Let’s Not Waste a Crisis

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

Let's Not Waste a Crisis

Former Barack Obama adviser Rahm Emanuel, during a recent interview, reminded us of his 2008 financial crisis quotation, “Never allow a crisis to go to waste.” The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a wonderful opportunity for those of us who want greater control over our lives. Sadly, too many Americans have already taken the bait. We’ve allowed politicians and bureaucrats to dictate to us what’s an essential business and what isn’t, who has access to hospitals and who hasn’t, and a host of minor and major dictates.

Leftist politicians who want to get into our pocketbooks are beginning to argue that the COVID-19 pandemic is the best argument for a wealth tax. Let’s first define a wealth tax. A wealth tax is applicable to and levied on a variety of accumulated assets that include cash, money market funds, real property, trust funds, owner-occupied housing and other wealth accumulations. Assume a taxpayer earns $150,000 a year and falls in the 32% tax bracket. That individual’s income tax liability for the year will be 32% x $150,000 or $48,800. Say the taxpayer has a net worth of $500,000 consisting of a business or home and the government imposes a wealth tax of 32%, the person’s tax liability is $160,000.

The problem with most politicians is when they enact a law, they seldom ask, “Then what?” They assume a world of what economists call zero elasticity wherein people behave after a tax is imposed just as they behaved before the tax was imposed and the only difference is that more money comes into the government’s tax coffers. The long-term effect of a wealth tax is that people will try to avoid it by not accumulating as much wealth or concealing the wealth they accumulate.

A wealth tax has become increasingly attractive because it lends itself to demagoguery about the significant wealth disparity in the United States. The Federal Reserve reports that, in 2018, the wealthiest 10% of Americans owned 70% of the country’s wealth, and the richest 1% owned 32% of the wealth. That fact gave Democratic presidential contenders such as Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren incentives to propose a wealth tax as a part of their campaign rhetoric. Leftists lament that multibillionaires such as Charles Koch, Warren Buffett, Larry Ellison and Sheldon Adelson have not made charitable efforts to address the coronavirus crisis.

My questions to these political leeches are: To whom does the billionaire’s wealth belong? And how did they accumulate such wealth?

Did they accumulate their great wealth by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man, as has been the case throughout most of human history? No, they accumulated great wealth by serving and pleasing their fellow man in the pursuit of profits. Unfortunately, demagoguery and lack of understanding has led to “profit” becoming a dirty word. Profit is a payment to entrepreneurs just as wages are payments to labor, interest to capital and rent to land. In order to earn profits in free markets, entrepreneurs must identify and satisfy human wants in a way that economizes on society’s scarce resources.

Here’s a question for you. Which entities produce greater consumer satisfaction: for-profit enterprises such as supermarkets, computer makers and clothing stores, or nonprofit entities such as public schools, post offices and motor vehicle departments? I’m guessing you’ll answer the former. Their survival depends on pleasing ordinary people. Public schools, post offices and motor vehicle departments’ survival are not strictly tied to pleasing people but rather on politicians and the ability of government to impose taxes.

Some advocates of wealth taxes and other forms of taxation might argue that they are temporary measures to get us over the COVID-19 crisis. Do not buy that argument. The great Nobel Laureate economist Milton Friedman once said, “Nothing is more permanent than a temporary government program.” The telephone tax was levied on wealthy Americans with telephones in 1898 to help fund the Spanish-American War. That tax was repealed over 100 years later in 2006. One of the objectives of the World War II withholding tax was to bring faster revenues to fight the war. The withholding of taxes is still with us blinding Americans on the taxes they pay. Let us not allow a crisis to bamboozle us again.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
27 Comments
Donkey
Donkey
May 13, 2020 7:35 am

Humans gonna human.

Without a doubt, wealth/income inequality, if it becomes great enough, will cause severe problems. Like it or not. All the arguments do not matter.

The comment in the article about ALL of this wealth was accumulated by serving their fellow man…laughable to say all of it. I guess great fortunes accumulated from endless war and theft via the fed?

