What If The Tax Donkeys Rebel?

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

I would hazard a guess that an increasing number of tax donkeys are considering dropping out as a means of increasing their happiness and satisfaction with life.

Since federal income taxes are in the spotlight, let’s ask a question that rarely (if ever) makes it into the public discussion: what if the tax donkeys who pay most of the tax rebel? There are several likely reasons why this question rarely arises.

1. Most commentators may not realize that the vast majority of income taxes are paid by the top 10%–and that roughly 60% are paid by the top 4% of households. (A nice example of the Pareto Distribution, i.e. the 80/20 rule, which can be extended to the 64/4 rule.)

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

As David Stockman noted in Trump’s 1,500-word Airball, “Among the 148 million income tax filers, the bottom 53 million owed zero taxes in the most recent year (2014), and the bottom half (74 million) paid an aggregate total of just $45 billion. So let me be very clear. There was still $4 trillion left in the collective pockets of these 122 million taxpayers — even after the IRS had its way with them!

By contrast, the top 4% or 6.2 million filers paid $802 billion in Federal income taxes. That amounted to nearly 58% of total Federal income tax payments.”

2. Few commentators draw a distinction between earned income (wages and salaries) and unearned income (dividends, interest, and more broadly, rentier income streams from the ownership of productive assets.

Here are a few examples to clarify the difference. Let’s say a couple earn $300,000 a year–a nice chunk of change, to be sure, but since this is earned income, it’s exposed to higher tax rates: 33% and up.

The primary tax breaks available to wage earners are mortgage interest and tax-deferred retirement contributions (IRAs and 401Ks). But there’s only so much income that can be sheltered with these deductions. The household earning $300,000 may not own much in the way of wealth, and might even devote much of that income to servicing student loans, paying private school tuition, supporting elderly parents, etc.

If this household is typical, its primary wealth/assets are home equity and retirement funds. A house doesn’t generate income, and any income generated by retirement funds is unavailable until retirement age, unless the owners are willing to pay steep penalties.

Now compare the hard-working folks earning $300,000 with a couple who don’t work at all, but live off a rentier/investment income of $300,000 annually. Long-time readers know I often distinguish between assets that don’t generate income (the family home, etc.) and assets that produce income, i.e. productive assets such as family businesses, stocks, bonds, commercial real estate, etc.

If these wealthy folks are typical, much of their income is taxed as capital gains at 15%, not 35%, and they also avoid the Social Security/Medicare payroll taxes paid by wage earners and the self-employed.

If we separate out these sources of income and types of wealth, we can distinguish two separate classes of high-income taxpayers: those who earn a lot of money and pay a lot of taxes, but who don’t get much income from productive assets/wealth. Furthermore, any increases in the value of their primary assets (the family home and retirement funds) are not available in the same way as gains registered in stocks, bonds, and other income-yielding assets.

These high-earners are tax donkeys–they pay much of the nation’s income tax but have to work hard for that privilege. While they typically have considerably more wealth than lower income households, their wealth is either inaccessible or unproductive, i.e. doesn’t generate income.

The top 9.5% of households are tax donkeys to some degree, while the top .5% are typically rentiers who live very well off the income streams flowing from productive wealth (apartment buildings, ownership of businesses, stocks, bonds, etc.)

At some point, tax donkeys may decide that it’s no longer worth it to work so hard, and so they downsize, retire, sell the business, etc.–get out while the getting’s good. The average wage earner may reckon that those making the big bucks and paying the big taxes would never stop slaving away because their net income would drop–and who would voluntarily let their income decline?

I would hazard a guess that an increasing number of tax donkeys are considering dropping out as a means of increasing their happiness and satisfaction with life. When the often overworked tax donkeys start bailing out, there may be no substitute source of taxes.

Those who reckon some new tax donkey will quickly take the place of the retiring tax donkey overlook the fact that many are entrepreneurs and/or highly experienced professionals who can’t be replaced as easily as a typical salaried person.

Courtesy of my esteemed colleague Lance Roberts, here are some charts that illuminate the widening disparities of income and wealth that differentiate those who pay little income tax, the tax donkeys and those who pay lower rates of taxes on unearned income: (Fed Admits The Failure Of Prosperity For The Bottom 90%):

Family income:

Family financial assets:

Business equity:


*  *  *

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com. Check out both of my new books, Inequality and the Collapse of Privilege ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print) and Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print, $5.95 audiobook) For more, please visit the OTM essentials website.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
October 3, 2017 9:03 am

For far too many years tax codes have been written to encourage some types of financial activity -and lifestyles- and discourage others.

This needs to be changed, but it is unlikely that it will because too many people have too much at stake to allow it.

Everyone, and I mean everyone, will end up demanding their particular position be protected at the expense of someone else’s.

Dave
Dave
  Anonymous
October 3, 2017 11:31 am

Anon:
“Don’t tax you, don’t tax me. Tax that fellow behind the tree.”

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
October 3, 2017 9:08 am

IMO it’s less about us stupid tax donkeys finally wise-ing up than younger, smart people looking at us and figuring out how to avoid our plight. That means having fewer – or no – kids, utilizing public education as much as possible, working for the government and being eligible for a pension (albeit one with a high risk of being repudiated), making sure not to earn too much, etc. It’s like the old Army slogan is inverted: Be Less Than You Can Be.

unit472
unit472
October 3, 2017 9:57 am

This is why I keep advocating switching to wealth tax rather than making income the primary taxable amount. As a society we want people able to command high wages to work more be they an emergency room surgeon in Las Vegas or a high voltage lineman doing hurricane reconstruction in Florida. OTOH of what real use are the profits made by some guy speculating in foreign exchange markets or interest rate swaps even if the amounts made are in the millions?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  unit472
October 3, 2017 11:29 am

Wouldn’t a wealth tax just extend annual taxation at a high rate to everything you own including your banking and financial accounts the way property and things like vehicle licensing taxes do now?

overthecliff
overthecliff
October 3, 2017 10:40 am

Sooner or later Atlas shrugs and the socialists run out of OPM. Like Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

Anon
Anon
October 3, 2017 12:46 pm

Or, we could have a consumption tax. This would keep the government honest, as taxes being raised would in turn, raise the cost of things we buy. It also would make companies selling those things less competitive. The incentive would then be on the corporate lobbies to keep OUR taxes as low as possible, so THEY could make more on each widget. No carve outs, no “special deals” none. Simply, everyone pays the same percentage at the time of purchase for the “cost” of government. You would not need FATCA, or teams of accountants. It also would be fair. You can afford to buy a 50 foot Yacht, well then you can afford the sales tax on a 50 foot yacht. You can only afford a Ford Focus, well, then you simply pay the same percentage of the purchase as the Yacht buyer, but obviously less tax. Every incentive in the world to be more successful, as you get to keep EVERY PENNY you make, and are free to live how you wish. You can even – god forbid, get ahead if you take that accumulated wealth and start a business. Of course you would be encouraged to start small, and with no debt (you know, the right way) since a big expensive machine would be a higher tax than a lower cost used model…..you get the idea.
However, we all know that would not happen, as then Government, the MIC, the Healthcare monopoly, education liars etc. would all lose power over the sheep. And the sheep would gain some power….

General
General
October 3, 2017 1:20 pm

How about no income or consumption tax. Tariffs only and not allow the government to borrow at all.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  General
October 3, 2017 2:55 pm

Our founding fathers might agree with that, but people today won’t.

artbyjoe
artbyjoe
October 3, 2017 9:06 pm

General & Anonymous says:
October 3, 2017 at 2:55 pm

tariffs only. I would agree with that. more might agree with it than you think. of course, i have been wrong before.