Refugee Industry Heads to Capitol Hill, Ignores Church State Separation

Guest Post by Joe Guzzardi

The refugee resettlement industry is in full panic mode. Some may question whether “industry” is the correct word. But the multi-million dollar budgets voluntary agencies (volags) have at their disposal and the lofty salaries the directors earn reveal that resettlement is a big and lucrative business, largely American taxpayer-funded.

Aided by a favorable Supreme Court decision, President Trump wants ever-fewer refugees. To the contractors’ dismay, last year President Trump threw out 5,000 as his recommended cap. As of July 1, 2018, the State Department has admitted 16,229 refugees, a pace well below this year’s 45,000 ceiling.

With the October 1 deadline looming for the president to make his annual determination on the FY 2019 refugee ceiling, the stakes are high for the nine federal contractors. Lower refugee totals put at risk volags’ substantial cash flow that includes $1,950 for each refugee and each child with the contractor pocketing $750 in federal and state grant money, as well as other perks. To protect their monetary interests, the volags gathered on Capitol Hill this month to lobby for higher refugee totals.

Six of the nine volags are religious-based groups. By lobbying on Capitol Hill, they ignore the church-state separation principle. When Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other Founding Fathers wrote about religious liberty’s importance, they also condemned church interference in federal policy. Moreover, the IRS specifically prohibits churches and other nonprofits from engaging in political activity like lobbying. The IRS code that pertains to 501(c)(3) volags states that they must completely refrain from political campaigning.

Yet in his August 3 op-ed published in the widely read and influential news magazine, The Hill, Rev. John McCullough, Church World Service CEO and president wrote a scathing commentary that attacked President Trump’s long-standing wish for fewer refugees, a sentiment many Americans share.

David Robinson, the State Department’s former Refugee Bureau acting director, shared his from-the- front perspective. Robinson wrote that “the federal government provides about 90 percent of its collective budget” and its lobbying umbrella “wields enormous influence over the Administration’s refugee admissions policy. It lobbies the Hill effectively to increase the number of refugees admitted for permanent resettlement each year…. If there is a conflict of interest, it is never mentioned….The solution its members offer to every refugee crisis is simplistic and the same: increase the number of admissions to the United States without regard to budgets…” Note the repeated references to lobbying even though the law prohibits it.

Like other federal immigration legislation, the 1980 Refugee Act and its consequences went unchallenged until the current administration. Proving the folly of never bucking the status quo, Refugee Resettlement Watch’s Ann Corcoran wrote that nearly four decades after the last American left Vietnam, the U.S. still accepts Southeast Asian refugees. More than 1.5 million have entered and contributed to nonrefugee chain migrants.

Congress should turn its attention to the hard math behind refugee resettlement: refugees immediately access food stamps, public housing, cash assistance, health care and child care. The Department of Health and Human Services doles out approximately $1.5 billion in grants to state and local agencies, schools, and nonprofits for refugee-oriented legal advocacy, language education, mental-health services and domestic-violence prevention.

Continuing refugee business as usual is a mistake; resettlement contractors profit, while the American communities where refugees are relocated struggle through difficult transition periods. The multi-millions in dollars the U.S. spends domestically on refugee programs would go 12 times as far if distributed in refugees’ home regions to provide for their shelter and care until they can safely return home. No nation including the U.S. can indefinitely accept the world’s displaced populations.

Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
JR Wirth
JR Wirth
August 12, 2018 5:12 pm

Fuck every single religious denomination involved here, including LCMS Lutherans, the only ones on the list who should know better and have at least one brain cell left. Happy Sunday! And if you belong to any of these denominations, you’re part of the problem. Especially the Catholics, that’s a given.

jamesthedeplorablewanderer
jamesthedeplorablewanderer
August 12, 2018 6:25 pm

Just to be clear, the nine biggest volags are:

Church World Service (CWS)
Ethiopian Community Development Council (ECDC)
Episcopal Migration Ministries (EMM)
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)
International Rescue Committee (IRC)
US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI)
Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services (LIRS)
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)
World Relief Corporation (WR)

but I’m pretty sure there are others. I think the local branch of the Unitarians is involved in resettling “refugees” as well – check out who is destroying your community locally while you’re boycotting these folks.

Kevin
Kevin
  jamesthedeplorablewanderer
August 13, 2018 3:53 am

You hit the biggies!

WestcoastDeplorable
WestcoastDeplorable
August 12, 2018 6:34 pm

I think we should enact a moratorium on ANY refugees except those in mortal danger if they remain in their home country (i.e. White landowners in S. Africa) until we can end homelessness. Way too many working people can’t even afford shelter and living on the street or in their cars. Why would we let even MORE people in when our citizens can’t take care of the basics?

AC
AC
August 12, 2018 7:15 pm

If we gave these people a financial incentive to ship all of the ‘refugees’ back to shitholeistan, how fast do you think they would completely change their position on such things?

Quarterseven
Quarterseven
August 13, 2018 1:02 am

Does anyone know when and who decided that it was a good idea to let immigrants, (legal is bad enough, but illegal is nuts) go on welfare? Silly me, until recently I thought that all wanting to legally come into this country had to prove they had a skill that and American could not provide, and prove that they had somewhere to live and work upon arriving in America, a sponsor so to speak. I was shocked to learn that illegal alien children were enrolled in schools and treated in emergency rooms. I still don’t get how that works, but what I really don’t get is the huge rallies/marches made up of illegal aliens demanding all kinds of rights, which is bad enough, but what is really stupid is why ICE doesn’t throw a giant shrimp net over the entire parade and march them back across the border? Would take no time at all to round up most of the illegal aliens and deport them if this was put into practice!