Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan
Our diversity is our greatest strength.
After playing clips of Democratic politicians reciting that truth of modern liberalism, Tucker Carlson asked, “How, precisely, is diversity our strength? Since you’ve made this our new national motto, please be specific.”
Reaction to Carlson’s question, with some declaring him a racist for having raised it, suggests that what we are dealing with here is not a demonstrable truth but a creed not subject to debate.
Yet the question remains valid: Where is the scientific, historic or empirical evidence that the greater the racial, ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of a nation, the stronger it becomes?
From recent decades, it seems more true to say the reverse: The more diverse a nation, the greater the danger of its disintegration.
Ethnic diversity, after all, tore apart our mighty Cold War rival, splintering the Soviet Union into 15 nations, three of which — Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia — have since split further along ethnic lines.
Russia had to fight two wars to hold onto Chechnya and prevent the diverse peoples of the North Caucasus from splitting off on ethnic grounds, as Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan had done.
Ethnic diversity then shattered Yugoslavia into seven separate nations.
And even as we proclaim diversity to be our greatest strength, nations everywhere are recoiling from it.
The rise of populism and nationalism across Europe is a reaction to the new diversity represented by the Arab, Asian and African millions who have lately come, and the tens of millions desperate to enter.
Center-left and center-right parties are losing ground in European elections because they are seen as feckless in meeting what more and more indigenous Europeans believe to be an existential threat — mass migration from across the Med.
Japan’s population has ceased to grow, and each year brings fewer toddlers into its schools. Yet Tokyo resists the racial and ethnic diversity greater immigration would bring. Why, if diversity is a strength?
What South Koreans dream of is uniting again with the 22 million separated members of their national family who live in the North, but share the same history and blood.
This summer, in its Basic Law, Israel declared itself an ethnonational state and national home of the Jewish people. African migrants crossing the Sinai to seek sanctuary in Israel are unwelcome.
Consider China, which seeks this century to surpass America as the first power on earth. Does Xi Jinping welcome a greater racial, ethnic and cultural diversity within his county as, say, Barack Obama does in ours?
In his western province of Xinjiang, Xi has set up an archipelago of detention camps. Purpose: Re-educate his country’s Uighurs and Kazakhs by purging them of their religious and tribal identities, and making them and their children more like Han Chinese in allegiance to the Communist Party and Chinese nation.
Xi fears that the 10 million Uighurs of Xinjiang, as an ethnic and religious minority, predominantly Muslim, wish to break away and establish an East Turkestan, a nation of their own, out of China. And he is correct.
What China is doing is brutalitarian. But what China is saying with its ruthless policy is that diversity — religious, racial, cultural — can break us apart as it did the USSR. And we are not going to let that happen.
Do the Buddhists of Myanmar cherish the religious diversity that the Muslim Rohingya of Rakhine State bring to their country?
America has always been more than an idea, an ideology or a propositional nation. It is a country that belongs to a separate and identifiable people with its own history, heroes, holidays, symbols, songs, myths, mores — its own culture.
Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger we will be?
Is the Britain of Theresa May, with its new racial, religious and ethnic diversity, a stronger nation than was the U.K. of Lloyd George, which ruled a fourth of mankind in 1920?
Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?
Empires, confederations and alliances are multiethnic and multicultural. And, inevitably, their diversity pulls them apart.
The British Empire was the greatest in modern history. What tore it apart? Tribalism, the demands of diverse peoples, rooted in blood and soil, to be rid of foreign rule and to have their own place in the sun.
And who are loudest in preaching that our diversity is our strength?
Are they not the same people who told us that democracy was the destiny of all mankind and that, as the world’s “exceptional nation,” we must seize the opportunity of our global preeminence to impose its blessings on the less enlightened tribes of the Middle East and Hindu Kush?
If the establishment is proven wrong about greater diversity bringing greater strength to America, there will be no do-over for the USA.
Well said.
The most successful, smartest populations with the highest IQs historically were decidedly non-diverse: I give you Japan, Germany, England, South Korea, and the Jews. They achieved their non- diversity through either geographical or cultural isolation.
Why did you specify south Korea as if NorKo was some diversity wonderland? In fact, NorKo is paranoid about miscegenation. It will be interesting to see how they resolve these things when they reunite north and south. Also, where is Jews located on the map?
AWACS.
Where is Jews located on the map?
That’s funny. What ain’t no country I ever heard of.
