You’re On Your Own

ichef.bbci.co.uk

If the world seems incomprehensible now, just wait.

Guest post by Robert Gore at Straight Line Logic

Within a twenty-four-hour span the Catalonian people voted 90 percent in favor of secession from Spain, despite the Spanish government’s effort to violently squelch the referendum, and a man in a Las Vegas hotel room opened fire on a concert, killing fifty-nine and wounding over 500. There’s no tangible connection between the two incidents, but they illustrate incipient forces still gathering steam that are transforming the world.

No government, military force, or intelligence unit has figured out how to stop those determined to kill large numbers of people if the killers are willing to forfeit their own lives. Nor will they. Individuals and small groups have the capability to amass and use large amounts of lethal weaponry, killing military and civilian targets in a guerrilla war, or victims on the deadly end of their random bullets or bombs.

Arguments that this can stopped by limiting access to weaponry are specious, serving only as cover for further expansion of government and curtailment of individual liberty. The trend towards cheaper, more widely distributed killing power stretches back to the invention of gun powder. Guns can now be manufactured at home with 3D printers. The cows left the barn long ago.

Standing in opposition to the forces of decentralized violence are the forces of centralized violence, governments. Catalonia offers a useful illustration. Violence was the government’s loud and clear cry that it had no other argument for preventing Catalonian succession. The wealthy region pays a disproportionate share of Spain’s taxes and gets less back than it puts in. Catalans are a distinct ethnic subgroup, attenuating any so-called blood ties between Catalonia and Spain. Suppression was only partially successful and 90 percent of those Catalonians who voted chose independence.

A wonder in Catalonia was that masses of demonstrators clearly outnumbered Spanish police forces, but made no attempt to fight back against their brutality. This will be the exception rather than the rule as these types of conflicts escalate, which they will.

A joint wonder of Catalonia and Las Vegas is that gun banners continue to argue that private ownership of guns isn’t a bulwark against governmental tyranny, that civilized, gun-banning governments don’t tyrannize. How different would last weekend in Catalonia have been if Catalans had guns? How different would the future be if the Spanish government had to deal with private firearm possession as it decided on its response to say, a declaration of Catalonian independence? Sure, governments protect your rights, but pass the ammo.

Greece’s No vote in the summer of 2015, Brexit, Trump, and now Catalonia have come amidst an anemic global “recovery.” These insurrectionary portents have been relatively peaceful; few of the insurrectionists, even in Greece, were starving. What happens when the global economy collapses under its mounting debt burden? What happens when comparatively wealthier areas, like Catalonia, decide they’ll no longer support poorer areas? What happens when the masses face destitution?

Insurrectionary violence will no longer be off the table. The US, where there are more private firearms than there are residents, will be the center of the coming maelstrom. Look at the staggering arsenal Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock legally and surreptitiously amassed. There are plenty of such arsenals out there. From gang-bangers in South Central Los Angeles to Appalachian survivalists, everyone has guns, lots of guns.

There is probably already a black market in all sorts of military weaponry, too: munitions, mines, artillery, anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles, etc. If there isn’t one now, expect one to emerge as the crisis mounts, fueled by the same sorts of entrepreneurs and networks who currently supply the US its illegal drugs.

The kind of decentralized, multi-sided guerrilla warfare that could coalesce in America will make Korea, Vietnam and all the other places the US has militarily intervened since look like walks in the park. Anyone who thinks the government will do anything more than add to the chaos is making a long-odds bet. Some government personnel, particularly those trained in violence—the police and military—will go free agent and join the general mayhem, especially after their employer goes bankrupt. The government’s only option for “order” may be the barren, decimated order of Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the atomic bomb blasts.

Preceding apace with the decentralization of violence has been a devolution of moral authority stretching back to the Reformation and the invention of the printing press. Organized religion has steadily lost influence, supplanted by countless doctrines of individual morality and choice, or conformity to the doctrines of self-selected groups. People shop in a philosophical bazaar of stated or unstated premises and tenets, consciously or unconsciously settling on those that appeal to their psychologies and correspond to their beliefs.

