Doug Casey on Electric and Self-Driving Vehicles, Part I

Via Casey Research

Chris’ note: We’re in the middle of a revolutionary trend…

As we’ve been showing you, the car industry is rapidly changing because of two growing technologies: electric vehicles (EVs) and self-driving cars.

EVs aren’t like traditional vehicles. They run on electricity instead of gasoline or diesel.

Not long ago, just a few hundred of these vehicles existed. Now, there are nearly 5.1 million EVs on the roads… and that number grows by the day.

And self-driving cars are only becoming more popular as well. By next year, estimates say there’ll be 10 million self-driving cars in use.

In short, these technologies are the future. Even our founder, Doug Casey, thinks so. And when Doug gets excited about something, I get him on the phone to find out why.

Read on to see what Doug has to say about this megatrend… and don’t miss tomorrow’s Dispatch, when Doug and I finish this important discussion…


Chris: Doug, you’ve mentioned how electric vehicles [EVs] will become a huge deal. What makes you say that?

Doug: There’s no doubt that electric vehicles are going to put an end to the internal combustion engine [ICE]. I want to not only explain why – but some related changes that are much bigger, that almost nobody has thought about.

There’s a famous picture that was taken of 5th Avenue in 1901. The whole street is chockablock with horses and buggies. There’s one motorcar in front of a building amongst the mass of horse-drawn vehicles. In 1913 another picture was taken of the exact same place. There’s only one horse and buggy on a street bumper-to-bumper with motor vehicles. Things changed radically in just more than a decade.

That’s about to happen again. From a purely technical point of view, EVs are now vastly superior to ICEs. And I speak as a lifelong car guy. I’ve owned high-performance cars, and played with them my whole life – including racing sports cars, stock cars on ovals, and quarter-mile drag racing. EVs are far superior to ICE vehicles. They’ve got every possible advantage. They handle better because of a much lower center of gravity. They’re more economical. They’re much faster. Much more quiet. And they’re more reliable because they have vastly fewer moving parts.

Every major car company in the world is going electric, as we speak. Mercedes, BMW, Porsche, and even General Motors and Ford – who tend to lag behind on everything – are all going to EVs. This is really something. It’s a megatrend. But the average guy is completely unaware of it, because there are as yet very few on the street. Mainly Teslas. Which probably won’t make it as a company. Not because of its cars, but because of its finances. Pioneers are the ones who get the arrows in their backs…

Chris: What are the biggest investment implications of this? Is it the battery metals or something else that nobody’s talking about yet?

Doug: As you know, there’s been a lot of emphasis on the metals necessary for batteries. That’s because the success of EVs relies on the quality of their batteries more than any other factor.

Electric vehicles were around a hundred years ago. If you read Uncle Scrooge comic books you might recall that Grandma Duck drove an electric vehicle – basically a primitive golf cart. In those days the only kind of economically and technologically viable battery was lead-acid, which is what you still find under the hood of ICE vehicles, to start the engine.

Lead-acid is cheap, but it’s very heavy and doesn’t hold a charge very long under use. We now have compact lithium batteries that are relatively lightweight and highly efficient, like the battery in your computer. But they’re expensive. In the near future thousands more tons of lithium will be needed. As well as gigantic amounts of nickel, cobalt, and vanadium for various applications. So far, people have been emphasizing metals as the way to play the inevitable triumph of electric vehicles. And that makes sense.

Chris: Yeah, there’s no doubt that demand for the battery metals will explode in the coming years. But what are some second-order effects of EVs?

Doug: The second – and third order – effects are going to be vastly more significant. They’ll change much of the landscape, and the very way people live. Electric vehicles will eliminate the need for 90% of gas stations. And repair shops. Just as ICEs largely eliminated stables, farriers, and buggy whip factories.

But EVs are just part of the story. Most of them will also be self-driving. There are already tens of thousands of self-driving trucks and cars on the road. They’re already safer than driven vehicles, but since the technology is improving at the rate of Moore’s Law they’re getting better every day. Further, when most cars are both battery-powered and self-driving, they’ll be safer and faster yet, because they’ll be able to identify each other.

The trend towards these cars is reinforced by the fact people today are much less interested in recreational driving. And for good reason. The roads in the United States – everywhere in the world, really – are way too crowded to enjoy in most places. And they’re full of police anxious to give you tickets. It’s not like it was in the ’50s, ’60s, or ’70s when you could drive fast just for the pleasure of it.

Cars are increasingly just for transportation. Evidence is that a lot of millennials don’t even bother getting driver’s licenses. And if they do, they avoid buying a car. It used to be that kids couldn’t wait until they were 16 to get a driver’s license. No more.

Self-driving vehicles will compound the changes due to electric vehicles.

Chris: What are the biggest implications of self-driving cars?

Doug: One big change with self-driving vehicles is that you’re not going to need many parking lots. Most cars will be driverless Ubers. A self-driving car will pick people up and drop them off wherever and whenever they want. At least in metropolitan areas, which is where more and more of the population is concentrating. Taxi, limo, and truck drivers will cease to exist within a decade. As will Uber and Lyft drivers.

It’s not just because of technology, it’s economics. The typical car today only spends between two and ten percent of its life on the road, driving. The rest of the time it’s parked on a street, or in a driveway or parking lot. Storing unused cars is a major expense. Commercial lots charge $10 an hour in many places. And over 10% of the square footage of urban buildings is used for parking cars. Plus all the parking spaces on streets, and giant parking lots out in the suburbs.