[img
[/img]
Nice try.
[img
?[/img]
No Holohoax next time. Expelled 109 times, THEY forced this diversity bullshit.
The Romans called it Judea.
No takers yet on Carlson’s proposal. Not even any mumbling garbled double-speak. Just silence. “I’m confused” -Tucker Carlson.
Tucker does a great job of saying “you’re an idiot” with just his facial expression. He’s about the only one I can stand to watch anymore. There isn’t really an answer to that question, either, because it’s bullshit to begin with. But, as Buchanan says, its a creed. And the left believes it with a religious fervor not unlike that which can be seen with a born-again christian. Same with the global warming nonsense. Its a religion. You’ll have no more luck talking a leftist out of either of those things than you would convincing a devout catholic that god makes no more sense than santa.
Diversity… never seems to work out, except perhaps to a limited degree in a few of the more benevolent dictatorships of antiquity.
The diversity thumpers never take into account how well the invaders to Europe and the US have accepted diversity in their own third world chitholes.
The Middle East and Africa are essentially at non-stop, ethnic and religious sect wars with each other. Africa’s tribalism-even within the same supposed country – has been going on for millennia Hutus and Toutsis anyone? Throw in a nice mix of Arabs, multiple variations of Islamic beliefs, and political turmoil and it is roiling continent of disfunction- diversity be damned. Watch the tribalism and warring start in S. Africa once the common enemy of the whites are eliminated.
Same with the entire Middle East–shia, sunni, kurds, wahabis, alawites, druze, etc….they will bring their wars and ancient hates here with them…..leftists are always short-sighted and NEVER think of consequences in their utopian dreams. Everything to them in their minds is like a Hollywood movie or Manhattan produced commercial where an Arab, a black, a couple Hispanics, maybe an Indian, and of course the white girl with the black dude, all sit around a campfire or on a mountain top drinking Coors lite and doing their glory hole smiles….they actually believe in this.
The reality however is far different. People naturally self-segregate. The blacks DON’T LIKE whites in their neighborhoods. London and Paris are showing you how Muslims, once taking over their section of a city, don’t like the native population to even enter “their area”– even the police won’t go there often. Cities across our country have always had Chinatown’s, Little Italy’s etc… The millions of Hispanics here in the US always move to majority Hispanic neighborhoods ( or states like Cali)… This is not diversification. When these areas start overlapping we see gang warfare like blacks and Hispanics in LA, or Islamists attacking whites or women who are in their neighborhoods dressed with ankles showing….
Anyhow, got to get to work…..diversity is a pipe dream in the unicorn and leprechaun type minds of leftists. The only way we would have diversity is by force or threat of a very powerful agency–and even then many people would rather die than give up their tribal, ethnic, or religious identities.
The world is clannish and tribal, with the exception of Europeans born west of the Hajnal Line….that’s the way it is, and that’s why immigrants will rarely assimilate.
Excellent analysis.
Tucker is a breath of fresh air from the sewer that is the rest of tv ‘news’. The man has a pair. Like his brawl last night with the ‘Creepy Porn Lawyer’. He made avenatti look like the blood sucking dung beetle he is. Pat’s also a gem. Only he could point to israel as a shining example of good for them and fuck the goy as they tossed a gaggle of black jews out of their country like garbage a while back. Didn’t hear much about that, right? No polluting the gene pool there.
Diversity–aka trying “to bring us together by pointing out how different we are” is just a bunch of illogical, doublespeak. People don’t bond due to differences, they bond due to similarities. It just a bunch of PC nonsense for people who lack critical thinking skills….
Or people with an evil plan…like creating a one world government, currency and religion. OR, creating a worldwide killoff.
‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’, by Harvard Prof. Robert Putnam, pretty clearly showed that diversity is a big negative…Published in 1995, and widely read in the business world, it failed to stem the tide of insanity.
There is an internally-destructive part of white humanity that manifests itself in always “looking out for the downtrodden” and a sense of “fair play” that is absent in every other race. Every other race looks inward, to itself and determines what is best for each other, within the race. Whites posses an externalized “altruism” that is internally destructive.
Civil-rights (for some) laws, “affirmative action” statutes, preferences for jobs and scholarships based solely on race–not ability, and other non-competitive schemes have done NOTHING but drag whites down and deny us whites our rightful place in OUR society.