Cribdawg
Cribdawg
  Donkey
May 13, 2020 10:30 am

And donkeys will asses. Move to Venezuela and ask them how economic equality works for them.

Donkey
Donkey
  Cribdawg
May 13, 2020 12:24 pm

Human nature. Ever heard of it?

We will pay for the poor one way or another. Or become a third world country.

And don’t kid yourself, you aren’t the “rich” anyone is concerned with.

centinel
centinel
  Donkey
May 13, 2020 12:07 pm

How do you define “wealth/income inequality” and how would you propose to solve it? Moreover, why is it a problem?

Donkey
Donkey
  centinel
May 13, 2020 12:25 pm

If it gets great enough to cause conflict. Duh

We will pay for the poor one way or another. Or become a third world country.

And don’t kid yourself, you aren’t the “rich” anyone is concerned with.

centinel
centinel
  Donkey
May 13, 2020 12:47 pm

You still didn’t define what you’re talking about. Why would “inequality” reaching a certain level cause conflict?

And there’s no need to project your class mindset onto me. My finances have nothing to do with my response above, and its pretty interesting that you seem to think they do.

Donkey
Donkey
  centinel
May 13, 2020 2:31 pm

I answered your question. Here, I’ll do it again. I’ll make it all caps and underline it and italicize it even. Let me know if you can see and read it.

HUMAN NATURE

Hey Nubie, better not be coming up in here all dense and shit, the big dogs will fuck your little asshole.

centinel
centinel
  Donkey
May 13, 2020 10:01 pm

Ok, I’ll try.

Wealth and income inequality = some having more wealth or income than others. To be generous let’s even grant…some having much, much more wealth than others.

Why does it matter whatsoever that wealth is unequal? Everything is unequal and always has been. Equality of outcome isn’t some kind of right.

If you’re talking about subsistence, i.e. human nature will kick in when people are starving and they’ll eat the rich, then you’re right. Happens all the time and it’ll happen again.

But for most of the people I hear talking about it, its just plain envy, and a boring sound bite.

Donkey
Donkey
  centinel
May 13, 2020 10:33 pm

And that is why I said Humans gonna human. BUT keep the inequality at an acceptable level and we avoid societal issues caused by it.

IMO you’re almost right….

“If you’re talking about subsistence, i.e. human nature will kick in when people are starving and they’ll eat the rich, then you’re right. Happens all the time and it’ll happen again.”

We don’t have to get to a subsistence level though. Just to an unacceptable level.

I never suggested what that level is, mind you, but I’m sure we will find out.

Fedup
Fedup
May 13, 2020 7:49 am

To whom does the billionaire’s wealth belong? And how did they accumulate such wealth?

Did they accumulate their great wealth by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man, as has been the case throughout most of human history? No, they accumulated great wealth by serving and pleasing their fellow man in the pursuit of profits.

They’re still looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man.
Example:

about Randall Stephenson receiving roughly $32 million in compensation last year, while about 20,000 AT&T workers lost their jobs due to various corporate developments and an undisclosed number of jobs were offshored. A company spokesperson disputed the amount of layoffs and the claim that jobs were outsourced.

Stephenson is leaving with a golden parachute retirement package. His pension is valued at $64 million with an additional $27.6 million in deferred earnings, according to the New York Times. This massive sum of money, according to MarketWatch, would provide 60-year-old Stephenson with “a guaranteed income of $274,000 a month for the rest of his days.” This is on top of his total last three years of an average $30 million compensation.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/05/12/atts-ceo-steps-down-with-a-64-million-gold-plated-retirement-plan/#45dab40959bd

Timmy75
Timmy75
  Fedup
May 13, 2020 9:54 am

That one simple, but nonetheless undeniable fact of life that a socialist cannot/will not acknowledge: life is not fair. If it were, there would be no stupid nor unattractive people, and Elvis would still be very much alive while tens of thousands of Elvis impersonators would be the one’s taking a dirt nap. So there.

