Possible? Bogus? Regardless, I see this person comments here on TBP all of the time, so…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rfl1P9IUYA
Anonymous: Next 10 Days Will Rock The World
Possible? Bogus? Regardless, I see this person comments here on TBP all of the time, so…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rfl1P9IUYA
The constitution states that if no one has enough electoral votes, then the House chooses from the three top electoral vote recipients. The House can’t just pick Joe Blow! Article II, Section I, and 12th amendment.
Isn’t there a clause whereby if Congress can’t decide, it goes to the Vice President? Not sure how that works?
Don’t bet on it.
The stuff they said about the attorney, Richard Painter, seems to be valid through. His contention is that Trump is in violation of the “Emoluments Clause” which “prevents any federal officer from accepting ’emoluments,’ i.e. compensation for business services, from a foreign government without the consent of Congress”
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/11/25/former-bush-ethics-lawyer-the-electoral-college-should-block-trump-if-hes-violating-the-emoluments-clause/
Trump isn’t a Federal officer.
Technically, he isn’t even “President elect” (which isn’t a federal office) yet since the electoral college hasn’t voted for him yet and they are the ones that elect the President.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrAVMpd7U8E&w=560&h=315%5D
Not sure where this comes from, but I just read a Sorcha Faal report that is word for word this Anonymous video. (I double checked.) http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2178.htm
I’ve followed Sorcha Faal and Anonymous for years. Much of Sorcha Faal has proven true, Anonymous…not so much.
But, now we can surmise what Shrill Jill has put into play and it ain’t about funding. A lot of people will be furious…and armed.
Sorcha Faal? Really? Don’t you mean Such a Fail?
“Anonymous” has never seemed credible.
Looks to me like Anonymous just read that Sorcha Faal article above verbatim. For anyone who doesn’t have time to view the 7 minute video above – maybe just read that.
BTW – who is Sorcha Faal again?
In all of the Sorcha Faal stuff I’ve seen -which isn’t even close to a significant part of it- I’ve never seen any of it proven true.
Could you give some examples of what has been proven true?
Anonymous owns that site
He’s not a Federal officer yet! As soon as he is sworn in, this may become a problem – but then, Hillary has been taking bribes from overseas governments as SoS for years! Decide if you want to prosecute HER first.
Death threats to the electoral college members?
Most foul and wicked, if true. I am waiting for the “list”
of offenders, as are many others, so it can be spread far
and wide. The thieves and murderers and pedos are
fearful Trump may punish them for their crimes?
They should be fearful.
This makes sense to me. It looks like Stein is just trying to delegitimize the process and exclude those electors from vote on 19th. The problem is Pennsylvania. Hopefully tomorrow the court will quash this attempt.
If not then civil war is not far away.
Didn’t Stein abandon the recount in Pennsylvania?I saw a headline today that stated it but did not read the article.
There is nothing in Article II, Section I that mentions a popular vote for President. The general convention, since the Civil War, is for the state electors to vote for the winner of the popular vote in the state. Prior to that many states appointed their electors. However, what I don’t know is if the current process for following the popular vote is mostly by law or convention, in the several states.
I can’t see how, in reading Article II, Section I, that a state can coerce an elector in how to vote. Therefore, it’s quite possible that we might see “faithless”electoral votes, making for a highly unstable situation. Having studied the Clinton Crime Syndicate for 30 years, I wouldn’t put corruption of the process, by intimidation, blackmail, or money, passed them.
Applies to anonymous commenters too.
[img
[/img]
Anyone that thought, or is thinking, that the fight was over when Trump won is naively wrong.
It is just getting started, Trump winning the election is just the first skirmish in the first battle of what will be a very long and deadly war.
And the political side of that war is the smaller part of it.
There was so much going on during the election, but I remember these guys saying something big would happen……and it was a dud.
When the music started on this video, I thought it was Jack Van Impe. He’s more credible than Anonymous. Plus there’s his lovely wife, Rexalla.
There was a shrill conspiracy story about how Trump would NEVER be allowed to win the election. It appears that the electors pledged to Trump are die-hard Trump supporters who know what is at stake. Having said that, I believe there have been a handful of elector defections over the years…
I didn’t watch the above video, but I read this comment from Joel Skousen’s World Affairs Brief:
The recount battle mounted by Green Party candidate Jill Stein and Democrat Hillary Clinton is a plan with secondary motives. Having missed the deadline to request a recount before the courts in Pennsylvania, there is no way to achieve the 270 electoral votes Clinton needs to turn this election around, even if the results were reversed in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania combined. But the Clinton margin of victory is even slimmer in New Hampshire than Trump’s margins in Wisconsin, so there’s a bit of hypocrisy in only asking for a recount in states where Clinton lost. So, what gives? The recount may be a move to deter the electors of the two contested states from casting their ballots on Dec. 19th when the Electoral College is scheduled to declare the winner.
As usual, they are up to no good…
Here: https://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/