Is This Worse Than ’68?

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

Is This Worse Than ’68?

Saturday, in Pittsburgh, a Sabbath celebration at the Tree of Life synagogue became the site of the largest mass murder of Jews in U.S. history. Eleven worshippers were killed by a racist gunman.

Friday, we learned the identity of the crazed criminal who mailed pipe bombs to a dozen leaders of the Democratic Party, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

From restaurants to Capitol corridors, this campaign season we have seen ugly face-offs between leftist radicals and Republican senators.

Are we more divided than we have ever been? Are our politics more poisoned? Are we living in what Charles Dickens called “the worst of times” in America? Is today worse than 1968?

Certainly, the hatred and hostility, the bile and bitterness of our discourse, seem greater now than 50 years ago. But are the times really worse?

1968 began with one of the greatest humiliations in the history of the American Navy. The U.S. spy ship Pueblo was hijacked in international waters and its crew interned by North Korea.

A week later came the Tet Offensive, where every provincial capital in South Vietnam was attacked. A thousand U.S. troops died in February, 10,000 more through 1968.

On March 14, anti-war Senator Eugene McCarthy captured 42 percent of the vote in New Hampshire against President Johnson.

With LBJ wounded, Robert Kennedy leapt into the race, accusing the president who had enacted civil rights of “dividing the country” and removing himself from “the enduring and generous impulses that are the soul of this nation.” Lyndon Johnson, said Kennedy, is “calling upon the darker impulses of the American spirit.”

Today, RFK is remembered as a “uniter.”

With Gov. George Wallace tearing at Johnson from the right and Kennedy and McCarthy attacking from the left — and Nixon having cleared the Republican field with a landslide in New Hampshire — LBJ announced on March 31 he would not run again.

Four days later, Martin Luther King, leading a strike of garbage workers, was assassinated in Memphis. One hundred U.S. cities exploded in looting, arson and riots. The National Guard was called up everywhere and federal troops rushed to protect Washington, D.C., long corridors of which were gutted, not to be rebuilt for a generation.

Before April’s end, Columbia University had exploded in the worst student uprising of the decade. It was put down only after the NYPD was unleashed on the campus.

Nixon called the Columbia takeover by black and white radicals “the first major skirmish in a revolutionary struggle to seize the universities of this country and transform them into sanctuaries for radicals and vehicles for revolutionary political and social goals.” Which many have since become.

In June, Kennedy, after defeating McCarthy in the crucial primary of California, was mortally wounded in the kitchen of the hotel where he had declared victory. He was buried in Arlington beside JFK.

Nixon, who had swept every primary, was nominated on the first ballot in Miami Beach, and the Democratic Convention was set for late August.

Between the conventions, Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev sent his Warsaw Pact armies and hundreds of tanks into Czechoslovakia to crush the peaceful uprising known as “Prague Spring.”

With this bloodiest of military crackdowns since the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, Moscow sent a message to the West: There will be no going back in Europe. Once a Communist state, always a Communist state!

At the Democratic convention in Chicago, the thousands of radicals who had come to raise hell congregated nightly in Grant Park, across from the Hilton where the candidates and this writer were staying.

Baited day and night, the Chicago cops defending the hotel, by late in the week, had had enough. Early one evening, platoons of fresh police arrived and charged into the park clubbing and arresting scores of radicals as the TV cameras rolled. It would be called a “police riot.”

When Sen. Abe Ribicoff took the podium that night, he directed his glare at Mayor Richard J. Daley, accusing him of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.” Daley’s reply from the floor was unprintable.

Through September, Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey could not speak at a rally without being cursed and shouted down.

Describing the radicals disrupting his every event, Humphrey said, these people “aren’t just hecklers,” but “highly disciplined, well-organized agitators. … Some are anarchists and some of these groups are dedicated to destroying the Democratic Party and destroying the country.”

After his slim victory, Nixon declared that his government would take as its theme the words on a girl’s placard that he had seen in the Ohio town of Deshler: “Bring us together.”

Nixon tried in his first months, but it was not to be.