Us whites have every right to be proud of our contributions to the human race. We have done MORE to (attempt to) uplift other races than any other race in human history.
Isn’t it curious to note that every other race wants to move to white-dominated countries, even those that practiced “apartheid”??
Once most other races immigrate to white countries, they attempt to “tear down” the white society that they advocate living in.
The other races are their own worst enemies…
Asia for asians…
Africa for Africans…
Middle east for semites…
White countries for everyone…
What’s wrong with this picture??
Multiculturalism and diversity are code words for white genocide…
…there is no “white liberation theology”.
Despite being the greatest promoter of advancement for ALL races, us whites are denied the right to look after OUR own interests, because “people of color” (who constantly look for and find “racism” under every rock) demand that us whites subjugate ourselves and deny ourselves the solidarity among our own kind that every other race practices.
As far as I am concerned, whites have done enough self-flagellation, having given up our own birthright, sacrificing it on the (false) altars of “civil-rights (for some)” and “anti-discrimination” laws that benefit only minorities.
Pushback is coming. It won’t be pretty, but is necessary.
A number of years ago, a survey of college students was done, asking one question: “What would life be like if every white person disappeared?”
After extensive soul-searching, one minority student spoke up…”we’d be screwed” was the answer.
Message to minorities–if life is so oppressive under whites, why not emigrate to whatever country you originate from?
Maybe. But more likely altruism is part of the (better) practice of Christianity. The West also has a better foundation in culture with the development of common law.
There is a difference between internalized and externalized altruism. I would not hesitate to help anyone, regardless of race, country of origin, or religion on an individual basis. Such altruism, directed towards individuals in need, is never a “bad thing”. However, looking out for “your own kind” FIRST does assure “survival of your culture”. The Christian concept of externalizing altruism needs to be reigned in. As long as there is one starving American, I see no need to “help” starving Africans (who are actually starving because of their own government’s policies and failures).
Help those at home FIRST…
I liked diversity when it was one falafel shop every 20 blocks or so. I do like falafels, I just prefer them to made by Druze. They are nice people.
I also like Japanese people. They are pretty cool and they have good food too.
I never go to the dirt cookie bakery that the Haitians run though.
It’s all just a plot to destroy the supremacy of western culture, although it goes by many fake, heartstring-tugging terms (sanctuary city, for example). The war is real and diversity is winning and the quality of life diminishes every single day. I weep for my grandchildren.
Strange how the very Americans screaming “Save The Environment ” are the very ones seeking it’s destruction via overpopulation.
Democracy Cannot Survive Overpopulation
Albert A. Bartlett
University of Colorado
http://www.albartlett.org/articles/ee_democracy_survive_overpopulation.pdf
Can you think of any problem
On any scale, from microscopic to global
Whose long – term solution is in any demonstrable way ,
Aided, assisted or advanced,
By having larger populations at the local, state, national, or global levels ?
Albert A. Bartlett
Overpopulation is one of the biggest scams perpetrated on the American and global public. True, there are areas of the world where massive population growth causes problems, but overpopulation is used as an excuse for environmental control and possible human extermination at the hands of these communist “environmentalists”.
If environmentalism restricted itself to truly caring for our natural resources, I would have no problem with it. However, with the secret science and questionable funding that these environmental groups taints the whole barrel. It turns out that many claims that environmentalists make have no basis in fact and are not based on good, honest, scientific investigation. This is why environmental scientists have to hide their data, as it does not fit their agenda. A good example of this is the so-called global warming crap, now renamed climate change. For one, the climate is always changing. The East Anglia University emails in which data was purposely falsified by climate scientists comes to mind. Not only that, the climate scientists (even NASA scientists, who should know better) purposely installed temperature monitoring sensors in cities, contrary to manufacturers recommendations and good scientific practices, in asphalt-covered parking lots, and other heat sink areas in order to prove their (faulty) hypothesis. This is scientific dishonesty at its worst.
It turns out that the solar system is in a cooling cycle due to decreased solar activity. There are two long-term solar cycles that reinforce themselves when in phase and cancel themselves out when out-of-phase. Look up the Maunder minimum. There are no SUVs on Mars or other planets, yet they are also experiencing the same solar variability.
Environmentalism has been the method used to impose communist principles on western society, especially in the USA.
Environmentalists are not content with promoting clean water, air and land, but are hell-bent on controlling human behavior, and yes, promoting extermination plans for much of humanity as these anointed types consider mankind to be a pestilence (except for themselves) to be reduced in population by any means necessary.
