Guest Post by Simon Black
Yesterday afternoon, a crew of workers descended upon the Arc de Triomphe– one of the most famous landmarks in Paris–to begin dismantling a piece of art.
The Arc de Triomphe has been fully wrapped in more than 250,000 square feet of silvery-blue plastic for the past three weeks, a sort of ‘life art’ first imagined decades ago by a Bulgarian-born artist named Christo Javacheff.
He called it “L’Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped.”
Now, I like art as much as the next guy. But it certainly makes me wonder how much time and how many resources went into this work.
The fabric itself had to be manufactured, which took natural resources and electricity. It had to be transported. It had to be installed. Work crews had to consume fuel going to and from the job site.
Now it will take them another three weeks of work to dismantle it. And the fabric will have to be recycled, which itself consumes a significant amount of energy.
In total that seems like quite a lot of resources expended, simply for the sake of covering a landmark with some fabric.
I raise this point as a counter-example to the constant criticism of cryptocurrency. The consensus algorithms for certain coins (including Bitcoin) require significant computing power to secure the blockchain.
And this computing power requires electricity. Lots of it.
In fact the amount of electricity consumed by Bitcoin miners is often compared to the entire electrical consumption of a small country, like Belgium or Sweden.
This is what the headlines usually say, something like “Bitcoin uses more electricity than Many Countries” (which was an actual headline from the New York Times last month).
Headlines like this are designed to spark fury and outrage by readers. But as is nearly always the case, the journalists fail to provide the full truth, or proper context.
It’s true that Bitcoin requires vast amounts of electricity. That’s the ‘cost’, so to speak. The reports never talk about the benefit. But let’s come back to that.
Think about “L’arc de Triomphe, Wrapped” again. Consider all the resources that went into creating it– the electricity, fossil fuels, etc. And then all the resources into dismantling it. All for an exhibit that was only on display for three weeks.
Was the benefit really worth the cost?
Consider bigger examples, like big tech companies. Facebook alone is responsible for more electrical consumption than 2/3 of the world’s countries.
Plus, the company boasts billions of active users averaging hours and hours each day scrolling infinitely through butt selfies laden with pithy maxims about life and success.
Try to imagine the magnitude of electricity wasted on the consumption of Instagram.
What about Netflix, and all the vast resources (including electricity) that go into delivering our evening’s entertainment?
What about pornography? Some of the larger Internet porn sites alone consume more electricity than entire countries.
It’s interesting how little criticism there is about any of these examples.
No one batted an eyelash when an artist wanted to squander a bunch of resources covering an already beautiful structure.
No one cares how much electricity these big companies consume… because so many people like the product.
And as far as I can tell, The New York Times has never published a story about how much electricity is used so that its subscribers can read The New York Times.
No. This environmental vitriol is reserved exclusively for Bitcoin.
Even Elon Musk has criticized Bitcoin because of its electrical consumption. Though just this morning he Tweeted some dog image related to the ‘Shiba Inu’ coin, whose algorithm still consumes plenty of electricity. So who knows where he stands.
It doesn’t matter that plenty of other industries, sectors, businesses, and institutions use vast amounts of resources in producing their goods and services.
There are always costs. Bitcoin has costs. But any sensible analysis should weigh the costs against the benefits. And Bitcoin (i.e. cryptocurrency in general) has vast benefits.
Crypto represents a new financial system– one that is completely transparent and available to anyone with a mobile device.
By comparison, our current financial system is dominated by central bankers who engineer (and then ignore) inflation, and by large commercial banks who routinely cheat their customers.
Think about the cost of this system. And not just the electricity cost of keeping all of those banks going; what is the human cost in terms of the economic inequality and suffering caused by our paper money system?
Cryptocurrency still has significant flaws, but it’s improving all the time (unlike our current financial system which hasn’t seen any real innovation in decades).
The cost is significant. But it’s far more beneficial than wrapping the Arc de Triomphe in 250,000 square feet of fabric… or most of the other things that gobble up natural resources and consume tons of electricity.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Elon’s “Bitcoin uses too much electricity” excuse was just a cover. It came about a month after Tesla announced it would accept Bitcoin as payment for its cars. This also sent the value of Bitcoin much higher, breaking $60,000.
The message must’ve been delivered to Elon from the central banks that WE control the medium of exchange, not you, and we won’t allow a company as large as Tesla to set any precedent by accepting Bitcoin as payment for its goods – i.e. as the medium of exchange. Reverse course, or else.
“Or else” what, I don’t know. But it was never about “the electricity.”
And the spammers have arrived on TBP….
They’re dismantling the Arc de Triomphe because France hasn’t had an actual Victory in, like, forever.
Got any submarines for sale?
The green weenies seem ignorant that the demand for energy will just keep growing, we need all the forms of power we can get. Most people don’t give a shit about what produces it.
This reminds me of ads I see on Craigslist where people want to give away some trivial object so they can do their part to “protect the environment” never realizing that someone would be using more resources to get that free can of peas.
Been through this exercise before. Watching people having to be constantly entertained with a phone. The resources used in transmitting the data are incredible if you start thinking about it. Fuckerborg and data centers use a lot of power not only in the servers but keeping them cooled down. The hypocrisy is mind boggling
L’Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped…Why am I suddenly in the 80s and seeing islands covered in pink. At least then it was just an artist being weird. This is like a giant visual representation of modern art destroying actual art and workmanship. In one fell swoop this ass hat turned a work of magnificent architecture and art into what looks like a half melted lego toy and denied anyone visiting from abroad the ability to enjoy the monument. The only bright side is that no one lit it on fire while it was there, because while I would definitely enjoy the site od such a giant blaze the loss of the monument would still have been tragic.
The author gets it right that art doesn’t have utility either but has value.
However, the problem is the Arc de Triomphe artwork did not cost even a tiny fraction of the electricity required just to keep bitcoin operational.
Nor does Instagram consume even a tiny fraction of electricity compared what Bitcoin does.