Sudden Shift In COVID-19 Lab Leak Narrative ‘Mysterious’: Bret Weinstein

Authored by Isabel Van Brugen and Jan Jekielek (emphasis ours),

Bret Weinstein on The Epoch Times’ American Thought Leaders set on June 30, 2021. 

The sudden shift in narrative over the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a lab in Wuhan, China, is mysterious and contingent to “just how corrupt our system has become,” according to evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein.

Weinstein, biologist and co-host of the DarkHorse Podcast, has since last year explored the possibility that COVID-19 could have emerged from a laboratory. He told Epoch TV’s “American Thought Leaders” program (episode premiering on Sat. July 3) that the fact that the hypothesis is now receiving widespread recognition from the international community is “completely mysterious.”

“My channel was very early on this topic, and it was quite clear to many of us, starting with the tremendous coincidence of this virus having emerged first in Wuhan, where there is a biosafety level four lab studying these very viruses and enhancing them,” said Weinstein. “It was quite clear that there was at least a viable hypothesis that needed to be discussed.

Weinstein, a visiting fellow at the James Madison Program at Princeton University, said that before the narrative surrounding the COVID-19 lab leak theory gained traction, those who did discuss it were stigmatized, demonized and “portrayed as everything from racist to reactionary.”

“All we were doing was following the evidence,” Weinstein continued. “The change in that story was, I have to say, completely mysterious.”

While the theory that the virus was the result of a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was labeled a “conspiracy theory” last year, it has recently gained traction as a growing number of scientists and officials have lent credence to the hypothesis.

COVID-19, the disease caused by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, was first reported in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

A January State Department fact sheet raised questions about whether the outbreak could have been the result of a lab accident at WIV. It said the United States has “reason to believe” that several WIV researchers became sick with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses in autumn 2019. The department also said the lab had been conducting secret military experiments on animals since at least 2017, and that it has a history of conducting gain-of-function research on viruses. Such research involves modifying viruses to have new or enhanced capabilities.

President Joe Biden on May 26 ordered the intelligence community to produce a report in 90 days on the origins of the virus, saying that intelligence agencies are looking at rival theories, including the possibility of a laboratory accident in China.

Weinstein criticized the explanations provided in recent weeks by “all of those who had gotten the story wrong” after the lab leak theory gained wider recognition.

PolitiFact, for example, on May 24 quietly retracted a September 2020 fact check that labeled a Hong Kong virologist’s claim that COVID-19 originated in a lab as inaccurate and a “debunked conspiracy theory.”

“The claim is inaccurate and ridiculous,” the now-archived fact check previously said. “We rate it Pants on Fire!”

In an updated editor’s note, PolitiFact explained why it removed the label.

“When this fact-check was first published in September 2020, PolitiFact’s sources included researchers who asserted the SARS-CoV-2 virus could not have been manipulated. That assertion is now more widely disputed,” the note said. “For that reason, we are removing this fact-check from our database pending a more thorough review. Currently, we consider the claim to be unsupported by evidence and in dispute.”

Separately, the Washington Post quietly walked back its claims regarding the COVID-19 lab leak theory.

The paper in February 2020 published an article claiming the idea was a “conspiracy theory” that had been “debunked.” The article attacked Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), who called for an investigation into the origins of the CCP virus.

Some reporters have said that they disregarded the lab leak theory because Republicans were largely the ones promoting the idea.

Weinstein described the phenomenon as “a headlong rush, by all of those who had gotten the story wrong to explain themselves—and their explanations made less than no sense.”

He said that certain journalists or media outlets “seemed to center on the fact that because [former President] Donald Trump had been favorable to the idea that this might have emerged from a lab, that that made it not true.”

“Which, of course, is such an illogical conclusion that it’s hard to imagine how anybody who considers himself a journalist could for a moment have been misled,” he continued. “I mean, at worst, if you thought everything that Donald Trump said was a lie—at worst, you would have to take it as no evidence either way.

“But that’s not how people treated it. They treated it almost as if the truth was always the opposite of what he said.”

Other outlets have also corrected or quietly updated stories, including Vox, while Facebook stopped banning posts suggesting the virus was man-made.

Weinstein said that he believes it eventually became “impossible to maintain the public lie that a laboratory version was somehow in conflict with the evidence.”

“And we now know from Dr. Fauci, his emails, that behind the scenes, the top people didn’t believe it either. They were just simply feeding the public a line that they had their own reasons for wanting the public to believe,” he said.

“It is contingent on the several different stories that surround COVID-19, revealing to us just how corrupt our system has become.”

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
30 Comments
Georges S
Georges S
July 3, 2021 9:47 am

On the bright side, WHO’s rep in India, Dr Soumya Swaminathan might just get the death penalty for hiding the effect of Invermectin and HCQ…
May the trend continues world wide.

India Could Sentence WHO Chief Scientist to Death for Misleading Over Ivermectin and Killing Indians

Warren
Warren
  Georges S
July 3, 2021 11:39 am

The people who knowingly hid and are hiding Ivermectin’s curative powers against the WuFlu a good all need to get the death penalty for mass murder.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Warren
July 4, 2021 12:15 pm

You think good people are going to assume power and establish a justice system?