According to Bryan Burrough, author of “Days of Rage, America’s Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary Violence,” “During an eighteen month period in 1971 and 1972, the FBI reported more than 2,500 bombings on U.S. soil, nearly 5 a day.”

No, 2018 is not 1968, at least not yet.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Bilco
Bilco
October 30, 2018 7:02 am

In 1968 these people wanted to take on “The Man” In 2018 they are the Man.

Mary Christine
Mary Christine
  Bilco
October 30, 2018 9:11 am

Pithy, Bilco. They all got too old to run around and start riots so they infiltrated the Democrat Party and the universities and made much more progress than they did with the violence.

It took this long for Joe Sixpack to take notice and rebel. They know their time is running short so they will resort back to violence but they will direct while the Millennials follow orders.

I really think Generation Z is different. They will not be like their Millennial parents. There might be hope. I have seen this in my nearly 14 year old grandson who said “third wave feminism is stupid” and falls in this category that Crowder is talking about it this video from a performance at the University of Michigan last week. Ignore the costume from a previous LGBT skit earlier in the show (also funny)

Unexpected
Unexpected
  Mary Christine
October 30, 2018 3:13 pm

A few weeks ago, through word of mouth, I sold a dresser and desk by text. When three young men showed up at my shop driving an old, rusted out mini-van, I at first regretted them knowing my location.

These young pups were quite the characters and two of them looked sort of like real-life manifestations of Shaggy and Fred from Scooby Do. The third one was Hispanic with almost comical droppy eyelids and long hair. They appeared to be stoners but also fit, and even formidable, at the same time. They also looked quite poor. It turned out they were college roommates and they eyed me cautiously; perhaps, for good reason.

As we were loading up the furniture, I looked at them and smiled. “Did you borrow this van from your parents?”

One shrugged and said it was his van. Quite honestly, I wasn’t expecting that.

“But, what about all these Trump bumper stickers? Are these yours too?”

The guy looked at me warily and said they were, as his friend glanced my way and said they all supported Trump.

I replied: “But, I thought all college campuses nowadays were just politically correct safe spaces.”

The Shaggy-looking guy countered somewhat cautiously: “Not us, we’re not like that.”

I said: “Well, maybe there’s hope for the future yet.”

They smiled and seemed a little relieved. I was too.

Exring
Exring
October 30, 2018 8:03 am

Is it not interesting that the narrative fits ANTIFA and its goals, perfectly. “done by a Nazi” in Pittsburgh” and only “the poor supporters of a Socialist/Communist/Anti-Constitution agenda” by a bomber introducing devices that would never injure a “fly” but cast dispursions on those that support the Constitution”. And, we still do not know anything of “substance” related to Las Vegas!

anonimeg
anonimeg
October 30, 2018 8:08 am

I believe he could have gone into a bit of background, especially this foreshadowing event:

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/watts-riot-begins

“In the predominantly black Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles, racial tension reaches a breaking point after two white policemen scuffle with a black motorist suspected of drunken driving. A crowd of spectators gathered near the corner of Avalon Boulevard and 116th Street to watch the arrest and soon grew angry by what they believed to be yet another incident of racially motivated abuse by the police. A riot soon began, spurred on by residents of Watts who were embittered after years of economic and political isolation. The rioters eventually ranged over a 50-square-mile area of South Central Los Angeles, looting stores, torching buildings, and beating whites as snipers fired at police and firefighters. Finally, with the assistance of thousands of National Guardsmen, order was restored on August 16.

The five days of violence left 34 dead, 1,032 injured, nearly 4,000 arrested, and $40 million worth of property destroyed. The Watts riot was the worst urban riot in 20 years and foreshadowed the many rebellions to occur in ensuing years during the 1967 Detroit Riots… ”

Leading into 1968.

BACKSTORY.