Martin
Martin
May 13, 2020 8:09 am

How ’bout cutting spending instead of increasing taxes? We now have a ‘wonderful opportunity’ to see that our Air Force can’t defend us against biological warfare delivered by airplane, our Army can’t defend us against an invasion from the South, and the Navy can’t even defend itself any better than a Carnival Cruise liner.

Timmy75
Timmy75
  Martin
May 13, 2020 10:00 am

Quite right. Gone are the daze of $400 hammers and $700 toilet seats (although I recently saw one on Ebay for a cool $699.95, but with no cup holder)

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
May 13, 2020 8:30 am

Dr. Williams – While I hold you in very high regard, the oligarchs of the modern world have ” accumulate(d) their great wealth by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man” through the use of politicians they have bought and paid for. There is no reason for our current tax system that rewards those who own politicians and punishes those who do not.

Timmy75
Timmy75
  TN Patriot
May 13, 2020 10:03 am

Would it make you feel better ‘lil goil if dey wuz standing ’round all day doing nothin’? –ARCHIE BUNKER

Jai Seli
Jai Seli
May 13, 2020 8:54 am

LOL – “Let’s . . .”? Ya got a rock in ur pocket/turd in ur pants? I [respectfully] REJECT ur “presumption” of “inclusion” w/ anybody/thing w/O my express acceptance. Perhaps the problem begins w/ each individual’s failure to continually demonstrate His/Her RIGHT to CHOOSE – the Lord’s most fundamental “Blessing from the Beginning” and REAFFIRMED by THE REDEMPTION. AND . . . still very much available to the REPENTing w/ [opened] “eyes/ears/minds to receive” the Truth / “JC Way” currently being sooooo attacked/obfuscated by the likes of the CCP Chicoms, Sharia crazies, Soros-funded DemonRATs, lib-turd academics, parasitic gov-agents/legisTRAITORs, Sillywood Hollywierds, BAR-fly LIEyers and Big-Corp social media rigger’s bull-schiff / “DISinfo-tainment”.
Yo fellow, still-productive “Repented/Redeemed Fly-Over Rurals” who are [UNencumbered/UNaddressed] GROUNDed, GATHERed, GUNned, GARDENed, and . . . SIMPLIFIED – carry on AS USUAL! Just “parry past” all the engineered FEAR/HATE.
“JC always before me”! Hoo-rah.

Timmy75
Timmy75
  Jai Seli
May 13, 2020 10:06 am

I suspect the latter, and in copious amount. Big pockets, may as well use them, no?

Frank Johnson
Frank Johnson
May 13, 2020 9:24 am

Reading the replies is scary. Inequality will always be with us because we all have different characteristics and abilities. Some like to be wealthy and work toward that end, some, too many, feel that they are owed a high standard of living simply because they exist. We are fast approaching the latter standard and excepting that will lead to lower standards of living and eventually poverty for all. Our so called poverty stricken would be upper middle class in a majority of the world’s population. Envy has replaced greed as highlighted by the victims groups. No country in the world has a greater ability for economic mobility. Ask yourself this, who should comprise the elites, the politicians who provide no input to th country or our businesses which provide the opportunities for wages or mobility?

Donkey
Donkey
  Frank Johnson
May 13, 2020 10:02 am

Can you refute my comment directly or are you a grandstander?

Timmy75
Timmy75
  Frank Johnson
May 13, 2020 10:11 am

“One can always choose to avoid reality, but what one cannot avoid are the consequences of having avoided reality.” –AYN RAND (after her 5th vodka on-the-rocks)

