Do Financial Markets Still Exist?

Guest Post by Paul Craig Roberts, Dave Kranzler, Michael Hudson
 
For many decades the Federal Reserve has rigged the bond market by its purchases. And for about a century, central banks have set interest rates (mainly to stabilize their currency’s exchange rate) with collateral effects on securities prices. It appears that in May 2010, August 2015, January/February 2016, and currently in February 2018 the Fed is rigging the stock market by purchasing S&P equity index futures in order to arrest stock market declines driven by fundamentals, and to push prices back up in keeping with a decade of money creation.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

No one should find this a surprising suggestion.  The Bank of Japan has a long tradition of propping up the Japanese equity market with large purchases of equities. The European Central Bank purchases corporate as well as government bonds.  In 1989 Fed governor Robert Heller said that as the Fed already rigs the bond market with purchases, the Fed can also rig the stock market to stop price declines. That is the reason the Plunge Protection Team (PPT) was created in 1987.

Looking at the chart of futures activity on the E-mini S&P 500, we see an uptick in activity on February 2 when the market dropped, with higher increases in future activity last Monday and Tuesday placing Tuesday’s futures activity at about four times the daily average of the previous month.  Futures activity last Wednesday and Thursday remained above the average daily activity of the previous month, and Friday’s activity was about three times the previous month’s daily average. The result of this futures activity was to send the market up, because the futures activity was purchases, not sales.  http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/e-mini-sandp500_quotes_volume_voi.html 

Who would be purchasing S&P equity futures when the market is collapsing from under them? The most likely answer we can come up with is that the Fed is acting for the PPT. The Fed can actually stop a market decline without purchasing a single futures contract. All that has to happen is that a trader recognized as operating for the Fed or PPT enters a futures bid just below the current price. The traders see the bid as the Fed establishing a floor below which it will not let the market fall.  Expecting continuing declines to make the bid effective, they front-run the bid, and the hedge funds algorithms pick it up, and up goes the market.

Is there another explanation for the shift in the market from decline to rise?  Are retail investors purchasing dips?  Not according to this report in Bloomberg — https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-12/record-23-billion-flees-world-s-largest-etf-as-panic-reigns — that last week a record $23.6 billion was removed from the world’s largest ETF, the SPDR S& 500 index fund. Here we see retail investors abandoning the market.

If central banks can produce zero interest rates simultaneously with a massive increase in indebtedness, why can’t they keep equity prices far above the values supported by fundamentals?  As central banks have learned that they can rig financial asset prices to the delight of everyone in the market, in what sense does capitalism, free markets, and price discovery exist? Have we entered a new kind of economic system?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Wip
Wip
February 14, 2018 3:18 pm

We have an elite who will do anything to keep the prices of their assets high as the moon.

It’s all about mamoon.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Wip
February 14, 2018 3:28 pm

Something most people with stuff like 401k’s seem to like.

starfcker
starfcker
February 14, 2018 4:05 pm

” Have we entered a new kind of economic system?” It only took about 20 years, but you guys are catching on. Yes. The idea is to keep things as stable as possible. They have actually done a really good job of it. If Trump can wring the criminality and corruption, along with some of the excesses out of it, and we are left with a much bigger world economy that we can actually compete in, will it have been worth it? I’m not sure. But I’m starting to see that as a real possibility.

MightyMike
MightyMike
February 14, 2018 7:01 pm

It is most certainly a controlled/manipulated system. Stocks, bonds, gold, silver. All of it. The question is how long can they maintain control?

steve
steve
February 15, 2018 11:51 am

When one group (the FED) can print free/no cost money and compete with your ability to participate (you actually have to earn your money) in the market, Hmmmm? How can that turn out well for you? It’s a casino for the well connected and the pigeons who think they have a chance-stay away, you can’t win. Ultimately, neither can they. Boom goes the dynamite-be prepared.

Trader Jim
Trader Jim
February 15, 2018 12:01 pm

It is not quite as simple as that. Having traded the /es (S&P mini futures) markets successfully for about 20 years, it is more subtle than that. My observations is that they initially come in, you see a big spike of volume, then the market will go down a little more, usually on retail emotion. Then it stabilizes, once it stabilizes, then the banksters start to come in and the algos start front running the banksters, then of course the large funds are always the last to the party.

As it goes up, the Fed begins to quietly exit, until the next drop. They basically act like a shock absorber, but don’t stay in the market too long. I don’t think it is anyone wanting to “let capitalism work” it seems to be more of a regulatory thing, as any longer term positions they may have to report.

This also could be accomplished by their hand maiden – The Swiss National bank. They already have commanding positions in the companies with the most influence over the main averages and ETF’s.

I really would love to see a big clearing of the market, yea, maybe panic would ensue, but for real investors, this panic is called opportunity, and is how a lot of very viable companies got started after the “big one” in 1929. Forest fires clear dead wood, and our financial system is overrun with dead wood like never before.