THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Thomas confirmed to the Supreme Court – 1991

Via History.com

After a bitter confirmation hearing, the U.S. Senate votes 52 to 48 to confirm Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

In July 1991, Thurgood Marshall, the first African American to sit on the Supreme Court, announced his retirement after 34 years. President George Bush quickly nominated Clarence Thomas, a 43-year-old African American judge known for his conservative beliefs, to fill the seat. Thomas had been chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) during the Reagan administration, and in 1990 Bush had appointed him to the U.S. Court of Appeals. As the confirmation hearings for Thomas’ Supreme Court nomination got underway, he evaded controversy over his conservative views on issues such as abortion by refusing to state a clear political position. He seemed headed for an easy confirmation until Anita Hill, a former aide, stepped forward and accused him of sexual harassment.

Hill, who had served as an aide to Thomas at the Department of Education and the EEOC during the 1980s, alleged that the Supreme Court nominee had repeatedly made sexually offensive comments to her in an apparent campaign of seduction. Beginning on October 11, 1991, the Senate Judiciary Committee held four days of televised hearings on Hill’s charges. Americans were shocked by both the frankness of Hill’s lurid testimony and the unsympathetic response of the all-male committee, some of whom were openly antagonistic toward Hill. Thomas, meanwhile, denied the charges, and some witnesses called on his behalf cast doubt on Hill’s character and mental stability. On October 15, the Senate narrowly voted to approve Thomas’ confirmation.

Although the hearings left the Senate and the nation deeply divided, the episode served to foster a greater public awareness of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace. In taking over the seat of the ultra-liberal Thurgood Marshall, Thomas contributed significantly to the conservative character of the nation’s highest court in the 1990s and after the turn of the century.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
anarchyst
anarchyst
October 15, 2017 9:46 am

The author of this article is being somewhat disingenuous by leaving open the question that Justice Clarence Thomas harassed Anita Hill. It is known that Anita Hill followed Justice Thomas from post to post. Would someone being harassed actually follow their abuser from job to job? Anita Hill was a “whack job” from the get-go, being used to destroy Clarence Thomas’ reputation (which she failed miserably), except for her leftist supporters and the so-called “mainstream media”…

Anonymous
Anonymous
  anarchyst
October 15, 2017 10:49 am

I never believed Anita Hill, her accusations didn’t fit the man they were aimed at in his character as demonstrated by his demeanor and past actions.

Had she been accusing, say, a Ted Kennedy type it would have been far more believable than Clarence Thomas.

Crawfisher
Crawfisher
  Anonymous
October 15, 2017 11:42 am

As the leftist are famous for saying,,,,’by any means necessary’.
To me Thomas fought back and won against the Democrat Socialist Left.
Trump has proven fighting back works.
Too bad RINOs will not learn.

Steve Bannon will teach them a lesson.