Guest Post by Pat Buchanan
Is America still the world’s last superpower with global policing obligations? Or should we shuck off this imperial role and make America, again, in Jeane Kirkpatrick’s phrase, “a normal country in a normal time”?
“Let someone else fight over this long blood-stained sand,” said President Donald Trump in an impassioned defense of his decision to cut ties to the Syrian Kurds, withdraw and end these “endless wars.”
Are our troops in Syria, then, on their way home? Well, not exactly.
Those leaving northern Syria went into Iraq. Other U.S. soldiers will stay in Syria to guard oil wells that we and the Kurds captured in the war with ISIS. Another 150 U.S. troops will remain in al-Tanf to guard Syria’s border with Iraq, at the request of Jordan and Israel.
And 2,000 more U.S. troops are being sent to Saudi Arabia to help defend the kingdom from Iran, which raises a question: Are we coming or going?
In his conflicting statements and actions, Trump seemingly seeks to mollify both sides of our national quarrel:
Is America still the world’s last superpower with global policing obligations? Or should we shuck off this imperial role and make America, again, in Jeane Kirkpatrick’s phrase, “a normal country in a normal time”?
In Middle America, anti-interventionism has carried the day. As Trump says, no declaration at his rallies is more wildly welcomed than his pledge to end our Middle East wars and bring the troops home.
But in this imperial capital, the voice of the interventionist yet prevails. The media, the foreign policy elite, the think tanks, the ethnic lobbies, the Pentagon, the State Department, Capitol Hill, are almost all interventionist, opposed to Trump’s abandonment of the Kurds. Rand Paul may echo Middle America, but Lindsey Graham speaks for the Republican establishment.
Yet the evidence seems compelling that anti-interventionism is where the country is at, and the Congress knows it.
For though the denunciations of Trump’s pullout from Syria have not ceased, one detects no campaign on Capitol Hill to authorize sending U.S. troops back to Syria, in whatever numbers are needed, to enable the Kurds to keep control of their occupied quadrant of that country.
Love of the Kurds, so audible on the Hill, does not go that far.
While surely loud, the neocons and liberal interventionists who drown out dissent in D.C. appear to lack the courage of their New World Order convictions.
In 1940-41, the anti-interventionists of “America First” succeeded in keeping us out of the world war (after Hitler and Stalin invaded Poland in September of 1939 and Britain and France went to war). Pearl Harbor united the nation, but not until Dec. 7, 1941, two years later — when America First folded its tents and enlisted.
Today, because both sides of our foreign policy quarrel have powerful constituencies, we have paralysis anew, reflected in policy.
We have enough troops in Afghanistan to prevent the Taliban from overrunning Kabul and the big cities, but not enough to win the war.
In Iraq, which we invaded in 2003 to oust Saddam Hussein and install a democracy, we brought to power the Shia and their Iranian sponsors. Now we battle Iran for political influence in Baghdad.
Across the Middle East, we have enough troops, planes and ships to prevent our expulsion, but not enough to win the wars from Syria to Yemen to Afghanistan.
Bahrain in the Persian Gulf is the home base of the U.S. Fifth Fleet. We have 13,000 troops and a major air base at Al Udeid in Qatar. U.S. Army Central Command and 13,000 U.S. troops are in Kuwait. Trump has sent more troops to Saudi Arabia, but it was the “infidel” troops’ presence on sacred Saudi soil that was among the reasons Osama bin Laden launched 9/11.
To the question, “Are we going deeper into the Middle East or coming out?” the answer is almost surely the latter.
Among the candidates who could be president in 2021 — Trump, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders — none is an interventionist of the Lindsey Graham school. Three are anti-interventionist and anti-war, which may help explain why Democrats are taking a second look at Hillary Clinton.
According to polls, Iran is first among the nations that Americans regard as an enemy. Still, there is no stomach for war with Iran. When Trump declined to order a strike on Iran — after an air and cruise missile attack shut down half of Saudi oil production — Americans, by their silent acquiescence, seemed to support our staying out.
Yet if there is no stomach in Middle America for war with Iran and a manifest desire to pull the troops out and come home, there is ferocious establishment resistance to any withdrawal of U.S. forces. This has bedeviled Trump through the three years of his presidency.
Again, it seems a stalemate is in the cards — until there is some new explosion in the Mideast, after which the final withdrawal for America will begin, as it did for the exhausted British and French empires after World War II.
That we are leaving the Middle East seems certain. Only the departure date is as yet undetermined.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Nothing seems certain Pat. This country (and the world) is in turmoil and the outcomes are as varied as the number of stars in the sky… Chip
…..or the number of genders on facetube
we have to feed the military machine. its nature kept it as the major industry that was not shipped offshore. bomb making requires bombing to keep the bomb factories humming. it also is valuable to ex-military mucky-mucks for 2nd careers, who then get paid gobs for staying in touch with their pentagon employed former colleagues ensuring their ongoing cooperation with future promises of cashing in. and politicians depend on the bomb makers for campaign funds so they can get re-elected and keep america free (by bombing only people who are no immediate threat to us). the bankers all like this business too, because these bombs are bought with borrowed money that pays the interest they deserve for creating from nothing.
Sounds like greed cause lots of problems all over the world.
united states of anything for a buck
“Pat Buchanan ponders geopolitics in baby terms to a group of gum smacking, absent-minded, Republican-voting Florida retirees.”
It’s Russia!
The war mongers in the Fed Gov are afraid of tangling with an entity that can fight back. They know that US weapons systems are trash. They get their cut via campaign contributions while the weapons manufacturers sell them high priced junk that is never field tested
but retired before the newer improved junk is sold. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Taking on Russia with junk weaponry would be bad for business. It would be proof that the world would see and US weapons sales would diminish. The swine feeding off the gov’t teat can’t take that chance.
Trump dogwhistles his base about ending involvement in the ME as he was elected to do, but ultimately does and will continue to do what his masters in Israel tell him to do – stay involved. Every other person running for the office in 2020 will also do exactly what they are told by the same masters. Pat knows this, probably better than anyone, so why play coy with reality, Pat?
Pat gets paid to certain write stuff, and leave certain stuff out.
Preaching to the choir here, but
I was taught in history, and it’s often repeated, that Americans changed their neutral stance, and willingly entered into WWII because we were attacked.
Did we provoke Japan?
Did FDR turn a blind eye to Pearl Harbors vulnerability for a larger cause?
Then we had Gulf War II justified after the 9-11 ‘attack on America’ in a repeat.
War is profitable, for many different people, for different reasons, and boobus americanus is lied to, told & sold a reason or four, that taps into and appeals for prideful defense initiatives, and standing up for freedom, the abused, and for capitalism advocates.
Yet the real reasons are often hidden in secret, by powerful people, who care nothing for the pain and death collateral damage that inevitably results for untold thousands, if not millions of people.
Devastating ripple effects.
One has to wonder what is really motivating the people who clamor for maintaining US military interventions around the globe.
What they announce publicly, should be seen with skepticism.
They lie. Habitually. A pattern.
We, in the past, have protected our foreign fighters by bringing them with us back to the USA. It has not always worked well for them or us. We need to keep out of a lot of the shit the warmongers get us into, to begin with. You know who I am talking about, the same people who make the bombs and weapons of destruction, the bankers who make money from both sides of a conflict. To the wealthy go the spoils, they are the only ones who profit by these conflicts!