Environmentalists HATE the God-given concept of private property and have imposed government-backed and enforced land use controls on private property owners without compensation clearly an unconstitutional taking of private property. If environmentalists want to control land use, let them purchase it themselves not by government force. Today the only method of negating government-imposed land use restrictions is shoot, shovel, and shut up.
If environmentalists had their way, the earth’s human population would be reduced by approximately 90%, with the remainder to (be forced) to live in cities, in soviet-style high rise apartments, utilizing bicycles, buses and trains for transportation. The use of automobiles and access to pristine wilderness (rural) areas would be off-limits to us mere mortals, and would only be available for these anointed environmentalists.
The endangered species act is another abuse of environmentalism. Species are always changing, to adapt to their environments, survival if the fittest. In fact, the hoopla over the spotted owl (that placed much northwest timber land off-limits to logging) turned out to be nothing but scientific misconduct and arrogance. There are virtually identical species in other parts of the northwest.
More scientific malpractice occurred when government biologists attempted to plant lynx fur in certain areas to provide an excuse for making those areas off-limits for logging or development. Fortunately, these scientists were caught, however, no punishment was given.
In a nutshell, today’s environmentalism IS communism, like watermelon, green on the outside and red (communist) on the inside.
It is interesting to note that communist and third-world countries have the WORST environmental conditions on the planet. Instead of the USA and other developed countries spending billions to get rid of that last half-percent of pollution, it would behoove the communist countries to improve their conditions first. Here is a question for you environmentalists: Why is there a push for restrictive environmental regulations, but only on the developed first-world countries, and not the gross polluters such as India and China?
Anarchyst..
Well said.
I’m one of those people who have to do the math on everything. If it don’t add up I don’t buy it.
So I did the math on overpopulation. All 7 bazillion of us could fit nicely in the state of Texas and still have room for a little lawn. Not that we would want to mind you, but we could. Food shortage is another lie. Most of what is used by agribusiness is grossly inefficient and dependent on petroleum products, including the fertilizers and herbicides and pesticides.
I’m not a back to the 1700’s advocate, however I also don’t buy much the Greenies put out even when they have a valid point. They never have valid motives.
I used to mistakenly quote the Texas holding the world’s population idea too but it would have to be VERY small homes and lawns—
Texas has 172,000,000 acres….divided into quarter acres means 688 million acres, assume 4 people in each home…. still only 2,752 million humans packed like sardines into a 172 million acre subdivision.
Throw in Alaska and you could fit the world’s population all on quarter acre lots with 4-people living in each .25 of an acre.
The US has 2.3 billion acres of land total–so you could fit the entire world’s population in the US on 1/3rd acre lots each for every man/woman/child (1 whole acre for a family of 3). It would cover every inch of the US/Alaska with housing developments–but the rest of the world would be clear…… 37 billion acres of land area in the world ( includes uninhabitable Antarctica, the Gobi, sahara etc)– just my opinion but I think it’s starting to feel crowded.
‘Merica is already beginning to feel like the world population….and Lord knows, that’s zactly what the NWO and democraps (socialists) want.
Javelin…
I didn’t say it wouldn’t be crowded. I got the same .25 acre area the thus the statement that we would all have a tiny piece of yard to sit in. .25 acre is roughly 100 by 100.
Well, the 7 bazillion may FIT ix TX, but we we have our side arms and don’t want y’all!
O.W.L.
I remember saying “not that we would want to mind you”. What agony, being forced to listen to you texans for an entire lifetime. Ugh.
Resources and arable lands are finite . And animals competing for for natural habitat against humans are are being killed at an alarming rate .
All the libertarian feel good gobbledygook aside, these facts are indisputable.
90% of the plastic in the ocean comes from two rivers, one in China, one in India.
Suprise
India is Filthy
Surprise
Filthy India – not for sensitive viewers! (47 pictures)
Great points!
And who in their right mind gave this down votes??
Diversity is only a strength if the individuals bring unique skills, not found in the general population. Or in the case of the US in the late 19th / early 20th century there was plenty of land to be developed.
What value is someone who doesn’t speak English? What’s even worse are the third world Muslims – a quadruple wammy: don’t speak English, have no first world skills, have disruptive / 11th century religious beliefs, living off public assistance.
They have no value – they should go home.