Get some.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 30, 2018 9:13 am

“At the Democratic convention thousands of radicals who had come to raise hell congregated nightly…

Baited day and night, the Chicago cops… had had enough. . . fresh police arrived and charged into the park clubbing and arresting scores of radicals as the TV cameras rolled. It would be called a “police riot.” {Again, please}

Sen. Abe Ribicoff directed his glare at Mayor Daley, accusing him of using “Gestapo tactics in the streets of Chicago.” Daley’s reply from the floor was unprintable. {Do tell…did he tell Ribidoff to fuck off?}

Through September, Democratic candidate Hubert Humphrey could not speak at a rally without being cursed and shouted down. {turning on their own kind?}

Describing the radicals disrupting his every event, Humphrey said, these people “aren’t just hecklers,” but “highly disciplined, well-organized agitators. … Some are anarchists and some of these groups are dedicated to destroying the Democratic Party and destroying the country.” {was baggy eyes Georgie at play way back then, with funding?}

Cycles.
History repeating.

When will modern day cops say ‘enough is enough’, and start busting some Antifa heads, instead of standing down, as this escalates further with the midterms fast approaching?

Likewise, for after the red piddle puddle fails the radical SJW’s plot to win the House and begin impeachment plans for DJT?

The rule of law, to protect law abiding citizens.
Restore it.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  Anonymous
October 30, 2018 10:52 am

The Stormers will probably all want a portrait of “Hizzonner” now. I know for a fact that the beginning of what Daley said was “You f..king Jew…”
It is not widely reported but Daley became prominent as leader of an Irish street gang in the WW1 era. His gang was used to crack a lot of skulls of Blacks during the Red Scare of 1919 or 1920 thereabouts.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Anonymous
October 31, 2018 1:44 am

It was so bad, John Lennon and Yoko Ono didn’t go to the Democratic convention. They thought they would be killed if they did. Only difference is they thought the government would use the chaos to have them killed.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
October 30, 2018 10:20 am

I was a Junior at FSU and remember every one of those events vividly. The MSM set the tone then and now; they are building a storm within the FSA Blacks and Mexicans to explode on cities like fire tornadoes. They will blame Trump to deflect their own blame and fan the fires. This time, the President and the “Silent Majority” probably won’t be passive because this Communist War is not in Asia, it is in America.

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
October 30, 2018 10:37 am

Sorry to disagree, Pat. We are in much worse shape now. True, 1968 was bad, very bad. This is the difference. In 1968 the violence and political insanity was restricted to a relatively small and – to be blunt – mostly Jewish, urban fringe. The black riots were, of course, a different matter but still they affected a small part of the population. In 1968 the U.S. population was still overwhelmingly white, patriotic, and sane. The Democratic Party was firmly in the hands of a mostly sober, pro-American, steady group of old time politicians. A Pelosi, Schumer, Ellis, Booker or Blumenthal would have been seen as the political freaks they are. Ocasio-Cortez? Socialism? Bernie? Yeah, the Chicago Convention looked bad, but it was mostly a bunch of Daley cops fed up with smart-ass Jewish college students.
What we are dealing with now is far more dangerous and, in fact, ominous. Trump – for all his many faults – represents the last chance of the historic core population of the country to stop and turn back a monstrous plot to literally destroy America. Fortunately, significant sectors of the so-called “Latino” or “Hispanic” population and large numbers of blacks are waking up to the mortal danger posed by leftist identity politics and are choosing reason and common sense over the leftist dog whistles (fog horns, really).
In 1968 there was never any real chance of Marxist traitors doing more than stamping their feet and setting off pipe bombs at ROTC buildings.
In 2018 we have a major portion of the population which can no longer be regarded as “American” in any real sense of the word. Look at the media. Joyce Behar is an American? Don Lemon? Jim Acosta? Rachel Maddow? Nope.
Pat was in the middle of the events of the 1960´s as a young man and remembers those days as some of the most exciting of his life. The murders of the Kennedy´s and Martin Luther King, Vietnam, Freedom Marches and all the rest. Very dramatic.
What we face now is a dreadful, ugly slog through muck, with civil war likely to be our reward at the end.
We are indeed in the middle of a Fourth Turning and it hasn´t even gotten started yet.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  Southern Sage
October 30, 2018 10:55 am

I fear your analysis to be spot on.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
October 30, 2018 12:55 pm

Nobody worries that some folks prefer to shop at Ralphs and some prefer to shop at Kroger, and some prefer Piggly Wiggly (what a great name for a store). None of us are harmed by the voluntary actions of others IN THE MARKETPLACE of products available to us all. I may not like your choices, but they impact me in NO WAY directly.

