Five Months In…

Guest Post by Eric Peters

It is almost halfway through 2016 and – still – no (new) diesels for you.VW lead

Not from VW, at any rate.

Uncle has still not given his permission for the sale of any 2016 model year TDI (diesel) powered VW cars. The entire inventory sits and waits.

Perhaps forever.

But another couple of months will be enough. Then it will be summer – with fall in sight, new model year-wise.

The 2017s will begin to appear.

At which point, the 2016s become like yogurt approaching its sell-by date. Good for buyers, perhaps – assuming they are allowed to buy. But terrible news for VW and its dealers, who will take an epic haircut that – by itself – could cause catastrophic financial damage to the German automaker. On top of that, there is the other problem – what to do about the roughly half-million “affected” TDI-powered VWs already in circulation.unhappy VW people

News reports say that Uncle and VW have come to an agreement of some kind. Very much in the way one comes to an “agreement” with the cop who “asks” you to buckle up. The details of this “agreement” will not be made public for months, however. Not until June 21 will the “agreement” be made public.

Some details have leaked, however.

It looks like VW will be forced (whoops, agreed) to buy back – and crush – some of the “affected” cars… and perform (it appears) software tweaks to the remainder, such that they are brought into compliance with Uncle’s edicts.

It will be interesting to see just how many of the half-million cars will simply be crushed – with VW eating the cost.DEF pic

It comes down to whether a given car can be brought into compliance via the relatively painless (and not-too-pricey) reprogramming or even outright replacement of its computer, which controls the operation of the engine. Some cars will need to have major physical work done to them – for instance, installing a urea injection system in the exhaust, which also requires modification to the fuel system, as well as software/computer work). This looks to be too painful and expensive to be worth doing and so those cars will – apparently – be destroyed and their owners cut a check.

VW’s 652 U.S. dealers will be handling all of these transactions. You can imagine the paperwork.

And it’s the dealers who will have to deal with this even more so than VW itself. Each one is an independent franchise. When you buy a new car, it is technically a “pre-owned” car. The dealer you bought it from previously bought the car from the manufacturer (e.g., VW) and is now selling the car to you.VWs waiting

So, it’s the dealerships who will be refunding your purchase, or dealing with the fix-it.

VW – the company – will no doubt reimburse its dealers. But if VW should prove unable to absorb the cost… which is a real possibility, one that no one seems eager to discuss… then it is the dealers who will be left holding the proverbial (and very empty) bag.

Not to mention VW owners.

Their cars could be orphaned if VW retreats back across the Rhine and (eventually) meets its untergang as a result of all this mess. Parts grow scarce and expensive as the supply chain peters out.

It is likely their cars will be worth less as a result of all this. Damaged brands depreciate. And VW’s brand is badly damaged.

Remember: Uncle has unlimited resources (yours and mine, however long they last) while VW’s resources are finite.because Uncle

Uncle, of course, does not care about such things. He cares about compliance – at whatever cost.

But what if – let’s imagine – VW elected to not comply? Gathered the honchos and called a media fest and announced to the assembled press that its cars are in fact “clean” by any sane standard; that the point of diminishing returns with regard to further fractional decreases in tailpipe emissions was reached years ago and that the time has come for sanity or even just common sense…

That the sensible thing to do is build more 50-plus MPG capable diesels that are 97 percent “clean” at the tailpipe rather than more 40-MPG diesels that are 97.2 percent clean” at the tailpipe… and which cost more to build, on top of that.

Caving in to Uncle is not the right policy. It is exactly like apologizing – endlessly – for having made an off-color joke or “racist” comment. They will never forgive you. They will continue to kick you, the more you expose your belly.

The thing to do is tell them – pardon the French – to fuck off.

Uncle is not reasonable. His demands are unhinged and VW is foolish to think it can ever make peace with him.

I have a feeling that if VW manned up, the people would cheer. Look a Trump. Without endorsing his politics, his straight talk about unmentionable subjects has earned him an ecstatic following. Just imagine if a car company actually went to bat for buyers for a change, instead of being a cuk to the man in the red, white and blue.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Gator
Gator
April 25, 2016 8:38 am

That urea injection shit blows. Ours at work will not go over 55 if the ‘exhaust fluid’is empty and it accelerates slower too. All to remove the remaining 4or 5 % of the emissions. According to my father, who buys these things for a large company and see the added costs every day, a modern diesel truck emits less pollution at full throttle than a deisel car from the 70s does at idle. Still not good enough though.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 25, 2016 8:44 am

I’m guessing that what the government really wants, covertly if not overtly, is to have everyone stuck in little electric self driving vehicles that can be fully monitored and controlled or on bicycles and such.

