopper issue for me. Apparently, this is quite a big deal for you. Just because it’s not also one for me, well, that has zero to do with being flippant. Project much?
Bea Lever inserts the dagger of truth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8xTAI-xevq
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BBwi1fYepa
Just in case you didn’t feel the need to watch the YouTubes above Stucky, they are of none other than Tulsi Gabbard talking up WOMEN IN COMBAT. One is from 2013 and one is from this year.
There are NUMEROUS interviews online of TULSI GABBARD advocating women fighting on the front lines in combat.
Just because you never heard of her, doesn’t mean others have not. Look at the timing, she is out here saying all the things you want to hear two months before the target date the military has for beginning the program of inserting women in combat.
Those of you here who have daughters/granddaughters/nieces between the ages of 18 and 28, start showing your opposition to this lest you will have them shipped off to a bankster war same as young men have done for hundreds of years.
Can you even imagine the horrors that could be done to a female in combat in WWIII?
After the last several war-mongering Chrisitians and the Muslim claiming to be a Christian, maybe a Hindu would be an improvement.
“Can you even imagine the horrors that could be done to a female in combat in WWIII?” – Bea Lever
All combat is horror; the rapist / murderer / bombadier / artillerist is just as degraded as the rapee / victim / “collateral damage” / “target” . WWIII is not likely to be as “contained”, as, say, WWII [which ravaged three continents and two oceans, along with several minor theaters], and is likely to “spill over” into mostly civilian areas [as did WWII’s Dresden, Moscow, Warsaw, London, etc.].
The truth is that we have become so successful at war that the next one could be the last – but not in the WWI – League of Nations meme; more like ecosystem failure will eliminate the species’ viability. My optimism for any future for my children comes from isolated, unpredictable events – like the time the Soviet early-warning radar had a failure, and instead of launching a few thousand ICBMs, the officer in charge held off to verify that it WAS a fault. Likewise, when JFK’s Navy was hunting and trying to force a Soviet nuke sub off Cuba to the surface, the officer in charge refused to fire a nuclear torpedo – even under deadly threat; he knew it might start the last conflict. There may be more, less known events – but unless WWIII is non-nuclear, whether the females are fighting on the front lines or incinerated at home may well be irrelevant.
@ stucky who I indeed respect for his outspoken comment s . You said prove it .
Her oath to defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC , she violated !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Had she honored her oath , with all that it entails , I do not think things would be as they are .
Altho , this applies to all currently serving members of the so called armed forces .
She is already captured by the MACHINE .
Normalcy bias .
All the . GOV employees are looking for the promised pension and health care benefits .
So many of them do not understand the basic math .
And never look into whether it is sustainable . Whatever
Stucky- Why so quiet? It is what it is, she is the rah-rah girl for women in combat and I don’t trust her.
Should I put up more proof?
Bea
Working on my Pictorial Essay — It’s a fake, fake, fake America.
Should be done in a couple hours or less.
Fantastic news Stuck, Can’t wait !!!
Just to settle this whole Tulsi Gabbard issue, do you understand who and what she is?
I have been waiting with great anticipation to see what you come up with as fake (won’t be hard as most of the crap we see/hear/deal with in the USA!USA!USA! is fake). I only hope that I can have something to offer the comment thread.