Government cannot replace organized religion as the central moral authority. Aside from criminalizing behaviors that are almost universally recognized as wrong (and even that is a fairly short list), government authority extends only to what is legal, not what is right and wrong. Much of what governments do, almost always characterized as legal by the governments that do it, would be universally recognized as evil if done by private individuals or groups. Governments have murdered millions, probably billions more people than whatever individual, group, or institution comes in a distant second place. Virtually all that murder has been legally sanctioned by the perpetrating government.

Efforts to obliterate traditional, religious-based morality with a morality of state worship have invariably been miserable failures; see Marxism. Government is everywhere and always power and coercion, and compliance with its dictates and strictures rests not on recognition of their moral worthiness, but on recognition of the costly and painful consequences of failure to do so.

Devolution has pushed morality down to the smallest social unit, the individual. Morality is a product of choices and choices are a matter of thought. Individualized morality—like all human thought—shaped in the trial and error of environments and circumstances best furthers the organic adaptation necessary for survival of the human species. It is like the English common law, incrementally developed and changed in light of what works and what doesn’t.

The devolution of morality has not wiped out either good or evil, or the vast range of human thought and behavior that falls in between. Thomas More’s individual defiance of England’s centralized government and church is now reckoned as saintly. Stephen Paddock was the personification of evil, but in the chaos and terror he unleashed, there were incredible stories of courage and heroism.

Even back in the Middle Ages the moral pronouncements of the Pope had little relevance to the serfs working far off lands. So little, in fact, that the Catholic Church didn’t deem it necessary to translate those pronouncements into a language the serfs could understand. The serfs went about their business, making their own judgments of right and wrong. Shaped, to be sure, by what religious instruction they had received, but mostly by the exigencies of their own situations.

In the coming atomized entropy, it will be starkly apparent that just as with preparation and survival strategies, morality lies with the individual. A fortunate few will be able to band together with other individuals of similar beliefs. Decentralization in full efflorescence will obliterate many of the current buffers—particularly the welfare state—between actions and consequences, meaning individuals will be forced to take responsibility for what they do, whether they want to or not. In an insolvent world nobody’s left to pick up the tab.

Cries will issue forth to the skies: Help us! Save us! Somebody do something! Somebody tell us what to do! The reply from the skies: You’re on your own.

Time to read a great book?

AMAZON

KINDLE

NOOK

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
38 Comments
Alan Donelson
Alan Donelson
October 6, 2017 3:29 pm

…and a man in a Las Vegas hotel room opened fire on a concert, killing fifty-nine and wounding over 500. There’s no tangible connection between the two incidents, but they illustrate incipient forces still gathering steam that are transforming the world.

Stopped reading right there. Mr. Gore, any relation to Albert of “hockey stick” fame? No acknowledgement, sir, of any DOUBTS or QUESTIONS about the Las Vegas “drama”? Perhaps one reason for no connection apparent to you is that you missed a commonality shared by Catalonia’s “vote” and the “Las Vegas show” — that is, divide and conquer, with tangential benefits of distraction, fear, the promulgation of legislation of various kinds (e.g., back scatter machines in all hotels, gun-control laws and restrictions, etc.). Never let a good crisis go to waste, whether you have to DIY or not.

Alan Donelson
Alan Donelson
  Robert Gore
October 6, 2017 4:01 pm

Perhaps you should also not preface articles you want to write with a premise (or two) many in your intended audience might misconstrue, for example, those concerned still about another “false flag”, the American version of Gladio, with more no doubt to come. Divide and conquer goes all the way to atomization. I think we now have a long ways to go before then. Your essay reminds me of the adverts and trailers for HorrorWorld’s “end times” movies. Same genre, I think.

N.Bidnes
N.Bidnes
  Alan Donelson
October 6, 2017 4:44 pm

Perhaps you should STFU Alan.

Alan Donelson
Alan Donelson
  N.Bidnes
October 6, 2017 5:19 pm

I shall take your well reasoned, thought-full [sic] suggestion to heart, “N.Bidnes”. As an aside, does your moniker point to “no business like ______ busyness?” I know, “freedom of speech” is so American, that it seems necessary to remind natural born folks like me to STFU. By the way, from which freer country do you transmit from? Israel?