Or maybe I’m wrong and just paranoid.

TC
TC
April 25, 2016 8:48 am

The real irony is that buying back and shredding the perfectly good cars to have to build new cars will cause much more environmental damage than merely letting the existing cars stay on the road. But it’s really not about the environment after all, is it?

Dutchman
Dutchman
April 25, 2016 9:22 am

Urea? Can you just piss in your gas tank?

overthecliff
overthecliff
April 25, 2016 11:09 am

What did VW do that PTB didn’t like. They could kill babies and get away with it if they had been good members of the club.

harry p.
harry p.
April 25, 2016 12:06 pm

and westy the bernie lover will comment that “VW should pay dearly for not playing by the rules and the prius is awesome” in 3, 2, 1….

rhs jr
rhs jr
April 25, 2016 12:08 pm

NYC’s Political, Economic and Cultural Pollution is worse than all the diesel engines, private jets and yachts and coal fired plants of the world.

Mesomorph
Mesomorph
April 25, 2016 2:08 pm

I’m still wondering why VW admitted guilt at all. They could learn some valuable lessons from Team Clinton.

Crushing the cars is retarded. At least part them out at junk yards and scrap the motors.

If VW could make all this happen with software it would already be done.

I bought mine specifically because it did not have urea injection so I don’t consider that an option even if it was cost effective.
If they try to buy me into accepting lower mileage after a software “fix” I will spent $500 of what they give me to buy the aftermarket software that will take me from 44MPG to almost 55MPG.

Anon
Anon
April 25, 2016 8:39 pm

Yet here in the Midwest, every redneck with a duramax or Cummins will remove ALL emissions and mufflers and spew out hundreds (? Thousands, millions) of times more emissions in carcinogenic particulate matter and probably NOx too.

Gator
Gator
April 25, 2016 9:06 pm

Anon, a muffler isn’t an emissions control device, numb nuts. It’s only job is to make the engine not be as loud. All removing the muffler on a deisel really does is make a louder whistle from the turbo. The flowmaster Super 40 on my Tahoe is a lot louder than a straight piped deisel. And as far as the other stuff, sure, the polute more, but the difference is minuscule. They already run 90% cleaner than the diesels of the 80s and older. All those things like a DPF and EGR do is wear out your engine faster and make you burn more fuel. More fuel burned means more emissions. Engines not lasting as long requires them to be replaced more often, and building a new truck or even engine and everything involved with that creates a much larger carbon foot print than removing the dumbass exhaust has recirculator.

ragman
ragman
April 25, 2016 9:42 pm

Gator; bullshit! I drive a 2012 F250 diesel with the DEF. Mileage: 19 in town and 22-25 highway depending on speed. Smoke: none. Noise: very little although diesel “rattle” doesn’t bother me in the least. WTF do you drive?

Anon
Anon
April 25, 2016 10:09 pm

I realize a muffler is not an emissions control device, hence why I said emissions and mufflers. The mufflers just make it that much more irritating for the general public who have to listen to these shit sounding engines and breathe all the particulate from dumping so much fuel without a DPF. So just Google diesel particulate filter delete and urea delete and check out how many rednecks who roll coal are bragging about their smoke show and increased mpg from taking all of this stuff off. Numbnuts.

Llpoh
Llpoh
April 25, 2016 11:43 pm

It is a head scratcher why VW gets so much support on this issue.

They intentionally mislead governments and consumers everywhere. They installed a device that recognised when the vehicle was being tested, so as to adjust settings to meet regs under test conditions, but that then switched back to better mpg mode when it came off test.

I would have happily applauded if they had given the EPA and others the finger if they were upfront about it. But no, they intentionally committed a crime and did their damnedest to hide that fact.

I hope they go broke.

As an aside, everyone understands that diesel is a by-product of gasoline refinement, and the volume of diesel is not independent of gasoline, right? In other words, everyone cannot simply switch from gas to diesel. There has to be a balance in the refinement of oil. Diesel is not a cure all that brings high mpg across the board.

Combustion engines are approaching the limits of how efficiently they can convert petroleum into energy.