Treefarmer
Treefarmer
  Warren
July 4, 2021 6:52 pm

Exactly right. It’s strange that people seem mostly angry at Fauci for things like flip flopping on masks and hiding information about the source of the virus. His real crime is preventing millions of people from access to therapeutics like Ivermectin.

tabarnac
tabarnac
  Georges S
July 3, 2021 8:47 pm

The jabs that have passed their expiration date could be enhanced with a little “eye of newt” and used for the death penalty jab.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 3, 2021 10:32 am

There is nothing mysterious about it. We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug
July 3, 2021 12:22 pm

Bret Weinstein is accruing cuckservative credit to spend later as misguidance, IMO.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  'Reality' Doug
July 3, 2021 4:05 pm

Every time a jew is ‘on your side’ it’s only to mislead or misdirect you.

CCRider
CCRider
  Anonymous
July 3, 2021 4:15 pm

You’re a goddamn fool.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
July 3, 2021 4:35 pm

You won’t fool me, jewboy!

Seriously though, I can think of only one or maybe two that might not fit that description. Prove me wrong if you can think of more.

CCRider
CCRider
  Anonymous
July 3, 2021 5:35 pm

Von Mises, Rothbard, Rand, Freedman, Hazlett, the list is extensive and has led to the advancement of free markets and liberty. The ones you don’t like are giving orders to white (former Christian) goyem sell-outs only too happy to grovel for money and sell us out.

Ex Roman Catholic touchhole.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
July 4, 2021 12:19 pm

Is that a list of the guilty or what? Those were all major subversives serving the New Order agenda, though tangentially.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  CCRider
July 6, 2021 1:47 am

The libertarian jews are easy to shoot down (I was a long time ancap myself) but I won’t bother except to point out that the least offensive of the bunch ‘von’ mises once worked for the mixed race Coudenhove-Kalergi who wanted to turn Europe into a literal mudblood continent and iirc was married to a jew as well (kalergi, I mean). Others like Rothbard certainly weakened us. Others like Rand, assuming you mean Ayn Rand, were incredibly destructive to Whites and I don’t even see the point in further describing. She was a typical subversive jewess.

I was never a catholic but they might have educated me enough to despise them. I certainly don’t care about christian ‘sellouts’, either way, jew defenders or converso jews.

I kind of thought you might at least mention Bobby Fischer or other people who claimed to not be jews at all.

Weak.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  'Reality' Doug
July 4, 2021 12:17 pm

That and little seeds of misinformation and distraction here and there. I always call it when I see them accruing credibility to spend it later. I make sure to tell my wife “I told you so” a year or so later, but she is never impressed.

CCRider
CCRider
July 3, 2021 1:40 pm

I’m halfway thru listening to Joe Rogan’s interview with Bret and Dr. Pierre Kory and it’s obvious Ivermectin is a wonder drug that if used early provides a miracle cure. I’m really interested to hear the rest of it to see if they actually call this COVID scheme what we now know it was; a Black Op.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  KaD
July 3, 2021 8:48 pm

“survivors” … really?!?
We’re calling people who got the flu and then got better … “survivors“!?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 3, 2021 9:07 pm

on the same note, from the article

“United States has “reason to believe” that several WIV researchers became sick with symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses in autumn 2019.”

A. “became sick with …” With what? With Covid? With Influenza? With Smallpox?
NO! With … SYMPTOMS.

B. “symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses”
That is, symptoms consistent with “X” or “Y”.
In other words, the symptoms of “X” are the exact same as the symptoms of “Y”.
“X” is Covid.
What’s “Y” again?
Oh, yeah, … “common seasonal illnesses”!

Covid … it’s just the flu, bro! Actually, it’s just the flu and the common cold. Combine two seasons worth, lie like hell, and … voila! … global pandemic

It’s just the flu, bro! It’s always been just the flu. The numbers were manipulated the whole way through.

Just another flu. Everything else has been hoax, lie, and propaganda.

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest
  Anonymous
July 3, 2021 11:49 pm

In fact CoVid-19(84) is the greatest psyop, mindfuck, social, economic and medical experiment in recorded Human history. Totally global and utterly unprecedented.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Auntie Kriest
July 4, 2021 12:22 pm

It is definitely up there with usury and feminism.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Auntie Kriest
July 5, 2021 2:44 pm

.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 5, 2021 2:43 pm

If it is not just the flu and cold, then it is even less deadly. “lockdowns” do not explain anything, because they have never been demonstrated to work by even fake metrics. But we do know many of the measures taken would increase risk of other diseases.

PB
PB
  Anonymous
July 4, 2021 4:55 am

Language and slogans are a key to their media managing of this. Repetition of what I call “Guide” words is central.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
July 4, 2021 12:20 pm

Even when they criticize themselves, they have to use it to add to the propaganda.

Unreleased
Unreleased
July 3, 2021 6:25 pm

Speculate harder, Brett, as to why those in power would like the public to think the virus might have been released from a lab.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Unreleased
July 3, 2021 9:10 pm

fear. Fear! FEAR!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Unreleased
July 4, 2021 12:23 pm

Isn’t this one where the CDC got the term “social distancing” from? That has never been a thing in the history of medicine except the obvious inclination to avoid people with symptoms.

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest
July 3, 2021 11:53 pm

Watch; lead will wind up being the actual cure for the disease scamdemic brought to the world courtesy of the B3RG*.

Anonymous
Anonymous
July 4, 2021 12:14 pm

Anyone know the deal with Bret Weinstein? He is smart, and I like what he is saying, but for several reasons I am suspicious, not being banned from YouTube is a big one. He says the virus was first seen in Wuhan, but this is now confirmed false.