anarchyst
anarchyst
May 13, 2020 10:00 am

Wall street sees “labor” as being a necessary evil, its true value to be minimized at all cost while valuing the CEOs and “stockholders” above and beyond their true worth.
This even applies to CEOs, that run their corporations into the ground while still receiving massive “rewards” for their “expertise”.
Let’s not forget the corporate vultures (a la Mitt Romney) that specialize in parting out viable businesses in order to maximize their “profits”
Henry Ford “got it right” when he CREATED a market for his cars by making them inexpensive while paying his workforce a decent wage. He realized that a well-paid workforce would be able to buy his products, among other things. It could be safely argued that Ford, CREATED the middle class. Automobiles, once “playthings for the rich” were made affordable for the “ordinary common man”.
Henry Ford KNEW who the banksters and vulture capitalists were and made no bones about calling them out and naming them, Father Charles Coughlin did the same thing and was ostracized by the Catholic Church for pointing out the TRUTH about our vulture capitalist society.
“Vulture capitalism” can be defined as the owners of businesses and industries that collude with each other, also in collusion with the “money types” (banksters) depressing wages solely to increase their stockholder “profits” at the top while impoverishing those who actually WORK, producing their products.
All one has to do is look at today’s CEOs, even in failing companies, being paid exorbitant salaries, along with stock options and other “perks” while pleading poverty, pushing down wages for their employees.
Today’s capitalist “mantra” is that labor costs must be as cheap as possible while the “value” (profit) to the stockholder must be as great as possible. Sacrificing labor on the altar of “maximum profits” NEVER works in the long term.
Of course, in the short term, with cheap Chinese goods flooding the market, the economy looks, good, but without CONSUMERS who hold jobs that pay reasonably well, all bets are off. There needs to be a balance between profits and labor.
Presently, labor is looked upon as a “necessary evil” to be minimized at all costs. The problem arises-without labor there are no consumers. As I previously stated, a “balance” must be maintained. Labor is not evil, but a necessary component of capitalism.
Pre-WW2 Germany’s economic successes and the rapid rise of the German economy was predicated on labor being assigned “value”and monetized-something that is (and has been) missing in capitalist societies today.
If labor costs need to be trimmed to assure “profit” at the top, something is seriously wrong. In fact, in the well-paid American automobile industry, labor costs account only for approximately 10% of total costs.
Offshoring production results in consumers (customers) being “lost”.
As to “tariffs”, the American country ran on tariffs from its inception until 1913, when the “income tax” and “federal reserve” was established.
The American economy is being propped up by the “social safety net” which obscures the TRUE economic situation in the U S .

centinel
centinel
  anarchyst
May 13, 2020 12:21 pm

Gosh, what does this even mean?

There is no “we”, there is no pie to split, and there is no balance except what happens naturally based on each individual’s decision to work together or not.

If a laborer doesn’t want to be a laborer any longer, he should cease being a laborer. Go try his hand at being an owner of capital.

I used to think that workers were entitled to higher wages. When the labor market improved post-2008, and workers ostensibly had more leverage, you would think they would take advantage and demand higher wages for their services. Instead, they used it to get ping pong tables and drink bars at work, and to negotiate “work” from home arrangements.

Labor isn’t some sacrosanct concept. Its just people.

22winmag - TBP's Mormon Crypto-Jew M110A2 Gunner
22winmag - TBP's Mormon Crypto-Jew M110A2 Gunner
May 13, 2020 10:03 am

Let’s not waste a crisis.
comment image

overthecliff
overthecliff
May 13, 2020 10:16 am

I’m sad. America is on its deathbed.

22winmag - TBP's Mormon Crypto-Jew M110A2 Gunner
22winmag - TBP's Mormon Crypto-Jew M110A2 Gunner
  overthecliff
May 13, 2020 5:27 pm

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?

You have a break a few eggs to fry a CCP omelette.

BUCKHED
BUCKHED
May 13, 2020 12:29 pm

I have no problem with someone becoming wealthy because they’ve created a business that has tangible assets . I do have a problem with the Wallstreet banksters etc.that became wealthy for creating NOTHING ….but moving money around and using high speed trading to scam us all .

Jury Nullification
Jury Nullification
May 13, 2020 4:51 pm

I salute you, Mr. Williams. You would have made a great president with your great respect for liberty. Miss you filling in for Rush.

Money is credits for service to one’s fellow man. Learned that from you.