It’s a new report. Based on Science. What do you say now you Shot Haters??! This changes ….. everything.
================
Vaccines DO help to stop coronavirus transmission, recent study suggests
A preprint study posted on Friday has found that family members of vaccinated British healthcare workers were around 30 percent less likely to catch Covid-19 than those of unvaccinated workers.
Though a reduction of 30 percent may seem minor, the study pointed out that these family members were also at risk of catching the virus outside the home, making the figure an “underestimate of the ‘true’ effect of vaccination on transmission.”
We provide the first direct evidence that vaccinating individuals working in high-exposure settings reduces the risk to their close contacts – members of their households.
The study was carried out by researchers at a number of top UK universities and institutions, including the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, the Imperial College NHS Trust and the MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine of University of Edinburgh. Elsewhere, Israeli researchers have also found that US drugmaker Pfizer’s vaccine is 94 percent effective against asymptomatic transmission of the virus, while the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently loosened its guidelines for people who’ve taken the jab, returning what the press termed “limited freedoms” to this group.
However, health officials in the US have insisted that masking and social distancing are here for the long term, regardless of the efficacy of vaccines. White House adviser Anthony Fauci last month stated that face coverings may be required until 2022, declaring that “there are things, even if you’re vaccinated, that you’re not going to be able to do in society.”
The World Health Organization declared last month that “there are still critical unknowns regarding the efficacy of vaccination in reducing transmission,” in a statement advising against the introduction of so-called ‘vaccine passports’ for air travel. This advice is set to be revised in May, and the latest findings from the UK and Israel could bolster the argument for proof of vaccination as a prerequisite for international travel.
Devi Sridhar, a professor of public health at Edinburgh University, predicted that the UK study will pave the way for “aviation & international mobility [safely opening] up with testing & vaccine passports,” but added that doing so would raise “major ethical issues.”
SOURCE: RT.COM
I am at the point that I do not believe anything about much of anything anymore. And I am highly skeptical at the best of times.
If there is something in the media saying that the sun will come up tomorrow, I start making plans for a full day of darkness.
Llpoh- You and others used to kick my ass over being a world class skeptic, now you are one. Who was right all along?? Dats right….me.
It’s all BS….. period.
Your memory sucks. I didn’t kick your ass for being a skeptic. I kicked your ass when you were an idjit. And it was damn near a full time job back then. Thank goodness you wised up a lot.
That was BB Loopey, I have never been a idjit. Be that as it may, glad to see you finally caught on. 🙂
Sure miss BB and EC.
Me too.
llpoh,
completely off topic but i ust read on another site that australia does not refine any gasoline-
true?
Not true.
TR, further off topic: I remember reading several years ago about the US importing gasoline from France-I suppose because they keep most of their diesel fuel but have little use for their gasoline.
It’s intellectually easy to be a committed skeptic. Takes a lot more energy to separate the wheat from the chafe.
https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/03/13/cdc-says-vaccines-are-ineffective-in-stopping-infection-and-spread-of-covid-19/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cdc-says-vaccines-are-ineffective-in-stopping-infection-and-spread-of-covid-19
Sooooo, NOW you believe the CDC??
Nope. But people claiming the CDC as an authority do not get to pick and chose which statements from the CDC they believe.
Here is something from CDC. better believe it.
well, go get your jab, big shot..
No nkit, it’s propaganda for kids from CDC . Really discusting.
In that case they should have included a drag queen.
I believe that if I get the vaccine, and die from anaphylactic Shock,
(as I have rather extreme Allergic Problems.),
I will statistically spread Covid to far less people, than if I had
never had the vaccination.
So why get jabbed?
Says who? The same ones that have proven so truthful every time in the past?
Everything the tools of the B3rg* publish or say is a LIE!
And Epstein still didn’t kill himself.
And Slick didn’t have sex “with that Lewinski woman”.
Auntie, you are correct! Any news bite from the MSM/CDC/NIH/etc can be disregarded, as their story is constantly shifting to keep us off balance.
In response to Stucky, we have to remember that before this colossal fraud called COVID hit the fan, it was well understood that viruses mutate rapidly when propagating through a host population, and in most, if not all, cases the mutants are LESS dangerous than the original strain, NOT MORE DANGEROUS.
It is all BS, since the COVID is not any more dangerous/lethal than the typical flu, though symptoms can be worse for people with co-morbidities.
Chances are pretty good that the Bioweapons lab that produced COVID was hoping it would be very lethal, but it turned out to be a DUD exactly because of the fact that viruses tend to become weaker, not stronger, as they mutate.
They really were trying to kill more people according to EVENT 201/AGENDA 2030, etc, but humans are tougher than viruses, or we would have been wiped out long ago.
I see.
Administer the shots, and then do the study.
Got it.
Exactly!
“We have to pass the Bill to see what’s in it.”. It’s like that.
Can’t spread the virus if you’re dead because of the vaccines.
The very problematic issue with vaccine passports is requiring someone to inject a foreign substance into their body is much more personally intrusive for a virus with such an incredibly high survival rate outside of very elderly and the obese than simply wearing a face diaper.
Not to mention it’s extremely fast political role out without adequate test time.
