A Manufactured World Crisis?

Authored by Llewellyn Rockwell via The Mises Institute,

Few people today ask the most important question about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Many people want America to stay out of the fight, but even they don’t ask the vital question. Why does the world face a crisis today? Why has a border dispute between Russia and Ukraine escalated to the point where people fear nuclear war?

The answer is simple. America, under the “leadership” of brain-dead Biden and the forces controlling him, has done this and, by doing so, brought the world to the brink of disaster. As always, the great Dr. Ron Paul gets it right: “Three weeks into this terrible war, the US is not pursuing talks with Russia.” As Antiwar.com recently reported, instead of supporting negotiations between Ukraine and Russia that could lead to a ceasefire and an end to the bloodshed, the US government is actually escalating the situation which can only increase the bloodshed.

The constant flow of US and allied weapons into Ukraine and talk of supporting an extended insurgency does not seem designed to give Ukraine a victory on the battlefield but rather to hand Russia what Secretary of State Blinken called ‘a strategic defeat.’

It sounds an awful lot like the Biden Administration intends to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian. The only solution for the US is to get out. Let the Russians and Ukrainians reach an agreement. That means no NATO for Ukraine and no US missiles on Russia’s borders? So what! End the war then end NATO.”

Let’s look at an analogy that will help us understand Dr. Paul’s point.

For years, the Ukrainian government has attacked an area in the Donbas region that has seceded from Ukraine and formed an independent, pro-Russian, republic. Just before Putin moved against Ukraine, Ukraianians increased the scale and scope of their attack. Rick Rozoff describes what they did: “Two-thirds of Ukrainian army servicemen have been amassed along the Donbas contact line, Eduard Basurin, spokesman for the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) militia, said on Thursday.

“Another three brigades are on their way [to Donbas], which is 20,000 to 25,000 troops more. The total number will reach 150,000, not to mention the nationalists. This is about two-thirds of Ukrainian Armed Forces’ personnel,” Basurin said on the Rossiya 1 television channel (VGTRK) on Thursday.

Ukrainian troops are stationed along the 320-kilometer front line, he said.”

Unlike what has just happened, the Ukrainian attack did not result in US sanctions on Ukraine. There were no meetings of the UN to condemn Ukrainian aggression. There was no talk of world war. On the contrary, Ukraine government used American weapons in its attack and asked America for more weapons to continue their attack. Let’s listen to Rick Rozoff again: “The Armed Forces of Ukraine used the American anti-tank missile system Javelin in the hostilities in Donbas. This was announced by the head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Kirill Budanov in an interview….

Budanov said that ideally, the U.S. would help deter any Russian incursion, through additional military aid and increased diplomatic and economic pressure, including more sanctions against Russia and the seizure and blocking of Russian banking accounts.

Also, in addition to U.S. aid already promised and delivered, including Mark VI patrol boats, Javelin anti-armor systems and AN/TPQ-53 light counter-fire radar systems, Ukraine seeks additional air, missile and drone defense systems and electronic jamming devices, Budonov said. Patriot missile batteries and counter rocket, artillery and mortar systems are on Ukraine’s wish list.

The AN/TPQ-53 systems were used to great effect, Ukraine military officials have previously reported. Budanov said the Javelin systems have also been used against Russian forces. Those, along with Turkish-manufactured drones, used against Russian-aligned separatist artillery troops, have a significant psychological deterrent value, said Budanov.”

Why the difference? We think that the US should not have shipped arms to Ukraine. Doing this made the situation worse. But for what we’re saying now, it doesn’t matter what you think of the policy. The key point is that because there was no international outcry and no sanctions, the matter remained a local fight. If brain dead Biden and his gang had reacted to the so-called Russian “invasion” in the same way, the matter would have remained a local quarrel. Russia and Ukraine would have made a deal and that would be that.

The neocon warmongers and other defenders of “democracy,” who unfortunately include some deluded “libertarians” object. Don’t we have a duty to resist “aggression?” The answer is clear: No, we don’t. We do not have a duty to evaluate every foreign quarrel and assess who is at fault. We do not have a duty to require leaders of regimes we, or rather our masters in Washington, don’t like to accept existing boundaries of countries as unchangeable. We should reject the false doctrine of “collective security,” which makes every border disputes a world war. The great American historian Charles Beard recognized what was wrong with “collective security” in the 1930s. In his article, “Giddy Minds and Foreign Quarrels,” he asked:

On what … should the foreign policy of the United States be based? Here is one answer and it is not excogitated in any professor’s study or supplied by political agitators. It is the doctrine formulated by George Washington, supplemented by James Monroe, and followed by the Government of the United States until near the end of the nineteenth century, when the frenzy for foreign adventurism burst upon the country. This doctrine is simple. Europe has a set of ‘primary interests’ which have little or no relation to us, and is constantly vexed by ‘ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice.’ The United States is a continental power separated from Europe by a wide ocean which, despite all changes in warfare, is still a powerful asset of defense. In the ordinary or regular vicissitudes of European politics the United States should not become implicated by any permanent ties. We should promote commerce, but force ‘nothing.’ We should steer clear of hates and loves. We should maintain correct and formal relations with all established governments without respect to their forms or their religions, whether Christian, Mohammedan, Shinto, or what have you.”

Beard then responded to those who wanted to scrap our traditional policy of non-intervention with “collective security”:

In the rest of the world, outside this hemisphere, our interests are remote and our power to enforce our will is relatively slight. Nothing we can do for Europeans will substantially increase our trade or add to our, or their, well-being. Nothing we can do for Asiatics will materially increase our trade or add to our, or their, well-being. With all countries in Europe and Asia, our relations should be formal and correct. As individuals we may indulge in hate and love, but the Government of the United States embarks on stormy seas when it begins to love one power and hate another officially.”

We should heed Beard’s wisdom today. Otherwise, the world may go up in flames.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Note from Nevada
Note from Nevada
March 27, 2022 8:51 am

I’m disappointed Rand Paul hasn’t been vocal about this situation. Ron Paul has his followers but Rand has a platform being an active Senator. Seems your either pro-war WWIII or your silent.

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
  Note from Nevada
March 27, 2022 9:18 am

Oh, so you want political theater that means absolutely nothing?

CCRider
CCRider
  Note from Nevada
March 27, 2022 9:25 am

I agree. In fact, there is no more obvious demonstration of the strength of the ruling elite than when war is being instigated. All the bullshit ‘contention’ between the 2 parties evaporates and they all sing from the same hymnal. It’s where people like Lindsay Graham and AOC suddenly sound like soulmates. It’s disgusting.

August
August
  CCRider
March 27, 2022 10:39 am

Disgusting… and revelatory.

George Corley Wallace, Jr. was right!

The Duke of New York
The Duke of New York
March 27, 2022 11:05 am

Dems spent the last two years promoting communism and saying guns and nazis are the biggest problems we face.

Now they’re giving guns to nazis to fight communists.

Seems a bit schizophrenic.

WTF
WTF
  The Duke of New York
March 27, 2022 1:05 pm

They’re pissing on Americans and the average dumbass thinks it’s raining.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 27, 2022 12:00 pm

A Manufactured World Crisis?

Why the Question Mark?

Matthew Clark
Matthew Clark
March 27, 2022 12:54 pm

The Russian policy advocating Ukraine neutrality and no nuclear weapons in any state bordering their country is a reasonable position. The United States has a similar policy in the whole western hemisphere regarding their relation with all the nations in that area. It is called the Monroe Doctrine. The Canadian government position of fully supporting Ukraine entry into the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is counterproductive to the nations interests of avoiding a general war in Europe. It is apparent that membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation will mean we likely stumble into a nuclear war at some point in the (near?) future. Canada should abandon that military alliance.

Jdog
Jdog
March 27, 2022 4:04 pm

The corruption of our Federal Government is so complete, that nothing it does is in the interest of it’s Citizens. Our government will either make us enslaved and poor, or kill us off altogether. I do not fear Putin, or Xi, or Kim, but Bidet and the rest of the Democrats, scare the shit out of me.

the Bruce
the Bruce
  Jdog
March 28, 2022 6:42 pm

The deep state is running the show. Biden is but a ‘meat puppet’

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 28, 2022 12:14 am

How long before thousands of anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles from US to Ukraine filter back into Europe and are used by terrorists?

fujigm
fujigm
  Anonymous
March 28, 2022 2:32 am

Not soon enough.

HowardStern'sAMoron
HowardStern'sAMoron
March 28, 2022 8:42 am

It is certainly a manufactured crisis to help the elites consolidate their power under the auspices of a one world government led, for the moment, by the United Nations. It is chilling to see how far they have come with this scheme but it has been in the works for decades if not generations. Anyone who thinks that Russia is not in on it is crazy. Putin has made many dumb moves and he is a very smart man. He is having Russia play its scripted role. The phantom threat of nuclear war is meant to scare the sheeple to death making them more compliant and willing to surrender their freedom.