William Barr Wants To Kill Privacy And Security… “For The Children”

Authored by Michael Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

U.S. Attorney General William Barr, along with co-conspirators in the UK and Australia, recently wrote a letter to Mark Zuckerberg requesting he not move forward with a plan to implement end-to-end encryption across Facebook’s messaging services. A draft of the letter was published earlier this month by Buzzfeed, and it’s worth examining in some detail.

What immediately strikes you is the letter’s emphasis on “protecting the children,” a talking point universally used by authoritarians throughout history to justify both a reduction of public liberty and a transfer of increased power to the state. Though this tactic is transparent and well understood by those paying attention, it’s nevertheless disturbing to observe Barr’s disingenuous and shameless use of it (the words ‘child’ and ‘children’ appear 17 times in the course of this brief letter).

Here’s just one example from the letter:

Companies should not deliberately design their systems to preclude any form of access to content, even for preventing or investigating the most serious crimes. This puts our citizens and societies at risk by severely eroding a company’s ability to detect and respond to illegal content and activity, such as child sexual exploitation and abuse, terrorism, and foreign adversaries’ attempts to undermine democratic values and institutions, preventing the prosecution of offenders and safeguarding of victims. It also impedes law enforcement’s ability to investigate these and other serious crimes. Risks to public safety from Facebook’s proposals are exacerbated in the context of a single platform that would combine inaccessible messaging services with open profiles, providing unique routes for prospective offenders to identify and groom our children.

Barr and the U.S. government feign deep concern regarding the ability of bad people to “identify and groom our children,” yet this is the same guy and government who allowed Jeffrey Epstein to be suicided in a Department of Justice prison just a few months ago. It’s the same guy and government who can’t find or doesn’t want to find Ghislaine Maxwell. And it’s same guy and government that can’t be bothered to raid Epstein’s New Mexico ranch despite known instances of child abuse there.

Allegations of sex abuse against Epstein in New Mexico date back to the mid-1990s. An affidavit filed in April alleges Epstein and his supposed ex-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell told a 15-year-old girl to “take off all of her clothes” and then “touched her inappropriately” on a massage table at the ranch in 1996.

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday morning, an accuser claims Epstein coerced the girl to engage in sex acts at Zorro Ranch between 2007 and 2010.

How stupid do they think we are?

Moreover, there are several reasons aside from the clearly corrupt and dishonest handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case that should lead to distrust in William Barr. Despite all the empty talk of Trump “draining the swamp,” there are few individuals alive today more swampy than Attorney General Barr.

Naturally, there’s more. Here’s some of what the man was up to while Attorney General under the first Bush.

The Justice Department under Attorney General William Barr launched a vast surveillance program that gathered records of innocent Americans’ international phone calls without first conducting a review of whether it was legal, the department’s inspector general concluded Thursday.

It happened in 1992, the last time Barr served as attorney general.

The secret program, run by the Drug Enforcement Administration, ultimately gathered billions of records of nearly all phone calls from the United States to 116 countries, with little oversight from Congress or the courts, a USA TODAY investigation foundIt provided a blueprint for far broader phone-data surveillance the government launched after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

It appears the entire unconstitutional mass surveillance apparatus we have today was actually birthed via secret actions taken by Barr nearly three decades ago, and he’s now come back to finish the job. This man has a long and well-documented track record of despising liberty and human privacy.

Finally, it’s noteworthy that the one time Facebook actually tries to do the right thing by its users is when the state gets all hot and bothered. To understand exactly what’s at stake here, take a read of an opinion-piece authored by Edward Snowden earlier today.

