When and how did the phrase “and replace” become part of the accepted political narrative?
Question of the Day, Aug 14
When and how did the phrase “and replace” become part of the accepted political narrative?
Until the 535 classless clowns who have an over blown and larger image of themselves realize that they need to get rid of this monstrosity that was designed to fail and actually get rid of it their prospects for continued employment as a “representative” of a state or district remains doubtful.
If they replace it with nothing, then I’m good with it.
Actually if they made them post prices for most procedures I’d be good with that also. Oh yeah, and send the hospital and insurance CEO’s – and their management teams to North Korea.
The simple answer is……..RINOs are ‘in charge’
Alan Moore would argue that this is simply the product of chaos and a rudderless world. It is simply a coincidence that the term “and replace” has become ubiquitous with the entire political elite of D.C. because if it were intentional it would be comforting a thought.
Or something like that.
Right around the day after the election when the shock wore off you started to hear in whispers ‘and replace’ First the dims, then the cucks. Before you knew it the media had picked it up and it was like ‘repeal and replace’ had been the goal all along.
(((They))) must have hours upon hours of endless laughter at how stupid the murican people are.
The operative term should be “get real”; pure Santa Claus Communism doesn’t work and Cuba, USSR, Venezuela, Africa, Detroit, Birmingham etc are the proof.
It feeds the delusion that only government can fix problems.
“and replace” became popular almost immediately after Ford built it’s first car.