I suspect most self-driving EVs – at least in cities – will be used like taxis, or rented by the hour. They’ll be used 24-7, however, so you’ll need only a fraction of the cars we now have. Self-driving EVs will be much more efficient, and much, much cheaper than the cars we use now.

Because there will be fewer vehicles, and they won’t be sitting in parking lots all the time, there’s going to be a glut of real estate hitting the market. Not sometime in the indefinite future – over the next decade. That goes for a lot of real estate now used for roads as well.

If a Martian were to land on Earth today, he’d think that the major lifeform on this planet is vehicles. But that will change as vehicles are used more efficiently. A lot of suburban families have two or three cars. Over the next decade, if they own any at all, it will be just one, mostly for long trips.

Chris: It’s interesting that you mention that. It seems like people across the country are opting to share vehicles rather than own them outright.

Doug: It’s unlikely that I’ll get another Porsche or Ferrari. Cars like that are increasingly pointless with roads being what they are today. Combine that with the effects of the Greater Depression, and in a decade you’ll find exotic cars sitting in barns with flat tires and birds roosting under the hood – which was the case with Duesenbergs and Cords in the ’40s and ’50s. The current boom in exotic cars selling for $100,000 to $1,000,000 is another bubble about to burst.

Anyway, if I want to go somewhere today, quite frankly I’d rather have some remote vehicle pick me up and drop me off. So I can read a book while I’m in transit.

This change is happening right before our eyes. And it’s going to play out quickly, taking millions of people completely by surprise.

Chris: Thanks for speaking with me today, Doug.

Doug: You’re welcome.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
October 12, 2019 7:12 pm

Delusional article, self-driving cars aren’t legal in any State, but there will be millions on the road next year?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
October 12, 2019 7:21 pm

This guy is an amazing example of self promotion. He was right. Once. 40 years ago in 1979. He told people to buy precious metals. The he wrote a book called “Crisis Investing For The ’90s”; again telling people to buy silver. This just as silver achieved it’s all time inflation adjusted low under $4 an ounce in 1993. He cost people a lot of money then and he hasn’t been right since. I’m suprised the guy is still around.

SlickWilly
SlickWilly
October 12, 2019 8:27 pm

-Performance wise electric cars eat the ICE cars lunch. Yes that is true.
-Cost wise right now they still are much more expensive.
-Their range is and always will be limited(unless you don’t mind waiting awhile for the battery to charge).
-When the battery pack does take a poop boy are you going to pay for it.
-The internal power grid in the US could not handle everyone driving these things without some major improvements in infrastructure.
-Pollution wise – Where do the dead batteries go after their life cycle has expired? Are these any more power efficient when they still need electricity which last I knew is mostly generated by fossil fuels(don’t forget that power plant may generate 1Mwh of electricty but much of that is lost in line transmission).

As for the idea of the new car sharing world thats really funny. People are destructive pigs especially when its not theirs. Don’t believe me? Have you ever seen a public restroom?

Dan
Dan
October 12, 2019 8:36 pm

EV’s would be amazing, but the current batteries are an abysmal failure, in terms of cost, energy storage, reliability, and environmental impact. I am far more interested in hydrogen fueled cars: you can make it at home with a solar panel and electrolysis equipment, and they wouldn’t be a large burden to the electric grid, like charging batteries are.

Until the battery or hydrogen issue is solved, these are a pipe dream.

Donkey
Donkey
  Dan
October 13, 2019 8:38 am

What is the hydrogen issue…colorless and odorless?

NJroute22
NJroute22
October 12, 2019 9:09 pm

This dope says EV’s are “vastly superior in every way.”
We’ve driven from NYC to Miami in one single day. How long (and how many long stops) would it take in an EV?
He’s definitely drinking the kool-aid.
Edit: He’s also wrong because they’re no “economical” EV in sight. And outside of the liberal meccas, they’re not selling as well as portrayed. Eric Peters should interview this guy and school him sideways.

GomeznSA
GomeznSA
October 12, 2019 9:10 pm

Unless or until they can come up with an extended range electric car that would allow me to make a 500 to 600 mile round trip in a day WITHOUT needing a recharge to complete – nope, not going to be in my carport.

Bob The Retard
Bob The Retard
October 12, 2019 9:49 pm

I think of EVs as mobile funeral pyres.

Donkey
Donkey
October 13, 2019 12:16 am

He says people won’t own cars, they’ll just use them as taxis and not as many will be needed. Really? How many will be needed at 8am when everyone needs a ride to work at the same time?

The wonder Of it all
The wonder Of it all
October 13, 2019 12:54 am

Granted the Evs today are cool looking, run great, quiet, great features. nice examples of tech. Many manufacturers are dablling into the foray. They do that and have had success and failures on other ideas leading edge also. Unless Nicholas Tesla can come back and broadcast energy the limits of resources for battery supply will hold back a take over. Just think of how many batteries are being used by the average family already. They may build a better design, sure be nice to stop burning so much gas.

yahsure
yahsure
October 13, 2019 1:08 am

Maybe as a driverless taxi in large cities. Charging all these cars will be a problem without major changes to our power grid. It won’t work in the sticks. Maybe a long time from now? I was waiting for hydrogen-powered cars and wondered what a kit would cost to convert over. But, not yet. The costs for people who are hanging onto their cars or trucks are too much and many people are happy that their vehicles are paid for.