It’s starting to seem like nary a day goes by that the world doesn’t isn’t confronted with new research raising safety questions about either the mRNA vaccines (mostly Moderna) or the adenovirus-vector jabs like the AstraZeneca and J&J jabs.
On Monday, the bad news focused on the adenovirus jabs, particularly the J&J jab, as researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota, who published their findings in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared data from the general population before the pandemic to data gathered from reported vaccine side effects suffered by Americans.
What they found was disturbing: a person who received the vaccine was 3.5x as likely to develop brain blood clots as an average person before the pandemic.
Blood clots, and specifically cerebral venous sinus thrombosis are well known side-effects of the J&J vaccine, and the discovery of this risk was the reason usage of the vaccine was paused in April. Still, however, the team insists the side-effect is rare and that the findings must be looked at in the context of the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe cases COVID-19.
The data were gathered from Olmstead, County, Minnesota – a county of around 158,000 people situated around 90 miles southeast of Minneapolis – from 2001 to 2015, per the Daily Mail.
They then used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to find diagnoses of blood clots in people who received the J&J vaccine between the jab’s approval date at the end of February 2021 to May 7.
During the 14 years before the pandemic, there were only 39 Olmstead residents who developed CVST – a rare, potentially deadly, blood clotting condition.
However, after the jabs were being used to treat COVID, that number shot up to 46 reports of CVST confirmed in the VAERS program following patients’ who received J&J jabs. Alhough eight were eventually removed from that pool for either being duplicate reports or not being professionally diagnosed. In total, 38 cases tied to the J&J vaccine were detected, with over 70% being among women.
The discrepancy here is pretty difficult to ignore.
around 8.7MM doses of the J&J vaccine had been administered in the US between February and May.
- Adjusted for population, there were 2.46 cases of CVST out of every 100,000 person-years, pre-COVID, pre-vaccine.
- However, when also adjusted for population, there were 8.65 cases out of every 100,000 person-years among people who received the vaccine – a rate 3.5 times higher than the general population.
Could it be a coincidence? Perhaps… but it certainly justifies closer examination.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
How does one fit “more likely” in the same sentence with “rare” when you are referencing the same thing?
Is it rare, or is more likely?
Remember, kids get strokes, too. – except they don’t.
In other news…”An extremely rare side effect of the J&J vaccine can cause blood clots, but do not be scared as the risks are worth it because we are in this together.”
The media is apparently allowed to cover a bit of bad news about the J&J and Moderna vaccines–always noting the risks are low and worth it for the gain, of course–but Pfizer vaccines are immune to negative news on MSM and social media. Why?
Challenge to TBP readers. Read the obits and check social media of those who are between the ages of 18 and 40 who “passed away suddenly at home”.
I am seeing that phrase “passed away suddenly at home” more and more . Sees like the vaxed on FB and other social media love to brag about their recent 2nd vax.
There have been 20% more car wrecks this year and my gut feeling is that is more than 10 in 100,000 people got a brain fog problem so far in 2021. Putting some other factoids into play, my guess is about 20% of Americans will have a serious health problem before New Years Eve, thank you Tony “The Shot” et all.
Safer than mrna but still poison.