You forgot to mention they’re often illiterate in their OWN language, and engage in incestuous marriages with first cousins, resulting in ALL KINDS of mental and physical handicaps that us
Western taxpayers have to take care of.
The USA needs to put an immediate halt to ALL immigration legal and illegal. We need a timeout to right our own ship and the hell with everyone else… Chip
Hear, hear!
Sadly, we don’t, and never have, lived in a Utopian paradise where each person’s beliefs/identity/culture are respected and left alone. It’s not how humans work. We may say the words individually, but history shows time and again that once a group gains enough power, they will try to force their way of life on others. The Spaniards did it in the Americas. Ghengis Khan did it across Asia. Alexander the Great. The Catholic Church. The Romans marched all the way to Britain to try it. Hitler. Pol Pot. England. Then, when those dominated peoples rise up and throw off the shackles, guess what? Yup. Their turn to squash the ones down the rungs. We are incapable of leaving anyone, or anything, alone. We have the mentality that “Our way is right” or “God loves us best” and use whatever ideology and charismatic strongman to make it happen. People in a group WANT to believe this. It’s part of human identity, and because so much of it is religious in nature, we cannot let it go. You simply cannot be Catholic/Hindu/Muslim, etc, have a belief system, and not act this way. Which is a paradox for the most part, because if most of the religions claim to preach “love” and “tolerance” for others, yet do the exact opposite EVERY TIME, then what kind of god are you allied with? Who’s right? Who decides?
I often think of if Aliens landed right in downtown Manhattan. Sure, people would freak out. Naturally. But the bigger problem would be the mass cognitive dissonance that would happen on a massive scale. Our petty nonsense with each other would be revealed for exactly that. We would be forced to come to a new understanding of ourselves as a race, our place in the universe. How could any culture justify the subjugation of another, based on some belief, when faced with irrefutable proof of an entire other species from another galaxy?
Our borders would mean nothing, really. Money? Who cares. The rich, the poor, meh. Color of skin? What are you talking about? We tout ourselves as an intelligent race, and sure, compared to dogs, cats, and dolphins, we are. But compared to a race that can travel the stars? Have technology we cannot even fathom? No. Sorry. It would bring us to our knees because right now, we simply cannot see anything beyond our petty squabbles coupled with the race for money, social media, and all that goes along with it.
It’s like dogs trying to convince us they have land they own and houses, and their superiority over the other dogs across town because they believe the right way and those other dogs don’t. Laughable.
Technology continues to advance, yet HUMANS stay the exact same way they have been for thousands of years. We have yet to throw off the chains of what currently we allow to define us, which only serves to divide us and keep us right here, on this rock, doing the same dumb shit we have done for thousands of years and will keep doing. Oh, we pretend we are oh-so-civilized, with our houses, and cars, and computers, and gadgets. Yet we continue to make really bad decisions, and have weapons of mass destruction that could just obliterate us in the blink of an eye. How is that responsible? How is that advanced? It’s like giving a bunch of two year olds loaded guns and expecting them to play nice and not shoot each other when one of them gets mad or doesn’t have a nap.
Please, read about the Kardashev Scale. We are a zero level civilization, and if we don’t get our collective heads out of our asses, we won’t make it to level 1. You don’t get a second chance. You either do, or boom, done.
So diversity. Come on. Who cares. It’s so not about that any more.
That Kardashev Scale is pure bullshit.
Muslims are a threat to any first world county. Their beliefs are toxic. They should not be in a free society.
I am not disagreeing with you on that, however, the same could have been said for the Catholics during the inquisition when thousands of people were murdered in horrible ways simply for being jews, or protestants, or gypsies, or what have you.
Can’t be compared. Yes, tyrants, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, all murdered people. The inquisition was 1400 – 1600 – before modernity.
The Muslims are living in the 11th century – out of step with the rest of the world – violent and oppressive. I don’t really care what they do – I just want them to stay in their own countries.
In 6000 years they have lived relatively the same backwards way. There is nothing any other society or culture can do to change them, they are fanatics. The problem with fanatics, especially the religious kind, they think they have everything to gain for what they do.
As far as the Inquisition goes, “before modernity”. Yes. Our perception and current time line . We perceive ourselves as being “modern”. But far in the future we will be looked at as savages as well. As mortals with a birth and death, we are incapable of seeing anything but the here and now. It’s not good or bad, it just is. But it limits us to this kind of boxed-in nonsense. Humanity as a collective, I don’t care what culture or society, is completely incapable of acting for the greater good on any level despite what we say. We just aren’t wired that way right now.
