You don’t handle sarin-saturated bodies *without gloves* – unless you’re a Syrian rebel trying to pull off yet another hoax. – Justin Raimondo
You don’t handle sarin-saturated bodies *without gloves* – unless you’re a Syrian rebel trying to pull off yet another hoax. – Justin Raimondo
I doubt you’ll see this anywhere in the MSM.
And the average American is too ignorant of the reality of chemical weapons to understand what it means, at least for this video, even if you do.
You mean another false flag operation? Ho hum.
But did you get Trump’s reaction? Remember all that talk about America first? Remember not getting involved in foreign entanglements where America’s vital interests are unaffected? Here’s a reminder:
June 15, 2013: We should stay the hell out of Syria, the “rebels” are just as bad as the current regime. WHAT WILL WE GET FOR OUR LIVES AND $ BILLIONS?ZERO
August 29, 2013: What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.
September 1, 2013: President Obama’s weakness and indecision may have saved us from doing a horrible and very costly (in more ways than money) attack on Syria!
September 2, 2013: If the U.S. attacks Syria and hits the wrong targets, killing civilians, there will be worldwide hell to pay. Stay away and fix broken U.S.
September 3, 2013: What I am saying is stay out of Syria.
September 5, 2013: The only reason President Obama wants to attack Syria is to save face over his very dumb RED LINE statement. Do NOT attack Syria,fix U.S.A.
September 5, 2013: AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA – IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
September 7, 2013: President Obama, do not attack Syria. There is no upside and tremendous downside. Save your “powder” for another (and more important) day!
September 9, 2013: Don’t attack Syria – an attack that will bring nothing but trouble for the U.S. Focus on making our country strong and great again!
Now, suddenly he’s so concerned about the “innocent babies”. Where was his concern last month when 200+ civilians, including “innocent babies” were killed in an American airstrike in Mosul?
Now comes the betrayal.
“Do NOT attack Syria,fix U.S.A”
Perhaps he realized the USA was unfixable, thus there is no reason to delay the agenda. We’ve known for 15+ years that Syria is next on the list.
Call me naive, but I’m going to watch what he does, not what he says. He knows no resolution will come out of the UN Security Council, no matter what that stupid Nikki Haley says or does. See this take on it https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/05/ambassador-haley-gives-passionate-humanitarian-speech-at-united-nations/ You do know the vote on Gorsuch is looming, right? If we take any military action against Assad, I’ll be livid, but I don’t see it happening. It’s like the “locker room talk” that came out in October: “it’s just words, folks. It’s just words.”
They want WW3 and they are willing to do whatever it takes to provoke it!
Ron Paul: “Zero Chance” Assad Behind Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria; Likely A False Flag
by Tyler Durden
Apr 6, 2017 10:06 AM
According to former Congressman Ron Paul, the chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun that killed 30 children and has led to calls for the Trump administration to intervene in Syria could have been a false flag attack.
As Paul Joseph Watson details, pointing out that the prospect of peace in Syria was moving closer before the attack, with ISIS and Al-Qaeda on the run, Paul said the attack made no sense.
“It looks like maybe somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode,” said Paul, asking, “who benefits?”
“It doesn’t make any sense for Assad under these conditions to all of a sudden use poison gases – I think there’s zero chance he would have done this deliberately,” said Paul.
he former Congressman went on to explain how the incident was clearly being exploited by neo-cons and the deep state to enlist support for war.
“It’s the neo-conservatives who are benefiting tremendously from this because it’s derailed the progress that has already been made moving toward a more peaceful settlement in Syria,” said Paul.
Many have questioned why Assad would be so strategically stupid as to order a chemical weapons attack and incite the wrath of the world given that he is closer than ever to winning the war against ISIS and jihadist rebels.
Just five days before the attack, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said, “The longer-term status of President Assad will be decided by the Syrian people,” implying a definite shift in U.S. foreign policy away from regime change in Syria.
Why would Assad put such assurances in jeopardy by launching a horrific chemical attack, allowing establishment news outlets like CNN to once against use children as props to push for yet another massive war in the Middle East?
I’ve been in the CBRN field 20 years in Engineering supporting the Army, developing equipment, protocols and materials to mitigate events like this.
You are not going to handle GB victims or their discarded clothing bare handed before thorough decon. Chlorobutyl gloves are commonly used to handle the contaminated clothing articles and victims until decontamination protocols are undertaken.
Atropine should be administered to victims as an antidote.
I would like to see the first responder level of protection used when evacuating the victims from the contaminated site itself. Something here does not quite pass the sniff test.
Trump Tells Members Of Congress He Is Considering Military Action In Syria
by Tyler Durden
Apr 6, 2017 12:09 PM
It appears that the neo-cons are on the verge of victory again: according to CNN, Trump has told some members of Congress that he is considering military action in Syria in retaliation for this week’s chemical attack and recognizes the seriousness of the situation, a source familiar with the calls tells CNN.
CNN hedges by noting that its source said the president had not firmly decided to go ahead with it, but said he was discussing possible actions with Defense Secretary Mattis. Trump is relying on Mattis’ judgment, according to the source.
US officials told CNN “the Pentagon has long standing options to strike Syria’s chemical weapons capability and has presented those options to the administration.”
The sources stressed a decision has not been made.
We now look forward to Russia’s response as the geopolitical situation in Syria devolves to precisely where it was during the Obama administration.
Gotta be a bit careful about how the MSM reports anything and what they report these days till other sources confirm it as well.
Rand Paul Urges Trump Not To Take Military Action In Syria
“I don’t want to support people who hate our country”
Steve Watson | Infowars.com – April 6, 2017
Senator Rand Paul has urged the President to stick to the position on Syria that he espoused before taking office – that military intervention will do more harm than good.
The Senator retweeted a tweet from Trump posted in August of 2013, when a similar chemical weapon attack to this week’s was blamed on the Syrian government.
At the Time Trump tweeted “What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.”
While he condemned the reported attacks in the Syrian city of Idlib, Paul noted that what Trump wrote “remains true today as it was in 2013. Both parts.”
At the time, Trump made his feelings clear after hundreds were killed in the attack, and the Obama administration was on the verge of taking military action.
With this week’s atrocity in Syria, it seems Trump may be changing his stance however.
The president said on Wednesday that the attack “crossed a lot of lines for me” and that his “attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed very much.”
After saying last week that it was up to the Syrian people, rather than outsiders to decide what to do about Assad, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said he now believes that Russia needs to reconsider its support of the Assad regime.
In a further interview with Fox & Friends Wednesday, Senator Paul reminded viewers that the support provided by the US government to Syrian rebels in the past has led directly to the current situation in Syria.
“I think it’s also important to note that on the rebel side that McCain wants to support, are radical Islamists who hate America and hate Israel. And I don’t want to support people who hate our country.” Paul noted.
“I don’t want to support people who say when they’re done with Assad they are going to attack Israel and not ISIS. So it’s a complicated situation. And it may be — may well be a war that has no friends in it. And that makes it a difficult position to watch.” the Senator added.
“But I think also we have actually allowed the situation by pushing Assad back and being part of that. We allowed a vacuum to let ISIS fill that — that’s been a mistake.” Paul urged.
Even if this was real and I am very skeptical, they are mohammedans. A dead mohammedan is a good mohammedan. Let allah sort them out. (lower case is intentional)
I thought Assad gave his WMD’s up for disposal?
Assad you old trickster you. Shame on you.
As long as these cheap tricks work “They” will keep using them. I keep waiting for Mr. Blown off legs man from Boston to show up in one of these B movies.