Democrats Threat to Stack the Supreme Court to Impose Their Views Upon the Nation

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

I believe that the Supreme Court should be restructured. The Constitution ONLY created the Supreme Court and Congress could not shut it down. However, all other lower Federal courts are statutory, created by Congress. It was Congress that unconstitutionally refused to expand the Supreme Court and instead, granted it the right to pick and choose what cases it wants to hear. This, in my opinion, violated the Constitution because it was the ONLY court created by the Founding Fathers and not expanding it to hear every case presented, to me means you are denied a tripartite government.

The lower courts know that the odds of ever being reviewed are slim to negligible. So people can be tortured, abused, and they do not have to comply with the law by any means. There is no rule of law because each circuit has its own rules and precedents. In theory, the Supreme Court is supposed to resolve conflicts between the circuits. But that is purely on a discretionary basis. This current structure means you are denied the right to Equal Protection of the Law when each circuit acts independently.

However, the Democrats’ threat to pack the Court if it doesn’t rule the way they want is a threat to intimidate the court which is in itself UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The very reason Justices are appointed for life is because the King would fire judges who ruled against him. So here we have the Democrats demonstrating that they seek to impose by dictatorial powers their view on the majority of the people even if they cannot win the votes of the people. That is an outright affront to the separation of power and the very principle of a Free Society.

The Democratic lawmakers have openly threatened the court with political retribution if it did not dismiss a gun-rights related case in which they submitted a brief in support of New York City urging the Supreme Court to dismiss a case involving the transportation of locked and unloaded handguns. The Democrats brief stated that “courts do not undertake political ‘projects,’ or at least they should not.” The Second Amendment is not political – it is the Constitution.

Clearly, this attempt by Democrats to intimidate the Court is outrageous and very dangerous. It demonstrates how and why the United States will decline and fall. There is no respect for the rule of law. The polarization in the country is just off the charts and this will undoubtedly lead to violence.

I believe the Supreme Court should be restructured, but I would add sub-justices and allow the Supreme Court to hire them on the recommendations of the American Bar Association (ABA) who should nominate unanimously each candidate – not Congress or any President. It should be life in prison for anyone to lobby the ABA from any outside group to select a particular candidate. There should be a lower tier of courts in the Supreme Court and then the Nine Justices sorts out any conflicts. This will give the ABSOLUTE Right to be Heard which is the foundation of Due Process of Law.

The Due Process Right to be Heard comes actually from the Bible. The basis is that of Cain and Able where one kills his brother and obviously God knew what he did. He still summons Cain to give him a Right to be Heard despite the fact he knows he is guilty.

And the Lord said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother? And he said, “I do not know: am I my brother’s keeper?” And He said, “What have you done? Listen! your brother’s blood cries out to me from the soil. 11And so, cursed shall you be by the soil that gaped with its mouth to take your brother’s blood from your hand. 

Therefore, knowing that Cain killed Able, he still gave him a Right to be Heard which is the foundation of Due Process of Law. In my view, one can be tortured and abused in any Federal Court. If you are denied the Right to be Heard in the Supreme Court you will die denied everything that we ask citizens to defend in war with their lives.

What the Democrats are proposing is effectively the overthrow of Democracy and to impose one-party rule of law. This illustrates the importance of the 2020 elections. This polarization is going to explode in 2020.

A look at the voting records of individual justices clearly shows that they DO NOT rule on party lines. It was Chief Justice Roberts who upheld Obamacare as a Tax joining the Democrats when he was appointed by George W. Bush. It just does not work on party lines all the time.

Even a Justice appointed by a Republican would still uphold Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the U.S. Constitution protects a pregnant because it cannot interject religion into the rule of law. What if the court became mostly Muslim? Would divorce then be up to overrule along with Polygamy, the practice of marrying multiple spouses?

Religion cannot be allowed to become the rule of law then you deny the freedom of religion no matter how much it offends someone’s individual beliefs. That’s God’s job to make those types of judgments. He will sort them out – not politicians.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
AC
AC
August 30, 2019 2:02 pm

If you expect the Dems to do anything but pursue power, at any cost, you’re a fool – and you’re just as foolish to believe the Republicans will do anything except pretend that whatever the Dems decide to do has always been a conservative principle, while expounding on their virtues of having half-black kids and hating white people.

ReluctantWarrior
ReluctantWarrior
August 30, 2019 2:05 pm

How are they going to do this? A) They don’t control the U.S. Senate and therefore have no chance of controlling the Senate Judiciary committee where these appointments are voted on. B) It is unlikely that they will control the Senate anytime soon? C) At the moment President Trump is verging on what might be his third pick for the high court. So it would seem that the courts is likely to be weighted heavily to the right for the foreseeable future. D) If the Democrats should win the White House in 2020 they will still probably face a Republican controlled Senate which would make it very hard for them to get ‘activist’ judges appointed in the event that an opening came up.

the experienced
the experienced
August 30, 2019 2:59 pm

Love the example with Cain being heard by God. Never looked at the event that way.

“overthrow of democracy” The USA has never been a democracy. It was designed to be a representative republic.

“Religion cannot be allowed to become the rule of law” Supposedly the USA was founded on judeo-christian principles. Is that religion, too?

Fatman from Oz
Fatman from Oz
August 30, 2019 5:17 pm

So, who is going to pay for the extra level of parasites?

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
August 30, 2019 5:45 pm

“the American Bar Association (ABA) who should nominate unanimously each candidate – not Congress or any President. ”
If this was made law then every Supreme Court Justice would be the most normal American hating, Bolshevik Jewish lowlife they could dig out of the bowels of the Democratic Communist Party. I think Mr. Martin has lost his mind. I now know there’s not a thing he has to say that I would waste my time listening to.

James the Deplorable Wanderer
James the Deplorable Wanderer
August 30, 2019 6:04 pm

(1) The ABA is an old-boys’ club, and will ONLY nominate lawyers. Wasn’t there a SCOTUS justice a while back who was NOT a lawyer, yet issued precedent-setting opinions and rulings that stood up? (2) Restructuring will not solve the problem that the DOJ justices get their salary from the Treasury, and are unlikely to rule against the government in any significant way (NO, you cannot collect income tax; NO, you cannot require medical insurance on everyone; NO, you cannot tax overseas income). (3) The Supreme Court need not accept every case; some are frivolous, some are matters for the legislature or executive, some are better left to the states.
FAIL. Until judges are not dependent on the Deep State for their salaries, the Deep State can control them – like they are now.

John
John
August 30, 2019 9:25 pm

The Supreme Court was created to protect the Constitutional rights of the sovereign states and their citizens. The states should select Supreme Court justices with the power to recall justices that do no fulfill their duties to the satisfaction of the states.

Hollow man
Hollow man
August 31, 2019 5:17 am

They are going to force us to live like they want on way or another.

messianicdruid
messianicdruid
August 31, 2019 11:18 am

Thirty Five million “laws” trying to enforce 10 Commandments.

Ken31
Ken31
August 31, 2019 1:06 pm

I’ve always had a major problem with Article III and what Congress did with it. This is an excellent discussion of it. I don’t think any State that ratified the constitution envisioned the system we have today and Congress has NEVER reigned in THEIR lower courts.

EXCEPT the ABA parts. There he is fucking retarded, if not subversive. The ABA is why our legal system is so fucking corrupt in general.