Not so in the case of government. I DO care who you support, what ideas you support, what sort of powers you wish to give to the government, etc. My income is not safe, my private property rights are not safe, the value and purchasing power of my money are not safe, my individual rights are not safe, etc.

Constitutional government as enshrined in our Constitution, was SUPPOSED to have prevented the central government from having the power over any of these things. Clearly it failed to do that (pretty much days after being ratified and so, so much worse in the past century). It failed because of the mistaken belief that anyone should have the right to rule over anyone for any reason. Endorsing the belief that voting is ok, fails to acknowledge that government itself is immoral. Voluntary, freely-entered associations are completely and totally moral, and the foundation of integrated society. But those based and founded upon force, and from which there is no peaceful escape, are the essence of immorality and are the root of all of our societal problems.

Unless the power is taken away, and nothing remains for everyone to fight over, the fighting will certainly get a lot worse and a lot more violent.

Vodka
Vodka
October 30, 2018 1:22 pm

After “four dead in oh-high-oh” in 1970, enthusiasm was dampened for large protests. A few fringe groups set off bombs in the early 70’s, but mostly things calmed down on the surface. The protesters went off to make money, get married and divorced (multiple times), and generally wreck society in insidious ways.

The sudden resurgence of chaos is perhaps just the Baby Boomers shooting their last wad. They organize and fund it. They rage once again, probably in part, because they see how few grains of sand are left in their hourglass. We should have guessed that there was no fucking way that this group was going to depart without a final, epic, juvenile tantrum. Worst Generation Ever.

Gloriously Deplorable Paul
Gloriously Deplorable Paul
  Vodka
October 30, 2018 1:55 pm

Love the line “Worst Generation Ever”.

I’ve long marveled that “The Greatest Generation” begat them. Talk about a turn in fortunes…..

And yet, there’s still a solid core of normal boomers (I count myself and friends as such) who will likely do what is necessary when the time comes.

Powder dry.

Vodka
Vodka
  Gloriously Deplorable Paul
October 30, 2018 6:18 pm

The Jews, who have a very long written and oral history, have noticed that when a generation succeeds another that accomplished great things that they become despondent, and ultimately rebellious, because they know they have no hope of matching their parent’s achievements. Sounds just like the Greatest Generation begetting the Baby Boomers. History repeats.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Gloriously Deplorable Paul
October 31, 2018 1:50 am

If I remember correctly, the second generation following a 4th turning, meaning, the generation that follows the saviors of the country, are the ones who become the out-of-control crazies. It happened in the generation after the Revolutionary War, and it definitely happened after the Greatest Generation. It seems that generation gets really tired of hearing how great the previous one was and rebel against it.

Edit: Vodka, didn’t see your comment below before I posted mine.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  Vodka
October 30, 2018 2:08 pm

Most Baby Boomers carried themselves a hell of a lot better than most of the youth of today who are voting with the FSA, getting pushed out of the labor market by foreigners with technical degrees, sporting mega tattoos and scrap metal, using mega dope, renting or living off parents, listening to rap, etc. Your Useful Idiot rant proves you are the Weakest Link.

Vodka
Vodka
  robert h siddell jr
October 30, 2018 6:28 pm

“Useful Idiot”?? “Weakest Link”?? I don’t think so, Robbie. I’m just traversing the wreckage that your generation left. You own it.

I admire your fighting spirit, though. 7.2 on a scale of 10.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Vodka
October 31, 2018 1:41 am

Yep, makes me automatically think of Archie Bunker and Meathead. I really hated Meathead. Still do in real life. He didn’t have to act because that’s who he is.