Why They Hate Us

Guest Post by The Zman

The other day I turned on Fox News and was presented with Britt Hume opining on the state of conservatism and where it goes after the election. I’m going from memory, but he said something like, “The Conservative Movement was about low taxes, small government, muscular foreign policy and opposition to abortion, among other things.” He then went on to point out that Trump is none of those things and that those issues are not featured in his campaign.

What struck me about what he said is there was no trace of self-awareness. No mention of the fact that the Conservative Movement lost on all but the foreign policy stuff, and that has been a disaster. The tax bite has not changed very much since the 50’s, despite endless rounds of tax cuts and tax reform. Government has grown like a weed and social issues have all moved in one direction, with amazing speed at times.

A theme here over the years has been the fact that the Conservative Movement has managed to conserve nothing. The reason they are in a crisis is the same reason a losing ball coach finds himself in jeopardy. People will tolerate only so much losing. A salesman, who cannot close deals, gets fired, even if he is the nicest guy in the world. What’s happening today is Official Conservatism™ is being fired.

There’s something else, I think. A useful tool for understanding the world is this. You can learn a great deal about someone by looking at who he hates. The same is true of groups of people. Yankee fans, for example, are indifferent to Mets fans, but they detest Red Sox fans. The reason for that is the Mets are always terrible and pose no threat to the wellbeing of Yankee fans. The Red Sox, on the other hand, are almost always a problem.

Official Conservatism™ hates Donald Trump and they hate the people voting for him. That’s been a bit of an eye-opener for people. When Hume detailed Trump’s deviationism, he was dismissive and condescending. He then had that gold plated phony George Will come in and dismiss Trump and the people supporting him as knaves and fools. The segment was ostensibly about Official Conservatism™, but it was really just an excuse for the two of them to bash Trump.

Take a look at this column from Mona Charen the other day.

If she wins (a bigger “if” today than a week ago), it will be due only to the Republican Party’s suicidal decision to nominate and support a pathological narcissist/con man — a figure utterly outside the parameters of acceptability for public office. Any public office. So as culpable as Democrats are for nominating a person who ought to have been disqualified, Republicans are even more irresponsible for risking the terrible powers of commander in chief to someone most elementary school kids would regard as emotionally unstable.

Just look at the language used here. If she were describing Hitler, would she use a different tone? More important, is it anything like the tone and language used to describe Clinton? Clearly not and that’s the tell. These are people driven purely by hatred of Trump and by extension those who support him. Hillary Clinton could probably promise to revive the Holocaust and Charen would support her, simply because she hates Trump.

The question is why do they hate Trump and his voters so intensely?

I don’t think there is a single answer, but a big part of it is purely personal. No one likes to see their mistakes and failures made public. The people at the core of NeverTrump are the same people who sold us neo-conservatism in the Bush years. What is happening now is a delayed reaction to the massive failures under George W. Bush. Trump made his mark in the primary by humiliating Jeb Bush and that was not an accident. Trump is the repudiation of Bush and the neo-cons.

There’s another bit here too. The Official Right™ has defined itself to the Left by who it hates. Purging people from their ranks has been an integral part of how modern conservatives define their thing. Naturally, when challenged, they fall back on the old ways. The trouble is all their name calling and threats have been met with jeers and laughter. They lost all of their moral authority so they can no longer simply scold the dissenters into silence.

Finally, there’s the creeping realization that their brand of conservatism is all hat and no cattle. Their moral preening and appeals to as yet undefined principles are just postures. In the end, their thing was just a jobs program for people unable to do productive work. As one of the moonbats at the post points out, it is a movement with no base. No matter what happens Tuesday, the pro-Trump people will never forget these traitors or welcome them back.

After liberation, French women guilty of “collaboration horizontale” were dragged into the street to have their heads shaved. It was punishment for betrayal of their people. The Dutch did the same, but they also sent their collaborators to work camps in New Guinea. Many were simply shot, of course. Immediately after the liberation, almost 200.000 Dutch citizens were interned in camps and prisons and put on trial. Sadly, this is not what awaits the traitors of NeverTrump, but at some level they know they will never be “us” again.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Hagar the Horrible
Hagar the Horrible
November 6, 2016 10:37 am

Reminds me of my better half’s favorite saying…”Line em up, I’ll pull the trigger”. But Zman says it eloquently.

rhs jr
rhs jr
November 6, 2016 10:47 am

The RINO’s (and the Social Democrat) kicking dogs broke their chains. The Elite have angry enemies everywhere and Obama has created enemies of America every where.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
November 6, 2016 11:30 am

“…someone most elementary school kids would regard as emotionally unstable…”

They also believe in Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy.

’nuff said.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
November 6, 2016 11:30 am

How can Trump fight the bureaucracy? Hillary will expand it, he can only slow it down.

The bureaucracy resisted the Reagan revolution. It’s soul is growth not decay. More rules enable growth.

When the size of government becomes greater than the private sector, they will begin to hire part-time to keep buying voters.

Eventually, they will have to adopt Maduro’s ploys, government holidays and two-day work weeks.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  EL Coyote
November 6, 2016 12:23 pm

Take away the government stimulated and supported private sector, the government spending dependent part of it, and the government is already much larger than the private sector.

The government spending dependent part of the “private sector” really isn’t the private sector, it’s just a privately owned segment of the government sector. It doesn’t support itself with production in the free markets, it supports itself by taking away from the productive free market private sector and uses government to transfer what was taken to itself.

yahsure
yahsure
November 6, 2016 1:52 pm

The whole Conservative thing.People who have just spent more money each year and voted for Obama’s spending package telling us they are conservative?
I have posted elsewhere and pointed out that under Hillary that Obamacare and the insane increases will continue.Gov. mandated insurance enforced by the IRS, I get nothing back.Everyone seems ok with Obamacare. I value my freedom and guess many don’t.

warts
warts
November 7, 2016 7:00 am

yahsure, nobody here is OK with Obamacare. It’ll die on it’s own. There is no need to waste more time trying to beat it to death on an internet forum.

I didn’t have health insurance for over 10 years before Obamacare, I quit when my premium went up to $350/month. I understand a lot of people don’t have the option of not participating because of poor health.

I paid the tax for the 2 years before I turned 65 and got on Medicare. People like me and all those young people who are healthy didn’t buy into the bullshit and buy in. That is a big reason Obamacare is failing.

I think it’s hilarious they are now talking about needing to raise the penalty.