And the tyrants that murdered didn’t get there all by themselves. They were pretty similar with the message: We are right, we are the best, let’s go conquer these other people because we can. And before you know it, atrocities are committed and tons of people die for no damn reason at all.
And Muslims being out of step…not really. Their message is scary, they are oppressive, they murder, but ultimately they are just taking the final step of acting out their intolerance and hate while the rest of us just twitter about it and pretend we care. If you gave a magic wand to someone, anyone, on the street, and told them if they waived it they could make the “perfect” society, would they do it? Probably. Would it be perfect? For them, but certainly not for everyone. And there would be a lot of pissed off people that didn’t get a vote, but oh well. So Dutchman, I have no doubt you are a generally good person, but of course I don’t know you, nor you me. I am sure you have worked, and supported yourself, and whatever family you have. You have friends you like, who like you. You don’t murder, or steal, or hurt other people for the hell of it. But given the chance, would you be THE GUY that could fix everything? Would you want to be? Not me. Jesus preached nothing more than love and look what happened to that guy. A lesson for us all.
While we generally agree that oppression is bad, you have to not want to be oppressed bad enough to make it stop. It took people literally starving in the streets for the French revolution to happen. In this country, no one thinks they are oppressed because they can drive through McDonalds, use their cell phone, and twitter and all that crap. So they must be free. Yes, free from taking care of themselves, not being fat, or dumb, or lazy. I think a lot of people are terrified of actually being responsible for themselves 100%. The prospect of trusting themselves to do good, and be moral, and care for themselves in a meaningful way is so out of the realm of reality as to be a nightmare.
You must be ready for the next evolutionary leap, Pup. It will be interesting, that’s for sure. I, for one, will not assimilate, regardless of whether I am told it’s futile.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnnosta/2018/08/22/its-official-the-transhuman-era-has-begun/#12bc678f1b84
Geez dude turn off PBS and stop listening to NPR
Zionism is just as dangerous as Islam and has done much to propel the USA into our present “world war” situation. Zionism is covert, with many zionist dual-national israelis infecting our government. There are forty or so dual citizenship isralis in the halls of congress, and many thousands in our state department, formulating middle east policy based on “what is good for israel.
God damn them all to hell.
Most historical records show that about 4000-5,000 people were killed over a several hundred year period of the “inquisition.”
Even Catholic records show that the vast majority of these were protestants who were killed for “blasphemy against the church” because they wanted free access to the scriptures and questioned Catholicism’s ritualizing Christianity and adding dozens of non-Christian teachings into their church ( idols in the church, praying to Mary, priests not being allowed to marry, confession of sins to priests instead of to God, infallibility of the pope, etc etc)
just sayin’
Every time I see Anderson Cooper – I want to put my boot up his ass. I knew he was a faggots, faggot first time I saw him.
Dutch..
He wouldn’t feel it.
Oh, my..Flea..that was a good one!
He’d probably like it.
The gay plague happening in this country is an after-effect and collateral damage caused by birth control pills. Hormonal disruption while in utero is causing this confusion over sexuality. Spread this knowledge!
Tucker’s family looks genuinely happy.
I always address the question of diversity in this manner: It is 100AD and you are about to march into combat carrying nothing but a spear. In front of you is another army of men carrying similar weapons. One army will be victorious and the other army either destroyed or taken as captives to be sold into slavery. The first army to see its lines broken and men flee in panic will lose.
Question: Do you want to be in the army made up of diverse people with different cultures, traditions and language or do you want to be in the army where everyone is of the same background, color, religion, etc.
Choose.
Neither.
I want to be the trader who sold them both the spears and waited to pick them up again after the fight.
But I agree with your point. It’s wayyy better to be part of a diverse, inclusive, organic free-range snowflake group.
So you want to be a Rothschild.
Pat hit the ball out of the park with this one.
Dutch for President.
Goombahs, Frogs, Krauts, Micks, Pollacks, Nordic Pussies, and even Russkies have all made great contributions to our greatness.
In other words, diversity works just great as long as everyone is white.
Bingo!!
The only diversity I want is a blonde,brunette and a red head in my bed…I have a dream !
