In sworn statement, prominent mathematician flags up to 100,000 Pennsylvania ballots

Via Just The News

In a sworn declaration, a respected mathematician says his analysis of election data and phone interviews with Pennsylvania voters raises questions about as many as 100,000 absentee ballots requested in the key battleground state where President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by just about 82,000 votes.

Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data collected by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard as well as 2,684 voter interviews conducted by a phone bank and found two concerning patterns. One involved possible votes that were not counted, the other ballots that appeared to be requested by someone other than a registered voter.

“I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801,” Miller said in the sworn statement provided to Just the News.

According to Pennsylvania state data for early and absentee ballot requests, there are roughly 165,000 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that had not been counted as of Nov. 16.

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor told Just the News that Miller’s analysis provides fresh evidence of potential voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

“This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year’s election,” Trainor said.

“Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters.”

The Pennsylvania Department of State’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday evening.

In addition to his two base estimates, Miller also offered two estimates with broader ranges and higher confidence intervals. “Almost surely, the number of ballots requested by someone other than the registered Republican is between 37,001 and 58,914,” Miller writes. “Almost surely the number of ballots requested by registered Republicans and returned but not counted is in the range from 38,910 to 56,483.”

Matt Braynard, the director of the Voter Integrity Project, which conducted the survey, said Miller’s conclusions are “indicative of a kind of problem that we’re seeing not just in Pennsylvania but in many of the other states that are determining the outcome of this election.”

“We’re sharing our data for the other states so that Professor Miller can conduct a similar analysis on them,” he told Just the News on Thursday. “I look forward to seeing the results.”

Miller’s analysis comes after numerous Pennsylvania voters have described what appear to be widespread irregularities in the voting process there.

Voters in that state described to Just the News receiving absentee ballots in spite of having not requested them; when they showed up at their polling place, they were required to vote with provisional ballots.

In some cases, mail-in ballots that went unmailed were still listed as “pending” on the state’s ballot tracking website as of this week.

A record number of Americans voted by mail in the 2020 election, driven by concerns that crowded polling places could become superspreader events for COVID-19.

Major get-out-the-vote campaigns sought to familiarize voters with the mail-in process for both the primary and general elections, though numerous issues were reported over the course of the year, including multiple absentee ballots mailed to individual voters, ballots being mailed to dead voters, and votes appearing to go uncounted well after Election Day.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
November 21, 2020 6:55 pm

Don’t make me math, man.

Joey Joe Joe Shabadoo
Joey Joe Joe Shabadoo
November 21, 2020 10:28 pm

The voter fraud has been going on for MANY MANY YEARS … As a CPA, I have always been surprised that SOME mathematical genius hasn’t brought this kind of stuff forward … a 2020 version of Harry Markopolos (the dude who knew Madoff was a fraud 9 years before he was exposed)

When Markopolos obtained a copy of Madoff’s revenue stream, he spotted problems. The biggest red flag, he believed, was that the return stream rose steadily with only a few downticks — represented graphically by a nearly perfect 45-degree angle. According to Markopolos, anyone who understood the underlying math of the markets would have known that such a return stream “simply doesn’t exist in finance,” since the markets were too volatile even in the most favorable conditions for this to be possible. Based on this and other factors, Markopolos eventually concluded that Madoff could not mathematically deliver his purported returns using the strategies he claimed to use. As he saw it, there were only two ways to explain the figures: Madoff was either running a Ponzi scheme (by paying established clients with newer clients’ money) or front running (buying stock for his own and the hedge fund’s accounts, based on insider knowledge about market impacts from about-to-be-executed client orders at his company’s unrelated broker-dealer business)

Kinda like when certain shit-hole voting districts absolutely MIRED in civic decay, somehow get 90% voter turn-out. You telling me that 90% of the folks that live in these disasters get out of bed to vote and/or pay the postage for absentee voter applications … and return the ballots. Don’t think so??? The stats should have been the impetus to implement safeguards by some honest folks to not ALLOW it to happen … but no … and here we are