Gay Veteran
Gay Veteran
  Alan Donelson
October 7, 2017 10:52 am

if you stopped reading then you’re an idiot

fred
fred
  Alan Donelson
October 8, 2017 2:49 pm

THis guy has a good point. Any discussion which includes “oh boy this guy got a lot of illegal guns…(whiney valley-girl voice optional)” cannot thereafter pretend that he is against gov’t tyranny, cover….blown…
I find this article to be the equivalent of diluted gmo-derived powdered non-dairy coffee product.
There’s only one bottom line we are fast approaching… armed fearless people need to realize their “possesions” in this world of samsara are garbage… give up on their slavery of mind and economics..realize they will work in their pointless jobs until they die of cancer….and eliminate the khazarian pieces of crap who set up this whole farcical crap.

CCRider
CCRider
October 6, 2017 3:42 pm

Great article. It’s so wonderful to see brave people like the Catalonians rise up in the face of statist brutality reclaiming their right to live as they damn well please without some overlord parasites riding them like mules. They’ll be an inspiration to similar movements in Scotland, Venice, Flanders, etc. As a natural born secessionist I really never felt that I would one day see a similar movement happen in the u.s.
Suddenly it looks inevitable. “You’re on your own” is exactly what I want.

SECEDE!

bluestem
bluestem
October 6, 2017 4:11 pm

I’d rather be on my own than dependent on the government any day. John

Work-In-Progress
Work-In-Progress
October 6, 2017 4:27 pm

So, it’s all over but the bankruptcy?

Will ((they)) really use the nukes?

Someone on an earlier post said…”If you can see your basement floor, you need more ammo.”

BB
BB
October 6, 2017 4:37 pm

Either way you look at it we are heading toward an unbelievable Scary future.

Mike Murray
Mike Murray
October 6, 2017 6:57 pm

If you want to be taken seriously, this is not a great way to start an article:

“Within a twenty-four-hour span the Catalonian people voted 90 percent in favor of succession from Spain…”

secession |səˈseSHən|
noun
the action of withdrawing formally from membership of a federation or body, especially a political state: the republics want secession from the union.

succession |səkˈseSHən|
noun
1 a number of people or things sharing a specified characteristic and following one after the other: she had been secretary to a succession of board directors.

Administrator
Administrator
  Robert Gore
October 6, 2017 7:20 pm

Taken care of. I know what it’s like being your own editor.

Gay Veteran
Gay Veteran
  Mike Murray
October 7, 2017 10:59 am

spelling Nazi

racistwhiteguy
racistwhiteguy
  Mike Murray
October 7, 2017 1:09 pm

You don’t take the whole finely crafted article seriously because of one word? Moron.

Unbeatable
Unbeatable
October 6, 2017 8:11 pm

Ooooh. Bring it on. Reading Gore’s stuff just makes me wanna…

Dennis Roe
Dennis Roe
October 6, 2017 8:14 pm

The only moral authority I know is me.

Bot
Bot
October 6, 2017 8:38 pm

Secession is the only hope. I say it over and over; decentralization down to the smallest possible unit. Any hope for freedom, liberty and prosperity lies in the rejection of governments, democracy, voting, and all other manifestations of collectivism. They manifest an undeniable, morally bankrupt and blood soaked record.

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
  Bot
October 6, 2017 11:23 pm

Yes, small countries have a very limited capacity for harming the rest of us….the smaller the better.

Thomas Ryan
Thomas Ryan
October 6, 2017 9:45 pm

Yes we are.

Rise Up
Rise Up
October 6, 2017 10:56 pm

You think things were bad the last week? Just wait until late December-early January. Trines, nodes, and oppositions dictate EVEN MORE ominous times ahead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMBq_Wq3klc&t=38m8s

Smoke Jensen
Smoke Jensen
  Rise Up
October 7, 2017 7:01 am

Rise Up. I tried to watch the video but I just can’t watch a guy that pronounces Uranus as Youranus. His views might be different too if he ever leaves his mum’s basement.

Rise Up
Rise Up
  Smoke Jensen
October 7, 2017 5:17 pm

Smoke, what do your charts show?

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
October 7, 2017 12:57 am

The thing that sucks about waiting for collapse is the waiting. They pick us apart a little bit at a time, it’s like death by a thousand cuts.

