The Offloading

Guest Post by Eric Peters

When the car industry begs to be regulated, you have to wonder about the regulations. And the motivations.

Is it a case of being crazy . . . or crazy like a fox?

The car industry – well, about a third of it so far (Ford, Honda, BMW, VW and Mercedes) wants to be forced to make cars that average close to 50 miles-per-gallon by 2025, as fatwa’d about four years ago by the federal regulatory apparat.

The current head of the federal government – President Trump – is trying to rescind the fatwa or at least dial it back to something more technically and economically feasible. In a startling turnabout, the car companies have stated that even if Trump dials back the federal fatwa, they will impose it upon themselves by embracing a mirrored fatwa issued by the state of California. Which will then become a de facto national fatwa.

It sounds crazy – self-destructive, at least.

And this self-imposed mania for saving gas? It’s like losing weight. Sounds great – but it’s not as easy as it sounds .

Or inexpensive.

Nor demanded by the market – but that’s another thing.

As Trump pointed out the other day, the cost of the technology – the physical hardware as well as physical changes to the way cars are designed – that will be necessary to get cars to average nearly 50 MPG (as specified by the fatwa) in just five years’ time will cost thousands of dollars per car. Trump says about $3,000 per car – which is very close to the mark because the only current cars that average 50 MPG and so fatwa-compliant are hybrids  – models like the Toyota Prius and Kia Niro.

These hybrids cost about $3k more than an otherwise similar non-hybrid. This is what the government wants you to spend to save gas. Or rather, it’s what Trump doesn’t want you to have to spend. But the car industry – VW, Ford, Honda, BMW and Benz, anyhow – wants you to spend.

Wants you to have to spend.

You will pay them more money rather than ExxonMobil.

And you’ll pay more than just $3k.

Trump failed to explain that if the fatwa stands, it will take more than a few hybrids to get to 50-something MPG. It will take a lot of electric cars. These use no gas, of course – and so they are a boon to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (the fatwa’s formal name) math. Each EV sold makes it feasible to sell non-EVs that aren’t hybrids and don’t – and can’t – achieve 50 MPG.

Trucks, for instance.

One 28 MPG truck plus one infinite MPG EV divided by two (this is crude, but it helps explain the math) equals  . . . closer to 50 MPG and fatwa compliance. The more EVs in the mix, the better the CAFE compliance math.

But there’s a fly in the soup.

Someone will have to buy all those EVs. And EVs cost many thousands more than hybrids Who’s gonna pony up – and how?

We hear talk about “breakthroughs” that will reduce the cost of EVs, but the fact is that you can’t buy any currently available EV for less than $30,000 (the entry-level version of the Nissan Leaf with a smaller battery and just 150 miles of range) which is $6,230 more than the price of the 2019 Prius ($23,770) or twice the compliance cost estimated by Trump. It is also more than twice the price of a current non-electric economy car – which is actually economical. It might not get 50 MPG – but you don’t have to spend $23k on it.

And that figure doesn’t include the $1,000 or so you’d have to spend to have your house wired up for the “fast” charger the EV would need.

So, absent the “breakthrough” we keep hearing about (and have been hearing about, for literally decades but which has yet to materialize and may never materialize) people will either pay a great deal more for EVs – or they will pay a great deal more for non-EVs, which will become more expensive to buy in order to absorb the cost of building all those unsold (or given away at a loss) EVs.

It sounds stupid – and it is.

But the car companies aren’t run by imbeciles. Virtue signalers, certainly. But not idiots.

There is another reason for their embrace of the 50 MPG fatwa that goes beyond green – the lust for mandated profits in the name of “saving” on gas.

It is, simply, the offloading of their regulatory burdens.

Electric vehicles are categorized by the regulatory apparat as “zero emissions” vehicles – which means zero compliance costs . . . for the car companies. No more having to sweat passing federal emissions certification tests – which don’t apply at all to electric cars.

It’s no accident VW – which was almost destroyed by the scandal over “cheating” on those tests – is among the Five who are demanding to be regulated . . . in order to be exempted.

Emissions compliance costs won’t go away; remember that the main gripe leveled at today’s non-electric cars is that they “emit” carbon dioxide. Well, so do electric cars – just indirectly.

The companies which make EVs won’t have to worry about tailpipe emissions regulations and compliance costs. But utilities – the power companies – will.

They’ll be regulated all the more – and those costs will be offloaded onto the backs of their customers, in the form of higher electricity costs.

But the car companies will avoid those costs.

No more worries about CAFE compliance costs, either – since electric cars use no gas at all.

It makes sense once you understand it. The car companies are demanding to be regulated in order to be freed from being regulated.

But it won’t be free.

We’ll be paying a great deal more for cars, soon. And even if you don’t buy a new car, you’ll be paying more for electricity – to cover the cost of all those shifted compliance costs.

The Orange Man is trying. But he hasn’t done the best job explaining.

Maybe this will help.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
August 31, 2019 7:18 pm

Eliminate CAFE standards. Eliminate all subsidies for hybrids and electric vehicles. Raise the gas tax by $3/gallon. Watch gasoline consumption plummet.

CO2 emissions drop
Budget deficit tightens
Illegals have to pay taxes

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Iska Waran
September 1, 2019 7:24 am

Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. If you believe it is, just stop exhaling.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Iska Waran
September 1, 2019 7:53 am

Those with money will be.fine.

That is what matters.

The real deal
The real deal
August 31, 2019 7:43 pm

Wow. Literally this morning speaking with a friend about buying an old ford excursion because the largest suv today is still 30% smaller than the excursion due to them bulking the doors so 5’2” women feel wrapped on a cocoon is bullshit. What are the 6’6” 350 lb guys gonna drive a fuckin donkey? I can get the 6.7 liter excursion diesel for less than $5k and drop a new underside, extra detail and even order some factory interior parts and new tranny and have less than 10k in it and will go another 400,000 miles.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The real deal
September 1, 2019 7:55 am

Saw a ridiculous news clip of Shaq O’Neil getting into one of those Smart cars…

He filled the entire car!

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
  Anonymous
September 1, 2019 2:50 pm

Bubba Smith and a VW beetle! Same size comparison! Of course, Bubba ripped out the front seat and drove from the rear.

yah sure
yah sure
August 31, 2019 8:11 pm

I was thinking about how much driving I will actually do in the future. If the SHTF I don’t see myself going much of anywhere. I can see the electric grid breaking down trying to charge millions of electric cars. I guess that power comes from wind and solar so electric cars won’t be wrecking the planet.
My truck will be fixed up enough to keep it the rest of my life. I can’t see buying thirty grand worth of gasoline. Fuk em, they just want to be able to shut off that electric car whenever they want.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
August 31, 2019 11:43 pm

None of these pie in the sky plans against the car are going to be realized. We are undergoing a Soviet style collapse right now. Oh yes, there will be chaos. Chaos can be a good thing, for that’s usually when lots of people get lined up and shot, especially people blamed for the collapse.

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  Coalclinker
September 1, 2019 7:57 am

Chaos is a ladder.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Hardscrabble Farmer
September 1, 2019 8:10 am

Piles of dead.people are foundations for greatness!

They are the foundations upon which conquerers stand.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  Anonymous
September 2, 2019 8:52 am

It wouldn’t surprise me if America doesn’t end up with its own version of a Cromwell, a violent man who paid his rise to power on the lives of many. On the other hand, we could end up with a Stalin, except ours won’t be communist but he’d be just as blood thirsty