Trigger Warnings and Self-Identifying

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a201/mister2wrx/trigger%20warning_zps4d8p5ual.jpg

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a201/mister2wrx/556%20self%20identifies%20as300aac_zps9jhcveje.jpg


Author: harry p.

A Gen X mechanical engineer who values family, strength, discipline, self-reliance and freedom who is doing what he can to protect his family, belittle morons and be ready for the tough times ahead. Discipline=Freedom

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Gator
Gator
May 20, 2016 9:41 am

Wow. I did not even think a 5.56 AR would go in battery with a 300 blk round. Learned something new today. Good job on the gun to Colt though, looking like it blew out away from the shooter like its supposed to, although that sucks for anyone right next to him.

Wip
Wip
May 20, 2016 10:01 am

Gator,

I need some lernin. Can you tell me what this…

I did not even think a 5.56 AR would go in battery with a 300 blk round.

Means?

ZombieDawg
ZombieDawg
May 20, 2016 10:12 am

Meh.. “Trigger warnings” ??
Way too many of ’em..

[imgcomment image[/img]

Rdawg
Rdawg
May 20, 2016 10:33 am

@Wip, go into battery generally means “cartridge in place and ready to fire”. In the case of this rifle, the cartridge is chambered, and the bolt closed.
I read up on how this would be possible, since the .300 BLK bullet is larger than 5.56 NATO, and thus should not be able to fit in the chamber. It turns out people have forced the cartridge in hard enough to push the .300 BLK bullet back into the case. Boom.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
May 20, 2016 10:43 am

My advice – he should take it back to the gun shop he bought it from on the weekend during peak hours and ask the owner for his money back or for warranty to cover the repair. He should also record the conversation (for legal purposes of course) and post to TBP.

Rdawg
Rdawg
May 20, 2016 11:49 am

harry p., nice explanation; pictures being ever so much more helpful.
Stuff I have read is that folks have jacked in a .300 blackout round into their 5.56, and whacked the crap out of the forward assist to get the bolt to lock. If you have to do that, it may be a sign that something’s up.

Wip
Wip
May 20, 2016 11:52 am

Rdawg & Harry p.

Hmmm, thanks for the explanation. So, DON’T use the .300 BLK? Harry made it sound like you can use it. I have wished I bought my AR chambered in .762.

Rdawg
Rdawg
May 20, 2016 1:12 pm

Wip,
Harry was saying he shoots it, but only because his gun is chambered for it. Sounds like he has another AR in 5.56, and he keeps them straight by marking his magazines.
May I suggest an SKS for your 7.62 needs? Inexpensive, reliable, and I shoot the steel cased commie ammo, so I never feel bad leaving the cases on the dirt. Definitely lacks the “tacticool” factor though.

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
May 20, 2016 1:40 pm

Greetings,

I have a love/hate relationship with this particular weapon having carried several versions around with me over the years. One of these that happens to be clean, oiled and with proper ammunition is a shooters dream as there is very little recoil and it is silly accurate easily up to 400 yards with open sights. They are light weight and will take more than average punishment.

If I were involved in some kind of long term fight where I didn’t have access to endless supplies of parts and cleaning materials then I might opt for something different. Of course, it always depends on the environment.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 20, 2016 5:45 pm

” I have wished I bought my AR chambered in .762.”

For the 300 it’s as simple as changing out a barrel.

You may be better off just buying a barreled upper if you don’t know how to do this, but every gun owner should know how to repair and modify his weapons so it doesn’t hurt a bit to learn.

FWIW, only thing I consider a serious round in the AR arena is the 50 Beowulf, Big slug with 50% more energy than a 12 gauge slug and a 200 yard usable range. You need the entire upper for that though, it needs a 7.62×39 bolt group even with the Beowulf’s rebated rim.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 20, 2016 5:51 pm

NickelthroweR,

Ive head the difference between the AK and AR design being explained as the AK 47 being designed by a solder and the AR being designed by an engineer.

They’re both good weapons, but the AK runs almost endlessly with little work or maintenance needed to make it run while the AR needs work to get it running right and a good deal of maintenance to keep it that way.

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
May 20, 2016 6:18 pm

@Anonymous

That is a good way to describe it. Again, if I were, say, fighting as a insurgent and my weapon spent a lot of time hidden or buried then I’d want something other than an AR type weapon. If the fighting I was to be involved in was street fighting or house to house then I might want something different than the AR as the .223 does an incredible amount of damage to a person if it hits them but I might wish for something that could blast open doors or shoot through walls. If you are engaging targets that are further than 200 yards away and you have a good supply chain then nothing is going to beat the AR.

Rise Up
Rise Up
May 20, 2016 9:33 pm

Ruger came out with a Mini-14 300 blackout last year. I have the 5.56/.223 dressed in pistol grip and folding stock (581 series–more accurate than the early Mini-14’s since it was retooled to tighter specs).

[imgcomment image[/img]