Excepts via The Guardian:

In the midst of the greatest computer security crisis in history, the US government, along with the governments of the UK and Australia, is attempting to undermine the only method that currently exists for reliably protecting the world’s information: encryption. Should they succeed in their quest to undermine encryption, our public infrastructure and private lives will be rendered permanently unsafe…

Donald Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, who authorised one of the earliest mass surveillance programmes without reviewing whether it was legal, is now signalling an intention to halt – or even roll back – the progress of the last six years. WhatsApp, the messaging service owned by Facebook, already uses end-to-end encryption (E2EE): in March the company announced its intention to incorporate E2EE into its other messaging apps – Facebook Messenger and Instagram – as well. Now Barr is launching a public campaign to prevent Facebook from climbing this next rung on the ladder of digital security. This began with an open letter co-signed by Barr, UK home secretary Priti Patel, Australia’s minister for home affairs and the US secretary of homeland security, demanding Facebook abandon its encryption proposals.

If Barr’s campaign is successful, the communications of billions will remain frozen in a state of permanent insecurity: users will be vulnerable by design. And those communications will be vulnerable not only to investigators in the US, UK and Australia, but also to the intelligence agencies of China, Russia and Saudi Arabia – not to mention hackers around the world…

The true explanation for why the US, UK and Australian governments want to do away with end-to-end encryption is less about public safety than it is about power: E2EE gives control to individuals and the devices they use to send, receive and encrypt communications, not to the companies and carriers that route them. This, then, would require government surveillance to become more targeted and methodical, rather than indiscriminate and universal.

The state doesn’t care about the children and it doesn’t care about you. The only thing it cares about is power and its control over the citizenry. Let’s not get conned for the millionth time.

*  *  *

Liberty Blitzkrieg is now 100% ad free. To make this a successful, sustainable thing consider the following options. You can become a Patron. You can visit the Support Page to donate via PayPal, Bitcoin or send cash/check in the mail.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Donkey
Donkey
October 16, 2019 12:20 pm

Vote Harder asked, in another post…

“When was the last time a law passed that increased your freedom”?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Donkey
October 16, 2019 9:12 pm

December 15, 1791 – The Bill of Rights

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
October 16, 2019 12:55 pm

“Without encryption, we will lose all privacy. This is our new battleground”.
comment image?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=0dc9917c3680e0b933d726391d5a2842

A brave new world for which Trump is just as complicit in as any other democrat or republican.

Vote Harder
Vote Harder
  Vote Harder
October 16, 2019 12:57 pm

It was supposed to be a picture of Snowden.

22winmag - Guns now, due process later. -DJT
22winmag - Guns now, due process later. -DJT
October 16, 2019 1:27 pm

STOP STOP STOP

The only time the AG writes a letter to a faggot cardboard CEO anally birthed out of a CIA laboratory is for laughs.

I mean think about the very premise of this. An absentee AG is showing who is in charge by writing a letter to a teleprompter reading nitwit fake billionaire like Zuck?

They are all on the same team and it shows so plainly there is no need to hash it over.

The whole article is premised on naked stupidity and denial, so I’m not sure where Krieger, who I tend to respect, is going with this one.

Ginger
Ginger

Put a different wig on zuckerburg and darken the skin tone a bit and voila, one would have obama.
Read a Philip K Dick short story once about a man who did not know he was an android till it had a heart attack. The doctor was trying to save him, then said something to the likes of “fuck it, this thing isn’t even alive”. It went home all rejected.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 16, 2019 2:10 pm
CCRider
CCRider
October 16, 2019 4:02 pm

Did he really need to ask this question:

“How stupid do they think we are?”

So stupid they can fuck us before our very eyes and get people to vote for them.

Anymouse
Anymouse
October 16, 2019 4:39 pm

Every day (almost) on local tv news, is a story about another random local guy, accused of “storing child porn on his computer”. But the name is never associated with any local institution, they never say anything about the person that you would be able to say “oh, he lived there, or worked there”.

So, either there is a million random child molesters in our area, all use unprotected browsers,
OR..
they are just getting us used to the FACT that they read and see EVERYTHING we do on the web.

KaD
KaD
October 16, 2019 4:46 pm

UK: 11-Year-Old British Girl Gang Raped by 500 Muslims with the AID OF THE POLICE

John Galt
John Galt
October 16, 2019 8:57 pm

All that Epstein media and promises the investigation would continue and all we hear now are crickets. Knew that before he was Arkancided..