That being said I continually say that multiculturalism is a myth. When I have a debate with a one world,kumbaya, granola eating turd who can’t support their position that diversity equals strength it quickly changes to…you just see a country that should be nothing but white. From that point it’s game,set and match .
The greater the diversity….the more ammo you should buy.
Who benefits?
From diversity? Not us.
Who could it be?
Bingo!
I had to look up Brutalitarian to make sure Patrick wasn’t going SJW on us. Seems it came into being around 1930.
At any rate, Xi wasn’t worried about them remaining Muslims. He was worried that we would set up shop there by way of Turkey and have a wet dream of a staging area smack in the middle of China and Russia and Kazakhstan . They should be glad the Chinks didn’t just turn it into a parking lot.
Pat really did a good job on this one. I agree with Javelin, “…leftists are always short-sighted and NEVER think of consequences in their utopian dreams.”
Most dictionaries define diversity as the inclusion of different types of people (such as people of different races or cultures) in a group or organization. The business dictionary was the only definition I find that has it mostly right as a feature of a mixed workforce that provides a wide range of abilities, experience, knowledge, and strengths due to its heterogeneity in age, background, ethnicity, physical abilities, political and religious beliefs, sex, and other attributes.
The inclusion of “a wide range of abilities, experience, knowledge, and strengths…“ is the key point that the leftist omit because it doesn’t fit the agenda. Most of these people believe in the first definition because that is what they learned in the indoctrination factories that we call schools.
If the diversity policies were actually decided by abilities, experience, knowledge, and strengths, affirmative action wouldn’t work out so well. Letting every immigrant that wants to come here for a “better life” wouldn’t work out so well either. Actually none of it is working out so well now, but you get a gold star if you can point out even one of these leftist idiots that actually says that.
I don’t care what color someone’s skin is, where they come from, or what spiritual believe they have as long as they don’t try to tell me how to live or worship and don’t expect me to support them because they are too lazy or too stupid. If they are capable of doing the job better than the next person, more power to them, but if not, why should I give two spits about them?
I may have gotten a little off topic, but I also think we should stop all immigration for a period of time until such time that our elected a-holes get off their collective asses and fund the border wall and shut down sanctuary jurisdictions. With the news of the nearly 40 million stolen social security numbers, in my mind that inflates the number of illegals here to well north of 30 million. Where will it stop?
I like diversity. I like it so much that I’ll get on a plane and travel to other lands to be with diverse people and eat their diverse food and enjoy their diverse traditions.
But when I return home, I don’t want any of that diversity shit in my neighborhood.
Living in the Silly Valley polyglot of leftist shit, feel like the proverbial White Pterodactyl as I walk around. Ready to very violently hurt anyone mistaking me for an easy white, libtard target!
In the army there was a t-shirt you could buy at one of the off post shops. It read:
The Army
Go To Strange New Lands
Meet Different Types Of People
And Kill Them
Alas that’s what happens when human natures natural tribalism kicks in. The difference is that it’s on your home field .
Twatter is banning political candidates in the uK for the mere mention of Muslim grooming gangs. Yet every #meetoo tweet sent is hailed as sacred because it seems that entire movement is against white males. Twatter loves that! Everyone hates white males until we stop providing and allow the world to crumble. This world is really getting fucked up and people are becoming bat shit crazy to the point where we need a good thinning out. I assume the earth does it’s thing and will create a 20th century Black Plague and hopefully wipe out enough to bring us back to center. Normally world wars didn’t this…… I just don’t see the next democratic president will have Americans best interest and there will probably be a full on revolution. They had the soft coup in the bag with Hitlery, just look around, corrupt fbi, justice dept, senate, democrats, media, corporations, NFL it’s all insane. This is not going to end well. Stupid should be painful. We all no worries know there was a coup to import immigrants to change demographics and forever keep fake democrats in charge as they’d moved us slowly into communist dictatorship. Only one way. We all coordinate to stop buying and spending and all file extensions for the IRS tax returns. Starve the fuckers show our strength we won’t be pushed around anymore. Option two is bloody revolution. Option three live on our knees.
Diversity is English, British, Welsh, Scotts, Irish, Anglos, and Saxons all living together in harmony in America.
If diversity is a strength, then the NBA is weak.
Diversity is not a strength. Try to get any five people to order one large pizza.
If there is a Blue Wave this November ….. and Prog-Commie Cunts like this get in ….. you’re gonna have diversity shoved far up your ass every single day.
[img
[/img]