It would be better if someone would just rip the band-aid off and get it over with. At least at that stage, a course of action becomes clear and you can act with clarity and purpose. And with a clear conscience.

james the deplorable wanderer
james the deplorable wanderer
  Francis Marion
October 7, 2017 1:15 am

My conscience is already clear.
Anyone who tries a “home invasion” at my place will go home in a bag. Anyone who comes to my house looking for firearms to confiscate is at best wasting their time. Anyone who wants to demand reparations from me is wasting their time and mine – I never owned any slaves, kept anyone from getting a job, benefited from someone else’s slave labor. IDGAF about refugees, illegal immigrants, SJWs, Antifas or their causes. I just don’t care anymore – being lied to, lied about and lied for continuously for the last few decades has depleted my store of human kindness for anyone who isn’t kind to me. HSF gets a pass for his syrup, I’d give him a hot meal in a snowstorm and a bed for the night, maybe more. Anyone else, not so sure.
When the mindless zombies come to call, few will leave unscathed – and few will return. 4th turnings may be a bitch, but rednecks with guns are even more so. Gotta go buy some more ammunition, I can still see the bottom of the closet.

Achmed Foley
Achmed Foley
October 7, 2017 6:02 am

I find it difficult to get enthusiastic about Catalan ‘independence’. They are just creating another European welfare state. One which will still tax them, spy on them, socially-engineer them. One which will contain large numbers of people who don’t want an independent Catalan state. Will those Catalan people who support secession from Spain also support secession from Catalonia of those areas which want to remain part of Spain? I expect they would violently suppress it and claim the indivisibility of Catalonia. I do support secession but it must be taken to it’s conclusion.

P.S. Low and middle income earners of Catalonia are not supporting the rest of Spain. They themselves are being supported by the wealthy. Are they actually going to call for tax cuts for wealthy Catalans if they do break away? Nah, they just want more of that wealth for themselves.

Rob
Rob
October 7, 2017 7:09 am

Try this on for size. October 2015 the US national debt was $17.75 Trillion. Today, 2 years later, we’re at $20 Trillion. China, India, and Russia are accumulating gold at a record breaking pace. Why? The dollar is going to be replaced by a basket of currencies. Do the math. In 2015, USA spent $400 billion to pay the interest on the national debt. Treasury takes in roughly $3.5 Trillion annually. Given the growth of USA debt, by 2026, the national debt will be over $31 Trillion. The interest on the debt will be over $1.1 Trillion. At some point in the next 10 years, the dollar will be replaced by a basket of currencies and the USA will no longer be able to just “print” money. So let Wall Street keep talking about how great the economy is, the wonders of artificial intelligence, robots, etc. They’re all smoke screens to divert attention away from the inevitable decline in our standard of living.

Mark
Mark
  Rob
October 7, 2017 9:36 pm

Rob,
Excellent mathematical post…but we will never make it 10 years…I’m prepping for 2020 max.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
October 7, 2017 7:13 am

I’ve been thinking along the same lines the past few days. And frankly I don’t think that the official narrative- as much as I personally question it- is any more comforting than the thought that this is a bigger conspiracy. There’s nothing that they can do to defend against real lone wolves with a desire for excitement or whatever nebulous motivations drive them.

I would have thought that the eclipse bisecting the country would have been enough of a Matrix-y tipoff for most people to alter their day to day behavior.

Bottom line, if you aren’t actively planning on going back to homesteading and a sustenance lifestyle, you have only yourself to blame if you get caught up in the machinations of complex societies gone to seed.

Suzanna
Suzanna
October 7, 2017 11:29 am

Bob,

Another great article from your mind to our minds.

We are on our own. The changes we are seeing are a product
of an abandonment of morality. Bankers, in collusion with the
large corporations, military contractors, and politicians…have looted
our country. Trillions are “missing.” Accounting errors?

LV? There was a drill for mass shooting events held there the
week before. The pictures available may have been taken during
the exercise. Then again, maybe not. Whatever…either way we
are inundated with conflicting reports.

The preening for status, and being “PC” may soon be irrelevant,
so it would be best to lower lifestyle expectations. Ultimately
one needs Maslow’s 3 basic needs chart. Any self-actualization
will be experienced through the kindness we extend to members
of our own community/others. However, we note: Charity starts
at home.

Thanks Bob, you are a smartie.

Suzanna

jimmieoakland
jimmieoakland
October 7, 2017 2:47 pm

A chilling, and I’m afraid, prescient statement of what is upon us.

