Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter
See, it’s important that you not use undeniably accurate terms to describe our enemies because by doing so you may convey truthful information that hurts liberals and, according to our conservative cruise ship betters, that’s not who we are. Well, that’s certainly not who they are, because if there’s one thing they simply cannot accept it is victory. And that includes victory over perverts who what to chat up your young ‘uns in kindergarten.
Accordingly, we are not supposed to call groomers “groomers” anymore because people draw the right conclusions when we do, and that certainly will not do.
If there’s anything the failurecons, who constitute a concentric circle with the Never Trump sissies, hate is winning. And we are winning the world’s easiest argument by taking the position that molesters and those excusing and facilitating them are bad.
David French, who has famously made the conservative case for drag queen story hour, CRT submission, and everything else except conservative success, is very upset with us again for accurately conveying the truth of the Democrat campaign to make the classroom safe for creepy perverts to talk about sex with your kids. Now, normal people, as opposed to Pastor French – who is the very best Christian that David French knows, according to David French – don’t like weirdos trying to steer convos toward genitalia during the limited periods in which adult strangers get to interact with other people’s children, like in school. And only weirdos try to do so. There is literally never any good reason for any non-parent to have a talk with toddlers about sexual topics. None. Zero. Zip.
But the groomers have a bad reason. They want to use the access we grant to schools to indoctrinate your kids into their bizarre world view, and some of them want to molest your kids – wanna speculate on the motive of the mutant who was teaching first graders how Jeffrey Toobin makes a Zoom call?
Neither objective is acceptable, and we are going to say so no matter how fussy it makes the sorry likes of David French. Rarely has someone’s surname been so apt. In the current culture war, this surrender flunky is aiming to be the Vichy conservative Marshall Pétain.
Weird how these guys never got upset when the left was lying that we are racist, but are in a tizzy when we accurately observe that the left is pro-pedo.
They want, at best, to excuse perverts. We want perverts hunted for sport.
The “Stop calling us groomers ‘groomers’” outcry is hilarious because it’s so transparent how the libs are just cribbing from the establishment narrative enforcement playbook.
They will insist that to oppose groomers is an attack on LGBTQ4*^hldghj&+dghfedh Americans. Remember how the Florida law was “Don’t say gay,” though the only thing that didn’t say gay was the Florida law? Plenty of folks within that ever-expanding acronym see grooming for what it is and refuse to be enablers. As DeSantis spokeswoman Christina Pushaw pointed out, it is a grievous libel to try to co-opt them to defend the indefensible. And many gay folks like Spencer Klavan are not having it.
Then the perv-progs try to neutralize the attack by distracting and getting you to engage on some peripheral issue. “The Qanon people are behind the child abuse conspiracy theory!” We’re supposed to respond “But we don’t like Q” and “This is not a conspiracy theory.” Except the smartest among us will not engage, except to mock. That’s why when they try this pivot, instead of observing that the last time anyone heard of Q gas was under $6 a gallon, hardcore cons just respond “OK, groomer.”
Remember that argument should be reserved for good faith opponents who will consider facts and evidence and change their mind accordingly. What our enemies, who are not good faith opponents, do is turn argument into a morass where we sink into the mire weighed down by bullSchiff slurs and slanders. So don’t argue with stupid, obnoxious people. Don’t accept that people who clearly hate you want the best for your kids – they just want your kids, period. Don’t think that teacher’s free speech rights – of which they have none on the job – trump your right to keep your kids’ innocence intact. And don’t credit lame explanations about how adult male transexuals suddenly want to hang out with kiddies and read them stories for some non-sexual reason no matter how hard the David Frenchies plead that this is just what the Founders had in mind.
Instead of arguing with nincompoops, do what Ron DeSantis does and simply smash their hideous dreams into little pieces.
Nor should you argue with the Conservative, Inc., chin-strokers who fret that “groomer” might not be the perfect term to describe teachers and other public school functionaries who want to use their special access to your kids to pursue their own strange-o agendas. In fact, it’s the perfect term. Groomers thrive on secret interactions where they shape and mold the minds of their victims away from those who would protect them.
If it walks like a groomer, talks like a groomer, and does Tik Tok vids like a groomer, it’s a groomer.
And when the pearl-clutchers sputter because we point out that these people are objectively pro-pedophile – because they excuse it and refuse to protect kids from it – there’s no point in debating it. Remember that every Democrat, plus Mitt Romney (to the extent there’s a difference), voted to confirm a SCOTUS judge who thought pedos were getting a bad rap. “But the blue-haired mutant teacher is not the one personally touching the kids xisself so you can’t lump xir in with the pedos even though xe makes it easy for the pedos!” the fussy tone police whine. Hey pseudo-cons, we’re not interested in making fine distinctions between pedo-friendly, pedo-adjacent, and fully pedo-engaged. If there is any ambiguity about that sordid topic, we can defer to the experts in the Lincoln Project to the extent we care to distinguish the sex pests from the sex pest enablers. And that extent is quite limited.
As Liz Wheeler has observed, it is not enough to not be a groomer. One must be actively anti-groomer.
We are. If you want to use your job to contaminate our kids with your bizarre sexual obsessions, you’re a groomer and we are saying so. And if David French et al doesn’t like it, good.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Pedos, child molesters (Cho in the shower with his daughter), and assorted scum were once ostracised and now they are being enabled.
When do we step in and step on them.
ANYONE who takes advantage of a child should be destroyed immediately. They will never stop hurting children as they are utterly controlled to maim and destroy by the Devil himself. Pedophiles and Sodomites are the lowest forms of life on the planet as described in Romans chapter 1.
The Jews are the lowest. They give rise to the pedos and perverts.
I loathe the term groomer or grooming – they are pedophiles – period – call a spade a spade
Call them Disneys. They would be able to censor that.
For once, Kurt Schlichter hits one out of the park.
FWIW, even if David French really did kill 72 Iraqi insurgents, with just his side-arm, bare hands, and teeth, he still symbolizes everything that is wrong with the Republican Party.
it is a criminal offense for these “teachers” to engage in sexual conversation with children. Are these conversations within the official published curriculum of the schools?
The offense is Corruption of a Minor.
State DA s who aren’t pedos should immediately bring charges – 1 count for each child in the class.
Engaging in sexual activity may be physical. But it can also be verbal. The sexualizing of children by these “teachers” is a form of establishing a sexual relationship with a minor child.
Corruption-of-a-minor definition
The offense of engaging in sexual intercourse or other sexual activity with a person who is not one’s spouse and who is under the age of consent or another age set by statute, especially if there is a considerable age difference (usually four years or more) between the offender and the victim. See also rape. In some states, to assist or encourage a minor to commit an offense. See also contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The arousal or encouragement of a child’s destructive antisocial behavior by a parent, guardian, or other caregiver. See also contributing to the delinquency of a minor.