If you think facemasks are unacceptable vaccine passport requirements will cause world war 3.
I think this is known as “putting lipstick on a pig”. A 30% reduction in transmission after a vaccine should be considered a failure and grounds for pulling it from the market. In the context of this virus, I am not even sure they could legitimately draw such a conclusion about its “efficacy” in that regard. What were their controls? Smells like statistical fraud. Statistical fraud is practically a standard in modern “science”.
Its not a vaccine. It’s gene therapy and DNA manipulation. Like taking chemotherapy for a cancer you might someday get. Lot of info out there on this craptastic shot. Threw the vaccine label on it to make it palatable to the public. I can’t believe so many people fell for this shit.
They call it a vaccine so they have no liability.
It’s the brainwashed telling the apathetic and ignorant, what to believe. He who has the knowledge of some so-called new virus, with some public status that the cultural narrative has conditioned us to revere, possesses the power to manipulate the ignorant and apathetic. There’s nothing about this concoction that makes it a vaccine. It does not grant you immunity—it does not prevent you from getting the virus or spreading the virus—it does not eliminate all these non-pharmaceutical interventions(masking, social-distancing, lockdowns). The whole thing is just garbage, a fraud, a scam, crime against humanity. And when “WE THE PEOPLE”, stand up to speak against us, we are out of our mind.
Maybe not even as efficacious as the influenza vac.
Falcon,
THERE. IS. NO. INFLUENZA. VACCINE. EITHER.
IT’S. ALWAYS. BEEN. CALLED. THE. FLU. SHOT.
Can you believe Americans still put up with this psychosis? I’m stunned.
Where do you live Dummian? Canuck? I’m betting Canada.
On the whole Americans are stupid. They prove it everyday.
or, is complacency ahead of stupidity?
Which comes first?
Chicken or the Egg?
If the shots kill you, then , I guess you’ll not spread the virus anymore!
Note that in good years the flu vaccine is about 50 % effective, meaning that it will prevent about 50 % of its recipients from getting the flu, symptomatic or asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic. If you don’t get infected, you can’t transmit it. Meanwhile, a lot of people will get the flu and be able to transmit it.
Also, about 50,00o people die of the flu each year, give or take about 20,000 ( except for some strange reason, this year). The key points are no lock downs with the flu and no “passports” to travel or to go to bars and restaurants. Something doesn’t add up here
2 and two = V?
2+2 = 22?
two + two = tutu?
Fuckit – Maff be hard.
At least you will not be accused of being Racist.
James R. Chaillet, Jr.,
THERE. IS. NO. INFLUENZA. VACCINE. EITHER.
IT’S. ALWAYS. BEEN. CALLED. THE. FLU. SHOT.
There is no such thing as asymptomatic infections.
And by their anal swab results shall you know them.
My inlaws lined up for round 2 this week. Neither was sick after the 1st round, just sore from the jab. Round 2 has them both with fever, aches, and tired for 48hrs so far. Mother in law felt so bad she just went to bed to be sick and left alone.
So, round 2 gave them all the same symptoms of flu (or Rona) without actually getting it. Not seeing what the advantage is for the healthy/non-risk population.
How do you determine that you are stopping transmission of a virus that has never been isolated?
Just asking.
They call it a Vaccine but it is immunology which has never been tried before. So Yes, You can still catch a bug and die from co morbidities and that that is your problem for being a fat obese and Mickey dee eating lumbering, multi fat rolled, fat freak who cannot reach your ass to wipe the shit off your anus
I swear that when Airlines charge by the Pound of lard, You will see some quick change.
A vaccine would, by definition stop you getting it.
Lies Lies and false promises.
Of course (if true) it begs the question, why is this revelation only being determined AFTER the vaccine has been rolled out to millions. Should this not have been established prior?
Covid is a mirage.
People that mask & separate are damned fools.
a gallup poll,via armstromg economics
51% of frontline health care workers are refusing the shot
“A preprint study posted on Friday has found that family members of vaccinated British healthcare workers were around 30 percent less likely to catch Covid-19 than those of unvaccinated workers”.
If they are 30% less likely to catch the virus, they will be less likely to spread it. Makes some sense.
The vaccinated will theoretically already have developed immunity from the shot; they are 95% protected (95% vaccine efficacy assumed) from those who are vaccinated or unvaccinated and contract and spread the disease.
Which is it, 30% or 95% efficacy? Who knows? Are there other variables? Yes, many. But taken at face value, the vaccine seems to reduce symptomatic cases. So the vaccinated are good to go, but please remember to wear your mask and distance anyway.
The unvaccinated have a 30% (or 95%) greater chance of getting the virus if exposed, and may or may not get sick. To calculate the chance of getting sick, we would need to know the rate of symptomatic cases / exposures, and that can never be known outside of a controlled study extrapolated to the general population. Good luck with that.
Those that believe the vaccine works (if it actually does), and have no concerns about short or long-term side effects, are protected by their vaccination. Those who have not taken it are protected by whatever other measures, if any, they have taken to maintain their health. Or they can use other effective treatments if symptomatic. Like flu shots in general or any other medical treatment, it is a personal choice.