I have been reflecting on the hysterical reactions from the left to the election of Donald Trump which continue unabated in their ferocity, which does not happen in the usual change of leadership. What dawned on me was that it is caused by their fear that they had lost the initiative, and the recognition that it had been lost for good. There has been a definite change in the zeitgiest. No one believes the bs anymore, and no one trusts the government to protect their rights, or even their person anymore. People even tire of the bread and circuses being served up. Progress has become a joke. And I think by now it is clear to everyone but our leadership that if guns are not available, the determined will use trucks, fertilizer or airplanes to kill.

The recognition that the center will not hold anymore is widespread, although in many cases at an unconscious level. It shapes peoples’ thoughts and actions anyway. They are afraid, and who can blame them? Gun ownership will rise even higher, and though attempts to control them will be made, these attempts will be unavailing.

I expect the unraveling to continue, slowly but steadily, with the occasional spike of activity. I’m not expecting a man on a white horse to save us.

Kudos to the author for the excellent analysis.

Luminae
Luminae
October 8, 2017 5:30 am

I kind of want to go along with this thinking…anarchy, or complete and total anarchy is a possibility…yet the lone wolf dies while the pack survives. Even the unarmed survived in the Postman.

I also remember the drills in elementary school where I had to huddle under my desk, too young to understand why, and not really knowing why I felt so scared.

As a result, I have spent the remainder of my life in fear of the big one going off….and it never happened.

Now I wonder if it ever will and if all of this worry and planning was a whole lot of nothingburger. Maybe we will muddle through.

We were damn lucky in so many European and Pacific battles in WWII…Operation Paperclip gave us nukes…and our space program. If we devolve into an anarchistic conglomeration of secessionist States divided by race, creed, color and sexual orientation…stick a fork in us.

John Coster
John Coster
October 8, 2017 10:34 am

Frankly, the events of the last week have made me consider for the first time that we might all be better off with less gun control. I never could have imagined I would even entertain such an idea. WTF, I’m a peacenik leftover from the Vietnam era, and though I grew up spending some weekends with a bunch of old guys in hunting cabin that had a million dollar gun collection, the thought of every asshole who thinks he’s Rambo running around with an AK 47 still scares me. I also believe that violence will not solve any of our problems, particularly since centralized power will likely win at that game. However this last event is making me question whether or not the Deep State or whatever you want to call those people who orchestrated 9/11 aren’t totally out of control or should I say “in” control. I don’t know what happened in Vegas but it is very alarming that so many videos and first hand reports contradict the story spun by the usual suspects in the major media from NPR to MSNBC. Particularly troubling are some I phone videos in which you hear apparent machine gun fire coming from obviously different locations. In one, I heard distant fire then suddenly a burst of shots that sounded as if it came from a few yards away. The country appears to be on the path to self destruction and strife in Washington seems more like turf war between rival gangs than dissention among those with different points of view. Considering that these rival gangs are utterly inept at dealing with the real economic and environmental crises of the time, Fukushima, climate change (whatever its source), the shell game of the fiat currency financial system, it seems most probable to me that this massacre in Vegas is an orchestrated
event, another pretext for restricting free assembly and accustomizing the population to further negations of the Constitution and a growing police presence. This is just the typical response of an elite class whose power is dependent on obsolete and nonadaptive ideas and technologies. Alas, it seems they are intent on riding the collapse rather than adapting. I wouldn’t bet the farm that Vegas was another false flag, but I sure intend to keep the farm running independently. I’ve always feared that allowing the attacks of 9/11 to go unpunished would ultimately bring on the final decline of the US, however much it was good for the warfare State and Militant Zionists. Still I am hopeful that the official story of Vegas is actually true and that the various anomalies can be explained.

Extraveritas
Extraveritas
October 8, 2017 11:56 am

“Government is everywhere and always power and coercion, and compliance with its dictates and strictures rests not on recognition of their moral worthiness, but on recognition of the costly and painful consequences of failure to do so.”

Absolute truth and never better said. I, too, wish to be ‘on my own’. The first rule of the king is to protect his subjects. Maybe Putin is following that rule. If so, he appears to be the only one.

lotekrednek
lotekrednek
October 8, 2017 3:47 pm

Considering how many times our own government has dropped biological “experiments” on us without our consent or knowledge, am I the only one who worries that my guns won’t be enough when things heat up? Remember the anthrax scare a few years back? That strain came right out of the labs of the U.S. army.